Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cleaning chemicals 'reach baby'

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roman Bystrianyk - 08 Sep 2005 02:31 GMT
"Cleaning chemicals 'reach baby'", BBC News, September 7, 2005,
Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4223984.stm

Chemicals found in perfumes and cleaning products can cross the
placenta and reach the baby in the womb, research shows.

Tests of umbilical cord blood shows many chemicals, ranging from those
used to make plastics and artificial musks, are present.

WWF-UK and Greenpeace who produced the report want to see regulations
to ban such substances in every day products.

But health experts said pregnant women should not be alarmed by the
findings.

Crossing the placenta

They said there was no clear evidence that the chemicals were causing
damage to unborn children.

For the report, tests were carried out on blood samples from the
umbilical cords of 27 newborn babies and 42 new mothers.

The samples were tested for eight groups of chemicals, including those
found in cleaning products and non-stick and waterproof coatings.

All of the samples tested positive for at least some of the 35
chemicals tested.

Some of the umbilical cord blood samples contained as many as 14, and
two of the mothers tested positive for 17 of the chemicals.

The researchers said they were concerned by their findings.

Helen Perivier, Toxics Campaigner for Greenpeace International said:
"It is shocking that such chemicals are in the human body at any stage
of our life, let alone at the very start, when the child is most
vulnerable."

Andrew Lee of WWF-UK said: "These chemicals should not be in products,
let alone in developing babies."

Safety laws

The European Union is currently revising its chemicals policy.

Mr Lee said it was vital for the health of future generations that this
legislation was effective and called for a wider ban on potentially
toxic chemicals.

WWF said "safer alternatives" existed and should be substituted.

Professor Andrew Shennan, consultant obstetrician and a spokesman for
Tommy's - the baby charity - said: "It's not that surprising that we
find in the blood things that are in the environment.

"Mother and baby communicate directly, although the placenta does
filter out some toxic substances.

"Without knowing that the substances are in some way harmful, it is
difficult to gauge the potential seriousness of this finding."

He said the baby was able to deal with toxic substances in a similar
way to adults.

However if they were exposed to something very harmful before birth and
onwards, that might be damaging.

But he added: "It's not something to be alarmed about. These substances
have probably been around for years and years.

"We are designed to live in hostile environments."
mcmahan@cup.hp.com - 09 Sep 2005 18:52 GMT
Be this as it may, another recent study showed that children picked
up more environmental toxins by eating foods grown with conventional
pesticides (as opposed to eating certified organic produce) than
they picked up by cleaning agents in their environment.

Larry
cathyb - 10 Sep 2005 14:13 GMT
> "Cleaning chemicals 'reach baby'", BBC News, September 7, 2005,
> Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4223984.stm
>
> Chemicals found in perfumes and cleaning products can cross the
> placenta and reach the baby in the womb, research shows.

Christ. Thank god I never clean anything. Finally, an excuse.

> Tests of umbilical cord blood shows many chemicals, ranging from those
> used to make plastics and artificial musks, are present.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> They said there was no clear evidence that the chemicals were causing
> damage to unborn children.

Oh. Does that mean I have to start cleaning?:(

> For the report, tests were carried out on blood samples from the
> umbilical cords of 27 newborn babies and 42 new mothers.
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> "We are designed to live in hostile environments."
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.