Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids tied to ADHD

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
C.Health - 04 Sep 2005 08:29 GMT
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/9606.Burgess.html

This is old news, but I wonder why omega-3 fatty acids aren't used more
often with ADHD children. The modern diet is very low in omega-3 compared to
a more primitive diet. Even grass fed beef has a much higher level of
omega-3 fats than grain fed beef. US children also get too much trans fats
from all of the junk foods, and we know the dangers of these fats all to
well.

Deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids tied to ADHD in boys  (June 1996 )

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. -- Purdue University researchers have found that boys
with low blood levels of essential omega-3 fatty acids, have a greater
tendency to have problems with behavior, learning and health consistent with
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or (ADHD).

Some previous studies by other researchers have indicated that symptoms
associated with a deficiency in fatty acids are exhibited to a greater
extent in children with ADHD. Those symptoms include thirst, frequent
urination and dry skin and hair. The Purdue researchers, however, were able
to pinpoint omega-3s as the fatty acids that may be associated with the
unique behavior problems in children with ADHD.

"There are two types of fatty acids that must be obtained from the foods we
eat because the body cannot synthesize them," says John R. Burgess,
assistant professor of foods and nutrition. "Omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids
are both essential to the body. However, evidence is accumulating that a
deficiency of omega-3 fatty acids may be tied to behavior problems, learning
and health problems."

ADHD is the most common behavioral disorder in children, affecting between 3
percent and 5 percent of school-age youngsters. It's diagnosed more often in
boys than girls. The cause of ADHD is unknown, but research suggests many
factors may contribute to it, including biological and environmental
elements.

Stimulant drugs such as Ritalin often are used to calm children with ADHD
and are effective about 75 percent of the time. "With our research we are
trying to find potential causes of ADHD so that nutritional treatments can
be developed for some children with ADHD," Burgess says.

For this study, the researchers compared the fatty-acid levels in the blood
of 96 boys, ages 6 to 12. Fifty-three of the boys had previously been
identified as having ADHD, and 43 did not. Teachers and parents also were
asked to rate the subjects on a scale used to assess childhood behavior
problems. The parents also filled out a health questionnaire for possible
symptoms associated with essential fatty acid deficiencies.

Approximately 40 percent of the boys with ADHD had a greater frequency of
symptoms indicative of essential fatty-acid deficiency, as reported by their
parents. Nine percent of the boys without ADHD had similar symptoms.

Burgess says boys with lower levels of omega-3 fatty acids scored higher in
the frequency of many behavioral problems. Children with lower omega-6
levels reported significantly more colds and health-related problems than
those with higher levels, but they did not exhibit more behavioral problems.

Omega-3 fatty acids are found in fish and other seafood. Burgess says there
are also small amounts of omega-3s in some polyunsaturated oils. Omega-3
fatty acids are essential to the proper functioning of the central nervous
system. He says the body doesn't need a great quantity of omega-3 fatty
acids, and he speculates that in children who have low blood levels of
omega-3s, their metabolism may be unable to adequately process the little
bit that they need from the foods they eat.

"While all children with ADHD are not deficient in omega-3 fatty acids, we
believe that this may be important for at least a subset of ADHD children,"
Burgess says. "However, at this point we don't know what the relationship is
between omega-3 fatty acids and ADHD."

The study appeared in the April/May edition of the journal Physiology &
Behavior.

Source: John Burgess, (765) 494-8239; Internet: john.r.burgess.1@purdue.edu
Writer: Beth Forbes, (765) 494-9723; Internet: beth_forbes@uns.purdue.edu
Purdue News Service: (765) 494-2096; e-mail, purduenews@uns.purdue.edu

NOTE TO JOURNALISTS: A copy of the study in Physiology and Behavior and a
color photo of a young boy holding up a fish are available from Purdue News
Service, (765) 494-2096. Ask for the photo called Omega-3/Burgess.
montygram - 04 Sep 2005 21:46 GMT
It's not an omega 3 deficiency issue, it's an arachidonic acid overdose
issue.  The omega 3s interfere with omega 6s, such as linoleic, being
metabolized into arachidonic acid.  Other fatty acids also have this
effect.  It is not only omega 3s that do this.  The problem is that
omega 3s are more susceptible to free radical degradation than any
other fatty acids, so while you may be interfering with omega 6
metabolization, you are giving yourself a nasty dose of free radical
damage.  Instead, if you just cut the omega 6s out of your diet, you
will no longer have the arachidonic acid problem, and then the
"disease" is gone.  There is a vast scientific literature documenting
how dangerous fish oil can be.  Here are some less technical examples:

""...addition of cod liver oil to to the diet elevated the rate of
peroxidation [free radical activity] by 20-fold."

And that was on top of the 10-fold increase over rats on the fat free
diet (when corn oil was added.

Source: from the text of the following:

Free Radic Biol Med. 1988;5(2):95-111.

A role for dietary lipids and antioxidants in the activation of
carcinogens.

Gower JD.

Division of Comparative Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Harrow,
Middlesex, U.K.

The ways in which dietary polyunsaturated fats and antioxidants affect
the balance between activation and detoxification of environmental
precarcinogens is discussed, with particular reference to the
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon benzo(a)pyrene. The structure and
composition of membranes and their susceptibility to peroxidation is
dependent on the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content of the cell
and its antioxidant status, both of which are determined to a large
degree by dietary intake of these compounds. An increase in the PUFA
content of membranes stimulates the oxidation of precarcinogens to
reactive intermediates by affecting the configuration and induction of
membrane-bound enzymes (e.g., the mixed-function oxidase system and
epoxide hydratase); providing increased availability of substrates
(hydroperoxides) for peroxidases that cooxidise carcinogens (e.g.,
prostaglandin synthetase and P-450 peroxidase); and increasing the
likelihood of direct activation reactions between peroxyl radicals and
precarcinogens. Antioxidants, on the other hand, protect against lipid
peroxidation, scavenge oxygen-derived free radicals and reactive
carcinogenic species. In addition some synthetic antioxidants exert
specific effects on enzymes, which results in increased detoxification
and reduced rates of activation. The balance between dietary
polyunsaturated fats, antioxidants and the initiation of carcinogenesis

is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis
and the epidemiology of human cancer.

Biochemist Ray Peat has cited much older studies, such as how dogs fed
fish oil all died of cancer:

"Fifty years ago, it was found that a large amount of cod liver oil in
dogs' diet increased their death rate from cancer by 20 times, from the

usual 5% to 100%.  A diet rich in fish oil causes intense production of

toxic lipid peroxides, and has been observed to reduce a man's sperm
count to zero.  [H. Sinclair, Prog. Lipid Res. 25, 667, 1989.]"

Source: http://www.healthythyroid.com/vegetableoils.htm"

This is basic science.  Unfortunately, many doctors and scientists
either don't know it, or are not up to date.  You can wait around for
them to get up to date, or you can damage your body.  As Dr. Richard
Stein, spokesman for the AHA, said recently, it's only the oxidized
cholesterol that is the problem.  Fish oil will oxidize the cholesterol
in your body, unless you consume massive amounts of the right
antioxidants, and nobody is sure about exactly which ones and what
amounts are needed (and it will vary from one person to another).  Play
it safe - just stay away from highly unsaturated oils and oxidized
cholesterol (steamed salmon is especially bad).
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 04 Sep 2005 23:19 GMT
> is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis
> and the epidemiology of human cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> usual 5% to 100%.

COMMENT:

Cod liver oil, which has toxic amounts of vitamin A if used as a major
dietary component, cannot be compared with fish (body) oil.

>  A diet rich in fish oil causes intense production of
> toxic lipid peroxides, and has been observed to reduce a man's sperm
> count to zero.  [H. Sinclair, Prog. Lipid Res. 25, 667, 1989.]"

COMMENT:

No such paper exists on medline. Would you like to provide the full
citation?

The idea is dunderheaded, anyway. If diets rich in fish oils reduced
men's sperm counts to zero, there would be no Eskimos to be transported
here and there in the North, by their cancerous sled dogs.

Give us a break.  I've posted a dozen papers showing omega-3
supplementation makes oxidative damage drop, in vivo. The only papers
where it climbs are artificial ones where they mince the tissue, expose
it to oxygen, and let the normal protective antioxidant systems die.
But inside your body, it doesn't happen that way.

SBH
C.Health - 05 Sep 2005 01:28 GMT
> > is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis
> > and the epidemiology of human cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> SBH

Considering your background, why do you think that it is not regularly used
as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical studies showing its
efficaciousness?
Mark Probert - 05 Sep 2005 17:30 GMT
>>>is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis
>>>and the epidemiology of human cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical studies showing its
> efficaciousness?

It is only recently that this was applied to ADHD, and the original
marketing was by people who found a study showing some effect, and then
went directly to market without further proof, dosage, etc.

Additionally, it does not eliminate the need for medications, and I do
not give a crap what the sales sites say. Some of the families in my
support group are using it for after medication times (eveinings and
weekends) and would not use it instead of medication.
Mr-Natural-Health - 05 Sep 2005 21:40 GMT
> Some of the families in my [ADHD] support group are
> using it for after medication times (eveinings and
> weekends) and would not use it instead of medication.

You have my condolences.
Mark Probert - 07 Sep 2005 15:16 GMT
>>Some of the families in my [ADHD] support group are
>>using it for after medication times (eveinings and
>>weekends) and would not use it instead of medication.
>
> You have my condolences.

Did you have a point?
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 06 Sep 2005 03:44 GMT
> Considering your background, why do you think that [fish oil] is not
> regularly used as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical
> studies showing its efficaciousness?

COMMENT:

All the usual reasons. No profit in it. Bigger pills, harder to
swallow.

Fish oil, contain as it does the main fatty acid of the brain, DHA, has
a calming and salutory effect on the brain, increasing serotonin and
decreasing irritability if the person hasn't been getting optimal ALA
or DHA in the diet. If I were top shrink, DHA it would be the base of
all treatment of all mental illnesses, along with a good stiff megadose
vitamin.

The problem with nutrition and mental illness, is that experimentally
induced shortage in human volunteers of many vitamins (and probably w-3
too) produces either 1) lethargy, 2) irritablity, or 3) depression. And
those are all so common in psychiatry (as are very bad diets), that how
in the world can you be sure you're not seeing some effect of bad diet
unless you correct it, THEN see what mental illnesses are left?

Back in the bad old days, ship Captains knew that when the crew fights
began to break out about 2 months into the voyage, scurvy was next.

Anyway, medicine will eventually come around. Neither the
orthomolecular people or the standard shrinks are right, in my humble
opinion.  A better strategy is some middle ground. You first do up the
nutrition really well (even using drugs as a stopgap to get supplements
down your patients if you must), THEN back off and use the long term
psych drugs only on what's LEFT after a month of supplementation and
talk therapy.

Of course, all this takes a huge amount of nursing care (anxious,
depressed, nauseous, angry, schizoid patients are not going to want to
swallow ten big pills even if they are fishoil and vitamins), and
thereby institutional expense. And there's the rub. But in the end, it
would probably pay for itself. I don't have time to post the positive
studies of things like fishoil on psych problems (at least down here in
the American corn-fed heartland), but as you say, there are quite a few
of them.

SBH
C.Health - 06 Sep 2005 04:55 GMT
> > Considering your background, why do you think that [fish oil] is not
> > regularly used as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> SBH

Great answer. I especially like the thought of a middle ground. This concept
should be used in most medical protocols, excluding acute cases and critical
care. You sir, are fair and balanced. By the way, the n-3 softgels I take
are molecularly distilled, have 300mg EPA & 200mg DHA per capsule, and
contain 1 IU of Vitamin E to reduce rancidity. Best of all, they're not
expensive compared to most brands, and I only need 3 per day.
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 07:01 GMT
Do you realize that experiments have been done which demonstrate these
fatty acids to be highly unstable?  I don't know what SBHarris is
smoking these days, but it must be awfully expensive.  To claim that
fish oil does not enhance oxidative stress in major ways is worse than
claiming that the world is flatter than a pancake.  I've read hundreds
of studies that talk about the susceptibility of double bonds to free
radical degradation, and it's also basic chemistry.  The only way such
highly unsaturated molecules could be reasonable safe (in small
amounts) is if tremendous antioxidant protection was also present
(which it is not).  But again, I repeat my offer:  let's get some
animals and feed half of them several grams of fish oil each day, and
the other half gets fresh coconut oil.  If the coconut oil group lives
as long or longer, you pay for all of the expenses for the experiment.
If the coconut oil group dies younger (in a statisically significant
way for that species) then I will pay all expenses.  If those of you
who speak of fish oil as if it were manna from Heaven truly believe,
you should be happy to take me up on my offer and show me up.  Loser
must sign a notarized statement that he/she now realizes how wrong
he/she was.  Mice are only 50 cents or so each.  This is not difficult,
nor expensive to do.  I'm waiting...
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 06 Sep 2005 07:55 GMT
> Do you realize that experiments have been done which demonstrate these
> fatty acids to be highly unstable?  I don't know what SBHarris is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> of studies that talk about the susceptibility of double bonds to free
> radical degradation, and it's also basic chemistry.

COMMENT:

Damnit, Monty, actual experiments with living animals trumps anything
you know (or think you know) about basic "theoretical chemistry."
Living systems are always more complicated than you can figure out.
Now, here are those abstracts again. Read and comment on each one, this
time.  Then you can post 12, and I'll do the same for yours. Pay
attension to my asterisks ****

1: Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2005 Spring;35(2):169-73.

Brief communication: omega-3 essential fatty acid supplementation and
erythrocyte oxidant/antioxidant status in rats.

Iraz M, Erdogan H, Ozyurt B, Ozugurlu F, Ozgocmen S, Fadillioglu E.

Department of Pharmacology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine,
Malatya.
mustafairaz@yahoo.com

Fish oil contains large amounts of essential omega-3 fatty acids, such
as
eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaneoic acids, which are building
structures of
cell membranes. The goal of this study was to elucidate the effects of
dietary
omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on the oxidant/antioxidant status of
erythrocytes in rats. The malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO)
levels and
the catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione
peroxidase
(GSH-PX) activities were assayed in erythrocytes of male Wistar albino
rats
after 30 days of dietary supplementation with fish oil (0.4 g/kg/day).
Erythrocyte CAT activity in the treated group was increased in
comparison with
the control group. Erythrocyte MDA and NO levels were lower in the
treated group
than the controls. Erythrocyte GSH-Px and SOD activities did not differ
significantly in the 2 groups. Negative correlations were found between
SOD and
CAT activities, and between SOD and GSH-Px activities in the treated
group. In
conclusion, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation helps to prevent lipid
peroxidation and to safeguard erythrocytes from oxidative injury.
Dietary
supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids ***might possibly protect**
tissues from
oxygen free radical injury in the various diseases in which the
oxidant/antioxidant defense mechanisms are disturbed.

PMID: 15943181 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

2: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2005 Apr;72(4):257-65.

Fish oil before cardiac surgery: neutrophil activation is unaffected
but
myocardial damage is moderated.

Charman A, Muriithi EW, Milne E, Wheatley DJ, Armstrong RA, Belcher PR.

Centre for Nutrition & Food Research, Queen Margaret University
College,
Edinburgh EH12 8TS, UK.

Could pre-operative dietary intervention with fish oil reduce
neutrophil
activation and myocardial damage associated with cardiopulmonary bypass
(CPB)?
Patients were randomised to receive either 8 g/day fish oil (n=22) or
placebo
(n=18) for 6 weeks. Neutrophil activation, apoptosis and cardiac damage
were
measured. Demographics and operative variables were similar. Fish oil
diet
decreased plasma VLDL from 0.69+/-0.34 to 0.51+/-0.24 mmol/l and
triglycerides
from 1.68+/-0.70 to 1.39+/-0.54 mmol/l. HDL cholesterol increased from
0.94+/-0.27 to 1.03+/-0.26 mmol/l demonstrating significant treatment
effects
(P=0.007, 0.02 and 0.0003, respectively) as well as compliance with
treatment.
There were no significant differences in ex vivo
N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine-stimulated neutrophil
superoxide anion
generation or myeloperoxidase release at recruitment, pre-operatively
and at
end-CPB. Apoptosis at end-CPB was equally reduced in both groups from
23+/-9% to
13+/-4% in the fish oil group (P<0.001) and 35+/-14% to 15+/-3% in the
placebo
group (P=0.001). At end-CPB overall troponin I levels averaged
0.91+/-0.60 ng/ml
which clearly exceeded diagnostic levels (0.15 ng/ml). At 24h troponin
I fell
significantly in the fish oil group to 46+/-23% of end-CPB levels
(P=0.0002)
whereas it peaked in the placebo group to 107+/-72% (P=0.098 vs.
end-CPB); this
difference was significant: P=0.013. At 48 h the placebo-treated
patients had
higher troponins but not significantly so (P=0.059).
Area-under-the-curve
analysis did not conclusively support this (P=0.068). ***We conclude
that fish oil
did not significantly decrease post-CPB neutrophil activation (as
detected ex
vivo) but may moderate post-operative myocardial damage.***

Publication Types:
   Clinical Trial
   Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 15763437 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

3: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Dec;79(4):651-9.

**Protective effect of chronic ethyl docosahexaenoate administration on
brain injury in ischemic gerbils.**

Cao DH, Xu JF, Xue RH, Zheng WF, Liu ZL.

Department of Biology, Nanjing University, 22 Hankou Road, Jiangsu
210093, PR
China.

There is evidence that the excessive generation of reactive oxygen free
radicals
contributes to the brain injury associated with cerebral ischemia. In
the
present study, the protective effect of chronic administration of ethyl
docosahexaenoate (E-DHA) against oxidative brain injury was evaluated
in the
gerbil model of transient cerebral ischemia. Weanling male gerbils were
orally
pretreated with either E-DHA (200 mg/kg) or vehicle, once a day, for 10
weeks
and subjected to bilateral occlusion of common carotid arteries for 10
min. At
the different reperfusion times, E-DHA pretreatment significantly
inhibited the
increases in the production of brain salicylate-derived
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic
acid (2,5-DHBA) and content of brain malonildialdehyde (MDA). The
superoxide
dismutase (SOD) activity was not modified; however, pretreatment with
E-DHA
significantly prevented the level of brain-reduced glutathione (GSH)
and
activities of brain glutathione peroxidase (GSH-P(X)) and catalase
(CAT) from
declines caused by cerebral ischemia. Moreover, ischemia and
reperfusion-induced
delayed neuronal loss in the hippocampus CA1 sector and locomotor
hyperactivity
were also significantly attenuated by pretreatment with E-DHA. These
results
suggested that the neuroprotective effect of E-DHA might be due to its
**antioxidant property.** [Cripes, it's just the ethyl ester of DHA--
same double bond system]

PMID: 15582673 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

4: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;28(4):693-8.

Hypothalamic superoxide dismutase, xanthine oxidase, nitric oxide, and
malondialdehyde in rats fed with fish omega-3 fatty acids.

Songur A, Sarsilmaz M, Sogut S, Ozyurt B, Ozyurt H, Zararsiz I,
Turkoglu AO.

Department of Anatomy, Afyon Kocatepe University Medical School,
Turkey.

Phospholipids located in the cellular membrane play a critical role in
the
fluid-mosaic model of membrane structure and membrane function.
Evidence is
mounting for the role of abnormal phospholipid metabolism in some
neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia. As an important
essential
fatty acid (EFA), omega-3 (omega-3) fatty acid series are found in
large amounts
in fish oil. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the
changes of
some of the oxidant and antioxidant parameters in the hypothalamus of
rats fed
with omega-3 EFA diet (0.4 g/kg/day) for 30 days. Eight control rats
and nine
rats fed with omega-3 were decapitated under ether anesthesia, and
hypothalamus
was removed immediately. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO)
levels as
well as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and xanthine oxidase (XO) enzyme
activities
in the hypothalamus were measured. SOD activity was significantly
decreased in
omega-3 EFA treated group compared to control group (p < 0.014). Tissue
MDA and
NO levels were also decreased in omega-3 EFA treated group compared to
control
rats (p < 0.0001). Xanthine oxidase activity was found to be increased
in
omega-3 EFA treated rats when compared to the control group (p <
0.0001). **Taken
together, this preliminary animal study provides strong support for a
**therapeutic effect** of omega-3 EFA in some neuropsychiatric
disorders in which
reactive oxygen species (ROS) are recently accused to be an important
physiopathogenetic factor.

PMID: 15276695 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

5: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2004 Sep;71(3):149-52.

Effect of fish oil supplementation on plasma oxidant/antioxidant status
in rats.

Erdogan H, Fadillioglu E, Ozgocmen S, Sogut S, Ozyurt B, Akyol O,
Ardicoglu O.

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa
University, Tokat
60100, Turkey. herdogan@gop.edu.tr

The aim of this study was to investigate effect of dietary omega-3
fatty acid
supplementation on the indices of in vivo lipid peroxidation and
oxidant/antioxidant status of plasma in rats. The plasma thiobarbituric
acid
reactive substances (TBARS) and nitric oxide (NO) levels, and
activities of
xanthine oxidase (XO), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione
peroxidase
(GSH-PX) were studied in male Wistar Albino rats after ingestion of 0.4
g/kg
fish oil (rich in omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid and
docosahexaenoic
acid) for 30 days and compared to untreated control rats. The rats in
the
treated group had significantly higher SOD activity (P < 0.001), NO
levels (P <
0.01) and decreased TBARS levels (P < 0.05) with respect to controls
whereas
GSH-Px and XO activities were not significantly different between the
groups.
None of the measured parameters had significant correlation with each
other in
both groups. ***We conclude that dietary supplementation of omega-3
fatty acids may
enhance resistance to free radical attack and reduce lipid
peroxidation.*** These
results support the notion that omega-3 fatty acids may be effective
dietary
supplements in the management of various diseases in which
oxidant/antioxidant
defence mechanisms are decelerated.  [You still reading, Monty? Is it
penetrating your DHA deficient brain??]

PMID: 15253883 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

6: Metabolism. 2004 Jan;53(1):59-65.

Effects of different dietary oils on inflammatory mediator generation
and fatty
acid composition in rat neutrophils.

de La Puerta Vazquez R, Martinez-Dominguez E, Sanchez Perona J,
Ruiz-Gutierrez
V.

Departamento de Farmacologia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de
Sevilla,
Seville, Spain.

Virgin olive oil (VOO) compared with fish oil (FO) and evening primrose
oil (PO)
on the ability of stimulated leukocytes to produce inflammatory
mediators was
investigated in rats. Weaned Wistar rats were fed a basal diet (BD) (2%
by
weight of corn oil) or diets containing 15% by weight of VOO, PO, or
FO. After 8
weeks, glycogen-elicited peritoneal polymorphonuclear leukocytes,
mainly
neutrophils, were isolated. The calcium-ionophore stimulated
neutrophils (2.5 x
10(6) cells/mL) obtained from rats fed the different oils produced a
higher
release of lysosomal enzymes (beta-glucuronidase, lysozyme, and
myeloperoxidase
[MPO]) compared with those fed BD. The production of reactive oxygen
species
(ROS) in response to the stimulant,
12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA),
by neutrophils from the VOO group (15.44 nmol of O(2)(-) and 6.56 nmol
of
H(2)O(2)) was similar to the BD group (12.01 nmol O(2)(-) and 8.49 nmol
H(2)O(2)) and significantly lower than the PO (20.90 nmol O(2)(-) and
10.84 nmol
H(2)O(2)) and FO (20.93 nmol O(2)(-) and 12.79 nmol H(2)O(2)) groups.
The
cyclooxygenase-derived eicosanoid production was reduced by the lipid
enrichment
of the diets. Whereas the generation of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) was
significantly decreased in VOO (5.40 ng/mL), PO (4.95 ng/mL), and FO
(1.44
ng/mL) groups compared with BD (8.19 ng/mL), thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2))
reduction
was especially significant in neutrophils from the FO diet group (14.67
ng/mL
compared with 26.69 ng/mL from BD). **These experimental data suggest
that FO [FISH OIL] and
PO, as well as VOO, could be considered a valuable strategy in
**preventing the
generation of some inflammatory mediators.**

PMID: 14681843 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

7: J Am Coll Nutr. 2003 Oct;22(5):388-99.

Effect of dietary n-3 and n-6 oils with and without food restriction on
activity
of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in livers of
cyclophosphamide
treated autoimmune-prone NZB/W female mice.

Bhattacharya A, Lawrence RA, Krishnan A, Zaman K, Sun D, Fernandes G.

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San
Antonio,
Texas 78229-3900, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Cyclophosphamide (CTX), an alkylating agent, is extensively
used in
the treatment of lupus nephritis, but its administration has been
associated
with free radical mediated oxidative stress. The present study was
designed to
investigate the effect of dietary corn oil (CO), fish oil (FO) and food
restriction (FR) on the activities of hepatic antioxidant enzymes,
fatty acid
composition and lipid peroxidation following CTX administration in
autoimmune-prone NZB/W female mice. METHODS: Autoimmune-prone NZB/W
female mice
were fed either ad libitum (AL) or food restricted (60% of AL intake),
semipurified diets containing 5% CO or 5% FO supplemented with equal
levels of
antioxidants and injected with either phosphate buffered saline (PBS),
or CTX
(50 mg/kg body weight) every 10 days. Proteinuria was measured
biweekly. The
treatment was stopped at 10 months and diets were continued until the
mice were
killed at 12 months. Fatty acid composition, activity of antioxidant
enzymes and
lipid peroxidation were analyzed in liver homogenates, and anti-DNA
antibodies
were analyzed in the serum. RESULTS: Mice in the FO/AL dietary group
exhibited
significantly higher liver catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD)
and
glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities compared to the CO/AL
dietary group.
CTX significantly decreased SOD and GSH-Px activity in the FO/AL group
and CAT
and GSH-Px in the CO/AL group. In AL fed mice given CTX, activities of
CAT,
GSH-Px and GST were significantly higher in mice fed FO diets than in
mice fed
CO diets. FR increased the activity of enzymes in both the CO and FO
diet
groups. In FR mice, CTX decreased CAT and GSH-Px activity in both the
CO and FO
dietary groups, but glutathione S-transferase (GST) only in the CO
group. The
decrease in SOD activity was not significant in either of the
restricted groups.
CTX significantly increased generation of thiobarbituric acid reactive
substances (TBARS) in both AL groups. FR significantly decreased lipid
peroxidation in both the CO and FO groups, with or without CTX. CTX
decreased
serum anti-DNA antibody levels in both the CO and FO dietary groups. FR
also
decreased antibody titer in both the CO and FO dietary groups, and it
was
decreased further with CTX treatment. FO fed animals had higher levels
of n-3
fatty acids, whereas CO fed animals had high levels of n-6 fatty acids.
CTX
significantly increased 20:4 and decreased 18:1 in CO/AL fed animals,
whereas it
increased 18:1 and decreased 22:6 in FO/AL fed animals. CONCLUSIONS:
Results
obtained in the present study suggests that FO [FISH OIL] and, more
significantly, FO
combined with FR [food restriction] can have a **beneficial effect** in
hepatic tissues subjected to
CTX induced **oxidative stress by regulating the activity of
antioxidant enzymes.**
In addition, the study also indicates that n-3 and n-6 dietary lipids
are
susceptible to lipid peroxidation, particularly in the presence of a
prooxidant
like CTX, and that FR is beneficial in decreasing lipid peroxidation.
The study
also suggests that FO and CTX can have **additive** effects in
preventing kidney
disease in NZB/W mice.

PMID: 14559931 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

8: Nutrition. 2003 Oct;19(10):837-42.

Decreased oxidative stress in patients with ulcerative colitis
supplemented with
fish oil omega-3 fatty acids.

Barbosa DS, Cecchini R, El Kadri MZ, Rodriguez MA, Burini RC, Dichi I.

Laboratory of Biochemistry, Londrina State University, Londrina,
Parana, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: The potential pathogenicity of free radicals may have a
pivotal role
in ulcerative colitis. Fish oil omega-3 fatty acids exert
anti-inflammatory
effects on patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), but the precise
mechanism of
the action of fish oil on oxidative stress is still controversial. The
aim of
the present work was to verify the blood oxidative stress in patients
with UC
and determine whether the association of sulfasalazine to fish oil
omega-3 fatty
acids is more effective than isolated use of sulfasalazine to reduce
the
oxidative stress. METHODS: Nine patients (seven female and two male;
mean age =
40 +/- 11 y) with mild or moderate active UC were studied in a
randomized
crossover design. In addition to their usual medication (2 g/d of
sulfasalazine), they received fish oil omega-3 fatty acids (4.5 g/d) or
placebo
for 2-mo treatment periods that were separated by 2 mo, when they only
received
sulfasalazine. Nine healthy individuals served as control subjects to
study the
oxidative stress status. Disease activity was assessed by laboratory
indicators
(C-reactive protein, alpha1-acid glycoprotein, alpha1-antitrypsin,
erythrocyte
sedimentation rate, albumin, hemoglobin, and platelet count),
sigmoidoscopy, and
histology scores. Analysis of oxidative stress was assessed by plasma
chemiluminescence and erythrocyte lipid peroxidation, both induced by
tert butyl
hydroperoxide (t-BuOOH) and by plasma malondialdehyde. Antioxidant
status was
assayed by total plasma antioxidant capacity (TRAP) and microsomal
lipid
peroxidation inhibition (LPI). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase
erythrocyte enzymatic activities were also determined. RESULTS: No
significant
changes were observed in any laboratory indicator or in the
sigmoidoscopy or
histology scores, with the exception of erythrocyte sedimentation rate,
which
decreased with both treatments. Oxidative stress was demonstrated by
significant
decreases in TRAP and LPI levels, increased chemiluminescence induced
by
t-BuOOH, and higher SOD activity in patients with UC. Treatment with
fish oil
omega-3 fatty acids reverted the chemiluminescence induced by t-BuOOH
and LPI to
baseline levels but that did not occur when patients received only
sulfasalazine. Levels of plasma malondialdehyde, erythrocyte lipid
peroxidation,
and catalase were not different from those in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS:
**The results indicated that plasma oxidative stress occurs in patients
with UC,
and there was a significant decrease when the patients used
sulfasalazine plus
fish oil omega-3 fatty acids.** However, there was no improvement in
most
laboratory indicators, sigmoidoscopy, and histology scores. **The
results
suggested that omega-3 fatty acids may act as free radical scavengers
protecting
the patients against the overall effect of oxidative stress.*** READ IT
AGAIN, MONTY

Publication Types:
   Clinical Trial
   Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 14559317 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

SBH
Mr-Natural-Health - 06 Sep 2005 12:40 GMT
> Do you realize that experiments have been done which demonstrate these
> fatty acids to be highly unstable?

Obviously, it does not penetrate your skull that that fact is a big so
what.

And, the reason is obvious.  Montygram has been deficient in Omega-3's
so long that his brain has roted out.  After all, he has on many
occasions manifested the public delusion that he has professional
credentials and works at a major university.  Ha, ... Hah, Ha!  Tell me
another tall tale, Montygram.

Montygram's brain is so bad that he don't even know what his name is.
Or, the name of books that he has never written.

Just my opinion, but I am right as usual.
RArmant - 06 Sep 2005 17:11 GMT
>Of course, all this takes a huge amount of nursing care (anxious,
>depressed, nauseous, angry, schizoid patients are not going to want to
>swallow ten big pills even if they are fishoil and vitamins), and
>thereby institutional expense. And there's the rub.

One approach is to open the capsules and put it in the food.
I would love to see studies done with Alzheimer's victims getting
a few grams of DHA per day over a period of several months to
years.

>But in the end, it
>would probably pay for itself. I don't have time to post the positive
>studies of things like fishoil on psych problems (at least down here in
>the American corn-fed heartland), but as you say, there are quite a few
>of them.
RArmant - 06 Sep 2005 21:21 GMT
>I would love to see studies done with Alzheimer's victims getting
>a few grams of DHA per day over a period of several months to
>years.

This looks interesting:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00090402

excerpt:
Expected Total Enrollment:  39
Study start: April 2004;  Expected completion: August 2005

AD is a serious condition associated with increased inflammation,
cholesterol, and oxidative stress (a condition involving an excess of
free radicals and a decrease in antioxidant levels). Fish oil and alpha
lipoic acid, which have few side effects, may help relieve these
problems; therefore, these supplements may slow the progression of AD,
particularly when given in combination. This study will evaluate the
effect of fish oil and alpha lipoic acid on inflammation, lipid levels,
and oxidative stress.

Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive fish oil
alone, fish oil and alpha lipoic acid, or placebo for 1 year. AD rating
scales as well as urine and blood tests will be used to assess
participants. Participants will have monthly clinic visits during the
study to monitor adverse events and to undergo various laboratory tests.
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 21:38 GMT
Fine, if you think these experiments mean anything significant, then
take me up on my offer.  I'm still waiting...
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 23:01 GMT
For those with an open mind:

If you read the studies that SBHarris et al. posted, there are
conflicting results.

"The rats in
the [fish oil] treated group had significantly higher SOD activity..."
whereas another found the opposite.

This is a minor point, though, because what is happening is clear, as
others before me have suggested (none of what I am saying is new,
novel, or inconsistent with known science): when exposed to oxidative
stress, the body responds with higher levels of antioxidants,
especially SOD.  After a while, the minerals needed for SOD activity
are no longer available and massive damage occurs, which is why zinc,
selenium, and other minerals are being called "cures" for cancer.  They
are not cures, but instead are needed for SOD function.  Over time, the
lipid peroxidation takes its toll, leading to cancer or some other
"disease."

At this point, it is generally agreed that "vitamin E" is the best
indicator of lipid peroxidation (I know of no scientist who disagrees
with this), and it appears that some researchers who have ties to fish
oil interests are not looking at vitamin E levels on purpose.  But if
you ever get a chance to ask such a reseacher a question, the best one
is, "if you were looking for lipid peroxidation, why didn't you measure
vitamin E levels of the alpha form?"  There really is not answer
except, "I don't know what I'm doing," or "I can't make the people
paying my salary unhappy, now can I?"

Moreover, we do not know what the "control diet" was.  Because these
researchers believe that omega 3 and 6 PUFAs are "essential," they load
the animals up with stuff like safflower oil, which can indeed be
worse, depending upon the quality of the oil.  There are some natural
antioxidants in most oils, though usually most is refined out of it.
If they don't measure the antioxidant potencies of the oils they use,
there is no way to know if this is a major factor in the results.
However, similar studies have actually been done on people, so there is
no need to cite mouse/rat studies.  For example (and this is from a
site that makes the same claim SBHarris does):

"Researchers at the Oregon State University have just released two
major studies designed to further explore this concern. The first study
involved 15 postmenopausal women who were randomized to supplement with
15 grams/day of sunflower oil, 15 grams/day of safflower oil or 15
grams/day of fish oil (providing 2.0 grams of EPA and 1.4 grams of DHA
per day) in a 3-treatment crossover trial. The researchers conclude
that there is no evidence that fish oil supplementation increases lipid
peroxidation when assessed by measuring the levels of blood plasma
malondialdehyde (MDA) and F2-isoprostanes. However, a slight increase
in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was noted in the
fish oil supplemented group."

Source: http://www.oilofpisces.com/vitamine.html

So you can see what is going on.  They only use oils that are all
susceptible to tremendous free radical degradation, so the results mean
next to nothing (though higher levels of the TBARS marker was found in
the fish oil people).  This is why people like SBHarris won't take me
up on my experiment offer, that is, because the control animals will
not get a horrible oil such as sunflower or safflower, but instead they
will get fresh coconut oil, which is highly resistant to free radical
degradation.  SBHarris knows that he/she will look like a fool after
such an experiment is conducted and will not take the challenge.  And
there will be no possibility of misleading markers, because we will
accept only mortality as the "endpoint."  They can't play their shell
games with me because I have researched this for years (and I'm an
academic myself) so I know all the little tricks they try and use to
"massage" the results.

SBHarris is fighting a battle he/she can't win, because the science is
very clear.  As  the "experts" catch on, you will hear more and more
about it, or will be nudged in a different direction.  For example,
when I was younger, the message was out that one should use highly
polyunsaturated oils.  Sunflower and safflower were being advocated,
yet now we hear about olive oil.  Why?  They are not telling you that
higher consumption of oils like sunflower and safflower means a  much
higher cancer risk.  Otherwise, what  would be the reason to switch
over to olive oil?  If they didn't know what they were talking about
when they made grand pronouncements in favor of safflower oil, why
should anyone believe the  now?  The only reason to believe anyone is
that the claim is consistent with known science.

I was attacked here not long ago for posting a study with markers, yet
they then support their points with studies containing markers.  They
have no internal consisstency.  However, when you supply an underlying
mechanism that is consistent with basic, known science, such as the
properties of the elements on the periodic table, then markers of this
mechanism are useful, though not conclusive, of course.  Science is not
about "proof" (which is for math and formal logic), but about an
interpretation of the evidence.  Markes are ridiculous when it is known
that they are not valid, or when grand claims are made for them.  An
excellent example is using total cholesterol or LDL, when even AHA
spokesmen are saying it's the oxidation of the cholesterol, and not the
cholesterol itself.  For those of you who want to be tested for
oxidized cholesterol, which is not done except by specialty labs, you
can go to www.gsdl.com.  The best thing to do is just to eat in a way
consistent with the oxidative stress hypothesis first put forth by
Denham Harman more than three decades ago.  As Dr. Richard Stein of the
AHA said, the data that has become available in the last 10 or 15 years
is very strong in favor of the oxidative  stress/damage hypothesis.  By
contrast, there is no overall hypothesis that is a challenge to it.
There are the "bug hunters" at the CDC, for example, but for the most
part, there is a general and non-scientific notion that the body just
"gets sick" or "falls apart" as you get older.  There is the idea that
"bad genes" are a problem, yet aside from a few very rare disorders
that occur during infancy or during growth spurts, the corrrelations
are minimal.  One is slightly more likely to be afflicted, and that's
not even considering that children are very likely to be eating the
same kinds of food their  parents who "get ill" do.

Be thankful that I am here, pointing out the incredibly dangerous
advice some possibly well-meaning but terribly misguided (deluded?)
individuals are posting here.  I am willing to help anyone free of
charge who has a problem and seeks advice.  Just do a post with a title
like "Montygram, I need help with chronic back pain" for example.  It's
free, and I get nothing whatsoever from helping you, not even
recognition.  I feel it's my responsibility, just as a parent has
responsibilities to his/her children.  I received grants at the
taxpayers expense to go to graduate school, and so feel obligated to
pay those people back in  a way that can save lives and alleviate
suffering.
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 23:27 GMT
Two other points:

One experiment ran for "30 days" and involved "Eight control rats and
nine
rats fed with omega-3."  This is really more of a joke than an
experiment.  I propose at least 50 animals, with the experiment running
until the animals die of "natural cauess."

My proposed experiment has a problem, which I readily admit to, and
that is that animals have instincts which tell them not to eat fish oil
(or other dangerous oils like safflower, sunflower, etc.) and so the
animals would have to be force fed the fish oil.  Otherwise - and this
has happened (though you don't read about it in the report) - the fish
oil animals are actually on a calorie-resticted diet because they try
to eat as little of the fish oil as possible.  If it is mixed in with
the other food, they eat less.  Therefore, unless one force feeds them
the fish oil, it is not a valid experiment (in terms of what the
researchers claim the results mean).  As long as one has no problem
force feeding the animals the fish oil (and as long as the carb/protein
sources are the same, with no added antioxidants), we can do the
experiment and see who is correct.  But they will never put their money
where their mouths are because they know they will lose badly.  The
fish oil animals will drop dead like flies, just as they have in past
experiments that fed the animals fish oil from birth to death.  There
is no problem with the coconut, however, because I have problems with
mice getting into my 25 pound bag of shredded coconut.  They love the
stuff.  There's a reason for it.  They have instincts whereas we must
use reason, something many people on this newsgroup either never had,
or lost somewhere along the line.
Matti Narkia - 10 Sep 2005 19:55 GMT
6 Sep 2005 15:01:13 -0700 in article
<1126042798.237416.208100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "montygram"
<nazztrader@lycos.com> wrote:

>At this point, it is generally agreed that "vitamin E" is the best
>indicator of lipid peroxidation (I know of no scientist who disagrees
>with this), and it appears that some researchers who have ties to fish
>oil interests are not looking at vitamin E levels on purpose.

You make so many false claims that no one has patience to correct them all,
there are more important things to do. There are better indicators for lipid
peroxidation than vitamin E status. Why use indirect measurements such as
vitamin E when more direct measurements are available? Besides, use of
vitamin E supplemenst would surely confuse the picture. A much better
measurement is for example F(2)-isoprostanes.

Signature

Matti Narkia

David Wright - 05 Sep 2005 02:05 GMT
>> is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis
>> and the epidemiology of human cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Cod liver oil, which has toxic amounts of vitamin A if used as a major
>dietary component, cannot be compared with fish (body) oil.

How can you say that?  Those fine people from the Weston A. Price
foundation assure me it's the cure for all diseases (so Hulda got it
wrong after all).

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
                                -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
George Cherry - 05 Sep 2005 03:59 GMT
>> is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis
>> and the epidemiology of human cancer.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> men's sperm counts to zero, there would be no Eskimos to be transported
> here and there in the North, by their cancerous sled dogs.

LOL! Funny, funny, funny.

> Give us a break.  I've posted a dozen papers showing omega-3
> supplementation makes oxidative damage drop, in vivo. The only papers
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> SBH
montygram - 05 Sep 2005 05:44 GMT
That fish oil is highly susceptible to free radical degradation is
basic science.  If  you don't understand it, you are just a fool.
Flax/linseed is high in omega 3s and used in oil painting precisely
because it degrades so quickly that it hardens up and has the
properties needed for this task.  If you tried to oil paint with
coconut oil, it would take years to dry.  If you don't understand this,
there's just no hope for you.

Contact biochemist Ray Peat if you want the full citation.  You can go
to pubmed.com and you'll find studies of Eskimos who have high rates of
"diseases" due to free radical damage.  On high omega 3 diets, the body
literally disintegrates.  Minor blunt force traumas become deadly.
Bleeding strokes are common, even in  young adults.  I just hope somone
like SBHarris does consume a lot of fish oil (of any kind), because
then he will be hurting himself as well as others (as he must be doing
by his nonsense postings).  Look at the raw demographic data.  Eskimos
eating large amounts of omega 3s rarely see their fiftieth birthday.
Asians on coconut oil live long lives with hardly any chronic disease.
Those numbers just don't like.  Only people like SBHarris do.
joshv - 07 Sep 2005 00:54 GMT
> That fish oil is highly susceptible to free radical degradation is
> basic science.  If  you don't understand it, you are just a fool.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> coconut oil, it would take years to dry.  If you don't understand this,
> there's just no hope for you.

Yes, and the next time I need to paint my intestines I will keep this
in mind.  My digestive system, however, is not a canvas, nor does it
react with the materials I eat in the same way a painter's canvas does.

> Contact biochemist Ray Peat if you want the full citation.  You can go
> to pubmed.com and you'll find studies of Eskimos who have high rates of
> "diseases" due to free radical damage.  On high omega 3 diets, the body
> literally disintegrates.

Ok, let's see about those Inuit (as Eskimos are called these days)
diseases on pubmed.  Search term: "Inuit Omega-3"

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=15736672&query_hl=1


CONCLUSION: These data show that peri- and post-menopausal Greenland
Inuit women have very high plasma concentrations of n-3 fatty acids
that protect them from ischemic heart disease.

And 75% of these women were smokers.

--------------------------------------------------

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=15588018&query_hl=1


This one found that the more DHA an Inuit baby had in it's blood, the
higher it's birth weight.

--------------------------------------------------

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=14594198&query_hl=1


CONCLUSION: The change in traditional diets has already led to
increased health problems, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and
diabetes, while the mental health of circumpolar peoples has also
declined substantially during the same time period. The decline in
mental health is characterized by increased rates of depression,
seasonal affective disorder, anxiety, and suicide, that now often occur
at higher rates than in lower-latitude populations. Studies in
non-circumpolar peoples have shown that diet can have profound effects
on neuronal and brain development, function, and health. Therefore, we
hypothesize that diet is an important risk factor for mental health in
circumpolar peoples.

---------------------------------------------------

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=14504206&query_hl=1


Incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer are reported to be
low among Inuit, but this finding must be additionally supported given
the difficulty of obtaining a precise medical diagnosis in the Arctic.
We conducted an autopsy study in 1990-1994 among 61 deceased males
representative of all deaths occurring in Greenland and found only one
invasive prostate cancer. Histological data were available for 27
autopsies and revealed no latent carcinoma. Our results suggest that in
situ carcinoma is rare among Inuit and that their traditional diet,
which is rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and selenium, may
be an important protective factor.

--------------------------------------------------

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=12848280&query_hl=1


"Our results indicate that increased consumption of fish as a source of
n-3 fatty acids is beneficially associated with levels of HDL
cholesterol and triacylglycerols."

--------------------------------------------------

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=11720618&query_hl=1


"Evidence first reported 20 years ago from the Greenland Inuit
population suggested that fatty fish and fish oils contained substances
that reduced the incidence of ischemic heart disease. These substances,
later determined to be omega-3 fatty acids, were found in early
clinical trials to reduce platelet aggregation and to reduce
hypertriglyceridemia by as much as 35%. More recent trials have found
that omega-3 fatty acids also appear to reduce the risk of cardiac
arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death and modestly reduce atherosclerotic
plaque formation and hypertension. Clinical trials have not
demonstrated adverse effects at moderate daily doses. These findings
have implications for clinicians who may want to suggest that patients
increase their intake of fatty fish or supplement their diet with more
concentrated sources of omega-3 fatty acids."

--------------------------------------------------

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=11566644&query_hl=1


CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of marine products, the main source of EPA and
DHA, appears to beneficially affect some cardiovascular disease risk
factors. The traditional Inuit diet, which is rich in n-3 fatty acids,
is probably responsible for the low mortality rate from ischemic heart
disease in this population.

Perhaps I am using the wrong search terms...  Can you give me some
references to substantiate your claims?

> Minor blunt force traumas become deadly.
> Bleeding strokes are common, even in  young adults.  I just hope somone
> like SBHarris does consume a lot of fish oil (of any kind), because
> then he will be hurting himself as well as others (as he must be doing
> by his nonsense postings).

Are you just making sh.t up?

>  Look at the raw demographic data.  Eskimos
> eating large amounts of omega 3s rarely see their fiftieth birthday.

Reference please?

> Asians on coconut oil live long lives with hardly any chronic disease.
> Those numbers just don't like.  Only people like SBHarris do.

If SBHarris is lying, please provide some references that refute his
claims and the finding of the studies above.
bae@cs.toronto.no-uce.edu - 07 Sep 2005 02:41 GMT
>> That fish oil is highly susceptible to free radical degradation is
>> basic science.  If  you don't understand it, you are just a fool.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>in mind.  My digestive system, however, is not a canvas, nor does it
>react with the materials I eat in the same way a painter's canvas does.

Just to shoot down one of the original poster's incorrect claims, raw
linseed oil is not a drying oil, suitable for use in paint.  It has to
be treated at high heat in an industrial process I don't recall the
details of to make "boiled" linseed oil for use in that application.
If you try to oil paint with raw linseed oil, it will take years to
dry too.

Both raw and boiled linseed oils are used in woodworking.  Feel free to
obtain some of each at your local hardware store and see for yourself.
Twittering One - 07 Sep 2005 03:33 GMT
"Deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids
Tied to ADHD ~

Just to shoot down
One of the original poster's incorrect claims,
Raw linseed oil is not a drying oil,
Suitable for use in paint."
~ B

"... or to glaze?"
~ Blackstone

"It has to be treated
At high heat, in an industrial process,
I don't recall ..."
~ B

"Stable, or fugitive,
Well cared for, or on the loose?"
~ B

"The details of ...
To make boiled linseed oil
For use in that application."
~ B

"The painting's ground,
Aptly prepared,
The landscape scene, yonder window,
Sited as seen in autumn's crisply alternating
Sharp air."
~ Blackstone

"If you try to mix oil paint with raw linseed oil,
It will take years to
Dry, too."
~ B

"... so unlike tempera,
Al fresco, or sunlight interior,
Liquid mutates, joins,

Married, one with wall's ground, light to plane,
Window's wall, passage opened
To garden."
~ Blackstone

"Both raw and boiled linseed oils a
Are used
In woodworking."
~ B

"And of woodworking,
A cabinet ~ maker, perhaps you know,
For a Curio Cabinet, as well, a fine Studiolo, I require,

Expert carpentry, for my needs, my parquet
Must exceed status quo,

Must be far more superior, than satisfactory.
The best, I will hire, no less,
No more.

For know ~
A Loyal Trompe l'Oeil
I desire."
~ Blackstone
Twittering One - 07 Sep 2005 03:38 GMT
"The studiolo from the ducal palace
In Gubbio ~

One of the most important
Works of art
Of the Italian Renaissance, whereupon,
Within, many hours,

I have spent,
The Metropolitan Museum,
My stomping ground, en Morning Wood's backyard ..."

http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/studiolo/studiolo.html
Twittering One - 07 Sep 2005 03:49 GMT
"The grouping of these objects
may at first seem puzzling

but becomes clear once we realize that all five
are concerned with measurement
and proportion.

The set square and plumb bob
were used as a level by builders and architects.

The dividers were employed to measure distances
on a chart or to determine the scale
of a design.

The sandglass,
an instrument popular in the late Middle Ages,
indicated the equal hours,

which came into general usage
in the last third of the fourteenth century.

During the fifteenth century the theory
of musical proportions and the studies of linear perspective
and architectural proportions
came to be seen as expressions of the same mathematical truth,

so even musical instruments such as the cittern
depicted here must be understood
as an allusion to the theory of music's harmonic
proportions."

http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/studiolo/studiolo3.html
montygram - 07 Sep 2005 06:14 GMT
Here are some relevant passages from "Diet and Health: Implications
for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk" published by The National Research
Council (USA), third printing:

The first (page 191) describes why omega 3s seem to be beneficial:
"This could be due to preferential incorporation and may lead to less
arachidonate [AA] being available for cyclooxygenase [CoxX-2].  There
may also be competition for cyclooxygenase between [AA] and EPA (which
is oxygenated less efficiently than arachidonate), resulting in less
TXA-2 formation [which is a metabolite of AA that causes platelet
aggregation]."

So as I've said many times before, I am not the first to say these
things.  What's also interesting here is that they say "oxygenated
less efficiently," which means free radical degradation.  Other
studies show that in some contexts AA is more unstable than EPA, but it
depends on what is done to the fatty acids.  Both are dangerous in
humans, for example:

"Dietary fats increase the yield of mammary tumors only when they
contain adequate amounts of omega 6 PUFAs... The requirements for omega
6 PUFAs in mammary tumor promotion systematically by Ip et al.(1985),
who reported  4 to 5% of total calories as the threshold at which the
yield of mammary tumors increased."  Page 213.  Isn't that
something that it would have been nice if the media had told us 20
years ago, and reminded us of on occasion since then?  They also found
that rats are more resistant, needing 8% or more total calories of
omega 6 PUFAs to reach the threshold.  You are being told to eat plenty
of canola oil, which is about 37% omega 6 PUFAs.  How do you feel about
that suggestion now?  Also on page 213: "...fats such as butter,
coconut oil, and beef tallow have little effect on mammary
carcinogenesis."  There, they also say that results with olive oil
have been mixed, probably due to the quality of the oil.  But here's
a great point: "...a relatively high ratio of fish oil to [oils high
in omega 6 PUFAs] is required to counteract the promoting effects [of
pancreatic, mammary, and colon cancer] of the [oils high in omega 6
PUFAs]."

Again, exactly what I was saying about the problem.  You must eat huge
amounts of fish oil for the effect to be felt and to last.  This point
is made explicitly again on page 600.  They make the point that
"prostaglandins may be involved" in carcinogenesis on page 601, and
are directly on point about free radical damage: "...the extreme
susceptibility of the omega 3 fatty acids in fish oil to oxidation may
give rise to products other than prostaglandins that act as inhibitors
of carcinogenesis."  Because fish oil goes rancid so quickly, the
damage to the body occurs in the stomach, which explains why the
Japanese still have high stomach cancer rates, even though all other
"advanced nations" used to have much higher stomach cancer rates than
they do now.  It would be worthwhile to create a model of normal
conditions in the human stomach and see what the lipid peroxidation
from the various oils is like.  The evidence suggests that fish oil
will do its damage in the stomach, and thus the "markers" of lipid
peroxidation will be lower than for an oil like safflower.

As to the Eskimos: "...the risk of CHD [heart disease] is unknown in
this small population, whose members... usually die before middle
age."  Page 192.  Then there is: "In Greenland Eskimos, bleeding
time averaged 8 minutes; in a Danish control population [and most
people know that the Danes eat quite a bit of fish as well], it was 5
minutes."  Page 191.  As most people realize, if you suffer a minor
blow to the head, and your platelet function is diminished, you are in
big trouble, which is why bleeding strokes were so common among such
peoples.

As I've said about the bogus "coconut oil is bad" studies:
"Malmros and Wigand (1957) found that hydrogenated coconut oil
elevated serum cholesterol more than other plant oils rich in PUFAs,
but they did not test the effects of hydrogenation alone."  Page 186.
Since it is now known that oxidized cholesterol is the problem, this
is important, because highly refined/hydrogenated coconut oil will be
stripped of antioxidants, and since it is about 8% unsaturated, it may
be a problem, though not nearly as bad as the highly unsaturated oils.

On the other hand, a major study from France found that for butter and
yogurt "there was the suggestion of a protective effect" against
breast cancer.  Page 207.

And now the scariest part: "The percentage of calories contributed by
linoleic [omega 6 PUFAs] to total fat intake increased from 7% during
1909-1913 to about 16% in 1985, whereas the corresponding percentage
from SFAs [saturated fatty acids] declined from approximately 42 to
34%.  In 1985, linoleic acid was available at 7% of total calories,
SFAs at 15%, and oleic at 17%."  Also: "The proportion of animal
fat declined from 83 to 58%, as butter and lard use declined [and lard
became more unsaturated as well, due to what the animals were fed],
whereas the proportion of vegetable fat (in margarines and in sald and
cooking oils) fose from 17 to 42%."  Page 160.  Make a graph of this,
and assume for the sake of simplicity that there is a gradual increase
or decrease.  Now go to the CDC or NIH web sites and get a graph of the
various chronic diseases: the common cancers, diabetes, heart disease,
etc., and make a similar graph.  What you will discover is shocking, in
light of the advice being given my the mainstream "experts."  Over
the last 5 years or so there have been many reports of "epidemics"
in obesity, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, ADHD, etc., and that
appears to be due to the rise in canola/rapeseed oil consumption.  Look
at some of the prepared foods in your local supermarket (or even in the
"health food stores") and you will see these oils as one of the top
ingredients in almost everything.

As I've demonstrated here, the recent studies that purport to show a
"benefit" to these very dangerous substances (unless you are a
plant that grows in Canada or a salmon) are almost all short-term and
use markers and endpoints that are based on faulty assumptions, or no
underlying assumptions at all.  The researchers involved appear to be
unaware of the professional literature which they are supposed to have
mastered.  If they do not agree with the huge amount of evidence
arrayed against their claims, it is their responsibility to explain why
they feel this way.  Yet they act as if it doesn't exist at all,
probably because they are young and inexperienced, or have not "done
their homework."  In the graduate department in which I received my
Ph.D., such "studies" would have resulted in the student being
reprimanded due to a lack of a basic understanding of the
discipline's methodology.  One must confront contrary claims and
explain exactly what is going on.  That is what I have done here, and
that is what the prestigious National Research Council and many
scientists have done a long time ago.

Within the context of electron stealing/oxidative stress/ free radical
damage/reactive oxygen species/lipid peroxidation or whatever it is
called by a group of researchers, the evidence is overwhelming in favor
of this hypothesis, and there is no other all-encompassing one that now
exists.  It is not my fault that the media seems to be quite happy to
go along with the latest snake oil pitch, but I'll be damned if I sit
around and do nothing for the people who seek scientifically-sound
advice on the diet/health connection.  If you choose to consume large
amounts of fish oil, canola oil, or any of the other dangerous oils, in
light of this evidence, I have no doubt that you will get what you
deserve, but because I believe in the scientific method, I am willing
to pay for a relevant, on-point experiment that lasts until the animals
die of "natural causes."  So far, all I see are the same studies
cited - ones that were refuted over 15 years ago, before most of the
researchers involved in the latest batch of studies probably graduated
from high school.
MattLB - 08 Sep 2005 18:00 GMT
> The first (page 191) describes why omega 3s seem to be beneficial:
> "This could be due to preferential incorporation and may lead to less
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> things.  What's also interesting here is that they say "oxygenated
> less efficiently," which means free radical degradation.

No it doesn't. It sounds like you don't know what cyclooxygenase does
to FA and what the "oxygenated" means in that context.

> Other
> studies show that in some contexts AA is more unstable than EPA, but it
> depends on what is done to the fatty acids.  Both are dangerous in
> humans, for example:

So your position is basically:
omega 6 is bad because tumour cells grow better when it's around
omega 3 is bad because it kills tumour cells, so must therefore be
really toxic

Or in other words both tumour growth and tumour death are bad. What
does that leave? Mead Acid, which is bad because it promotes tumour
metastasis.

> "Dietary fats increase the yield of mammary tumors only when they
> contain adequate amounts of omega 6 PUFAs... The requirements for omega
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> omega 6 PUFAs to reach the threshold.  You are being told to eat plenty
> of canola oil, which is about 37% omega 6 PUFAs.

That figure has nothing to do with with the 5% mentioned previously -
they're referring to different things.

> Again, exactly what I was saying about the problem.  You must eat huge
> amounts of fish oil for the effect to be felt and to last.  This point
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> give rise to products other than prostaglandins that act as inhibitors
> of carcinogenesis."

As usual you don't realise that oxidation can be a perfectly normal
part of metabolism.

> As I've said about the bogus "coconut oil is bad" studies:
> "Malmros and Wigand (1957) found that hydrogenated coconut oil
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> is important, because highly refined/hydrogenated coconut oil will be
> stripped of antioxidants, and since it is about 8% unsaturated,

Not after hydrogenation. According to your theories it should be better
when fully hydrogenated.

> On the other hand, a major study from France found that for butter and
> yogurt "there was the suggestion of a protective effect" against
> breast cancer.  Page 207.

You're happy to back up your theories with "suggestions" are you?

> As I've demonstrated here, the recent studies that purport to show a
> "benefit" to these very dangerous substances (unless you are a
> plant that grows in Canada or a salmon)

Yes, just how is it salmon don't "disintegrate" from all the omega-3 in
them?

MattLB
montygram - 08 Sep 2005 22:12 GMT
Where are all the true believers when it comes to doing an experiment
that will be on point?  Why are they not even explaining why they won't
take me up on my offer.

I have debunked all of their ideas before.  I am not going to go
through all my files every time somebody posts something about fish
oil.  Presumably, the National Research Council cannot be trusted in
their interpretation of the evidence, which they site it the book.
Why?  Everything they say is consistent with the evidence.  And if
MattLB wants to swim around nude in the north Atlantic the rest of his
life, he may be correct that the omega 3s will not be his biggest
worry.

So who will take me up on my offer?

I am still waiting...
montygram - 08 Sep 2005 23:20 GMT
For those who want even more citations and perhaps most importantly, a
scientific explanation of the phenomena at issue, go to:

http://www.efn.org/~raypeat/

You will find such entries as the following:

UNSATURATED VEGETABLE OILS: TOXIC

GLOSSARY:

    Immunodeficiency (weakness of the immune system) can take many forms.
AIDS, for example, refers to an immunodeficiency which is "acquired,"
rather than "inborn."  Radiation and vegetable oils can cause "acquired
immunodeficiency."  Unsaturated oils, especially polyunsaturates,
weaken the immune system's function in ways that are similar to the
damage caused by radiation, hormone imbalance, cancer, aging, or viral
infections.  The media discuss sexually  transmitted  and  drug-induced
immunodeficiency, but it isn't yet considered polite to discuss
vegetable oil-induced immunodeficiency.

    Unsaturated oils: When an oil is saturated, that means that the
molecule has all the hydrogen atoms it can hold.  Unsaturation means
that some hydrogen atoms have been removed, and this opens the
structure of the molecule in a way that makes it susceptible to attack
by free radicals.

    Free radicals are reactive molecular fragments that occur even in
healthy cells, and can damage the cell.  When unsaturated oils are
exposed to free radicals they can create chain reactions of free
radicals that spread the damage in the cell, and contribute to the
cell's aging.

    Rancidity of oils occurs when they are exposed to oxygen, in the body
just as in the bottle.  Harmful free radicals are formed, and oxygen is
used up.

    Essential fatty acids (EFA) are, according to the textbooks, linoleic
acid and linolenic acid, and they are supposed to have the status of
"vitamins," which must be taken in the diet to make life possible.
However, we are able to synthesize our own unsaturated fats when we
don't eat the "EFA," so they are not "essential."  The term thus
appears to be a misnomer.  [M. E. Hanke, "Biochemistry,"  Encycl. Brit.
Book of the Year, 1948.]

Q:  You say vegetable oils are hazardous to your health.  What
vegetable oils are you talking about?

    Mainly, I'm referring to soybean oil, corn oil, safflower oil, canola,
sesame oil, sunflower seed oil, palm oil, and any others that are
labeled as "unsaturated" or "polyunsaturated."   Almond oil, which is
used in many cosmetics, is very unsaturated.

    Chemically, the material that makes these oils very toxic is the
polyunsaturated fat itself.  These unsaturated oils are found in very
high concentrations in many seeds, and in the fats of animals that have
eaten a diet containing them. The fresh oils, whether cold pressed or
consumed as part of the living plant material, are intrinsically toxic,
and it is not any special industrial treatment that makes them toxic.
Since these oils occur in other parts of plants at lower concentration,
and in the animals which eat the plants, it is impossible to eat a diet
which lacks them, unless special foods are prepared in the laboratory.

    These toxic oils are sometimes called the "essential fatty acids" or
"vitamin F," but this concept of the oils as essential nutrients was
clearly disproved over 50 years ago.

    Linoleic and linolenic acids, the "essential fatty acids," and other
polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are now fed to pigs to fatten them,
in the form of corn and soy beans, cause the animals' fat to be
chemically equivalent to vegetable oil.  In the late 1940s, chemical
toxins were used to suppress the thyroid function of pigs, to make them
get fatter while consuming less food.  When that was found to be
carcinogenic, it was then found that corn and soy beans had the same
antithyroid effect, causing the animals to be fattened at low cost.
The animals' fat becomes chemically similar to the fats in their food,
causing it to be equally toxic, and equally fattening.

    These oils are derived from seeds, but their abundance in some meat
has led to a lot of confusion about "animal fats."  Many researchers
still refer to lard as a "saturated fat," but this is simply incorrect
when pigs are fed soybeans and corn.

Q:  How are these oils hazardous to your health?

    Ultimately, all systems of the body are harmed by an excess of these
oils.  There are two reasons for this.  One is that the plants produce
the oils for protection, not only to store energy for the germination
of the seed.  To defend the seeds from the animals that would eat them,
the oils block the digestive enzymes in the animals' stomachs.
Digestion is one of our most basic functions, and evolution has built
many other systems by using variations of that system; as a result, all
of these systems are damaged by the substances which damage the
digestive system.

    The other reason is that the seeds are designed to germinate in early
spring, so their energy stores must be accessible when the temperatures
are cool, and they normally don't have to remain viable through the hot
summer months.  Unsaturated oils are liquid when they are cold, and
this is necessary for any organism that lives at low temperatures.  For
example, fish in cold water would be stiff if they contained saturated
fats.  These oils easily get rancid (spontaneously oxidizing) when they
are warm and exposed to oxygen.  Seeds contain a small amount of
vitamin E to delay rancidity.  When the oils are stored in our tissues,
they are much warmer, and more directly exposed to oxygen, than they
would be in the seeds, and so their tendency to oxidize is very great.
These oxidative processes can damage enzymes and other parts of cells,
and especially their ability to produce energy.

    The enzymes which break down proteins are inhibited by unsaturated
fats, and these enzymes are needed not only for digestion, but also for
production of thyroid hormones, clot removal, immunity, and the general
adaptability of cells.  The risks of abnormal blood clotting,
inflammation, immune deficiency, shock, aging, obesity, and cancer are
increased.  Thyroid and progesterone are decreased.  Since the
unsaturated oils block protein digestion in the stomach, we can be
malnourished even while "eating well."

    Plants produce many protective substances to repel or injure insects
and other animals that eat them.  They produce their own pesticides.
The oils in seeds have this function.  On top of this natural toxicity,
the plants are sprayed with industrial pesticides, which can
concentrate in the seed oils.

    It isn't the quantity of these polyunsaturated oils which governs the
harm they do, but the relationship between them and the saturated fats.
Obesity, free radical production, the formation of age pigment, blood
clotting, inflammation, immunity, and energy production are all
responsive to the ratio of unsaturated fats to saturated fats, and the
higher this ratio is, the greater the probability of harm there is.

    There are interesting interactions between these oils and estrogen.
For example, puberty occurs at an earlier age if estrogen is high, or
if these oils are more abundant in the diet.  This is probably a factor
in the development of cancer.

    All systems of the body are harmed by an excess of these oils.  There
are three main kinds of damage: one, hormonal imbalances, two, damage
to the  immune system, and three, oxidative damage.

Q: How do they cause hormonal imbalances?

    There are many changes in hormones caused by unsaturated fats.  Their
best understood effect is their interference with the function of the
thyroid gland.  Unsaturated oils block thyroid hormone secretion, its
movement in the circulatory system, and the response of tissues to the
hormone.  When the thyroid hormone is deficient, the body is generally
exposed to increased levels of estrogen.  The thyroid hormone is
essential for making the "protective hormones" progesterone and
pregnenolone, so these hormones are lowered when anything interferes
with the function of the thyroid.  The thyroid hormone is required for
using and eliminating cholesterol, so cholesterol is likely to be
raised by anything which blocks the thyroid function.  [B. Barnes and
L. Galton, Hypothyroidism, 1976, and 1994 references.]

Q: How do they damage the immune system?

    Vegetable oil is recognized as a drug for knocking out the immune
system.  Vegetable oil emulsions were used to nourish cancer patients,
but it was discovered that the unsaturated oils were suppressing their
immune systems.  The same products, in which vegetable oil is
emulsified with water for intravenous injection, are now marketed
specifically for the purpose of suppressing immunity in patients who
have had organ transplants.  Using the oils in foods has the same
harmful effect on the immune system. [E. A. Mascioli, et al.,Lipids
22(6) 421, 1987.]  Unsaturated fats directly kill white blood cells.
[C. J. Meade and J. Martin, Adv. Lipid Res., 127, 1978.]

Q: How do they cause oxidative damage?

    Unsaturated oils get rancid when exposed to air; that is called
oxidation, and it is the same process that occurs when oil paint
"dries."  Free radicals are produced in the process.
    This process is accelerated at higher temperatures.  The free radicals
produced in this process react with parts of cells, such as molecules
of DNA and protein and may become attached to those molecules, causing
abnormalities of structure and function.

Q: What if I eat only organically grown vegetable oils?

    Even without the addition of agricultural chemicals, an excess of
unsaturated vegetable oils damages the human body.  Cancer can't occur,
unless there are unsaturated oils in the diet.  [C. Ip, et al., Cancer
Res. 45, 1985.] Alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver cannot occur unless
there are unsaturated oils in the diet.  [Nanji and French, Life
Sciences. 44, 1989.]  Heart disease can be produced by unsaturated
oils, and prevented by adding saturated oils to the diet.  [J. K. G.
Kramer, et al., Lipids 17, 372, 1983.]

Q.  What oils are safe?

    Coconut and olive oil are the only vegetable oils that are really
safe, but butter and lamb fat, which are highly saturated, are
generally very safe (except when the animals have been poisoned).
Coconut oil is unique in its ability to prevent weight-gain or cure
obesity, by stimulating metabolism.  It is quickly metabolized, and
functions in some ways as an antioxidant.  Olive oil, though it is
somewhat fattening, is less fattening than corn or soy oil, and
contains an
antioxidant which makes it protective against heart disease and cancer.

    Israel had the world's highest incidence of breast cancer when they
allowed the insecticide lindane to be used in dairies, and the cancer
rate decreased immediately after the government prohibited its use.
The United States has fairly good laws to control the use of
cancer-causing agents in the food supply, but they are not vigorously
enforced.  Certain cancers are several times more common among corn
farmers than among other farmers, presumably because corn "requires"
the use of more pesticides.  This probably makes corn oil's toxicity
greater than it would be otherwise, but even the pure, organically
grown material is toxic, because of its intrinsic unsaturation.

    In the United States, lard is toxic because the pigs are fed large
quantities of corn and soy beans.  Besides the intrinsic toxicity of
the seed oils, they are contaminated with agricultural chemicals.  Corn
farmers have a very high incidence of cancer, presumably because of the
pesticides they use on their crop.

Q: But aren't "tropical oils" bad for us?

    In general, tropical oils are much more healthful than oils produced
in a cold climate.  This is because tropical plants live at a
temperature that is close to our natural body temperature.  Tropical
oils are stable at high temperatures.  When we eat tropical oils, they
don't get rancid in our tissues as the cold-climate seed oils, such as
corn oil, safflower oil and soy oil, do.  [R.B. Wolf, J. Am. Oil Chem.
Soc. 59, 230, 1982; R. Wolfe, Chem 121, Univ. of Oregon, 1986.]

    When added to a balanced diet, coconut oil slightly lowers the
cholesterol level, which is exactly what is expected when a dietary
change raises thyroid function.  This same increase in thyroid function
and metabolic rate explains why people and animals that regularly eat
coconut oil are lean, and remarkably free of heart disease and cancer.

    Although I don't recommend "palm oil" as a food, because I think it is
less stable than coconut oil, some studies show that it contains
valuable nutrients.  For example, it contains antioxidants similar to
vitamin E, which lowers both LDL cholesterol and a platelet clotting
factor. [B. A. Bradlow, University of Illinois, Chicago; Science News
139, 268, 1991.]  Coconut oil and other tropical oils also contain some
hormones that are related to pregnenolone or progesterone.

Q: Isn't coconut oil fattening?

    Coconut oil is the least fattening of all the oils.  Pig farmers tried
to use it to fatten their animals, but when it was added to the animal
feed, coconut oil made the pigs lean [See Encycl. Brit. Book of the
Year, 1946].

Q: What about olive oil?  Isn't it more fattening than other vegetable
oils?

    In this case, as with coconut oil, "fattening" has more to do with
your ability to burn calories than with the caloric value of the oil.
Olive oil has a few more calories per quart than corn or soy oil, but
since it doesn't damage our ability to burn calories as much as the
unsaturated oils do, it is less fattening.   Extra virgin olive oil is
the best grade, and contains an antioxidant that protects against
cancer and heart disease.  [1994, Curr. Conts.]

Q:  Is "light" olive oil okay?

    No. Now and then someone learns how to make a profit from waste
material.  "Knotty pine" boards were changed from a discarded material
to a valued decorative material by a little marketing skill.  Light
olive oil is a low grade material which sometimes has a rancid smell
and probably shouldn't be used as food.

Q:  Is margarine okay?

    There are several problems with margarine.  The manufacturing process
introduces some toxins, including a unique type of fat which has been
associated with heart disease. [Sci. News, 1974; 1991.] There are
likely to be dyes and preservatives added to margarine.  And newer
products contain new chemicals that haven't been in use long enough to
know whether they are safe.

    However, the basic hardening process, hydrogenation of the oils, has
been found to make the oils less likely to cause cancer.  If I had to
choose between eating ordinary corn oil or corn oil that was 100%
saturated, to make a hard margarine, I would choose the hard margarine,
because it resists oxidation, isn't suppressive to the thyroid gland,
and doesn't cause cancer.

Q:  What about butter?

    Butter contains natural vitamin A and D and some beneficial natural
hormones.  It is less fattening than the unsaturated oils.  There is
much less cholesterol in an ounce of butter than in a lean chicken
breast [about 1/5 as much cholesterol in fat as in lean meat on a
calorie basis, according to R. Reiser of Texas A & M Univ., 1979.].

Q:  Are fish oils good for you?

    Some of the unsaturated fats in fish are definitely less toxic than
those in corn oil or soy oil, but that doesn't mean they are safe.
Fifty years ago, it was found that a large amount of cod liver oil in
dogs' diet increased their death rate from cancer by 20 times, from the
usual 5% to 100%.  A diet rich in fish oil causes intense production of
toxic lipid peroxides, and has been observed to reduce a man's sperm
count to zero.  [H. Sinclair, Prog. Lipid Res. 25, 667, 1989.]

Q: What about lard?

    In this country, lard is toxic beause the pigs are fed large
quantities of corn and soy beans.  Besides the natural toxicity of the
seed oils, the oils are contaminated with agricultural chemicals.  Corn
farmers have a very high incidence of cancer, presumably because corn
"requires" the use of more pesticides.  This probably makes corn oil's
toxicity greater than it would be otherwise. but even the pure,
organically grown material is toxic, because of its unsaturation.

    Women with breast cancer have very high levels of agricultural
pesticides in their breasts [See Science News, 1992, 1994].

    Israel had the world's highest incidence of breast cancer when they
allowed the insecticide lindane to be used in dairies, and the cancer
rate decreased immediately after the government prohibited its use.
The United States has fairly good laws to control the use of
cancer-causing agents in the food supply, but they are not vigorously
enforced.  [World Incid. of Cancer, 1992]

Q:  I have no control over oils when eating out.  What can I do to
offset the harmful effects of polyunsaturated oils?

    A small amount of these oils won't kill you.  It is the proportion of
them in your diet that matters.  A little extra vitamin E (such as 100
units per day) will take care of an occasional American restaurant
meal.  Based on animal studies, it would take a teaspoonful per day of
corn or soy oil added to a fat-free diet to significantly increase our
risk of cancer.  Unfortunately, it is impossible to devise a fat-free
diet outside of a laboratory.  Vegetables, grains, nuts, fish and meats
all naturally contain large amounts of these oils, and the extra oil
used in cooking becomes a more serious problem.

Q Why are the unsaturated oils so popular if they are dangerous?

    It's a whole system of promotion, advertising, and profitability.

    50 years ago, paints and varnishes were made of soy oil, safflower
oil, and linseed (flax seed) oil.  Then chemists learned how to make
paint from petroleum, which was much cheaper.  As a result, the huge
seed oil industry found its crop increasingly hard to sell.  Around the
same time, farmers were experimenting with poisons to make their pigs
get fatter with less food, and they discovered that corn and soy beans
served the purpose, in a legal way.  The crops that had been grown for
the paint industry came to be used for animal food.  Then these foods
that made animals get fat cheaply came to be promoted as foods for
humans, but they had to direct attention away from the fact that they
are very fattening.  The "cholesterol" focus was just one of the
marketing tools used by the oil industry.  Unfortunately it is the one
that has lasted the longest, even after the unsaturated oils were
proven to cause heart disease as well as cancer.  [Study at L.A.
Veterans Hospital, 1971.]

    I use some of these oils (walnut oil is very nice, but safflower oil
is cheaper) for oil painting, but I am careful to wash my hands
thoroughly after I touch them, because they can be absorbed through the
skin.

SUMMARY
    Unsaturated fats cause aging, clotting, inflammation, cancer, and
weight gain.

    Avoid foods which contain the polyunsaturated oils, such as corn, soy,
safflower, flax, cottonseed, canola, peanut, and sesame oil.

    Mayonnaise, pastries, even candies may contain these oils; check the
labels for ingredients.

    Pork is now fed corn and soy beans, so lard is usually as toxic as
those oils; use only lean pork.

    Fish oils are usually highly unsaturated; "dry" types of fish, and
shellfish, used once or twice a week, are good.  Avoid cod liver oil.

    Use vitamin E.

    Use coconut oil, butter, and olive oil.

    Unsaturated fats intensify estrogen's harmful effects.

REFERENCES

1. C. F. Aylsworth, C. W. Welsch, J. J. Kabora, J. E. Trosko, "Effect
of fatty acids on junctional communication:  Possible role in tumor
promotion by dietary fat," Lipids 22(6), 445-54, 1987.

2. J. M. Bell and P. K. Lundberg, "Effects of a commercial soy lecithin
preparation on development of sensorimotor behavior & brain
biochemicals in the rat," Dev. Psychobiol. 8(1), 59-66, 1985.

3. R. S. Britton and B. R. Bacon, "Role of free radicals in liver
diseases and hepatic fibrosis," Hepatogastroenterology 41(4), 343-348,
1994.

4. M. S. Brown, et al., "Receptor mediated uptake of
lipoprotein-cholesterol and its utilization for steroid synthesis,"
Recent Progress in Hormone Res. 35, 315-257, 1979.

5. P. A. Cerutti, "Oxy-radicals and cancer," Lancet 455(8926), 862-863,
1994.

6. I. Davies and A. P. Fotheringham, "Lipofuscin--Does it affect
cellular performance?" Exp. Gerontol. 16, 119-125, 1981.

7. K. L. Erickson, et al., "Dietary lipid modulation of immune
responsiveness," Lipids 18, 468-74, 1983.

8. V. A. Folcik and M. K. Cathcart, "Predominance of esterified
hydroperoxy-linoleic acid in human monocyte-oxidized LDL," J. Lipid
Res. 35(9), 1570-1582, 1994.

9. Fuller, C. J. and I. Jialal, "Effects of antioxidants and fatty
acids on low-density-lipoprotein oxidation," Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 60(6
Suppl.), S1010-S1013, 1994.

10. M. C. Galli, et al., "Peroxidation potential of rat thymus during
development and involution," Comp. Biochem. Physiol (C) 107(3),
435-440, 1994.

11. J. M. Gaziano, et al., "Supplementation with beta-carotene in vivo
and in vitro does not inhibit low density lipoprotein oxidation,"
Atherosclerosis 112(2), 187-195, 1995.

12. M. B. Grisham, "Oxidants and free radicals in inflammatory bowel
disease," Lancet 344(8926), 859-861, 1994.

13. J. M. C. Gutteridge, "Antioxidants, nutritional supplements and
life-threaening diseases," Brit. J. Biomed. Sci. 51(3), 288-295, 1994.

14. D. Harman, et al., "Free radical theory of aging: effect of dietary
fat on central nervous system function," J. American Geriatrics Soc.
24(1), 292-98, 1976.

15. W. S. Hartroft and E. A. Porta, "Ceroid pigments,"  chapter VIII in
Present Knowledge in Nutrition, 3rd Edition, Nutrition Foundation,
N.Y., 1967.

16. H. J. Helbock, et al., (Univ. of Calif. Berkeley) January, 1993
Pediatrics; in Science News 143, 78, 1993.  "Toxic 'fats' in preemie
supplement."

H. R. Hirsch, "The waste-product theory of aging:  Cell division rate
as a function of waste volume," Mech. Ageing Dev. 36, 95-107, 1986.

17. S. G. Imre, et al., "Increased proportion of docosahexanoic acid
and high lipid peroxidation capacity in erythrocytes of stroke
patients," Stroke 25(12), 2416-2420, 1994.

18. Clement Ip, et al., "Requirement of essential fatty acids for
mammary tumorigenesis," Cancer Res. 45(5), 1997-2001, 1985.

19. P. V. Johnston, "Dietary fat, eicosanoids, and immunity," Adv. in
Lipid Res. 21, 103-41, 1985.

20. S. Kasayna, et al., "Unsaturated fatty acids are required for
continuous proliferation of transformed androgen-dependent cells by
fibroblast growth factor family proteins," Cancer Research 54(24),
6441-6445, 1994.

21. H. A. Kleinveld, et al., "Vitamin E and fatty acid intervention
does not attenuate the progression of atherosclerosis in watanabe
heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits," Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15(2), 290-297, 1995.

22. J. K. G. Kramer, et al., Lipids 17, 372, 1983.

23. I. A. Kudryavtsev, et al., "Character of the modifying action of
polyunsaturated fatty acids on growth of transplantable tumors of
various types," Bull. Exp. Biol & Med. 105(4), 567-70, 1986.

24. R. D. Lynch, "Utilization of polyunsaturated fatty acids by human
diploid cells aging in vitro," Lipids 15(6), 412-20, 1967.

25. M. Martinez and A. Ballabriga, "Effects of parenteral nutrition
with high doses of linoleate on the developing human liver and brain,"
Lipids 22(3), 133-8, 1987.

26. R. S. Mehta, et al., "High fish oil diet increases oxidative stress
potential in mammary gland of spontaneously hypertensive rats," Clin.
Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 21(11), 881-889, 1994.

27. A. A. Nanji and S. W. French, "Dietary linoleic acid is required
for development of experimentally induced alcoholic liver-injury," Life
Sciences 44, 223-7, 1989.

28. J. A. Lindsay, et al., "Fatty acid metabolism and cell
proliferation," Lipids 18, 566-9, 1983.

29. M. L. Pearce and S. Dayton, "Incidence of cancer in men on a diet
high in polyunsaturated fat," Lancet 1, 464-467, 1971.

30. Pryor, W. A., "Free radicals and lipid proxidation--what they are
and how they got that way," Natural Antioxidants in Human, pp. 1-24,
1994.

31. P. Purasiri, et al., "Modulation of cytokine production in vivo by
dietary essential fatty acids in patients with colorectal cancer,"
Clin. Sci. 87(6), 711-717, 1994.

32. S. Rapoport and T. Schewe, "Endogenous inhibitors of the
respiratory chain," Trends in Biochemical Sci., Aug., 1977, 186-189.

33. H. Selye, "Sensitization by corn oil for the production of cardiac
necrosis...," Amer. J. of Cardiology 23, 719-22, 1969.

34. D. A.  Street, et al., "Serum antioxidants and myocardial
infarction--Are low levels of carotenoids and alpha-tocopherol risk
factors for myocardial infarction?" Circulation 90(3), 1154-1161, 1994.

35. M. Takei, et al., "Inhibitory effects of calcium antagonists on
mitochondrial swelling induced by lipid peroxidation or arachidonic
acid in the rat brain in vitro," Neurochem. Res. 29(9), 1199-1206,
1994.

36. J. P. Thomas, et al., "Involvement of preexisting lipid
hydroperoxides in Cu2+-stimulated oxidation of low-density
lipoprotein," Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315(2), 244-254, 1994.

37. C. W. Welsch, "Review of the effects of dietary fat on experimental
mammary gland tumorigenesis:  Role of lipid peroxidation," Free Radical
Biol. Med. 18(4), 757-773, 1995.

Essential Fatty Acids ("EFA"):  A Technical Point