> LadyLollipop wrote:
>> "Mark Probert" <mark.probert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
>> news:hUlXe.8104$IC3.2650@fe12.lga...
>>
>>>LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>
>>>>YES, Rich *roganized medicine*, NOT "*organized medicine*"  has given
>>>>them freely to millions of kids
>>>> even though they don't know if they are safe.
>>>
>>>This is such a non-specific claim that it reminds me of the one you made
>>>that doctors were prescribing without a diagnosis.
>>
>> No need to take off in yet another direction, Mark. That was discussed
>> and
>> you were the loser as usual.
>
> Bull. In you imagination. You never proved your claim. You couldn't, and
> what I, and others, found, disproved your claim.

>> I disagree it is a non-specific claim.
>
> That is a lie.

>>>Of course, that was totally refuted, but, as usual, you did not admit you
>>>made it up.
>>
>> I did not make it up, and it was not totally refuted, just the opposite.
>
> Nope. You claim was totally refuted, and, since you were the one making
> a false claim, you made it up.

>> You are not only a liar, you have a short memory as well as too lazy to
>> look
>> anything up.
>
> My memory on this issue is crystal clear, and, you were unable to prove
> your claim.

>> Ideally diagnosis of a child would involve a visit with the child,
>> reports
>> on his schoolwork,
>> examination of his home life, and discussions with parents and
>> teachers to develop a profile of the child and his situation.
>>
>> <snip more twisting>