Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / November 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cranial Adjustment?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dalyjason@gmail.com - 28 Nov 2005 23:06 GMT
During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
said that through manipulating the bones in the skull he had allowed
non-verbal autistics to speak and greatly improved the condition of
people with Chronic Fatigue Sydrome and other disorders such as ADD, he
talked about a few of these people. He said that misalignments in the
skull caused by head injuries either from the birthing process or from
accidents can contribute to a variety of health problems such as those.
He did mention that this is different from craniosacral therapy which
involves fluids in the brain.

Do any of you have any experience with this type of therapy? Have you
ever been to a chiropractor who practices this kind of treatment? Is
there any other source of information regarding this treatment?

Obviously, I'm very skeptical to let someone manipulate the bones in my
skull, so I would appreciate any information on this.

Thanks!
Mark Probert - 28 Nov 2005 23:18 GMT
> During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
> attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks!

Professional pick pockets distract the mark in various ways. Cranial
manipulation must be a new one.
dalyjason@gmail.com - 29 Nov 2005 00:12 GMT
I've obviously posted in the wrong group!
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 00:31 GMT
> I've obviously posted in the wrong group!

Not at all. You got the best advice you could pay for in usenet.

The fact is that the claim that the bones that comprise the skull can be
manipulated is utterly absurd.

Further, the idea that this can address AD/HD is even more absurd.

You said you were skeptical, so let me direct you to

http://scholar.google.com/

and sucggest that you do a search there. You may find something, but, I
doubt it.
Rich - 29 Nov 2005 02:09 GMT
> I've obviously posted in the wrong group!

So, do you want advice or warm fuzzy support for something you really want
to be true? The truth is that once the sutures fuse, (and a baby's
fontanelles or 'soft spots' close) the cranium is one solid sturdy box, and
even the strongest chiropractor's thumbs are not going to be moving the
bones around. Only the mandible, the hyoid, and, to some extent the nasal
septum are mobile. Moving those is not going to help autism or ADD, nor
would moving any of the bones comprising the cranial vault. "Cranial
Adjustment" is a fraud, designed to extract money from the naive.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

dalyjason@gmail.com - 29 Nov 2005 02:41 GMT
This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.

Here is a link that you may find interesting.
http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf
Happy Dog - 29 Nov 2005 04:17 GMT
> This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
> assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.

In what way have you been insulted?

> Here is a link that you may find interesting.
> http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf

It isn't.  It's a hodgepodge of long-discredited ancient ideas that have
been resurrected to make a worthless "treatment" seem useful.  Ask yourself
this:  If the claims are true, why isn't there any decent research that
confirms them?  Why isn't there any theory that predicts them to be likely
or possible?

moo
JanD - 29 Nov 2005 06:23 GMT
>> This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
>> assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
>
> In what way have you been insulted?

Professional pick pockets distract the mark in various ways. Cranial
manipulation must be a new one.

You got the best advice you could pay for in usenet.

The fact is that the claim that the bones that comprise the skull can be
manipulated is utterly absurd.

Further, the idea that this can address AD/HD is even more absurd.

So, do you want advice or warm fuzzy support for something you really want
to be true? The truth is that once the sutures fuse, (and a baby's
fontanelles or 'soft spots' close) the cranium is one solid sturdy box, and
even the strongest chiropractor's thumbs are not going to be moving the
bones around. Only the mandible, the hyoid, and, to some extent the nasal
septum are mobile. Moving those is not going to help autism or ADD, nor
would moving any of the bones comprising the cranial vault. "Cranial
Adjustment" is a fraud, designed to extract money from the naive.

>> Here is a link that you may find interesting.
>> http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf
>
> It isn't.  It's a hodgepodge of long-discredited

Discredited by whom?

ancient ideas that have
> been resurrected to make a worthless "treatment" seem useful.

WRONG.

Ask yourself
> this:  If the claims are true, why isn't there any decent

ZZzz.

*Substantial* *real* *solid* *convincing* *hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable*
*significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct*  *unreliable*
*decent*

research that
> confirms them?  Why isn't there any theory that predicts them to be likely
> or possible?
>
> moo

http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html
cathyb - 29 Nov 2005 06:36 GMT
> >> This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
> >> assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>  research that
> > confirms them?

Exactly. Jan finally got a clue.

>  Why isn't there any theory that predicts them to be likely
> > or possible?
> >
> > moo

<snip Lollicrap>
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 13:55 GMT
>>>This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
>>>assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Further, the idea that this can address AD/HD is even more absurd.

There are no insults to the poster there. Just facts, which you abhor.

> So, do you want advice or warm fuzzy support for something you really want
> to be true? The truth is that once the sutures fuse, (and a baby's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> would moving any of the bones comprising the cranial vault. "Cranial
> Adjustment" is a fraud, designed to extract money from the naive.

More facts that refute the possibility that the chiropractor is telling
the truth.

>>>Here is a link that you may find interesting.
>>>http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf
>>
>>It isn't.  It's a hodgepodge of long-discredited

> Discredited by whom?

Intelligent people. IOW, not you.

> ancient ideas that have
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>  *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct*  *unreliable*
> *decent*

Yawn...that is not intelligent discussion.

> research that
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html

Chronic Trigeminal Neuralgia is not the same, or even close to, autism
and AD/HD. There is no comparison what-so-ever.
Rich - 29 Nov 2005 19:22 GMT
>>> This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
>>> assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html

"Discredited by whom?
WRONG.
ZZzz."

And your usual list of qualities that you don't find important in research
or science opinion, are the sum total of your own words in this post. There
is no discussion here, no content, no contribution, only disruption. You not
only are incapable of discussion, you can't resist the temptation to disrupt
a discussion when one begins in this newsgroup. I'm all in favor of free
speech, but nothing you post here really qualifies as speech. So, either
sh.t or get off the pot; contribute or go away.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

JanD - 29 Nov 2005 22:19 GMT
http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html

>>>> This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
>>>> assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> WRONG.
> ZZzz."
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 22:23 GMT
> http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html

Jan, that does not add anything to the discussion and is disruptive.

>>>>>This is the first time I have posted here. I was looking for
>>>>>assistance. I was not looking to be insulted.
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>>WRONG.
>>ZZzz."
dalyjason@gmail.com - 29 Nov 2005 00:13 GMT
I've obviously posted in the wrong group!
Raving Loonie - 29 Nov 2005 01:21 GMT
> I've obviously posted in the wrong group!
Sounds Chiropractic to me ????
JanD - 29 Nov 2005 02:49 GMT
> During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
> attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks!

http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html

Cranial and Other Chiropractic Adjustments in the Conservative Treatment of
Chronic Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Case Report
FRANK O. PEDERICK

ABSTRACT: Trigeminal neuralgia, sometimes called tic douloureux, is
characterised by episodes of electric-shock-like pain in areas of the face
where branches of the trigeminal nerve are distributed. Medical treatment
includes pharmaceuticals, analgesics, surgery, radiosurgery, low-powered
lasers, TENS, acupuncture and biofeedback. Manipulative approaches have been
used successfully in a medical centre in China, and reports of successful
treatment with chiropractic techniques have been published. The patient in
this report had a history of right-sided facial pain, diagnosed as
trigeminal neuralgia, over a 6-year period with remissions after dental or
medical treatment and exacerbations, the most recent of 2 months duration.
Prior to cranial and other chiropractic adjustments, the patient had
continuous pain that she rated at 9.5 on the visual analogue scale, and
after 4 consultations over an 11-day period, pain had reduced to 0.5. Spinal
and cranial adjusting potentially affects a wide range of causes of
trigeminal neuralgia and offers a conservative, low-cost, low-technology
initial approach which, if ineffective, will not greatly delay or inhibit
other treatment. Occasional maintenance care may be required in some
instances to reduce occurrences.

INDEX TERMS: MeSH: CHIROPRACTIC; TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA. Other: CRANIAL
ADJUSTING, SPINAL ADJUSTING; CRANIAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; SPINAL
MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; SOFT TISSUE THERAPY.

Chiropr J Aust 2005; 35:9-15

====

http://www.icnr.com/cs/cs_06.html
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 03:14 GMT
>>During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
>>attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> http://www.icnr.com/cs/cs_06.html

Interesting *case report*. I hope it can be repeated for others who
suffer from trigemminal neuralgia.

However, that being said, it does not in any manner support the
chiropractors claim that he can treat AD/HD or autism with cranial
manipulation. the skull is one solid bone. It cannot be moved. The
entire purpose of using helmets is to prevent any injury to the skull.
JanD - 29 Nov 2005 03:52 GMT
>>>During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
>>>attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> manipulation. the skull is one solid bone. It cannot be moved. The entire
> purpose of using helmets is to prevent any injury to the skull.

http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 13:58 GMT
>>>>During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
>>>>attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
>
> http://www.turnerwellness.com/media/cranial-adjusting-mike.pdf

Yes, Dr. Turner, whom I suspect is the chiropractor referred to by the
OP, is promoting this. However, he offers NO PROOF that it works. None.
Zero. Not even a decent anecdote.
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 14:00 GMT
>>>>> During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention
>>>>> center), I
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
> OP, is promoting this. However, he offers NO PROOF that it works. None.
> Zero. Not even a decent anecdote.

Darn...hit that send button too soon...

Yes, it is Turner who was the chiropractor that the OP referred to:

TURNER WELLNESS     Barrie ON     *143
Chiropractic Cranial Adjustment

http://www.wholelifeexpo.ca/expo2005/exhibit.html

Turner is an "exhibitor" and did not present any form of research that
is referenced on that website.
JohnDoe - 29 Nov 2005 07:56 GMT
> During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
> attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks!

Cranial adjustment is a fraud. Period. The bones in the skull are
solidly fused and can't be moved. And concerning the cases he mentioned,
if he can show any of them to real I think he'd be eligible for the
Nobel Prize in medicine. Since this stuff has been around for a while,
don't you find it interesting no chiropractor has won the Nobel Prize yet?
JanD - 29 Nov 2005 15:27 GMT
http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html

>> During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
>> attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> medicine. Since this stuff has been around for a while, don't you find it
> interesting no chiropractor has won the Nobel Prize yet?
Rich - 29 Nov 2005 19:46 GMT
> http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html

There is nothing at this link that supports "cranial adjustment" except a
case history report that is undocumented and not really convincing at all.
To show that "cranial adjustment" "works," it would first be necessary to
prove that bones in the skull can be "adjusted" at all. This case history is
the equivalent of claiming that one has cured his patient of diabetes by
levitating him four feet off the floor for five hours. Levitation just might
have a curative effect on diabetics, but first the practitioner must prove
that he can do the levitation in the first place.

It takes a great amount of force to move the bones of the skull. These bones
are so solidly fused in adults that skull fractures usually do not even
follow the margins of the individual bones but behave as though the skull
were one solid bone. When enough force is applied to the skull to actually
move bone, that is a skull fracture, and this usually results in concussion
syndrome and often even permanent brain injury. That isn't something you
want to try as a cure for facial tics.

What is probably really happening is that Turner, et.al., are pressing
around on the scalp with enough force to cause discomfort in the patient,
which is convincing enough to make him believe that cranial bones have been
moved. To do this to children is clearly abuse, and to do it to autistic
children against their revulsion at being touched by others is particularly
heinous abuse deserving of prosecution and imprisonment.

If you are going to proclaim that skeptical refutations of "cranial
adjustment" are "WRONG," Jan, at least explain what exactly is 'wrong' about
the skeptics' comments. Participate in the discussion. Don't just disrupt.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

JanD - 29 Nov 2005 22:16 GMT
http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html

>> http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html
Mark Probert - 29 Nov 2005 22:24 GMT
> http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html

Jan, that is not a way to encourage discussion. It is disruptive.

>>>http://www.chiropractors.asn.au/cjournal/vol35/cjamarch05.html

Here is what you snipped. Please try to post something substantive.

There is nothing at this link that supports "cranial adjustment" except a
case history report that is undocumented and not really convincing at all.
To show that "cranial adjustment" "works," it would first be necessary to
prove that bones in the skull can be "adjusted" at all. This case
history is
the equivalent of claiming that one has cured his patient of diabetes by
levitating him four feet off the floor for five hours. Levitation just
might
have a curative effect on diabetics, but first the practitioner must prove
that he can do the levitation in the first place.

It takes a great amount of force to move the bones of the skull. These
bones
are so solidly fused in adults that skull fractures usually do not even
follow the margins of the individual bones but behave as though the skull
were one solid bone. When enough force is applied to the skull to actually
move bone, that is a skull fracture, and this usually results in concussion
syndrome and often even permanent brain injury. That isn't something you
want to try as a cure for facial tics.

What is probably really happening is that Turner, et.al., are pressing
around on the scalp with enough force to cause discomfort in the patient,
which is convincing enough to make him believe that cranial bones have been
moved. To do this to children is clearly abuse, and to do it to autistic
children against their revulsion at being touched by others is particularly
heinous abuse deserving of prosecution and imprisonment.

If you are going to proclaim that skeptical refutations of "cranial
adjustment" are "WRONG," Jan, at least explain what exactly is 'wrong'
about
the skeptics' comments. Participate in the discussion. Don't just disrupt.
-- --Rich Recommended websites: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles 
http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ 
http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/
guptaguy44@yahoo.ca - 30 Nov 2005 05:45 GMT
Why don't you mention the name of the chiropractor?

http://www.turnerwellness.com/roger_CV.htm

The Whole Life Expo is Canada's number one playground for quacks.

I had my head adjusted a few years ago by Turner and have the pictures
to prove it. My guess is that I need an overhaul somewhere between my
occiput and right parietal bone.
I am really sorry about missing the show again this year.

For an overview of the problem with this fellow I found this for your
pleasure:

http://www.chirowatch.com/cw-ontario-chiros.html#rogerturner

http://www.chirowatch.com/chiro-practices/Chiro-Ontario/Turner-Roger/cco2002disc
ipline.html


Were his sons with him this year? They want to be chiropractors so I
was told by one of them.

> During Whole Life Expo 2005 (at the metro toronto convention center), I
> attended a lecture called "Cranial Misalignments". The chiropractor
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks!
Mark Probert - 30 Nov 2005 14:11 GMT
> Why don't you mention the name of the chiropractor?

Turner seems to be the only one pushing cranial adjustment, unless you
count Jan Drew.

> http://www.turnerwellness.com/roger_CV.htm
>
> The Whole Life Expo is Canada's number one playground for quacks.

From reading their website, I know I could not get a decent hamburger
at this event.

> I had my head adjusted a few years ago by Turner and have the pictures
> to prove it. My guess is that I need an overhaul somewhere between my
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>>
>>Thanks!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.