Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Republican-Watching, October 2000

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kathleen - 18 Sep 2005 20:43 GMT
(By the way, the grotesque posts to the Lyme newsgroup
are by Chuck P Adams who is a friend of Edward
McSweegan and not me.)

==============================
Perhaps you will find this ***Oct 2000*** post
interesting:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_frm/thread/6940a8d9e
0024621/8591b95e0ece47f7?q=Bush%2FGore+re+ENERGY&rnum=1&hl=en#8591b95e0ece47f7


From: Kathleen <kathleen.dick...@snet.net>
Subject: Re: Bush/Gore, agenda, Bush/Gore re ENERGY,
and all related threads
Date: 2000/10/13
Message-ID: <39E6E8DA.3064@snet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 680949434
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <39E5B20E.5419@snet.net>
<20001012091550.10712.00000001@nso-cs.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@snet.net
X-Trace: typhoon.snet.net 971434175 204.60.28.204
(Fri, 13 Oct 2000 06:49:35 EDT)
Organization: SeCT Lyme Support Group
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: kathleen.dick...@snet.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 06:49:35 EDT
Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme

Well, no Kathleen, it *is* your political view and it
really doesn't
belong
> here. Not because I disagree with you, but because
telling people things like
> "You vote for Bush, you vote for continued Islamic
terrorism" has zero to do
> with Lyme disease.
>
> Give us a break.
>
> Brian

I shall make it simple.  If we stay with
oil as a primary means of energy, and do
not aggressively invest in energy alternatives,
we will have another recession and postpone
the inevitable: investing in alternative
forms of energy.  Postponing it now while
times are good for us economically will make
it all the harder.

A recession means everything, including
healthcare, will become even more expensive
and less accessible.

Our economy must move away from oil
as a means of energy and we can thereby
cease to support Arab terrorism.

This has to do with Bush, because he owns
an oil company and has personal financial
interest in keeping that industry alive,
which he will bring to White House energy policy.

Clear?  We get Bush, we get more oil and
lack of investment in energy alternatives,
more terrorism, more pollution, a recession...

We get Gore, we get an investment in energy
independence.  They will be somewhat tough
economic times, but that's exactly the
nature of "investment":  put off spending
what you have today so you will have even more
tomorrow.

Nobody can argue with that.

Kathleen

Google Home - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs,
Press, & Help

========

This simply proves my points all along, that
Republicans are morons, because everything that
happened to this country under Bush was entirely
predictable.  War, Oil, Terrorism, and the Economy in
the toilet.  
Duh.
Kathleen
dali - 18 Sep 2005 23:36 GMT
>This simply proves my points all along, that
>Republicans are morons, because everything that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Duh.
>Kathleen

Hard to argue with that.
I've been for a dollar tax on oil for the last ? years. If that had
been in effect gas conservation would have started years ago and we
would have some wiggle room if prices get out of control.
Yep, that would have been a very hard sell to the public.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.