Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Proof of Cyberstalking,  REPEATED LIES & OBESSSION

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JanD - 30 Jan 2006 05:10 GMT
Additional Proof of Cyberstalking , OBSESSION & LIES.

*Believing that she knew my real name.*

Rich ,@. wrote in news:khcbeusflte8j1bpsr6ltdva9r1s4jd8o8@4ax.com:> On

> Sat, 18 May 2002 01:29:42 GMT
>>i...@san.rr.com (Ilena Rose) wrote: In
> article4t8beu4ufu8n24vblsrpdkubhoj93tt...@4ax.com
>>, Rich ,@. wrote: Are you sure my name is Richard Jacobson??

ilena>Is it or isn't it?

>> > Negative. Does this mean that I don't have to agree to Jan's request to

cease and desist??  Of course her request presumes that I have been

> stalking and harassing her.
>>It is kind of like asking someone if they have stopped beating their wife.
> But I do think that this is a very important lesson for people who post
> here. They should not reveal their real name unless they are prepared for
> various net  loons such as Jan, Debbee, and Ilena who would use such
> information to harass people in their private lives.
>> Jan has already done so by posting someone's name, address and phone
>> number.
> Ilena has also allegedly contacted someone's wife through email. And
> Debbee  has attempted to find out my real identity by asking  about RM
> Jacobson.
>JD  Hmmmmmm. No mention of Mark Thorson posting a private phone number and
>address,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Rich is certainly selective.
>> > I am grateful for one thing; that Richard Jacobson is not my real name.
> Unfortunately the Richard Jacobson that DOES live in Hawaii may not be too
> happy with my assuming his name for purposes of the internet especially
> given  the recent events.  He happens to live on a different island from
> me. I do plan  to contact him to let him know that someone may try to
> harass him since he is  listed in the phone book.
> Aloha, Rich
> Hiking The Kalalau Trail
> Richard Jacobson (r...@cris.com) Sat, 16 Mar 1996 00:27:34 -0500 (EST)
> Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message:
> Jand...@aol.com: "Florida hike" Previous message: L. Barry Rinehart: "Se
> 'Ya"
>>Hawaii's premier backpacking trail, the Kalalau Trail on the island of
> Kauai still remains closed past Hanakoa due to the reconstruction of the
> trail near "crawler's ridge". Estimated date of completion is Mid May.
> Until then, camping will only be permitted in Hanakapiai and Hanakoa
> Valleys. I for one am anxious to have Kalalau open again. It has to be one
> of the finest trails in the world.
> Aloha, Rich ------------------------
> ------------------------
> Richard H. Jacobson Always remember to put Horace before Descarte

Richard H Jacobson is psychopath and he does not care if he
lies, bears false witness or libels others.

Such as:

She then called someone to complain about Mark MD.

Richard H Jacobson cannot deal with people who expose his lies,
cbyerstaking,
hypocrisy, proven pattern of badgering and obsessing.

>  (words of Richard H Jacobson)

Proof of Cyberstalking & OBSESSION

Jan Drew ( 19 times)

she knew

she has

she may

she did

She said

She then ( 3 times)

she believed ( 4 times)

she could

she does

she believes ( 4 times)

she wonders

Jan continues

She handles

she kept

she tried

she called

she bore

she knows

she is (2 times)

she will ( 3 times)

she thought

She admitted

She also

she asked

she told (2 times)

she wants

Jan wants

Jan will

>  Beware of Jan Drew, Stalker

>  Jan Drew 18 times

>  Earth To Jan Drew

>  Jan Drew (6 times)

>  Re: MHA Contest: Claims that Jan Drew Cannot Back Up

>  Jan Drew (5 times)

>  (Under the same thread)

>  Poor Jan. This thread is about Jan Drew's false claims. Thanx for
>  playing Jan. You lose.

>  Notice that Jan Drew cannot dispute a single claim that she made that
>  she cannot back up. And she cannot use as an excuse that she did not
>  read them.

>  Claims that Jan DRew CAnnot Back Up.
>  Unless Richard H Jacobson is really Jan Drew he is not the subject of
>  this thread. Cue Jan to start a new thread with claims that Rich
>  cannot back up. Just watch.

>  Jan Drew is trying to disrupt this thread. Contestants, just ignore
>  her and keep her unbacked claims coming. Maybe after we reach a
>  hundred unbacked claims by Jan DRew she will realize what a hypocrite
>  and liar she is. OTOH it may take a thousand unbacked claims.
>  Fortunately Jan Drew is a never ending source of unbacked claims.

>  Jan Drew claimed that a specific doctor lost his license to practice.

>  Jan Drew said that the reason

>  Jan Drew said:

>  Jan Drew NEVER

>  that Jan Drew is

>  Jan Drew claimed

>  from Jan Drew

>  Jan Drew repeatedly

>  Jan DRew

>  Re: LIAR Alert!

>  Jan Drew  (32 times)

>  The Hypocrisy of Jan Drew

>  Jan Drew (4 times)

>  Re: Mark Probert Has NO Job!

>  JanD wrote:

>  LadyLollipop wrote:

>  Jdrew63...@aol.com

>  (All diversions)

>  Looks Like Someone Struck A Nerve With Jan Drew

>  Jan should

>  Re: Mark Probert Has NO Job!

>  On 09 May 2004 03:10:30 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:

>  >>>>I wish for you a good dose of mercury poisoning, peripheral
> neuropathy and
>  >>>>migraine headaches.

>  ( still posting that being the despicable cyberstalking he is, NOT
> posting where I said I did say it and it was wrong, OVERLOOKING all the
> wishing of disabilites his buddy posted, proving he is a hypocrite)

>  Jan still

>  Jan said

>  Didn't Jan

>  Re: Cyberstalking Alert!

>  Jan Drew (51 times)

>  (or Jan DRew)

>  Jan Drew On Selective Believing

>  Jan Drew and Jan

>  Re: More nonsense

>  Jan Drew (3 times)

>  Re: Bless

>  Jan should  (3 times)

>  (That becuase I showed where he lost his temper, he though it was nuked)

>  Coleah apparently scored a direct hit!

>  Jan Drew, Proven Anti-semite.

>  >> Jan Drew is desperate to call me a liar

>  >> Jan Drew Cannot Keep Her Lies and Anti-semitism Straight

>  >> ==========

>  >> Every single one of these titles proves:

>  >> Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title

>  >> Proving once again.

>  >> Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie

>  >> =======

>  >> Poor pathetic, Rich, foaming at the mouth, talking out of both sides.

>  >> But you would never hear Jan make a comment like "Steven Bornfeld is a
>  >> real Jewish gentleman"

>  >> ( that's correct, as this is the FIRST time, I have ever heard that
> Steve
>  >> was a Jew, and it matters NOT, Steve is ALWAYS a *gentleman*) GOD
> BLESS
>  >> STEVE!

>  >> She reserves the use of identifying someone as Jewish when she wants
>  >> to attack them. She does this because she is an anti-semite who has a
>  >> deep seated hatred for Jews.

>  >> Poor, poor Rich!

>  >> It has been over two thousand years since Jesus was crucified and Jan
>  >> Drew still cannot forgive the Jews who were involved

>  >> Richard H Jacobson knows who I cannot forgive? Does he think he is
> GOD?

>  >> And she ridicules Mark P for not accepting the religious
>  >> beliefs of the Jews for Jesus

>  >> Oh? Do wonder if Richard can show us WHERE I did this?

>  >> Let's cover a few other lies today.

>  >> See how the story changes.

>  >> What was the substantive change? I did not use the exact words and Jan
>  >> accuses me of changing the story. She really is desperate.

>  >> Poor, pathetic, Rich goes into a rant, changes the subject title when
> his
>  >> lies are exposed.

>  >> The changes are VERY  clear!

>  >> ***She claimed that ALL her feet pain went away****

>  >> *****because all her foot pain was gone******

>  >> *******with no foot pain*********

>  >> Don't believe Jan Drew. She is a psychopathic liar

>  >> And now for more lies. Jan Drew told two egregious lies that were told

>  >> She claimed that *ALL* her feet pain went away

>  >> she went from being *bedridden* to going out line dancing.

>  >> (oops, wait a minute, Rich can't keeps his lies straight, he also LIED
>  >> and
>  >> claimed I was bedridden the how many days *BEFORE* I had my amalgams
>  >> removed?)

>  >> Jan Drew knows that what I have said above is true

>  >> (poor, pathetic, Richard H Jacobson (WHO LIES ABOUT HIS NAME) thinks
> he
>  >> is
>  >> GOD and knows what *I* know is true!)

>  >> And now for more lies. Jan Drew told two egregious lies that were told

>  >> On June 26, 1999 Jan said that she was able to go out line dancing

>  >> >because all her foot pain was gone

>  >> (that's right TWO LIES in the same post!)

>  >> pathologic liar Jan Drew knows it.

>  >> >This is why she kill filed me. This is why she lies about me being a
>  >> >liar and a stalker. Jan Drew knows that I exposed her lies and she
>  >> >refuses to admit it. She is a despicable human being whose sole
>  >> >purpose in life is to shill for alternative dentists and to
> perpetuate
>  >> >the lie that she had mercury poisoning from amalgams. She did not and
>  >> >the proof is in her own words.
>  >> >Jan Drew will not respond to any of the points in this post. Instead
>  >> >she will pretend she is not reading them and then personally attack
> me
>  >> >in order to discredit me. Or she will continue her stalking of me by
>  >> >posting what she thinks is my name, address and phone number. Just
>  >> >watch.
>  >> >Aloha,
>  >> >Rich

>  >> ========

>  >> What I ACTUALLY SAID!

>  >> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
>  >>       From: jdrew63...@aol.com (JDrew63929) - Find messages by this
>  >> author
>  >>       Date: 1999/06/26
>  >>       Subject: Re: Chronic constipation

>  >> [snipping to the point in question]

>  >> THANK GOD, my feet didn't hurt!

>  >> ==========

>  >> Further LIES from Rich.

>  >>  When Jan Drew was asked if she was a devout Christian she remained
>  >> silent

>  >> JDrew63929" <jdrew63...@aol.com>

>  >> From Happy Dog

>  >> Jan, please tell us where this quote is from.  Revelations?  Is it in
>  >> your
>  >> bible?  You are supporting it so I assume you're sure that it comes
> from
>  > the
>  >> bible.  So tell us where.  I can't find it.  But since you're the
> devout
>  >> Christian, you must be able to. erf

>  >> >> First of all I have never said I was a devout Christian.
>  >> >OK.  You aren't a devout Christian.  Thanks for clearing that up'
>  >> >You're welcome, however you snipped, I try, but God ain't done with
> me
>  > yet.

>  >> ==========

>  >> Oops, Jan says it does not matter what a person's religion is but she
>  >> identified some Jews here.

>  >> Note the twisting Rich has stated things, I have not said.

>  >> Poor, pathetic, Rich.

>  >> When Jan was asked to identify those who have stated that they were
> Jews
>  > she
>  >> was silent

>  >> There is NOT a group here that have identified themselves as Jewish.

>  >> Poor, pathetic, LYING Richard H Jacobson!

>  >> Jan determines in her mind who is Jewish

>  >> WOW!!!

>  >> Jan Drew thinks that Catholics who pray to Saints are being led by
> Satan.

>  >> Richard H Jacobson is a despicable sick man, OBSESSED with Jan, he has
> a
>  >> PROVEN pattern of BADGERING, of *any* person who ever claimed success
>  > using
>  >> alternative medicine.  He once stated:

>  >> Probably the best way to debunk these claims is to demonstrate that
> the
>  >> person
>  >> making the claim is lying.

>  >> In any case I will continue to pray to Saint Jude, patron saint of
> lost

>  >> >causes, that something will happen that prevents Jan from posting in
>  >> >this
>  >> >newsgroup since praying that she will change would take more than a
>  >> >miracle.
>  >> >Aloha,

>  >>  Rich

>  >> >Unfortunately my prayers have not yet been answered. However I
> believe

>  >> that there is justice in this world and soon my prayers will be
>  >> answered. I am patient.

>  >> 2001

>  >> >MHA is a discussion group to discuss alternative health modalities. I
>  >> >choose to
>  >> >discuss the issue of whether Jan Drew actually had mercury poisoning.

>  >> Aloha,

>  >>  Rich

>  >> The pattern of badgering that Richard thinks he has nuked that started
>  >> before I ever posted.

>  >> http://tinyurl.com/39u2g

>  >> http://tinyurl.com/2vxcl

>  >> http://tinyurl.com/2nbzc

>  >> http://tinyurl.com/3gzhf

>  Re:Liar Alert!

>  Jan Drew ( 3 times)

>  Re: Kevin Trudeau on 20-20

>  according to Jan

>  Cue Jan

>  Jan Drew when

>  My pleasure. But how much respect can I give to someone who endlessly
>  tries to discuss topics with Jan Drew when she obviously cannot
>  discuss anything and then repeats thousands of lines of her abusive
>  posts in the process? Sorry, but stupid is as stupid does.

>  Jan is just a seriously disturbed insecure angry intolerant woman who
>  has absolutely no insight into her behavior and blames everyone under
>  the sun for her problems. Cue Jan to call me a liar as she does not
>  even know everyone under the sun. Cue Jan to call me a stalker. Cue
>  Jan to say that the subject is not Jan.

>  Jan Drew realizes

>  Jan Drew is

>  Jan is

>  She is

>  her rage

>  She may ( 4 times)

>  her become

>   Is Mark the subject of this thread? I thought NOT Jan!!!

>  Re: Pitiful Attempt to Badger

>  Susan, Jan flames nearly everyone with whom she disagrees especially
>  if they are Jewish. Or had you not noticed?

>   She will also flame those who don't attack the people that she does
>  not like especially if they are Jewish. Or had you not noticed?

>  It is pretty pointless to try to get Jan Drew to change. Or had you
>  not noticed?

>  Jan is a very bitter and angry woman who harbors great resentments and
>  grudges. If you are on her sh.t list be prepared to be harassed. If
>  you want to get off her sh.t list you need to do more than just be
>  nice to her. You have to join her "bash the gang" bandwagon and tell
>  her how she is a wonderful and loving Christian lady who is being
>  inappropriately attacked by a gang of lying Jews and atheists.

>  Re: More blathering

>  Jan Drew (2 times)

>   Re: Rich Shewmaker Is So Predictable

>  On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:31:06 GMT, "LadyLollipop" aka Jan Drew aka
>  JanD  aka Jan the hypocrite
Mark Probert - 30 Jan 2006 14:43 GMT
> Additional Proof of Cyberstalking , OBSESSION & LIES.
>
[quoted text clipped - 532 lines]
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:31:06 GMT, "LadyLollipop" aka Jan Drew aka
>> JanD  aka Jan the hypocrite
rich.@, - 30 Jan 2006 16:24 GMT
>Richard H Jacobson is psychopath and he does not care if he
>lies, bears false witness or libels others.
>
>Such as:
>
>She then called someone to complain about Mark MD.

Poor Jan. Like Jacob Jan must lie to cover up previous lies.

Jan Drew e-mailed one or more of Mark Lowry's colleagues to complain
about him. She cannot admit that she did this even though Mark Lowry
has directly asked her to answer the question. She won't answer the
question because she knows this would add another data point to the
assertion that she is a stalker. She has a pattern of stalking. This
is not the first time she called someone to harass.

For the same reason Jan Drew will not admit that she lied about a
doctor (who she believes to be me) losing his license. Jan Drew knows
that she made up the story about loss of license but cannot admit that
she LIED. All she can do is reflexively and falsely accuse the people
who expose her lies as liars. It is all so predictable.

Watch how Jan Drew starts a thread "Like Jacob, Rich Must Lie To Cover
Up Previous Lies".

Aloha,

Rich

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.