Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

End Of The 'Prozac Nation' - More Counselling, More Therapy, Less Medication To Treat Depression, UK

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jan Drew - 20 May 2006 07:15 GMT
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=43363

[Once again...other countries have more sense than the US]

People suffering from depression will be able to have better access to
counselling and talking therapies under a major new programme announced
today by UK Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.

At the moment many people with mild to moderate depression find it difficult
to access talking therapies, with services patchily spread across the
country. This is despite clinical evidence showing that better access to
therapies such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) can help cure
depression and reduce time off work due to ill-health. Patients also prefer
to receive talking therapies rather than medication.

The programme, announced today by Patricia Hewitt in a speech to the
National Mental Health Partnership Conference, consists of two demonstration
sites in Doncaster and Newham, which will be linked to a regional network of
local improvement programmes. The two demonstration sites will bring
together key programmes in the NHS, voluntary sector and local employers to
test various models that can be implemented nationally.

Announcing the launch of the programme today, Miss Hewitt said:

"Millions of people suffer from mild to moderate mental health problems, and
treating them takes up about a third of GPs' time. Too many people are
prescribed medication as a quick fix solution, but talking therapies work
equally well and patients prefer to receive them.

"We know that people in work have better health than those out of work and
the Choosing Health White Paper made clear that work matters - it can
improve your mental and physical health, reduce health inequalities and
improve life chances for people and their families.

"I hope that these pilot sites will provide real, tangible evidence of the
effectiveness of investing in talking therapies. They will help break the
cycle of deprivation, where poor health leads to unemployment and wasted
lives as people fail to reach their full potential."

Rethink chief executive Cliff Prior said:

"This could be the beginning of a dramatic advance in mental health. We know
from our members that there is a huge demand for talking therapies. We also
know that there is already a strong evidence base to support these types of
interventions. We hope that the pilot sites will report quickly and
positively so that this initiative can become a full national programme
available to everyone who needs it."

Paul Farmer, Chief Executive of Mind, said:

"Mind has long been campaigning for a wider choice of therapies, including
talking therapies, to be readily available on the NHS for all who need them.
We hope that these pilot schemes will be a first step towards making this a
reality, and look forward to the scheme's extension to cover the whole
population.

"We are delighted to finally see delivery of pilot schemes for these
urgently needed alternative treatments to medication, now advocated by
several NICE guidelines as frontline treatments. Giving people the chance to
learn coping strategies and self-management techniques can help reduce the
risk of mental health problems returning later on."

Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health chief executive Angela Greatley said:

"People with depression and anxiety have for too long been offered little
more than medication. For a significant minority, this is not enough to help
them to recover. As a result, many lose their jobs, drop out of education or
see their relationships break down. Waiting times for psychological
therapies are long, despite the mass of evidence about their benefits for
many people. Today's announcement should be the beginning of a new approach
that ensures timely access to effective treatment and practical support,
with real choices and care close to home."

1. Improving access to talking therapies has the potential to save the
economy millions of pounds by helping people with mild to moderate
depression to get back into employment and off incapacity benefit. About one
in three of the 1.3 million people claiming long-term incapacity benefit in
the UK have a mental health problem, mostly mild to moderate depression.

2. The pilots will provide real evidence of the benefits that can be gained
from increasing access to psychological therapies, both to the individual
and to the local economy. They have been given £3.7 million funding over two
years from the Department of Health.

The two sites have been chosen because they serve very different
demographics with different health needs, and they offer different treatment
models such as community-based, voluntary sector-led, or employer-led.

Local people will benefits from the pilots by having:

- Access to coping strategies and support as an alternative to taking sick
leave from work due to depression

- Better support in the work place from Occupational Health

- Retaining employment, even where the individual may suffer from stress,
anxiety or depression

- Enabling people on benefits to return to work more quickly

- More choice over their care and treatment

http://www.dh.gov.uk
marcia - 20 May 2006 15:43 GMT
> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=43363
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> counselling and talking therapies under a major new programme announced
> today by UK Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt.

I am not anti-medication because I take psychiatric meds and have
already determined I can't function without them; HOWEVER, I agree that
people in the US should have better access to counseling. That they
don't is the fault of both the insurance companies and the Federal
government, which refuse to underwrite such treatment, claiming it is
too expensive.

It has been demonstrated that psychotherapy (more specifically,
cognitive therapy) can be more cost-effective and at least as
efficacious as medication for minor-to-moderate depression, and
increases the efficacy of treatment when used in combination with
medication for severe depression and other conditions.
Peter Bowditch - 21 May 2006 02:26 GMT
>> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=43363
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>government, which refuse to underwrite such treatment, claiming it is
>too expensive.

It's not just the US. The situation is the same in Australia. One of
the major problems is that there are no votes in mental health so the
politicians talk and don't act, and lots of costs and visits so the
insurance companies aren't interested. There is something wrong with a
system which provides reimbursement of costs for such obvious quackery
as Advanced Allergy Elimination but severely limits payments for
visits to psychologists.

>It has been demonstrated that psychotherapy (more specifically,
>cognitive therapy) can be more cost-effective and at least as
>efficacious as medication for minor-to-moderate depression, and
>increases the efficacy of treatment when used in combination with
>medication for severe depression and other conditions.

The medications are necessary for initial control, but they do nothing
about the possible causes for depression. In the absence of access to
counselling and other "talk" therapies, however, they are better than
nothing.
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

marcia - 21 May 2006 19:08 GMT
> >> People suffering from depression will be able to have better access to
> >> counselling and talking therapies under a major new programme announced
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> as Advanced Allergy Elimination but severely limits payments for
> visits to psychologists.

I agree. I think there is still a lot of stigmatization of mental
illness and a lot of ignorance involved on the part of politicians and
the general public. If the voting public were more aggressive about
demanding better mental health care for people, politicians (facing
reelection) might be more "concerned" about the issue. But so many
people still believe mental illness involves character flaws and
personal weakness, does not exist at all, or is something that only
happens to "other people."

> >It has been demonstrated that psychotherapy (more specifically,
> >cognitive therapy) can be more cost-effective and at least as
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> counselling and other "talk" therapies, however, they are better than
> nothing.

They are better than nothing, but there has been some unexpected
fallout from the prescription of medication without therapy, which is
that the medication itself is now blamed for people committing suicide!

It's been well documented that depressed people who are suicidal are
most at risk when the medication begins to relieve some of the physical
inertia before it relieves the emotional pain.

This goes *way* back to at least the tricyclic era, some 20 years or
more ago. Back then, people were more likely to receive talk therapy
along with their medication, and were also more likely to be
hospitalized until they were functional and no longer a risk to
themselves. Funny how lack of funding for these services never gets
blamed for increases in suicide rates.
Robert CLS, MT(ASCP) - 21 May 2006 19:28 GMT
> >It has been demonstrated that psychotherapy (more specifically,
> >cognitive therapy) can be more cost-effective and at least as
> >efficacious as medication for minor-to-moderate depression, and
> >increases the efficacy of treatment when used in combination with
> >medication for severe depression and other conditions.

> The medications are necessary for initial control, but they do nothing
> about the possible causes for depression. In the absence of access to
> counselling and other "talk" therapies, however, they are better than
> nothing.

<They are better than nothing, but there has been some unexpected
<fallout from the prescription of medication without therapy, which is
<that the medication itself is now blamed for people committing
suicide!

<It's been well documented that depressed people who are suicidal are
<most at risk when the medication begins to relieve some of the
physical
<inertia before it relieves the emotional pain.

<This goes *way* back to at least the tricyclic era, some 20 years or
<more ago. Back then, people were more likely to receive talk therapy
<along with their medication, and were also more likely to be
<hospitalized until they were functional and no longer a risk to
<themselves. Funny how lack of funding for these services never gets
<blamed for increases in suicide rates.

It's a double edge sword. There was a concerted effort to destigmatize
mental illness
by putting forth the "not your fault" neurotransmitter cause. People
came forward and treated for their imbalance and thus a medical
condition.

If I have learned anything about posting here on these NG is that
people
do not believe they have a mental illness and absolutely refuse to seek
pyschological counseling. They all insist it's strickly medical and are

insulted when any suggestion is made.

When it comes to suicide, people bury their head in the sand.
The family wants to hear that they did nothing wrong and their
was no hint that the person would kill themselves and the drugs
are a good safe target.
marcia - 21 May 2006 20:43 GMT
> If I have learned anything about posting here on these NG is that
> people
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> was no hint that the person would kill themselves and the drugs
> are a good safe target.

Yes, and not only do people fail to recognize (or deny) their own
mental illness, but they also use other people's admission of mental
illness as weapon against them. My opinions have been discredited
several times simply because people keep digging the old bipolar dx out
of past threads. Destigmatization has not quite made it to the masses.

I do think children and teens on psychiatric meds should be
hospitalized until stable, if for no other reasons than that they're
inherently impulsive, have no historical perspective on life from which
to draw hope, and no responsibility for the welfare of others who might
be impacted by their death. I think that could potentially put them at
greater risk for acting on suicidal feelings.
Peter Bowditch - 21 May 2006 23:57 GMT
>> >> People suffering from depression will be able to have better access to
>> >> counselling and talking therapies under a major new programme announced
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>fallout from the prescription of medication without therapy, which is
>that the medication itself is now blamed for people committing suicide!

Only the ignorant anti-psychiatry loons blame the medication.

>It's been well documented that depressed people who are suicidal are
>most at risk when the medication begins to relieve some of the physical
>inertia before it relieves the emotional pain.

That's what we keep telling the anti-psychiatry loons, but they won't
listen. The drugs increase motivation before relieving depression but
that concept is too hard for people with an agenda, as is the concept
that the sort of person given these drugs is more prone to suicide
anyway.

Still, if you can't get someone to see the faults in Scientology, how
could you expect them not to agree with CCHR?

>This goes *way* back to at least the tricyclic era, some 20 years or
>more ago. Back then, people were more likely to receive talk therapy
>along with their medication, and were also more likely to be
>hospitalized until they were functional and no longer a risk to
>themselves. Funny how lack of funding for these services never gets
>blamed for increases in suicide rates.
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Jan Drew - 22 May 2006 00:12 GMT
>>> >> People suffering from depression will be able to have better access
>>> >> to
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>>themselves. Funny how lack of funding for these services never gets
>>blamed for increases in suicide rates.

FDA caught covering up the fact that the drug they had approved
was CAUSING suicides among teenagers, while advertised to do the opposite.

http://www.drugawareness.org/home.html

****Finally!****FDA Committee Says Risk of suicide with SSRIs Should be
Communicated Immediately.

2/19/2004
Drug companies need to come clean on SSRIs; time for Health Canada to warn
us

2/17/2004
Drug risks ***hidden from public****
****Drug companies keep test failures quiet,**** medical journal says

2/15/2004
Suicide brings changes to Lilly drug trial.

2/15/2004
19 quit Lilly drug trial after a death

2/15/2004
Student's suicide cries out to FDA for drug warnings

2/13/2004
Woman testing depression drug kills herself

2/12/2004
Student, 19, in Trial of New Antidepressant Commits Suicide

2/12/2004
Rep. Tauzin to $2 million-a-year job to work for the Pharmaceutical
Research
and Manufacturers of America

2/9/2004
Prescription For Suicide?

2/9/2004
Woman participating in Lilly trial hangs self
Coroner will examine whether experimental drug played possible part in
19-year-old's suicide.

2/5/2004
Medicating America's Kids
NPR Program

2/4/2004
Lawmaker Seeks Data on Antidepressants for Kids

2/4/2004
Ottawa warns of suicide risk for teens on anti-depressants

4/2004
Ottawa warns of suicide risk for teens on anti-depressants

By ANDRÉ PICARD
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTER

Mounting concerns over the safety of prescribing a new generation of
anti-depressants to children and teenagers has prompted Health Canada to
issue
a rare public warning to reconsider their use because the popular drugs may
actually increase the risk of suicide.

2/3/2004
Antidepressant Strengthened Warnings About Pediatric Suicidality Risk
Needed
Immediately, Cmte. Says

2/3/2004
Pittman tragedy detailed in letter

2/3/2004
Antidepressant warning: Adult drugs may lead to increased risk of suicide
in
children

/3/2004
FDA mulls antidepressant warning
Panel cites risks to some children, notes benefits too

2/3/2004
FDA Links Antidepressants, Youth Suicide Risk

2/3/2004
Alert on antidepressants for kids
Panel urges sterner FDA warnings on children's suicide risks

2/3/2004
Parents Blame Medicines for Suicides

2/3/2004
Company 'held back' data on drug for children
Antidepressant had no effect, leak reveals

2/2/2004
Will British Ban Spur FDA to Act?

2/2/2004
Youth, meds and suicide

2/1/2004
Kids, Meds, and Suicide
The dangerous side effects of some SSRIs
are back in the headlines

2/1/2004
Drug report barred by FDA
Scientist links antidepressants to suicide in kids

1/31/2004
Wyeth Among 3 Firms Subpoenaed by U.S.

1/30/2004
Deluge of drug ads has FDA struggling to stop the hype

1/30/2004
FDA to debate antidepressant risk to kids

1/29/2004
Antidepressant Makers Withhold Data on Children

1/26/2004
FDA Knew About the Dangers of Redux® but Approved it Anyway

1/26/2004
Special Report
Antidepressant Drugs and Suicidal/Aggressive Behaviors

1/23/2004
Report casts doubt on drug, suicide link

1/21/2004
New Report Concludes SSRI Antidepressants Do Not Increase Suicidal Behavior
in
Youth with Depression ACNP Presents Findings As FDA Opens Hearings

1/20/2004
Drug Companies Get Too Close for Med School's Comfort

1/6/2004
Probe into antidepressant link to suicides

1/6/2004
New Hope for Battling Depression
Study Illuminates Why Benefits of Therapy Are More Lasting Than Medication

1/4/2004
A Suicide Side Effect?
What parents aren't being told about their kids' antidepressants

1/4/2004
New York Times Lives: A Doctor's Toxic Shock

1/4/2004
Drug commercials can make you a little bit dopey

12/10/2003
NIH to launch ethics review - Zerhouni promises comprehensive look at
lucrative consulting payments to top officials

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/07/health/07DEPR.html?hp&pagewanteda...

FDA COVER UP!

Antidepressants:" FDA suppressed damaging data

http://tinyurl.com/d3z6r

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8HIB6EO0.htm?campaign_i...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5989348/

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=39016
Herman Rubin - 22 May 2006 01:52 GMT
>> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/printerfriendlynews.php?newsid=43363

            ................

>It has been demonstrated that psychotherapy (more specifically,
>cognitive therapy) can be more cost-effective and at least as
>efficacious as medication for minor-to-moderate depression, and
>increases the efficacy of treatment when used in combination with
>medication for severe depression and other conditions.

This depends on the person and circumstances.  I am doing
reasonably well with medication (I reacted badly to Prozac)
and I was told long ago that in my case counseling would
have little value.

Signature

This address is for information only.  I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu         Phone: (765)494-6054   FAX: (765)494-0558

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.