<snip Jan Drew again trying to reveal what she believes to be my real
name proving that she is a stalker>

Obviously Jan Drew thinks that she knows my real name. Knowing that I
prefer to remain anonymous due to her stalking behavior Jan Drew
persists in trying to reveal it. By trying to reveal what she thinks
is my real name she proves that she is stalking me.

But what adds to the proof of her stalking is her admission that she
called what she believed to be my business number and failing to reach
me, then called someone at the same address to ask about the person
she believes to be me.

Jan Drew does not realize that what she is doing is proving that SHE
is the cyberstalker and the one obsessed.

Have I EVER posted personal information about Jan Drew? No
Have I EVER tried to find her address and phone number? No
Have I EVER tried to dial her number? No.

And yet Jan Drew continues to call *me* a cyberstalker. What a
complete hypocrite. She cannot take responsibility for HER stalking
behavior.

Has Jan Drew explained why she tried to call what she thought was my
number? No.
Has Jan Drew explained why she called someone else and asked about the
person she believed to be me? No.
Has Jan Drew explained why she lied about the doctor losing his
license? No.

Jan Drew admits to using the internet to get personal information
about me and believing she had it to telephone me and others for the
purpose of harassment. Stalking does not get any more obvious.

She also has used the internet to get personal information about Mark
Lowry MD and then posted this information in this newsgroup. She then
contacted someone to complain about him. She essentially stalked Mark
Lowry. Jan Drew has a pattern of stalking.

Jan Drew is obviously a very disturbed individual. How else to explain
her using the internet to get personal information and then to try to
call the person. How else to explain her lying about a doctor losing
his license because she thought that doctor was me and wanted to hurt
me. Jan Drew is guilty of lying, bearing false witness, stalking and
libeling.

And finally my post is certainly on topic since the title of the
thread is Proof Of Cyberstalking and Obsession. Jan Drew fits this
description to a T. The irony is that she is accusing me of what she
is obviously guilty.

Aloha,

Rich

PS: Cue Jan to not answer ANY of the questions in this message. Cue
Jan to continue to try to reveal what she thinks is my real name even
though I have clearly said I want to remain anonymous due to HER
stalking behavior. Just watch.

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance

Jan is a well known net stalker who has contacted employers, and other
people outside of Usenet. She posts private addresses and personal
information. She supports contacting spouses of posters in order to
silence them.

Jan HATES the First Amendment, Jews, Atheists, Catholics, and anyone who
does not sit in her pew.

You would be wise not to ever let her have any personal information.

 what is the deal w/ this stalking stuff??

 Look it up under Proof Jan Drew lied about having mercury poisoning.

 Be prepared to read for quite some time.
   "JanD" <JanD@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:lzQCf.518011$084.291115@attbi_s22...
     (words of Richard H Jacobson)

     Beware of Jan Drew, Stalker

     Jan Drew 18 times

     Earth To Jan Drew

     Jan Drew (6 times)

     Re: MHA Contest: Claims that Jan Drew Cannot Back Up

     Jan Drew (5 times)

     (Under the same thread)

     Poor Jan. This thread is about Jan Drew's false claims. Thanx for
     playing Jan. You lose.

     Notice that Jan Drew cannot dispute a single claim that she made that
     she cannot back up. And she cannot use as an excuse that she did not
     read them.

     Claims that Jan DRew CAnnot Back Up.
     Unless Richard H Jacobson is really Jan Drew he is not the subject of
     this thread. Cue Jan to start a new thread with claims that Rich
     cannot back up. Just watch.

     Jan Drew is trying to disrupt this thread. Contestants, just ignore
     her and keep her unbacked claims coming. Maybe after we reach a
     hundred unbacked claims by Jan DRew she will realize what a hypocrite
     and liar she is. OTOH it may take a thousand unbacked claims.
     Fortunately Jan Drew is a never ending source of unbacked claims.

     Jan Drew claimed that a specific doctor lost his license to practice.

     Jan Drew said that the reason

     Jan Drew said:

     Jan Drew NEVER

     that Jan Drew is

     Jan Drew claimed

     from Jan Drew

     Jan Drew repeatedly

     Jan DRew

     Re: LIAR Alert!

     Jan Drew  (32 times)

     The Hypocrisy of Jan Drew

     Jan Drew (4 times)

     Re: Mark Probert Has NO Job!

     JanD wrote:

     LadyLollipop wrote:

     Jdrew63929@aol.com

     (All diversions)

     Looks Like Someone Struck A Nerve With Jan Drew

     Jan should

     Re: Mark Probert Has NO Job!

     On 09 May 2004 03:10:30 GMT, jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) wrote:

     >>>>I wish for you a good dose of mercury poisoning, peripheral neuropathy
   and
     >>>>migraine headaches.

     ( still posting that being the despicable cyberstalking he is, NOT posting
   where I said I did say it and it was wrong, OVERLOOKING all the wishing of
   disabilites his buddy posted, proving he is a hypocrite)

     Jan still

     Jan said

     Didn't Jan

     Re: Cyberstalking Alert!

     Jan Drew (51 times)

     (or Jan DRew)

     Jan Drew On Selective Believing

     Jan Drew and Jan

     Re: More nonsense

     Jan Drew (3 times)

     Re: Bless

     Jan should  (3 times)

     (That becuase I showed where he lost his temper, he though it was nuked)

     Coleah apparently scored a direct hit!

     Jan Drew, Proven Anti-semite.

     >> Jan Drew is desperate to call me a liar

     >> Jan Drew Cannot Keep Her Lies and Anti-semitism Straight

     >> ==========

     >> Every single one of these titles proves:

     >> Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title

     >> Proving once again.

     >> Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie

     >> =======

     >> Poor pathetic, Rich, foaming at the mouth, talking out of both sides.

     >> But you would never hear Jan make a comment like "Steven Bornfeld is a
     >> real Jewish gentleman"

     >> ( that's correct, as this is the FIRST time, I have ever heard that
   Steve
     >> was a Jew, and it matters NOT, Steve is ALWAYS a *gentleman*) GOD BLESS
     >> STEVE!

     >> She reserves the use of identifying someone as Jewish when she wants
     >> to attack them. She does this because she is an anti-semite who has a
     >> deep seated hatred for Jews.

     >> Poor, poor Rich!

     >> It has been over two thousand years since Jesus was crucified and Jan
     >> Drew still cannot forgive the Jews who were involved

     >> Richard H Jacobson knows who I cannot forgive? Does he think he is GOD?

     >> And she ridicules Mark P for not accepting the religious
     >> beliefs of the Jews for Jesus

     >> Oh? Do wonder if Richard can show us WHERE I did this?

     >> Let's cover a few other lies today.

     >> See how the story changes.

     >> What was the substantive change? I did not use the exact words and Jan
     >> accuses me of changing the story. She really is desperate.

     >> Poor, pathetic, Rich goes into a rant, changes the subject title when
   his
     >> lies are exposed.

     >> The changes are VERY  clear!

     >> ***She claimed that ALL her feet pain went away****

     >> *****because all her foot pain was gone******

     >> *******with no foot pain*********

     >> Don't believe Jan Drew. She is a psychopathic liar

     >> And now for more lies. Jan Drew told two egregious lies that were told

     >> She claimed that *ALL* her feet pain went away

     >> she went from being *bedridden* to going out line dancing.

     >> (oops, wait a minute, Rich can't keeps his lies straight, he also LIED
     >> and
     >> claimed I was bedridden the how many days *BEFORE* I had my amalgams
     >> removed?)

     >> Jan Drew knows that what I have said above is true

     >> (poor, pathetic, Richard H Jacobson (WHO LIES ABOUT HIS NAME) thinks he
     >> is
     >> GOD and knows what *I* know is true!)

     >> And now for more lies. Jan Drew told two egregious lies that were told

     >> On June 26, 1999 Jan said that she was able to go out line dancing

     >> >because all her foot pain was gone

     >> (that's right TWO LIES in the same post!)

     >> pathologic liar Jan Drew knows it.

     >> >This is why she kill filed me. This is why she lies about me being a
     >> >liar and a stalker. Jan Drew knows that I exposed her lies and she
     >> >refuses to admit it. She is a despicable human being whose sole
     >> >purpose in life is to shill for alternative dentists and to perpetuate
     >> >the lie that she had mercury poisoning from amalgams. She did not and
     >> >the proof is in her own words.
     >> >Jan Drew will not respond to any of the points in this post. Instead
     >> >she will pretend she is not reading them and then personally attack me
     >> >in order to discredit me. Or she will continue her stalking of me by
     >> >posting what she thinks is my name, address and phone number. Just
     >> >watch.
     >> >Aloha,
     >> >Rich

     >> ========

     >> What I ACTUALLY SAID!

     >> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
     >>       From: jdrew63...@aol.com (JDrew63929) - Find messages by this
     >> author
     >>       Date: 1999/06/26
     >>       Subject: Re: Chronic constipation

     >> [snipping to the point in question]

     >> THANK GOD, my feet didn't hurt!

     >> ==========

     >> Further LIES from Rich.

     >>  When Jan Drew was asked if she was a devout Christian she remained
     >> silent

     >> JDrew63929" <jdrew63...@aol.com>

     >> From Happy Dog

     >> Jan, please tell us where this quote is from.  Revelations?  Is it in
     >> your
     >> bible?  You are supporting it so I assume you're sure that it comes
   from
     > the
     >> bible.  So tell us where.  I can't find it.  But since you're the
   devout
     >> Christian, you must be able to. erf

     >> >> First of all I have never said I was a devout Christian.
     >> >OK.  You aren't a devout Christian.  Thanks for clearing that up'
     >> >You're welcome, however you snipped, I try, but God ain't done with me
     > yet.

     >> ==========

     >> Oops, Jan says it does not matter what a person's religion is but she
     >> identified some Jews here.

     >> Note the twisting Rich has stated things, I have not said.

     >> Poor, pathetic, Rich.

     >> When Jan was asked to identify those who have stated that they were
   Jews
     > she
     >> was silent

     >> There is NOT a group here that have identified themselves as Jewish.

     >> Poor, pathetic, LYING Richard H Jacobson!

     >> Jan determines in her mind who is Jewish

     >> WOW!!!

     >> Jan Drew thinks that Catholics who pray to Saints are being led by
   Satan.

     >> Richard H Jacobson is a despicable sick man, OBSESSED with Jan, he has
   a
     >> PROVEN pattern of BADGERING, of *any* person who ever claimed success
     > using
     >> alternative medicine.  He once stated:

     >> Probably the best way to debunk these claims is to demonstrate that the
     >> person
     >> making the claim is lying.

     >> In any case I will continue to pray to Saint Jude, patron saint of lost

     >> >causes, that something will happen that prevents Jan from posting in
     >> >this
     >> >newsgroup since praying that she will change would take more than a
     >> >miracle.
     >> >Aloha,

     >>  Rich

     >> >Unfortunately my prayers have not yet been answered. However I believe

     >> that there is justice in this world and soon my prayers will be
     >> answered. I am patient.

     >> 2001

     >> >MHA is a discussion group to discuss alternative health modalities. I
     >> >choose to
     >> >discuss the issue of whether Jan Drew actually had mercury poisoning.

     >> Aloha,

     >>  Rich

     >> The pattern of badgering that Richard thinks he has nuked that started
     >> before I ever posted.

     >> http://tinyurl.com/39u2g

     >> http://tinyurl.com/2vxcl

     >> http://tinyurl.com/2nbzc

     >> http://tinyurl.com/3gzhf

     Re:Liar Alert!

     Jan Drew ( 3 times)

     Re: Kevin Trudeau on 20-20

     according to Jan

     Cue Jan

     Jan Drew when

     My pleasure. But how much respect can I give to someone who endlessly
     tries to discuss topics with Jan Drew when she obviously cannot
     discuss anything and then repeats thousands of lines of her abusive
     posts in the process? Sorry, but stupid is as stupid does.

     Jan is just a seriously disturbed insecure angry intolerant woman who
     has absolutely no insight into her behavior and blames everyone under
     the sun for her problems. Cue Jan to call me a liar as she does not
     even know everyone under the sun. Cue Jan to call me a stalker. Cue
     Jan to say that the subject is not Jan.

     Jan Drew realizes

     Jan Drew is

     Jan is

     She is

     her rage

     She may ( 4 times)

     her become

      Is Mark the subject of this thread? I thought NOT Jan!!!

     Re: Pitiful Attempt to Badger

     Susan, Jan flames nearly everyone with whom she disagrees especially
     if they are Jewish. Or had you not noticed?

      She will also flame those who don't attack the people that she does
     not like especially if they are Jewish. Or had you not noticed?

     It is pretty pointless to try to get Jan Drew to change. Or had you
     not noticed?

     Jan is a very bitter and angry woman who harbors great resentments and
     grudges. If you are on her sh.t list be prepared to be harassed. If
     you want to get off her sh.t list you need to do more than just be
     nice to her. You have to join her "bash the gang" bandwagon and tell
     her how she is a wonderful and loving Christian lady who is being
     inappropriately attacked by a gang of lying Jews and atheists.

     Re: More blathering

     Jan Drew (2 times)

      Re: Rich Shewmaker Is So Predictable

     On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 23:31:06 GMT, "LadyLollipop" aka Jan Drew aka
     JanD  aka Jan the hypocrite

I bet you won't get any takers on your bet offer. Are you offering any
odds?? Maybe if you give a million to one you may get a taker or two.

Jan Drew already admitted trying to stalk me. She admitted not only
trying to call what she thought was my business number but someone
else at the same business address. She also said that she asked about
the person she believed to be me. Lord knows what she told the person
she spoke to. Maybe she told them she was being stalked by a Jew Boy.

In any case to top it off Jan Drew lies about the doctor (she believed
to be me) losing his license.

Jan Drew realizes that she has proved that she is a stalker not to
mention a libeler.

I doubt if she wants to add to her stalking resume by admitting that
she e-mailed one of your colleagues.

Jan is obviously smart enough to know that stalking is a crime. This
is probably why she has stopped posting what she believes to be my
business address and phone number. She may be loony but she aint brain
dead.

Aloha,

Rich

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance