"Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:KXMVe.6559$Gh.4073@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:ArMVe.107489$084.75527@attbi_s22...
>>
>> "Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:CNLVe.6541$Gh.5473@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>
>>> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>> news:L9KVe.348160$xm3.224958@attbi_s21...
>>>>
>>>> "Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:M3IVe.6494$Gh.2414@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:pxFVe.326700$x96.193620@attbi_s72...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:UCEVe.6479$Gh.5397@tornado.socal.rr.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip lie>
>
> Snipping it and calling it a lie will not take away the FACT that you are
> a
> PROVEN liar and thief. The evidence is there for all to see.
YOU are the PROVEN LIAR, you LIE every time you post the PROVEN LYING
websites.
You lie REPEATEDLY saying they are not proven to be lying, when they CLEARLY
have been
As for the thief, not even:
pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
Never happened.
present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing
source
Never happened.
<snip>
I don't need to say a thing, as the proven *cyberstalker* will prove it
himself by replying to this post.
Rich.@. - 14 Sep 2005 05:24 GMT
>When starting a new thread don't just reply to a message sent by someone
>else and clear the subject line. Not all e-mail and news clients behave like
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Message" function. This will start a fresh thread of your own without any
>traces of previous threads.
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 14 Sep 2005 05:25 GMT
>>Jan wrote:
>>Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title and
>>insults.
>>
>>Proving once again:
>>
>>Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
LadyLollipop - 14 Sep 2005 05:56 GMT
>>>>>> <snip lie>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> I don't need to say a thing, as the proven *cyberstalker* will prove it
> himself by replying to this post.
Make that. twice, it's gets worse everyday!!!
Rich.@. - 14 Sep 2005 06:06 GMT
>> I don't need to say a thing, as the proven *cyberstalker* will prove it
>> himself by replying to this post.
>
>Make that. twice, it's gets worse everyday!!!
Let's see. My replies consisted entirely of Jan's OWN WORDS!
Jan is foaming at the mouth as I post her own words to show she is a
hypocrite and a liar.
Jan accuses others of being liars when she lies repeatedly.
Jan accuses others of stalking when she is guilty of this very
behavior by her own words.
Jan accuses others of hypocrisy when she repeatedly accuses others of
exactly what she is guilty of.
Jan cannot stop me from exposing her lies, hypocrisy and bigotry even
though she has tried by complaining to my ISP and stalking me.
When Jan DRew lies I will use her own words to prove it.
The subject of this thread is Re: The Proven REPEATED LIAR + HARASSER
And before Jan Drew says "the thread is not about Jan" I say it is
completely about Jan.
Aloha,
Rich
Aloha,
Rich
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
Lurker - 14 Sep 2005 22:21 GMT
Why do you go on and on year after year with this Jan? Why don't
you just killfile and ignore people you believe are liars?
You're making yourself look like a kook and you're driving
people off this NG.
>>>>> <snip lie>
>
> Snipping it and calling it a lie will not take away the FACT that you are
> a
> PROVEN liar and thief. The evidence is there for all to see.
YOU are the PROVEN LIAR, you LIE every time you post the PROVEN
LYING
websites.
You lie REPEATEDLY saying they are not proven to be lying, when
they CLEARLY
have been
As for the thief, not even:
pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
Never happened.
present as new and original an idea or product derived from an
existing
source
Never happened.
> --
>
> --Rich
<snip>
I don't need to say a thing, as the proven *cyberstalker* will
prove it
himself by replying to this post.