Richard H Jacobson can NOT STOP LYING & Cyberstalking

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

LadyLollipop - 09 Sep 2005 10:04 GMT

He wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 16, 2:50 am).

(Too bad, I am keeping it as just one more to prove you are an ABSOLUTELY
LIAR)

>I have posted NO personal information EVER

*This is a whopper of a lie. Jan has posted a number of what she
believes to be the names, business addresses and telephone numbers of
a number of posters here*.

Richard H Jacobson has NOW added the words *business addresses*

*Names, business addresses and telephone numbers are personal
information. Note that I did not say PRIVATE information. I said
PERSONAL (relating to a person)*

Note, Richard H Jacobson has NOW added the words *business addresses*

Note, Richard H Jacobson is a L I A R!!!!!

He thinks by removing his posts, that can not be archived, however he still
forgets they are in other people's post and YES indeed he did say *private*

Here is the proof:

Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
From: Vashti <vashti...@gmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:59:38 +0200
Local: Tues, Jul 19 2005 6:59 am
Subject: Re: When is stalking not stalking? (was Re: God Bless Dr
Breggin)
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | View Thread | Show original |
Report Abuse

It wasn't a dark and stormy night when Rich.@. wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:34:05 +0200, Vashti <vashti...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

[snip]

> >[stalking snipped]

> >Yup, that's stalking. Trying to post identifying offline info to
> >Usenet.

> It is *much* worse than that. Jan Drew actually *posted* that she
> tried to call what she thought was my phone number and failing to
> reach me she said that she called others who might know me
> (because they had addresses close to where she thought I was).

Now that is pretty abusive behaviour, especially coming from someone
claiming to be a Christian. I've read the Bible and can't recall
any passage admonishing believers to "Seek out thine enemies and the
neighbours of thine enemies"(may have missed it though) but I'm
certain there's nothing in there like "Stalk those who expose thine
lies for what they are and make known to all where any who
would resemble them in name or be their neighbours reside".

> Jan Drew is a very disturbed individual. She should be a
> cautionary tale to anyone thinking about posting their real names
> on usenet. Jan Drew is extremely angry because I completely
> debunked her bogus amalgam mercury poisoning claim. Not only did I
> debunk it but I proved with Jan's own words that she deliberately
> changed her history to make her claim more believable. And now she
> is desperately trying to find out personal information so that she
> could harass me in my personal life. A big part of it has to do
> with Jan believing Mark P and I are Jewish. She is a despicable
> anti-semite who agreed with poster Debbee Adams that Hitler was
> right in what he did to the Jews.

Yup, next stop would be the old "Wir haben es nicht gewußt". :/

[snip]

> Whenever Jan DRew posts private personal information, anyone who
> responds should make sure that they remove the information from
> their reply. Anyone who does not is just as bad as the person
> posting it originally. If you are not part of the solution you are
> part of the problem.

Yup, I agree... that she posted someone's info is wrong. It should
not be repeated.

Vashti

Reply to this Message

Mark Probert - 09 Sep 2005 16:07 GMT

> He wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (Too bad, I am keeping it as just one more to prove you are an ABSOLUTELY
> LIAR)

That is incorrect. Rich did not write the words you claim he did. Those
words are automatically inserted by Google, when the x:no thingy is used.

Your friend and supporter, Atlas the Chiroquacker used to do this all
the time and you remained silent.

I guess you were just being *Selective*.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 09 Sep 2005 20:36 GMT

>> He wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> That is incorrect. Rich did not write the words you claim he did. Those
> words are automatically inserted by Google, when the x:no thingy is used.

I am sorry, he IS the one who did the thingy!

> Your friend and supporter, Atlas the Chiroquacker used to do this all the
> time and you remained silent.

Look who is talking about remaining silent.

> I guess you were just being *Selective*.

Look who is talking about being *selective*

The one and ONLY who helped Coleah post a reverse telephone directory
posting the names, addresses, and phone numbers of *****72******INNOCENT
people, who you and she falsely thought were my neighbors.

You are DESPICABLE, Mark Probert!

Cue Richard H Jacobson to Cue Jan

He wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 16, 2:50 am).

(Too bad, I am keeping it as just one more to prove you are an ABSOLUTELY
LIAR)

>I have posted NO personal information EVER

*This is a whopper of a lie. Jan has posted a number of what she
believes to be the names, business addresses and telephone numbers of
a number of posters here*.

Richard H Jacobson has NOW added the words *business addresses*

*Names, business addresses and telephone numbers are personal
information. Note that I did not say PRIVATE information. I said
PERSONAL (relating to a person)*

Note, Richard H Jacobson has NOW added the words *business addresses*

Note, Richard H Jacobson is a L I A R!!!!!

He thinks by removing his posts, that can not be archived, however he still
forgets they are in other people's post and YES indeed, he did say *private*

Here is the proof:

Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
From: Vashti <vashti...@gmail.com> - Find messages by this author
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:59:38 +0200
Local: Tues, Jul 19 2005 6:59 am
Subject: Re: When is stalking not stalking? (was Re: God Bless Dr
Breggin)
Reply to Author | Forward | Print | View Thread | Show original |
Report Abuse

It wasn't a dark and stormy night when Rich.@. wrote:

[snip]

> >[stalking snipped] Yup, that's stalking. Trying to post identifying
> >offline info to Usenet.
> It is *much* worse than that. Jan Drew actually *posted* that she tried
> to call what she thought was my phone number and failing to reach me she
> said that she called others who might know me (because they had addresses
> close to where she thought I was).

> Jan Drew is a very disturbed individual. She should be a cautionary tale
> to anyone thinking about posting their real names on usenet. Jan Drew is
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> despicable anti-semite who agreed with poster Debbee Adams that Hitler was
> right in what he did to the Jews.

Yup, next stop would be the old "Wir haben es nicht gewußt". :/

[snip]

> Whenever Jan DRew posts private personal information, anyone who responds
> should make sure that they remove the information from their reply. Anyone
> who does not is just as bad as the person posting it originally. If you
> are not part of the solution you are part of the problem.

Yup, I agree... that she posted someone's info is wrong. It should
not be repeated.

Vashti

Reply to this Message

Mark Probert - 09 Sep 2005 22:57 GMT

>>>He wrote:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I am sorry, he IS the one who did the thingy!

True, you are sorry. However, he did not write it. He did include the
x:no thing.

>>Your friend and supporter, Atlas the Chiroquacker used to do this all the
>>time and you remained silent.
>
> Look who is talking about remaining silent.

I was pointing out your hypocrisy. You whine about Rich doing exactly
what a camp-mate of yours does. That is called being a

H Y P O C R I T E.

>>I guess you were just being *Selective*.
>
> Look who is talking about being *selective*

I am not selective. I am discriminating. There is a difference.

> The one and ONLY who helped Coleah post a reverse telephone directory
> posting the names, addresses, and phone numbers of *****72******INNOCENT
> people, who you and she falsely thought were my neighbors.

You are a liar. I never did that.

> You are DESPICABLE, Mark Probert!

More lies.

Jan Drew's (Satan's Mistress) stalking removed.

Reply to this Message

LadyLollipop - 10 Sep 2005 00:47 GMT

>>>>He wrote:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> H Y P O C R I T E.

Look who is talking about being a hypocrite.

Look who is talking about whining.

>>>I guess you were just being *Selective*.
>>
>> Look who is talking about being *selective*
>
> I am not selective. I am discriminating. There is a difference.

Thanks for showing you are a *bigot*

>> The one and ONLY who helped Coleah post a reverse telephone directory
>> posting the names, addresses, and phone numbers of *****72******INNOCENT
>> people, who you and she falsely thought were my neighbors.
>
> You are a liar. I never did that.

W R O N G!!!!!!!!! What's more, you remained *silent*

You are lying and you very well know it. In fact you mentioned *Longview*
numerous times and it BEFORE Coleah did her search.

M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 22, 2004

Bloomington, and, if you take the *Longview*, you will see it.

Coleah May 23 2004, 10:27 am

You mean:

Longview Mobile Park
2215 W 3rd St
Bloomington, IN
(812) 332-8221

You are both so incredibly dumb, you actually thought I lived in a trailer
park

It was YOU who mentioned *Longview* F I RS T*

You are a PROVERN LIAR ONCE A G A I N!!!!!!!!!

>> You are DESPICABLE, Mark Probert!
>
> More lies.

The ABSOLUTE TRUTH.

************72************INNOCENT people had their names, addresses, and
phones numbers posted and YOU helped do it!!!!

> Jan Drew's (Satan's Mistress) stalking removed.

An EXCELLENT excellent example of the LIES that come form the mouth of Mark
Probert.

The below shows Richard H Jacobson is a L I A R.

He wrote:

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 16, 2:50 am).

(Too bad, I am keeping it as just one more to prove you are an ABSOLUTELY
LIAR)

>I have posted NO personal information EVER

Yup, next stop would be the old "Wir haben es nicht gewußt". :/

[snip]

Yup, I agree... that she posted someone's info is wrong. It should
not be repeated.

Vashti

Cue Rich to Cue Jan

Reply to this Message

Mark Probert - 10 Sep 2005 23:16 GMT

>>>>>He wrote:
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Thanks for showing you are a *bigot*

Are you really that stupid?

dis·crim·i·nat·ing (d-skrm-ntng) KEY

ADJECTIVE:

1. a. Able to recognize or draw fine distinctions; perceptive.
b. Showing careful judgment or fine taste: a discriminating
collector of rare books; a dish for the discriminating palate.

2. Separating into distinct parts or components; analytical.

3. Serving to distinguish; distinctive: a discriminating characteristic.

4. Marked by or showing bias; discriminatory.

Clearly, I fit definitions 1, 2, and 3, and you fit only 4.

>>>The one and ONLY who helped Coleah post a reverse telephone directory
>>>posting the names, addresses, and phone numbers of *****72******INNOCENT
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> W R O N G!!!!!!!!! What's more, you remained *silent*

WRONG. I never helped do that, and when I saw it, I posted that it was
wrong.

> You are lying and you very well know it. In fact you mentioned *Longview*
> numerous times and it BEFORE Coleah did her search.

Yes, I did mention Longview, because YOU were posting the address and
phone number of someone you thought was a participant here. YOUR purpose
was to stalk and intimidate.

> M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 22, 2004
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> It was YOU who mentioned *Longview* F I RS T*

So what? You can be easily found on the internet by using one of several
search engines.

> You are a PROVERN LIAR ONCE A G A I N!!!!!!!!!

No, you are still a proven bigot who cannot read for comprehension.

>>>You are DESPICABLE, Mark Probert!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
>
> Cue Rich to Cue Jan

Reply to this Message