Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2006
Cell Tech sued over death
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Mark Thorson - 28 Jan 2006 22:21 GMT This is an interesting development. The timing is also interesting, as it comes at the same time that new management (Bob Underwood and Wynn Weeks) is taking over at Cell Tech.
Quoting from: http://www.heraldandnews.com/articles/2006/01/26/news/local_news/local2.txt
"Blake, who worked as a receptionist for Cell Tech in Klamath Falls, was 34 when she died April 18, 2003, from severe liver and kidney failure. She left behind a young son. In the civil suit, filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court, the family is asking for $500,000 in economic damages for medical and funeral and burial costs and $1.5 million in damages for the emotional loss of Blake as a daughter and mother."
And later:
"Blake developed liver and kidney failure in February 2003, and despite medical treatment, her condition worsened, court records state."
"Doctors at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland performed an autopsy of Blake several days after her death. According to complaint filed with the suit, the results indicated that 'observable liver and kidney damage to Ms. Blake were suggestive of exposure to toxins which occur with blue green algae called microcystins.' Microcystins are a group of amino acids and liver toxins found in natural bodies of water."
"OHSU lab experts also tested algae products found in Blake's home, and results of those tests indicated that they had high amounts of microcystins in them. The products were supplied to Blake by Cell Tech, the complaint alleged."
JanD - 28 Jan 2006 23:17 GMT > This is an interesting development. The timing > is also interesting, as it comes at the same time [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Quoting from: > http://www.heraldandnews.com/articles/2006/01/26/news/local_news/local2.txt Most interesting that Mark only quoted the part that suited him.
<snip>
Quoting properly:
Published January 26, 2006
By LAURA McVICKER
H&N Staff Writer
The family of a deceased Klamath Falls woman has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Cell Tech International, alleging she died after the company supplied her dietary supplements with toxic levels of microcystins.
But Cell Tech's attorney Erick Haynie said Wednesday that there has been no evidence provided by doctors that Melissa Blake died due to repeated exposure to the naturally occurring toxin.
Blake, who worked as a receptionist for Cell Tech in Klamath Falls, was 34 when she died April 18, 2003, from severe liver and kidney failure. She left behind a young son. In the civil suit, filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court, the family is asking for $500,000 in economic damages for medical and funeral and burial costs and $1.5 million in damages for the emotional loss of Blake as a daughter and mother.
The suit was filed for the estate of Melissa Kay Blake through her mother, Susan Blake of Klamath Falls. Susan Blake told the Herald and News that her attorney advised her not to comment on the case.
A trial date is scheduled for April, but may be postponed until fall at the request of both sides, Haynie said.
Blake developed liver and kidney failure in February 2003, and despite medical treatment, her condition worsened, court records state.
Doctors at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland performed an autopsy of Blake several days after her death. According to complaint filed with the suit, the results indicated that "observable liver and kidney damage to Ms. Blake were suggestive of exposure to toxins which occur with blue green algae called microcystins." Microcystins are a group of amino acids and liver toxins found in natural bodies of water.
OSHU lab experts also tested algae products found in Blake's home, and results of those tests indicated that they had high amounts of microcystins in them. The products were supplied to Blake by Cell Tech, the complaint alleged.
But Haynie said that testing of microcystins in Blake's liver during the autopsy did not show exposure. Further, Haynie said that Cell Tech carefully tests its products to ensure that no high levels of the toxins exist.
"There is no evidence of anyone being harmed of the company's product, let alone dying," he said.
According to the complaint, Cell Tech's product contains "dangerously high levels of contaminants" and the corporation did not "adequately warn of the dangers associated with continued ingestion or consumption of the product."
The complaint also alleges that Cell Tech did not warn consumers of the dangers of microcystins in the dietary supplement, and says that Blake consumed numerous dietary supplement products, "as intended and encouraged by Cell Tech."
Cell Tech harvests blue-green algae from Upper Klamath Lake for use as food supplements. In 2004, the company had an average of 31,195 distributors and net sales of $14.8 million. At its peak in the 1990s, Cell Tech employed about 600 people in Klamath Falls.
In 1996, Cell Tech officials faced a toxic scare after microcystins was found in Upper Klamath Lake. Though Cell Tech then tested its harvest to ensure consumers that their product was toxin-free, their sales plummeted from $200 million to $14.8 in 2004.
Mark Probert - 28 Jan 2006 23:31 GMT >>This is an interesting development. The timing >>is also interesting, as it comes at the same time [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Most interesting that Mark only quoted the part that suited him. Thanks for posting the whole article. I looked on Toxnet, which, interestingly, Debeeeee had recommended, and found that the toxin, microcystin, is highly hepato- and nephrotoxic.
The woman died from kidney and liver failure, and, there is no other explanation as to the cause of her condition other than the demonstrated presence of the toxin in her supplement.
You can check this out for yourself, by checking Toxnet:
http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/index.html
Most assuredly, this is something I would not wish on anyone.
> <snip> > [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > ensure consumers that their product was toxin-free, their sales plummeted > from $200 million to $14.8 in 2004. JanD - 29 Jan 2006 00:52 GMT >>>This is an interesting development. The timing >>>is also interesting, as it comes at the same time [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Thanks for posting the whole article. I looked on Toxnet, which, > interestingly, Debeeeee There never was any such person.
had recommended, and found that the toxin,
> microcystin, is highly hepato- and nephrotoxic. > > The woman died from kidney and liver failure, and, there is no other > explanation as to the cause of her condition other than the demonstrated > presence of the toxin in her supplement. That would be wrong. Do some more research.
> You can check this out for yourself, by checking Toxnet: > [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] >> ensure consumers that their product was toxin-free, their sales plummeted >> from $200 million to $14.8 in 2004. Mark Probert - 29 Jan 2006 03:27 GMT >>>>This is an interesting development. The timing >>>>is also interesting, as it comes at the same time [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > There never was any such person. You do not recall Debbee12324, or whatever number she used?
> had recommended, and found that the toxin, > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > That would be wrong. Do some more research. Point out to me in the article any other possible source of a toxin which could cause liver and kidney failure. The article says:
OSHU lab experts also tested algae products found in Blake's home, and results of those tests indicated that they had high amounts of microcystins in them. The products were supplied to Blake by Cell Tech, the complaint alleged.
She worked for Cell Tech...why would she use anything else?
Instead of merely saying that I am wrong, show me why. Until then, I am correct.
>>You can check this out for yourself, by checking Toxnet: >> [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] >>>ensure consumers that their product was toxin-free, their sales plummeted >>>from $200 million to $14.8 in 2004. JanD - 29 Jan 2006 04:46 GMT > JanD wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > You do not recall Debbee12324, or whatever number she used? Yes.
There was no Debeeeee
There was a DEBBEE1023@aol.com
Your recall is not very good.
>> had recommended, and found that the toxin, >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Point out to me in the article I did not say in the article.
Do some more research.
<snip>
>>>You can check this out for yourself, by checking Toxnet: >>> [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] >>>>ensure consumers that their product was toxin-free, their sales >>>>plummeted from $200 million to $14.8 in 2004. Mark Probert - 29 Jan 2006 16:58 GMT >>>>>>This is an interesting development. The timing >>>>>>is also interesting, as it comes at the same time [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Your recall is not very good. Who the Drew cares what she called herself? You knew it and decided to play one of your stupid sand box games.
>>> had recommended, and found that the toxin, >>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Do some more research. Sorry, toots, but you are making a claim that there is more information. Provide it.
> <snip> Restored:
The article says:
OSHU lab experts also tested algae products found in Blake's home, and results of those tests indicated that they had high amounts of microcystins in them. The products were supplied to Blake by Cell Tech, the complaint alleged.
She worked for Cell Tech...why would she use anything else?
Instead of merely saying that I am wrong, show me why. Until then, I am correct.
Show why I am wrong. You cannot, twit.
Google searches:
Your search - "Melissa Blake" Microcystins - did not match any documents.
Your search - "Melissa Blake" "Cell tech" - did not match any documents.
Your search - "Erick Haynie" "cell tech" - did not match any documents.
Likewise, there is no link between Haynie and Blake.
Haynie is Cell Tech's Attorney.
So, you claim there is something else:
PROVE IT!
However, I expect you to play your usual stupid games.
BTW, a check of the Cell Tech website does not mention it. I wonder why? ;)
>>>>You can check this out for yourself, by checking Toxnet: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] >>>>>ensure consumers that their product was toxin-free, their sales >>>>>plummeted from $200 million to $14.8 in 2004.
|
|
|