Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BOTTOM LINE IS THAT IT WORKS, SAYS HOMEOPATHIC CHIEF

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dr. Jai Maharaj - 29 May 2006 23:03 GMT
Bottom line is that it works, says homeopathic chief

Bullish mood prevails in hospital at centre of
controversial approach

By Sarah Boseley, health editor
The Guardian
Saturday, May 27, 2006

Peter Fisher, clinical director of the Royal London
Homeopathic Hospital and the man at the centre of this
week's storm over alternative medicine in the NHS, blames
Descartes.

Although he spends a lot of time arguing the scientific
evidence for alternative treatments, it really does no
good to separate out what is going on in the patient's
mind from what is happening in their body, he says.

"Are they depressed because they are ill or are they ill
because they are depressed? You get bogged down in
sterile argument. Descartes is to blame."

This week the rationalists have turned some heavy
firepower on what they say are scientifically unproven
treatments provided on the NHS. Thirteen eminent doctors,
led by Michael Baum, emeritus professor of surgery at the
same Trust as Fisher - University College London
Hospitals - urged that the NHS should not pay for
alternative therapies.

The Royal London Homeopathic Hospital, recently reopened
after a £20m refurbishment, is entirely NHS funded. Great
Ormond Street children's hospital shares its building -
you can tell the homeopathic corridors by their
stimulating lime green paint and natural wood floors.

GPs and consultants refer patients there. It costs the
NHS about £3.4m a year. And, says Dr Fisher, the 27,000
patients who come for homeopathy, acupuncture,
nutritional therapy and other treatments it offers do
well. But if he won't admit - as someone who studied
medicine at Cambridge University and a conventional
rheumatologist - that homeopathy is implausible, he does
agree it is controversial.

In the pharmacy thousands of little bottles, exactly the
same size and shape, are lined up ready for use. The
theory behind homeopathy is treating a condition with a
very tiny amount of what caused it - something like the
vaccination principle.

The dilution varies. Dr Fisher picks up one labelled 6c -
that is, 600 parts water to one part active substance.
Another is 9c - 900 parts water. "As near as dammit there
is no molecule in that one," he said. "But it works -
absolutely."

Clear tubes full of tiny sugar pills are stored nearby. A
couple of drops of the liquid go on each pill. The
homeopath will prescribe how many such pills are to be
taken each day.

"I know it's controversial," says Dr Fisher. "Part of
what got me into this is sheer scientific curiosity. I
thought, I'm going to be the one to crack this."

He hasn't cracked it, although, he says, "we have made a
lot of progress." He cites studies that show people have
got better in certain conditions with homeopathy.

His critics counter with studies that show they haven't.
Could it be a placebo effect? He doesn't like the term.
"I much prefer non-specific effect." But no - he is, he
says, "an unapologetic homeopath" and believes something
really happens.

It began for Dr Fisher when he went to China as a medical
student at the tail end of the Cultural Revolution, when
Mao was still alive and the Gang of Four were in control.
"I saw a woman on an operating table with her entire
abdomen open, talking to the surgeons, with three needles
in her ear. I became convinced something very interesting
was going on."

Upstairs a mass acupuncture session is being held, an
experiment in cost-effectiveness. Patients recline on
four of the eight day-beds with trouser legs and skirts
rolled up, their knees stuck with metal pins attached to
electrodes. All have arthritis. It is a condition for
which there is good evidence that acupuncture works.

Three out of the four say they have less pain. "I used to
get a burning sensation in my knee every day. That's
finished. I don't like needles, but this reduces the
swelling and everything," said Pamela Picking from
Finchley, north London.

Mumtas Rizui from Golders Green, north London, trained as
a chemist and says a surgeon friend made fun of him for
coming. "But I say seeing is believing. It is helping
me."

But Aqila Azhar and her husband Ilyas are unconvinced.
Acupuncture did not help her knees - she preferred
homeopathy. Mr Azhar said the recent questioning of
homeopathy might be harmful. "If you go for any
treatment, you must have faith like my wife," he said

Some patients travel long distances. Adam Frankel lives
in Devon. He has a long history of illnesses that made
him spend months in bed. The NHS had done nothing for
him, he says. He arrived at the hospital about nine years
ago with abscesses in his gums and has been taking a
variety of homeopathic medicines since.

The remedies have helped him and his family - and, he
says, even the cat.

More at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,1784359,00.html

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

    o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
    o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
    o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
hari.kumar@indero.com - 29 May 2006 23:06 GMT
The bottom line is that it doesn't work, and the truth claims as to how it
is said to work is scientific trash.  The real bottom line is that the
brit tax supported health system is considering pulling the carpet of
public funding from this crowd and they are screaming.
Peter Moran - 30 May 2006 21:33 GMT
> Bottom line is that it works, says homeopathic chief
>
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> is no molecule in that one," he said. "But it works -
> absolutely."

Peter Fisher's own studies show that homeopathy works no better than a sham
treatment.    If he is promoting the use of placebo treatments let him say
so explicitly.

Interesting that in this study the designated placebo "worked" better than
the homeopathic placebo for pain (p<.032), showing how clinical trials can
throw up positive results merely by chance.
1: Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001 Sep;40(9):1052-5 Related Articles, Links

A randomized controlled trial of homeopathy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Fisher P, Scott DL.

Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, UK.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that homeopathy is effective in reducing
the symptoms of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD:
This was a 6-month randomized, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
single-centre study set in a teaching hospital rheumatology out-patient
clinic. The participants of the study were 112 patients who had definite or
classical RA, were seropositive for rheumatoid factor and were receiving
either stable doses of single non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
for > or =3 months or single disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
with or without NSAIDs for > or =6 months. Patients who were severely
disabled, had taken systemic steroids in the previous 6 months or had
withdrawn from DMARD therapy in the previous 12 months were excluded. Two
series of medicines were used. One comprised 42 homeopathic medicines used
for treating RA in 6cH (10(-12)) and/or 30cH (10(-30)) dilutions (a total of
59 preparations) manufactured to French National Pharmacopoeia standards,
the other comprised identical matching placebos. The main outcome measures
were visual analogue scale pain scores, Ritchie articular index, duration of
morning stiffness and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). RESULTS:
Fifty-eight patients completed the trial. Over 6 months there were
significant decreases (P<0.01 by Wilcoxon rank sum tests) in their mean pain
scores (fell 18%), articular indices (fell 24%) and ESRs (fell 11%).
Fifty-four patients withdrew before completing the trial. Thirty-one changed
conventional medication, 10 had serious intercurrent illness or surgery, 12
failed to attend and three withdrew consent. Placebo and active homeopathy
had different effects on pain scores; mean pain scores were significantly
lower after 3 months' placebo therapy than 3 months' active therapy (P=0.032
by Wilcoxon rank sum test). Articular index, ESR and morning stiffness were
similar with active and placebo homeopathy. CONCLUSIONS: We found no
evidence that active homeopathy improves the symptoms of RA, over 3 months,
in patients attending a routine clinic who are stabilized on NSAIDs or
DMARDs.

Peter Moran

> Clear tubes full of tiny sugar pills are stored nearby. A
> couple of drops of the liquid go on each pill. The
[quoted text clipped - 109 lines]
> your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
> copyright owner.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.