Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2005
Deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids tied to ADHD
|
|
Thread rating:  |
C.Health - 04 Sep 2005 08:29 GMT http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/9606.Burgess.html
This is old news, but I wonder why omega-3 fatty acids aren't used more often with ADHD children. The modern diet is very low in omega-3 compared to a more primitive diet. Even grass fed beef has a much higher level of omega-3 fats than grain fed beef. US children also get too much trans fats from all of the junk foods, and we know the dangers of these fats all to well.
Deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids tied to ADHD in boys (June 1996 )
WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. -- Purdue University researchers have found that boys with low blood levels of essential omega-3 fatty acids, have a greater tendency to have problems with behavior, learning and health consistent with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or (ADHD).
Some previous studies by other researchers have indicated that symptoms associated with a deficiency in fatty acids are exhibited to a greater extent in children with ADHD. Those symptoms include thirst, frequent urination and dry skin and hair. The Purdue researchers, however, were able to pinpoint omega-3s as the fatty acids that may be associated with the unique behavior problems in children with ADHD.
"There are two types of fatty acids that must be obtained from the foods we eat because the body cannot synthesize them," says John R. Burgess, assistant professor of foods and nutrition. "Omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids are both essential to the body. However, evidence is accumulating that a deficiency of omega-3 fatty acids may be tied to behavior problems, learning and health problems."
ADHD is the most common behavioral disorder in children, affecting between 3 percent and 5 percent of school-age youngsters. It's diagnosed more often in boys than girls. The cause of ADHD is unknown, but research suggests many factors may contribute to it, including biological and environmental elements.
Stimulant drugs such as Ritalin often are used to calm children with ADHD and are effective about 75 percent of the time. "With our research we are trying to find potential causes of ADHD so that nutritional treatments can be developed for some children with ADHD," Burgess says.
For this study, the researchers compared the fatty-acid levels in the blood of 96 boys, ages 6 to 12. Fifty-three of the boys had previously been identified as having ADHD, and 43 did not. Teachers and parents also were asked to rate the subjects on a scale used to assess childhood behavior problems. The parents also filled out a health questionnaire for possible symptoms associated with essential fatty acid deficiencies.
Approximately 40 percent of the boys with ADHD had a greater frequency of symptoms indicative of essential fatty-acid deficiency, as reported by their parents. Nine percent of the boys without ADHD had similar symptoms.
Burgess says boys with lower levels of omega-3 fatty acids scored higher in the frequency of many behavioral problems. Children with lower omega-6 levels reported significantly more colds and health-related problems than those with higher levels, but they did not exhibit more behavioral problems.
Omega-3 fatty acids are found in fish and other seafood. Burgess says there are also small amounts of omega-3s in some polyunsaturated oils. Omega-3 fatty acids are essential to the proper functioning of the central nervous system. He says the body doesn't need a great quantity of omega-3 fatty acids, and he speculates that in children who have low blood levels of omega-3s, their metabolism may be unable to adequately process the little bit that they need from the foods they eat.
"While all children with ADHD are not deficient in omega-3 fatty acids, we believe that this may be important for at least a subset of ADHD children," Burgess says. "However, at this point we don't know what the relationship is between omega-3 fatty acids and ADHD."
The study appeared in the April/May edition of the journal Physiology & Behavior.
Source: John Burgess, (765) 494-8239; Internet: john.r.burgess.1@purdue.edu Writer: Beth Forbes, (765) 494-9723; Internet: beth_forbes@uns.purdue.edu Purdue News Service: (765) 494-2096; e-mail, purduenews@uns.purdue.edu
NOTE TO JOURNALISTS: A copy of the study in Physiology and Behavior and a color photo of a young boy holding up a fish are available from Purdue News Service, (765) 494-2096. Ask for the photo called Omega-3/Burgess.
montygram - 04 Sep 2005 21:46 GMT It's not an omega 3 deficiency issue, it's an arachidonic acid overdose issue. The omega 3s interfere with omega 6s, such as linoleic, being metabolized into arachidonic acid. Other fatty acids also have this effect. It is not only omega 3s that do this. The problem is that omega 3s are more susceptible to free radical degradation than any other fatty acids, so while you may be interfering with omega 6 metabolization, you are giving yourself a nasty dose of free radical damage. Instead, if you just cut the omega 6s out of your diet, you will no longer have the arachidonic acid problem, and then the "disease" is gone. There is a vast scientific literature documenting how dangerous fish oil can be. Here are some less technical examples:
""...addition of cod liver oil to to the diet elevated the rate of peroxidation [free radical activity] by 20-fold."
And that was on top of the 10-fold increase over rats on the fat free diet (when corn oil was added.
Source: from the text of the following:
Free Radic Biol Med. 1988;5(2):95-111.
A role for dietary lipids and antioxidants in the activation of carcinogens.
Gower JD.
Division of Comparative Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Harrow, Middlesex, U.K.
The ways in which dietary polyunsaturated fats and antioxidants affect the balance between activation and detoxification of environmental precarcinogens is discussed, with particular reference to the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon benzo(a)pyrene. The structure and composition of membranes and their susceptibility to peroxidation is dependent on the polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content of the cell and its antioxidant status, both of which are determined to a large degree by dietary intake of these compounds. An increase in the PUFA content of membranes stimulates the oxidation of precarcinogens to reactive intermediates by affecting the configuration and induction of membrane-bound enzymes (e.g., the mixed-function oxidase system and epoxide hydratase); providing increased availability of substrates (hydroperoxides) for peroxidases that cooxidise carcinogens (e.g., prostaglandin synthetase and P-450 peroxidase); and increasing the likelihood of direct activation reactions between peroxyl radicals and precarcinogens. Antioxidants, on the other hand, protect against lipid peroxidation, scavenge oxygen-derived free radicals and reactive carcinogenic species. In addition some synthetic antioxidants exert specific effects on enzymes, which results in increased detoxification and reduced rates of activation. The balance between dietary polyunsaturated fats, antioxidants and the initiation of carcinogenesis
is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis and the epidemiology of human cancer.
Biochemist Ray Peat has cited much older studies, such as how dogs fed fish oil all died of cancer:
"Fifty years ago, it was found that a large amount of cod liver oil in dogs' diet increased their death rate from cancer by 20 times, from the
usual 5% to 100%. A diet rich in fish oil causes intense production of
toxic lipid peroxides, and has been observed to reduce a man's sperm count to zero. [H. Sinclair, Prog. Lipid Res. 25, 667, 1989.]"
Source: http://www.healthythyroid.com/vegetableoils.htm"
This is basic science. Unfortunately, many doctors and scientists either don't know it, or are not up to date. You can wait around for them to get up to date, or you can damage your body. As Dr. Richard Stein, spokesman for the AHA, said recently, it's only the oxidized cholesterol that is the problem. Fish oil will oxidize the cholesterol in your body, unless you consume massive amounts of the right antioxidants, and nobody is sure about exactly which ones and what amounts are needed (and it will vary from one person to another). Play it safe - just stay away from highly unsaturated oils and oxidized cholesterol (steamed salmon is especially bad).
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 04 Sep 2005 23:19 GMT > is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis > and the epidemiology of human cancer. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > usual 5% to 100%. COMMENT:
Cod liver oil, which has toxic amounts of vitamin A if used as a major dietary component, cannot be compared with fish (body) oil.
> A diet rich in fish oil causes intense production of > toxic lipid peroxides, and has been observed to reduce a man's sperm > count to zero. [H. Sinclair, Prog. Lipid Res. 25, 667, 1989.]" COMMENT:
No such paper exists on medline. Would you like to provide the full citation?
The idea is dunderheaded, anyway. If diets rich in fish oils reduced men's sperm counts to zero, there would be no Eskimos to be transported here and there in the North, by their cancerous sled dogs.
Give us a break. I've posted a dozen papers showing omega-3 supplementation makes oxidative damage drop, in vivo. The only papers where it climbs are artificial ones where they mince the tissue, expose it to oxygen, and let the normal protective antioxidant systems die. But inside your body, it doesn't happen that way.
SBH
C.Health - 05 Sep 2005 01:28 GMT > > is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis > > and the epidemiology of human cancer. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > SBH Considering your background, why do you think that it is not regularly used as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical studies showing its efficaciousness?
Mark Probert - 05 Sep 2005 17:30 GMT >>>is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis >>>and the epidemiology of human cancer. [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical studies showing its > efficaciousness? It is only recently that this was applied to ADHD, and the original marketing was by people who found a study showing some effect, and then went directly to market without further proof, dosage, etc.
Additionally, it does not eliminate the need for medications, and I do not give a crap what the sales sites say. Some of the families in my support group are using it for after medication times (eveinings and weekends) and would not use it instead of medication.
Mr-Natural-Health - 05 Sep 2005 21:40 GMT > Some of the families in my [ADHD] support group are > using it for after medication times (eveinings and > weekends) and would not use it instead of medication. You have my condolences.
Mark Probert - 07 Sep 2005 15:16 GMT >>Some of the families in my [ADHD] support group are >>using it for after medication times (eveinings and >>weekends) and would not use it instead of medication. > > You have my condolences. Did you have a point?
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 06 Sep 2005 03:44 GMT > Considering your background, why do you think that [fish oil] is not > regularly used as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical > studies showing its efficaciousness? COMMENT:
All the usual reasons. No profit in it. Bigger pills, harder to swallow.
Fish oil, contain as it does the main fatty acid of the brain, DHA, has a calming and salutory effect on the brain, increasing serotonin and decreasing irritability if the person hasn't been getting optimal ALA or DHA in the diet. If I were top shrink, DHA it would be the base of all treatment of all mental illnesses, along with a good stiff megadose vitamin.
The problem with nutrition and mental illness, is that experimentally induced shortage in human volunteers of many vitamins (and probably w-3 too) produces either 1) lethargy, 2) irritablity, or 3) depression. And those are all so common in psychiatry (as are very bad diets), that how in the world can you be sure you're not seeing some effect of bad diet unless you correct it, THEN see what mental illnesses are left?
Back in the bad old days, ship Captains knew that when the crew fights began to break out about 2 months into the voyage, scurvy was next.
Anyway, medicine will eventually come around. Neither the orthomolecular people or the standard shrinks are right, in my humble opinion. A better strategy is some middle ground. You first do up the nutrition really well (even using drugs as a stopgap to get supplements down your patients if you must), THEN back off and use the long term psych drugs only on what's LEFT after a month of supplementation and talk therapy.
Of course, all this takes a huge amount of nursing care (anxious, depressed, nauseous, angry, schizoid patients are not going to want to swallow ten big pills even if they are fishoil and vitamins), and thereby institutional expense. And there's the rub. But in the end, it would probably pay for itself. I don't have time to post the positive studies of things like fishoil on psych problems (at least down here in the American corn-fed heartland), but as you say, there are quite a few of them.
SBH
C.Health - 06 Sep 2005 04:55 GMT > > Considering your background, why do you think that [fish oil] is not > > regularly used as part of a protocol for ADHD, based on the clinical [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > SBH Great answer. I especially like the thought of a middle ground. This concept should be used in most medical protocols, excluding acute cases and critical care. You sir, are fair and balanced. By the way, the n-3 softgels I take are molecularly distilled, have 300mg EPA & 200mg DHA per capsule, and contain 1 IU of Vitamin E to reduce rancidity. Best of all, they're not expensive compared to most brands, and I only need 3 per day.
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 07:01 GMT Do you realize that experiments have been done which demonstrate these fatty acids to be highly unstable? I don't know what SBHarris is smoking these days, but it must be awfully expensive. To claim that fish oil does not enhance oxidative stress in major ways is worse than claiming that the world is flatter than a pancake. I've read hundreds of studies that talk about the susceptibility of double bonds to free radical degradation, and it's also basic chemistry. The only way such highly unsaturated molecules could be reasonable safe (in small amounts) is if tremendous antioxidant protection was also present (which it is not). But again, I repeat my offer: let's get some animals and feed half of them several grams of fish oil each day, and the other half gets fresh coconut oil. If the coconut oil group lives as long or longer, you pay for all of the expenses for the experiment. If the coconut oil group dies younger (in a statisically significant way for that species) then I will pay all expenses. If those of you who speak of fish oil as if it were manna from Heaven truly believe, you should be happy to take me up on my offer and show me up. Loser must sign a notarized statement that he/she now realizes how wrong he/she was. Mice are only 50 cents or so each. This is not difficult, nor expensive to do. I'm waiting...
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 06 Sep 2005 07:55 GMT > Do you realize that experiments have been done which demonstrate these > fatty acids to be highly unstable? I don't know what SBHarris is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > of studies that talk about the susceptibility of double bonds to free > radical degradation, and it's also basic chemistry. COMMENT:
Damnit, Monty, actual experiments with living animals trumps anything you know (or think you know) about basic "theoretical chemistry." Living systems are always more complicated than you can figure out. Now, here are those abstracts again. Read and comment on each one, this time. Then you can post 12, and I'll do the same for yours. Pay attension to my asterisks ****
1: Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2005 Spring;35(2):169-73.
Brief communication: omega-3 essential fatty acid supplementation and erythrocyte oxidant/antioxidant status in rats.
Iraz M, Erdogan H, Ozyurt B, Ozugurlu F, Ozgocmen S, Fadillioglu E.
Department of Pharmacology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya. mustafairaz@yahoo.com
Fish oil contains large amounts of essential omega-3 fatty acids, such as eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaneoic acids, which are building structures of cell membranes. The goal of this study was to elucidate the effects of dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on the oxidant/antioxidant status of erythrocytes in rats. The malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) levels and the catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) activities were assayed in erythrocytes of male Wistar albino rats after 30 days of dietary supplementation with fish oil (0.4 g/kg/day). Erythrocyte CAT activity in the treated group was increased in comparison with the control group. Erythrocyte MDA and NO levels were lower in the treated group than the controls. Erythrocyte GSH-Px and SOD activities did not differ significantly in the 2 groups. Negative correlations were found between SOD and CAT activities, and between SOD and GSH-Px activities in the treated group. In conclusion, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation helps to prevent lipid peroxidation and to safeguard erythrocytes from oxidative injury. Dietary supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids ***might possibly protect** tissues from oxygen free radical injury in the various diseases in which the oxidant/antioxidant defense mechanisms are disturbed.
PMID: 15943181 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2005 Apr;72(4):257-65.
Fish oil before cardiac surgery: neutrophil activation is unaffected but myocardial damage is moderated.
Charman A, Muriithi EW, Milne E, Wheatley DJ, Armstrong RA, Belcher PR.
Centre for Nutrition & Food Research, Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh EH12 8TS, UK.
Could pre-operative dietary intervention with fish oil reduce neutrophil activation and myocardial damage associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)? Patients were randomised to receive either 8 g/day fish oil (n=22) or placebo (n=18) for 6 weeks. Neutrophil activation, apoptosis and cardiac damage were measured. Demographics and operative variables were similar. Fish oil diet decreased plasma VLDL from 0.69+/-0.34 to 0.51+/-0.24 mmol/l and triglycerides from 1.68+/-0.70 to 1.39+/-0.54 mmol/l. HDL cholesterol increased from 0.94+/-0.27 to 1.03+/-0.26 mmol/l demonstrating significant treatment effects (P=0.007, 0.02 and 0.0003, respectively) as well as compliance with treatment. There were no significant differences in ex vivo N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine-stimulated neutrophil superoxide anion generation or myeloperoxidase release at recruitment, pre-operatively and at end-CPB. Apoptosis at end-CPB was equally reduced in both groups from 23+/-9% to 13+/-4% in the fish oil group (P<0.001) and 35+/-14% to 15+/-3% in the placebo group (P=0.001). At end-CPB overall troponin I levels averaged 0.91+/-0.60 ng/ml which clearly exceeded diagnostic levels (0.15 ng/ml). At 24h troponin I fell significantly in the fish oil group to 46+/-23% of end-CPB levels (P=0.0002) whereas it peaked in the placebo group to 107+/-72% (P=0.098 vs. end-CPB); this difference was significant: P=0.013. At 48 h the placebo-treated patients had higher troponins but not significantly so (P=0.059). Area-under-the-curve analysis did not conclusively support this (P=0.068). ***We conclude that fish oil did not significantly decrease post-CPB neutrophil activation (as detected ex vivo) but may moderate post-operative myocardial damage.***
Publication Types: Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 15763437 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004 Dec;79(4):651-9.
**Protective effect of chronic ethyl docosahexaenoate administration on brain injury in ischemic gerbils.**
Cao DH, Xu JF, Xue RH, Zheng WF, Liu ZL.
Department of Biology, Nanjing University, 22 Hankou Road, Jiangsu 210093, PR China.
There is evidence that the excessive generation of reactive oxygen free radicals contributes to the brain injury associated with cerebral ischemia. In the present study, the protective effect of chronic administration of ethyl docosahexaenoate (E-DHA) against oxidative brain injury was evaluated in the gerbil model of transient cerebral ischemia. Weanling male gerbils were orally pretreated with either E-DHA (200 mg/kg) or vehicle, once a day, for 10 weeks and subjected to bilateral occlusion of common carotid arteries for 10 min. At the different reperfusion times, E-DHA pretreatment significantly inhibited the increases in the production of brain salicylate-derived 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,5-DHBA) and content of brain malonildialdehyde (MDA). The superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was not modified; however, pretreatment with E-DHA significantly prevented the level of brain-reduced glutathione (GSH) and activities of brain glutathione peroxidase (GSH-P(X)) and catalase (CAT) from declines caused by cerebral ischemia. Moreover, ischemia and reperfusion-induced delayed neuronal loss in the hippocampus CA1 sector and locomotor hyperactivity were also significantly attenuated by pretreatment with E-DHA. These results suggested that the neuroprotective effect of E-DHA might be due to its **antioxidant property.** [Cripes, it's just the ethyl ester of DHA-- same double bond system]
PMID: 15582673 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
4: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;28(4):693-8.
Hypothalamic superoxide dismutase, xanthine oxidase, nitric oxide, and malondialdehyde in rats fed with fish omega-3 fatty acids.
Songur A, Sarsilmaz M, Sogut S, Ozyurt B, Ozyurt H, Zararsiz I, Turkoglu AO.
Department of Anatomy, Afyon Kocatepe University Medical School, Turkey.
Phospholipids located in the cellular membrane play a critical role in the fluid-mosaic model of membrane structure and membrane function. Evidence is mounting for the role of abnormal phospholipid metabolism in some neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia. As an important essential fatty acid (EFA), omega-3 (omega-3) fatty acid series are found in large amounts in fish oil. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the changes of some of the oxidant and antioxidant parameters in the hypothalamus of rats fed with omega-3 EFA diet (0.4 g/kg/day) for 30 days. Eight control rats and nine rats fed with omega-3 were decapitated under ether anesthesia, and hypothalamus was removed immediately. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) levels as well as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and xanthine oxidase (XO) enzyme activities in the hypothalamus were measured. SOD activity was significantly decreased in omega-3 EFA treated group compared to control group (p < 0.014). Tissue MDA and NO levels were also decreased in omega-3 EFA treated group compared to control rats (p < 0.0001). Xanthine oxidase activity was found to be increased in omega-3 EFA treated rats when compared to the control group (p < 0.0001). **Taken together, this preliminary animal study provides strong support for a **therapeutic effect** of omega-3 EFA in some neuropsychiatric disorders in which reactive oxygen species (ROS) are recently accused to be an important physiopathogenetic factor.
PMID: 15276695 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2004 Sep;71(3):149-52.
Effect of fish oil supplementation on plasma oxidant/antioxidant status in rats.
Erdogan H, Fadillioglu E, Ozgocmen S, Sogut S, Ozyurt B, Akyol O, Ardicoglu O.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60100, Turkey. herdogan@gop.edu.tr
The aim of this study was to investigate effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on the indices of in vivo lipid peroxidation and oxidant/antioxidant status of plasma in rats. The plasma thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and nitric oxide (NO) levels, and activities of xanthine oxidase (XO), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX) were studied in male Wistar Albino rats after ingestion of 0.4 g/kg fish oil (rich in omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) for 30 days and compared to untreated control rats. The rats in the treated group had significantly higher SOD activity (P < 0.001), NO levels (P < 0.01) and decreased TBARS levels (P < 0.05) with respect to controls whereas GSH-Px and XO activities were not significantly different between the groups. None of the measured parameters had significant correlation with each other in both groups. ***We conclude that dietary supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids may enhance resistance to free radical attack and reduce lipid peroxidation.*** These results support the notion that omega-3 fatty acids may be effective dietary supplements in the management of various diseases in which oxidant/antioxidant defence mechanisms are decelerated. [You still reading, Monty? Is it penetrating your DHA deficient brain??]
PMID: 15253883 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
6: Metabolism. 2004 Jan;53(1):59-65.
Effects of different dietary oils on inflammatory mediator generation and fatty acid composition in rat neutrophils.
de La Puerta Vazquez R, Martinez-Dominguez E, Sanchez Perona J, Ruiz-Gutierrez V.
Departamento de Farmacologia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Virgin olive oil (VOO) compared with fish oil (FO) and evening primrose oil (PO) on the ability of stimulated leukocytes to produce inflammatory mediators was investigated in rats. Weaned Wistar rats were fed a basal diet (BD) (2% by weight of corn oil) or diets containing 15% by weight of VOO, PO, or FO. After 8 weeks, glycogen-elicited peritoneal polymorphonuclear leukocytes, mainly neutrophils, were isolated. The calcium-ionophore stimulated neutrophils (2.5 x 10(6) cells/mL) obtained from rats fed the different oils produced a higher release of lysosomal enzymes (beta-glucuronidase, lysozyme, and myeloperoxidase [MPO]) compared with those fed BD. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to the stimulant, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA), by neutrophils from the VOO group (15.44 nmol of O(2)(-) and 6.56 nmol of H(2)O(2)) was similar to the BD group (12.01 nmol O(2)(-) and 8.49 nmol H(2)O(2)) and significantly lower than the PO (20.90 nmol O(2)(-) and 10.84 nmol H(2)O(2)) and FO (20.93 nmol O(2)(-) and 12.79 nmol H(2)O(2)) groups. The cyclooxygenase-derived eicosanoid production was reduced by the lipid enrichment of the diets. Whereas the generation of prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) was significantly decreased in VOO (5.40 ng/mL), PO (4.95 ng/mL), and FO (1.44 ng/mL) groups compared with BD (8.19 ng/mL), thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2)) reduction was especially significant in neutrophils from the FO diet group (14.67 ng/mL compared with 26.69 ng/mL from BD). **These experimental data suggest that FO [FISH OIL] and PO, as well as VOO, could be considered a valuable strategy in **preventing the generation of some inflammatory mediators.**
PMID: 14681843 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7: J Am Coll Nutr. 2003 Oct;22(5):388-99.
Effect of dietary n-3 and n-6 oils with and without food restriction on activity of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in livers of cyclophosphamide treated autoimmune-prone NZB/W female mice.
Bhattacharya A, Lawrence RA, Krishnan A, Zaman K, Sun D, Fernandes G.
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA.
OBJECTIVE: Cyclophosphamide (CTX), an alkylating agent, is extensively used in the treatment of lupus nephritis, but its administration has been associated with free radical mediated oxidative stress. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of dietary corn oil (CO), fish oil (FO) and food restriction (FR) on the activities of hepatic antioxidant enzymes, fatty acid composition and lipid peroxidation following CTX administration in autoimmune-prone NZB/W female mice. METHODS: Autoimmune-prone NZB/W female mice were fed either ad libitum (AL) or food restricted (60% of AL intake), semipurified diets containing 5% CO or 5% FO supplemented with equal levels of antioxidants and injected with either phosphate buffered saline (PBS), or CTX (50 mg/kg body weight) every 10 days. Proteinuria was measured biweekly. The treatment was stopped at 10 months and diets were continued until the mice were killed at 12 months. Fatty acid composition, activity of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation were analyzed in liver homogenates, and anti-DNA antibodies were analyzed in the serum. RESULTS: Mice in the FO/AL dietary group exhibited significantly higher liver catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities compared to the CO/AL dietary group. CTX significantly decreased SOD and GSH-Px activity in the FO/AL group and CAT and GSH-Px in the CO/AL group. In AL fed mice given CTX, activities of CAT, GSH-Px and GST were significantly higher in mice fed FO diets than in mice fed CO diets. FR increased the activity of enzymes in both the CO and FO diet groups. In FR mice, CTX decreased CAT and GSH-Px activity in both the CO and FO dietary groups, but glutathione S-transferase (GST) only in the CO group. The decrease in SOD activity was not significant in either of the restricted groups. CTX significantly increased generation of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in both AL groups. FR significantly decreased lipid peroxidation in both the CO and FO groups, with or without CTX. CTX decreased serum anti-DNA antibody levels in both the CO and FO dietary groups. FR also decreased antibody titer in both the CO and FO dietary groups, and it was decreased further with CTX treatment. FO fed animals had higher levels of n-3 fatty acids, whereas CO fed animals had high levels of n-6 fatty acids. CTX significantly increased 20:4 and decreased 18:1 in CO/AL fed animals, whereas it increased 18:1 and decreased 22:6 in FO/AL fed animals. CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained in the present study suggests that FO [FISH OIL] and, more significantly, FO combined with FR [food restriction] can have a **beneficial effect** in hepatic tissues subjected to CTX induced **oxidative stress by regulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes.** In addition, the study also indicates that n-3 and n-6 dietary lipids are susceptible to lipid peroxidation, particularly in the presence of a prooxidant like CTX, and that FR is beneficial in decreasing lipid peroxidation. The study also suggests that FO and CTX can have **additive** effects in preventing kidney disease in NZB/W mice.
PMID: 14559931 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8: Nutrition. 2003 Oct;19(10):837-42.
Decreased oxidative stress in patients with ulcerative colitis supplemented with fish oil omega-3 fatty acids.
Barbosa DS, Cecchini R, El Kadri MZ, Rodriguez MA, Burini RC, Dichi I.
Laboratory of Biochemistry, Londrina State University, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.
OBJECTIVE: The potential pathogenicity of free radicals may have a pivotal role in ulcerative colitis. Fish oil omega-3 fatty acids exert anti-inflammatory effects on patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), but the precise mechanism of the action of fish oil on oxidative stress is still controversial. The aim of the present work was to verify the blood oxidative stress in patients with UC and determine whether the association of sulfasalazine to fish oil omega-3 fatty acids is more effective than isolated use of sulfasalazine to reduce the oxidative stress. METHODS: Nine patients (seven female and two male; mean age = 40 +/- 11 y) with mild or moderate active UC were studied in a randomized crossover design. In addition to their usual medication (2 g/d of sulfasalazine), they received fish oil omega-3 fatty acids (4.5 g/d) or placebo for 2-mo treatment periods that were separated by 2 mo, when they only received sulfasalazine. Nine healthy individuals served as control subjects to study the oxidative stress status. Disease activity was assessed by laboratory indicators (C-reactive protein, alpha1-acid glycoprotein, alpha1-antitrypsin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin, hemoglobin, and platelet count), sigmoidoscopy, and histology scores. Analysis of oxidative stress was assessed by plasma chemiluminescence and erythrocyte lipid peroxidation, both induced by tert butyl hydroperoxide (t-BuOOH) and by plasma malondialdehyde. Antioxidant status was assayed by total plasma antioxidant capacity (TRAP) and microsomal lipid peroxidation inhibition (LPI). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase erythrocyte enzymatic activities were also determined. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in any laboratory indicator or in the sigmoidoscopy or histology scores, with the exception of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, which decreased with both treatments. Oxidative stress was demonstrated by significant decreases in TRAP and LPI levels, increased chemiluminescence induced by t-BuOOH, and higher SOD activity in patients with UC. Treatment with fish oil omega-3 fatty acids reverted the chemiluminescence induced by t-BuOOH and LPI to baseline levels but that did not occur when patients received only sulfasalazine. Levels of plasma malondialdehyde, erythrocyte lipid peroxidation, and catalase were not different from those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: **The results indicated that plasma oxidative stress occurs in patients with UC, and there was a significant decrease when the patients used sulfasalazine plus fish oil omega-3 fatty acids.** However, there was no improvement in most laboratory indicators, sigmoidoscopy, and histology scores. **The results suggested that omega-3 fatty acids may act as free radical scavengers protecting the patients against the overall effect of oxidative stress.*** READ IT AGAIN, MONTY
Publication Types: Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 14559317 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
SBH
Mr-Natural-Health - 06 Sep 2005 12:40 GMT > Do you realize that experiments have been done which demonstrate these > fatty acids to be highly unstable? Obviously, it does not penetrate your skull that that fact is a big so what.
And, the reason is obvious. Montygram has been deficient in Omega-3's so long that his brain has roted out. After all, he has on many occasions manifested the public delusion that he has professional credentials and works at a major university. Ha, ... Hah, Ha! Tell me another tall tale, Montygram.
Montygram's brain is so bad that he don't even know what his name is. Or, the name of books that he has never written.
Just my opinion, but I am right as usual.
RArmant - 06 Sep 2005 17:11 GMT >Of course, all this takes a huge amount of nursing care (anxious, >depressed, nauseous, angry, schizoid patients are not going to want to >swallow ten big pills even if they are fishoil and vitamins), and >thereby institutional expense. And there's the rub. One approach is to open the capsules and put it in the food. I would love to see studies done with Alzheimer's victims getting a few grams of DHA per day over a period of several months to years.
>But in the end, it >would probably pay for itself. I don't have time to post the positive >studies of things like fishoil on psych problems (at least down here in >the American corn-fed heartland), but as you say, there are quite a few >of them. RArmant - 06 Sep 2005 21:21 GMT >I would love to see studies done with Alzheimer's victims getting >a few grams of DHA per day over a period of several months to >years. This looks interesting: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00090402
excerpt: Expected Total Enrollment: 39 Study start: April 2004; Expected completion: August 2005
AD is a serious condition associated with increased inflammation, cholesterol, and oxidative stress (a condition involving an excess of free radicals and a decrease in antioxidant levels). Fish oil and alpha lipoic acid, which have few side effects, may help relieve these problems; therefore, these supplements may slow the progression of AD, particularly when given in combination. This study will evaluate the effect of fish oil and alpha lipoic acid on inflammation, lipid levels, and oxidative stress.
Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive fish oil alone, fish oil and alpha lipoic acid, or placebo for 1 year. AD rating scales as well as urine and blood tests will be used to assess participants. Participants will have monthly clinic visits during the study to monitor adverse events and to undergo various laboratory tests.
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 21:38 GMT Fine, if you think these experiments mean anything significant, then take me up on my offer. I'm still waiting...
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 23:01 GMT For those with an open mind:
If you read the studies that SBHarris et al. posted, there are conflicting results.
"The rats in the [fish oil] treated group had significantly higher SOD activity..." whereas another found the opposite.
This is a minor point, though, because what is happening is clear, as others before me have suggested (none of what I am saying is new, novel, or inconsistent with known science): when exposed to oxidative stress, the body responds with higher levels of antioxidants, especially SOD. After a while, the minerals needed for SOD activity are no longer available and massive damage occurs, which is why zinc, selenium, and other minerals are being called "cures" for cancer. They are not cures, but instead are needed for SOD function. Over time, the lipid peroxidation takes its toll, leading to cancer or some other "disease."
At this point, it is generally agreed that "vitamin E" is the best indicator of lipid peroxidation (I know of no scientist who disagrees with this), and it appears that some researchers who have ties to fish oil interests are not looking at vitamin E levels on purpose. But if you ever get a chance to ask such a reseacher a question, the best one is, "if you were looking for lipid peroxidation, why didn't you measure vitamin E levels of the alpha form?" There really is not answer except, "I don't know what I'm doing," or "I can't make the people paying my salary unhappy, now can I?"
Moreover, we do not know what the "control diet" was. Because these researchers believe that omega 3 and 6 PUFAs are "essential," they load the animals up with stuff like safflower oil, which can indeed be worse, depending upon the quality of the oil. There are some natural antioxidants in most oils, though usually most is refined out of it. If they don't measure the antioxidant potencies of the oils they use, there is no way to know if this is a major factor in the results. However, similar studies have actually been done on people, so there is no need to cite mouse/rat studies. For example (and this is from a site that makes the same claim SBHarris does):
"Researchers at the Oregon State University have just released two major studies designed to further explore this concern. The first study involved 15 postmenopausal women who were randomized to supplement with 15 grams/day of sunflower oil, 15 grams/day of safflower oil or 15 grams/day of fish oil (providing 2.0 grams of EPA and 1.4 grams of DHA per day) in a 3-treatment crossover trial. The researchers conclude that there is no evidence that fish oil supplementation increases lipid peroxidation when assessed by measuring the levels of blood plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) and F2-isoprostanes. However, a slight increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) was noted in the fish oil supplemented group."
Source: http://www.oilofpisces.com/vitamine.html
So you can see what is going on. They only use oils that are all susceptible to tremendous free radical degradation, so the results mean next to nothing (though higher levels of the TBARS marker was found in the fish oil people). This is why people like SBHarris won't take me up on my experiment offer, that is, because the control animals will not get a horrible oil such as sunflower or safflower, but instead they will get fresh coconut oil, which is highly resistant to free radical degradation. SBHarris knows that he/she will look like a fool after such an experiment is conducted and will not take the challenge. And there will be no possibility of misleading markers, because we will accept only mortality as the "endpoint." They can't play their shell games with me because I have researched this for years (and I'm an academic myself) so I know all the little tricks they try and use to "massage" the results.
SBHarris is fighting a battle he/she can't win, because the science is very clear. As the "experts" catch on, you will hear more and more about it, or will be nudged in a different direction. For example, when I was younger, the message was out that one should use highly polyunsaturated oils. Sunflower and safflower were being advocated, yet now we hear about olive oil. Why? They are not telling you that higher consumption of oils like sunflower and safflower means a much higher cancer risk. Otherwise, what would be the reason to switch over to olive oil? If they didn't know what they were talking about when they made grand pronouncements in favor of safflower oil, why should anyone believe the now? The only reason to believe anyone is that the claim is consistent with known science.
I was attacked here not long ago for posting a study with markers, yet they then support their points with studies containing markers. They have no internal consisstency. However, when you supply an underlying mechanism that is consistent with basic, known science, such as the properties of the elements on the periodic table, then markers of this mechanism are useful, though not conclusive, of course. Science is not about "proof" (which is for math and formal logic), but about an interpretation of the evidence. Markes are ridiculous when it is known that they are not valid, or when grand claims are made for them. An excellent example is using total cholesterol or LDL, when even AHA spokesmen are saying it's the oxidation of the cholesterol, and not the cholesterol itself. For those of you who want to be tested for oxidized cholesterol, which is not done except by specialty labs, you can go to www.gsdl.com. The best thing to do is just to eat in a way consistent with the oxidative stress hypothesis first put forth by Denham Harman more than three decades ago. As Dr. Richard Stein of the AHA said, the data that has become available in the last 10 or 15 years is very strong in favor of the oxidative stress/damage hypothesis. By contrast, there is no overall hypothesis that is a challenge to it. There are the "bug hunters" at the CDC, for example, but for the most part, there is a general and non-scientific notion that the body just "gets sick" or "falls apart" as you get older. There is the idea that "bad genes" are a problem, yet aside from a few very rare disorders that occur during infancy or during growth spurts, the corrrelations are minimal. One is slightly more likely to be afflicted, and that's not even considering that children are very likely to be eating the same kinds of food their parents who "get ill" do.
Be thankful that I am here, pointing out the incredibly dangerous advice some possibly well-meaning but terribly misguided (deluded?) individuals are posting here. I am willing to help anyone free of charge who has a problem and seeks advice. Just do a post with a title like "Montygram, I need help with chronic back pain" for example. It's free, and I get nothing whatsoever from helping you, not even recognition. I feel it's my responsibility, just as a parent has responsibilities to his/her children. I received grants at the taxpayers expense to go to graduate school, and so feel obligated to pay those people back in a way that can save lives and alleviate suffering.
montygram - 06 Sep 2005 23:27 GMT Two other points:
One experiment ran for "30 days" and involved "Eight control rats and nine rats fed with omega-3." This is really more of a joke than an experiment. I propose at least 50 animals, with the experiment running until the animals die of "natural cauess."
My proposed experiment has a problem, which I readily admit to, and that is that animals have instincts which tell them not to eat fish oil (or other dangerous oils like safflower, sunflower, etc.) and so the animals would have to be force fed the fish oil. Otherwise - and this has happened (though you don't read about it in the report) - the fish oil animals are actually on a calorie-resticted diet because they try to eat as little of the fish oil as possible. If it is mixed in with the other food, they eat less. Therefore, unless one force feeds them the fish oil, it is not a valid experiment (in terms of what the researchers claim the results mean). As long as one has no problem force feeding the animals the fish oil (and as long as the carb/protein sources are the same, with no added antioxidants), we can do the experiment and see who is correct. But they will never put their money where their mouths are because they know they will lose badly. The fish oil animals will drop dead like flies, just as they have in past experiments that fed the animals fish oil from birth to death. There is no problem with the coconut, however, because I have problems with mice getting into my 25 pound bag of shredded coconut. They love the stuff. There's a reason for it. They have instincts whereas we must use reason, something many people on this newsgroup either never had, or lost somewhere along the line.
Matti Narkia - 10 Sep 2005 19:55 GMT 6 Sep 2005 15:01:13 -0700 in article <1126042798.237416.208100@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "montygram" <nazztrader@lycos.com> wrote:
>At this point, it is generally agreed that "vitamin E" is the best >indicator of lipid peroxidation (I know of no scientist who disagrees >with this), and it appears that some researchers who have ties to fish >oil interests are not looking at vitamin E levels on purpose. You make so many false claims that no one has patience to correct them all, there are more important things to do. There are better indicators for lipid peroxidation than vitamin E status. Why use indirect measurements such as vitamin E when more direct measurements are available? Besides, use of vitamin E supplemenst would surely confuse the picture. A much better measurement is for example F(2)-isoprostanes.
 Signature Matti Narkia
David Wright - 05 Sep 2005 02:05 GMT >> is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis >> and the epidemiology of human cancer. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Cod liver oil, which has toxic amounts of vitamin A if used as a major >dietary component, cannot be compared with fish (body) oil. How can you say that? Those fine people from the Weston A. Price foundation assure me it's the cure for all diseases (so Hulda got it wrong after all).
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me." -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
George Cherry - 05 Sep 2005 03:59 GMT >> is discussed in relation to animal models of chemical carcinogenesis >> and the epidemiology of human cancer. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > men's sperm counts to zero, there would be no Eskimos to be transported > here and there in the North, by their cancerous sled dogs. LOL! Funny, funny, funny.
> Give us a break. I've posted a dozen papers showing omega-3 > supplementation makes oxidative damage drop, in vivo. The only papers [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > SBH montygram - 05 Sep 2005 05:44 GMT That fish oil is highly susceptible to free radical degradation is basic science. If you don't understand it, you are just a fool. Flax/linseed is high in omega 3s and used in oil painting precisely because it degrades so quickly that it hardens up and has the properties needed for this task. If you tried to oil paint with coconut oil, it would take years to dry. If you don't understand this, there's just no hope for you.
Contact biochemist Ray Peat if you want the full citation. You can go to pubmed.com and you'll find studies of Eskimos who have high rates of "diseases" due to free radical damage. On high omega 3 diets, the body literally disintegrates. Minor blunt force traumas become deadly. Bleeding strokes are common, even in young adults. I just hope somone like SBHarris does consume a lot of fish oil (of any kind), because then he will be hurting himself as well as others (as he must be doing by his nonsense postings). Look at the raw demographic data. Eskimos eating large amounts of omega 3s rarely see their fiftieth birthday. Asians on coconut oil live long lives with hardly any chronic disease. Those numbers just don't like. Only people like SBHarris do.
joshv - 07 Sep 2005 00:54 GMT > That fish oil is highly susceptible to free radical degradation is > basic science. If you don't understand it, you are just a fool. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > coconut oil, it would take years to dry. If you don't understand this, > there's just no hope for you. Yes, and the next time I need to paint my intestines I will keep this in mind. My digestive system, however, is not a canvas, nor does it react with the materials I eat in the same way a painter's canvas does.
> Contact biochemist Ray Peat if you want the full citation. You can go > to pubmed.com and you'll find studies of Eskimos who have high rates of > "diseases" due to free radical damage. On high omega 3 diets, the body > literally disintegrates. Ok, let's see about those Inuit (as Eskimos are called these days) diseases on pubmed. Search term: "Inuit Omega-3"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=15736672&query_hl=1
CONCLUSION: These data show that peri- and post-menopausal Greenland Inuit women have very high plasma concentrations of n-3 fatty acids that protect them from ischemic heart disease.
And 75% of these women were smokers.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=15588018&query_hl=1
This one found that the more DHA an Inuit baby had in it's blood, the higher it's birth weight.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=14594198&query_hl=1
CONCLUSION: The change in traditional diets has already led to increased health problems, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, while the mental health of circumpolar peoples has also declined substantially during the same time period. The decline in mental health is characterized by increased rates of depression, seasonal affective disorder, anxiety, and suicide, that now often occur at higher rates than in lower-latitude populations. Studies in non-circumpolar peoples have shown that diet can have profound effects on neuronal and brain development, function, and health. Therefore, we hypothesize that diet is an important risk factor for mental health in circumpolar peoples.
---------------------------------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=14504206&query_hl=1
Incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer are reported to be low among Inuit, but this finding must be additionally supported given the difficulty of obtaining a precise medical diagnosis in the Arctic. We conducted an autopsy study in 1990-1994 among 61 deceased males representative of all deaths occurring in Greenland and found only one invasive prostate cancer. Histological data were available for 27 autopsies and revealed no latent carcinoma. Our results suggest that in situ carcinoma is rare among Inuit and that their traditional diet, which is rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and selenium, may be an important protective factor.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=12848280&query_hl=1
"Our results indicate that increased consumption of fish as a source of n-3 fatty acids is beneficially associated with levels of HDL cholesterol and triacylglycerols."
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=11720618&query_hl=1
"Evidence first reported 20 years ago from the Greenland Inuit population suggested that fatty fish and fish oils contained substances that reduced the incidence of ischemic heart disease. These substances, later determined to be omega-3 fatty acids, were found in early clinical trials to reduce platelet aggregation and to reduce hypertriglyceridemia by as much as 35%. More recent trials have found that omega-3 fatty acids also appear to reduce the risk of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death and modestly reduce atherosclerotic plaque formation and hypertension. Clinical trials have not demonstrated adverse effects at moderate daily doses. These findings have implications for clinicians who may want to suggest that patients increase their intake of fatty fish or supplement their diet with more concentrated sources of omega-3 fatty acids."
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=11566644&query_hl=1
CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of marine products, the main source of EPA and DHA, appears to beneficially affect some cardiovascular disease risk factors. The traditional Inuit diet, which is rich in n-3 fatty acids, is probably responsible for the low mortality rate from ischemic heart disease in this population.
Perhaps I am using the wrong search terms... Can you give me some references to substantiate your claims?
> Minor blunt force traumas become deadly. > Bleeding strokes are common, even in young adults. I just hope somone > like SBHarris does consume a lot of fish oil (of any kind), because > then he will be hurting himself as well as others (as he must be doing > by his nonsense postings). Are you just making sh.t up?
> Look at the raw demographic data. Eskimos > eating large amounts of omega 3s rarely see their fiftieth birthday. Reference please?
> Asians on coconut oil live long lives with hardly any chronic disease. > Those numbers just don't like. Only people like SBHarris do. If SBHarris is lying, please provide some references that refute his claims and the finding of the studies above.
bae@cs.toronto.no-uce.edu - 07 Sep 2005 02:41 GMT >> That fish oil is highly susceptible to free radical degradation is >> basic science. If you don't understand it, you are just a fool. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >in mind. My digestive system, however, is not a canvas, nor does it >react with the materials I eat in the same way a painter's canvas does. Just to shoot down one of the original poster's incorrect claims, raw linseed oil is not a drying oil, suitable for use in paint. It has to be treated at high heat in an industrial process I don't recall the details of to make "boiled" linseed oil for use in that application. If you try to oil paint with raw linseed oil, it will take years to dry too.
Both raw and boiled linseed oils are used in woodworking. Feel free to obtain some of each at your local hardware store and see for yourself.
Twittering One - 07 Sep 2005 03:33 GMT "Deficiency in omega-3 fatty acids Tied to ADHD ~
Just to shoot down One of the original poster's incorrect claims, Raw linseed oil is not a drying oil, Suitable for use in paint." ~ B
"... or to glaze?" ~ Blackstone
"It has to be treated At high heat, in an industrial process, I don't recall ..." ~ B
"Stable, or fugitive, Well cared for, or on the loose?" ~ B
"The details of ... To make boiled linseed oil For use in that application." ~ B
"The painting's ground, Aptly prepared, The landscape scene, yonder window, Sited as seen in autumn's crisply alternating Sharp air." ~ Blackstone
"If you try to mix oil paint with raw linseed oil, It will take years to Dry, too." ~ B
"... so unlike tempera, Al fresco, or sunlight interior, Liquid mutates, joins,
Married, one with wall's ground, light to plane, Window's wall, passage opened To garden." ~ Blackstone
"Both raw and boiled linseed oils a Are used In woodworking." ~ B
"And of woodworking, A cabinet ~ maker, perhaps you know, For a Curio Cabinet, as well, a fine Studiolo, I require,
Expert carpentry, for my needs, my parquet Must exceed status quo,
Must be far more superior, than satisfactory. The best, I will hire, no less, No more.
For know ~ A Loyal Trompe l'Oeil I desire." ~ Blackstone
Twittering One - 07 Sep 2005 03:38 GMT "The studiolo from the ducal palace In Gubbio ~
One of the most important Works of art Of the Italian Renaissance, whereupon, Within, many hours,
I have spent, The Metropolitan Museum, My stomping ground, en Morning Wood's backyard ..."
http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/studiolo/studiolo.html
Twittering One - 07 Sep 2005 03:49 GMT "The grouping of these objects may at first seem puzzling
but becomes clear once we realize that all five are concerned with measurement and proportion.
The set square and plumb bob were used as a level by builders and architects.
The dividers were employed to measure distances on a chart or to determine the scale of a design.
The sandglass, an instrument popular in the late Middle Ages, indicated the equal hours,
which came into general usage in the last third of the fourteenth century.
During the fifteenth century the theory of musical proportions and the studies of linear perspective and architectural proportions came to be seen as expressions of the same mathematical truth,
so even musical instruments such as the cittern depicted here must be understood as an allusion to the theory of music's harmonic proportions."
http://www.metmuseum.org/explore/studiolo/studiolo3.html
montygram - 07 Sep 2005 06:14 GMT Here are some relevant passages from "Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk" published by The National Research Council (USA), third printing:
The first (page 191) describes why omega 3s seem to be beneficial: "This could be due to preferential incorporation and may lead to less arachidonate [AA] being available for cyclooxygenase [CoxX-2]. There may also be competition for cyclooxygenase between [AA] and EPA (which is oxygenated less efficiently than arachidonate), resulting in less TXA-2 formation [which is a metabolite of AA that causes platelet aggregation]."
So as I've said many times before, I am not the first to say these things. What's also interesting here is that they say "oxygenated less efficiently," which means free radical degradation. Other studies show that in some contexts AA is more unstable than EPA, but it depends on what is done to the fatty acids. Both are dangerous in humans, for example:
"Dietary fats increase the yield of mammary tumors only when they contain adequate amounts of omega 6 PUFAs... The requirements for omega 6 PUFAs in mammary tumor promotion systematically by Ip et al.(1985), who reported 4 to 5% of total calories as the threshold at which the yield of mammary tumors increased." Page 213. Isn't that something that it would have been nice if the media had told us 20 years ago, and reminded us of on occasion since then? They also found that rats are more resistant, needing 8% or more total calories of omega 6 PUFAs to reach the threshold. You are being told to eat plenty of canola oil, which is about 37% omega 6 PUFAs. How do you feel about that suggestion now? Also on page 213: "...fats such as butter, coconut oil, and beef tallow have little effect on mammary carcinogenesis." There, they also say that results with olive oil have been mixed, probably due to the quality of the oil. But here's a great point: "...a relatively high ratio of fish oil to [oils high in omega 6 PUFAs] is required to counteract the promoting effects [of pancreatic, mammary, and colon cancer] of the [oils high in omega 6 PUFAs]."
Again, exactly what I was saying about the problem. You must eat huge amounts of fish oil for the effect to be felt and to last. This point is made explicitly again on page 600. They make the point that "prostaglandins may be involved" in carcinogenesis on page 601, and are directly on point about free radical damage: "...the extreme susceptibility of the omega 3 fatty acids in fish oil to oxidation may give rise to products other than prostaglandins that act as inhibitors of carcinogenesis." Because fish oil goes rancid so quickly, the damage to the body occurs in the stomach, which explains why the Japanese still have high stomach cancer rates, even though all other "advanced nations" used to have much higher stomach cancer rates than they do now. It would be worthwhile to create a model of normal conditions in the human stomach and see what the lipid peroxidation from the various oils is like. The evidence suggests that fish oil will do its damage in the stomach, and thus the "markers" of lipid peroxidation will be lower than for an oil like safflower.
As to the Eskimos: "...the risk of CHD [heart disease] is unknown in this small population, whose members... usually die before middle age." Page 192. Then there is: "In Greenland Eskimos, bleeding time averaged 8 minutes; in a Danish control population [and most people know that the Danes eat quite a bit of fish as well], it was 5 minutes." Page 191. As most people realize, if you suffer a minor blow to the head, and your platelet function is diminished, you are in big trouble, which is why bleeding strokes were so common among such peoples.
As I've said about the bogus "coconut oil is bad" studies: "Malmros and Wigand (1957) found that hydrogenated coconut oil elevated serum cholesterol more than other plant oils rich in PUFAs, but they did not test the effects of hydrogenation alone." Page 186. Since it is now known that oxidized cholesterol is the problem, this is important, because highly refined/hydrogenated coconut oil will be stripped of antioxidants, and since it is about 8% unsaturated, it may be a problem, though not nearly as bad as the highly unsaturated oils.
On the other hand, a major study from France found that for butter and yogurt "there was the suggestion of a protective effect" against breast cancer. Page 207.
And now the scariest part: "The percentage of calories contributed by linoleic [omega 6 PUFAs] to total fat intake increased from 7% during 1909-1913 to about 16% in 1985, whereas the corresponding percentage from SFAs [saturated fatty acids] declined from approximately 42 to 34%. In 1985, linoleic acid was available at 7% of total calories, SFAs at 15%, and oleic at 17%." Also: "The proportion of animal fat declined from 83 to 58%, as butter and lard use declined [and lard became more unsaturated as well, due to what the animals were fed], whereas the proportion of vegetable fat (in margarines and in sald and cooking oils) fose from 17 to 42%." Page 160. Make a graph of this, and assume for the sake of simplicity that there is a gradual increase or decrease. Now go to the CDC or NIH web sites and get a graph of the various chronic diseases: the common cancers, diabetes, heart disease, etc., and make a similar graph. What you will discover is shocking, in light of the advice being given my the mainstream "experts." Over the last 5 years or so there have been many reports of "epidemics" in obesity, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, ADHD, etc., and that appears to be due to the rise in canola/rapeseed oil consumption. Look at some of the prepared foods in your local supermarket (or even in the "health food stores") and you will see these oils as one of the top ingredients in almost everything.
As I've demonstrated here, the recent studies that purport to show a "benefit" to these very dangerous substances (unless you are a plant that grows in Canada or a salmon) are almost all short-term and use markers and endpoints that are based on faulty assumptions, or no underlying assumptions at all. The researchers involved appear to be unaware of the professional literature which they are supposed to have mastered. If they do not agree with the huge amount of evidence arrayed against their claims, it is their responsibility to explain why they feel this way. Yet they act as if it doesn't exist at all, probably because they are young and inexperienced, or have not "done their homework." In the graduate department in which I received my Ph.D., such "studies" would have resulted in the student being reprimanded due to a lack of a basic understanding of the discipline's methodology. One must confront contrary claims and explain exactly what is going on. That is what I have done here, and that is what the prestigious National Research Council and many scientists have done a long time ago.
Within the context of electron stealing/oxidative stress/ free radical damage/reactive oxygen species/lipid peroxidation or whatever it is called by a group of researchers, the evidence is overwhelming in favor of this hypothesis, and there is no other all-encompassing one that now exists. It is not my fault that the media seems to be quite happy to go along with the latest snake oil pitch, but I'll be damned if I sit around and do nothing for the people who seek scientifically-sound advice on the diet/health connection. If you choose to consume large amounts of fish oil, canola oil, or any of the other dangerous oils, in light of this evidence, I have no doubt that you will get what you deserve, but because I believe in the scientific method, I am willing to pay for a relevant, on-point experiment that lasts until the animals die of "natural causes." So far, all I see are the same studies cited - ones that were refuted over 15 years ago, before most of the researchers involved in the latest batch of studies probably graduated from high school.
MattLB - 08 Sep 2005 18:00 GMT > The first (page 191) describes why omega 3s seem to be beneficial: > "This could be due to preferential incorporation and may lead to less [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > things. What's also interesting here is that they say "oxygenated > less efficiently," which means free radical degradation. No it doesn't. It sounds like you don't know what cyclooxygenase does to FA and what the "oxygenated" means in that context.
> Other > studies show that in some contexts AA is more unstable than EPA, but it > depends on what is done to the fatty acids. Both are dangerous in > humans, for example: So your position is basically: omega 6 is bad because tumour cells grow better when it's around omega 3 is bad because it kills tumour cells, so must therefore be really toxic
Or in other words both tumour growth and tumour death are bad. What does that leave? Mead Acid, which is bad because it promotes tumour metastasis.
> "Dietary fats increase the yield of mammary tumors only when they > contain adequate amounts of omega 6 PUFAs... The requirements for omega [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > omega 6 PUFAs to reach the threshold. You are being told to eat plenty > of canola oil, which is about 37% omega 6 PUFAs. That figure has nothing to do with with the 5% mentioned previously - they're referring to different things.
> Again, exactly what I was saying about the problem. You must eat huge > amounts of fish oil for the effect to be felt and to last. This point [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > give rise to products other than prostaglandins that act as inhibitors > of carcinogenesis." As usual you don't realise that oxidation can be a perfectly normal part of metabolism.
> As I've said about the bogus "coconut oil is bad" studies: > "Malmros and Wigand (1957) found that hydrogenated coconut oil [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > is important, because highly refined/hydrogenated coconut oil will be > stripped of antioxidants, and since it is about 8% unsaturated, Not after hydrogenation. According to your theories it should be better when fully hydrogenated.
> On the other hand, a major study from France found that for butter and > yogurt "there was the suggestion of a protective effect" against > breast cancer. Page 207. You're happy to back up your theories with "suggestions" are you?
> As I've demonstrated here, the recent studies that purport to show a > "benefit" to these very dangerous substances (unless you are a > plant that grows in Canada or a salmon) Yes, just how is it salmon don't "disintegrate" from all the omega-3 in them?
MattLB
montygram - 08 Sep 2005 22:12 GMT Where are all the true believers when it comes to doing an experiment that will be on point? Why are they not even explaining why they won't take me up on my offer.
I have debunked all of their ideas before. I am not going to go through all my files every time somebody posts something about fish oil. Presumably, the National Research Council cannot be trusted in their interpretation of the evidence, which they site it the book. Why? Everything they say is consistent with the evidence. And if MattLB wants to swim around nude in the north Atlantic the rest of his life, he may be correct that the omega 3s will not be his biggest worry.
So who will take me up on my offer?
I am still waiting...
montygram - 08 Sep 2005 23:20 GMT For those who want even more citations and perhaps most importantly, a scientific explanation of the phenomena at issue, go to:
http://www.efn.org/~raypeat/
You will find such entries as the following:
UNSATURATED VEGETABLE OILS: TOXIC
GLOSSARY:
Immunodeficiency (weakness of the immune system) can take many forms. AIDS, for example, refers to an immunodeficiency which is "acquired," rather than "inborn." Radiation and vegetable oils can cause "acquired immunodeficiency." Unsaturated oils, especially polyunsaturates, weaken the immune system's function in ways that are similar to the damage caused by radiation, hormone imbalance, cancer, aging, or viral infections. The media discuss sexually transmitted and drug-induced immunodeficiency, but it isn't yet considered polite to discuss vegetable oil-induced immunodeficiency.
Unsaturated oils: When an oil is saturated, that means that the molecule has all the hydrogen atoms it can hold. Unsaturation means that some hydrogen atoms have been removed, and this opens the structure of the molecule in a way that makes it susceptible to attack by free radicals.
Free radicals are reactive molecular fragments that occur even in healthy cells, and can damage the cell. When unsaturated oils are exposed to free radicals they can create chain reactions of free radicals that spread the damage in the cell, and contribute to the cell's aging.
Rancidity of oils occurs when they are exposed to oxygen, in the body just as in the bottle. Harmful free radicals are formed, and oxygen is used up.
Essential fatty acids (EFA) are, according to the textbooks, linoleic acid and linolenic acid, and they are supposed to have the status of "vitamins," which must be taken in the diet to make life possible. However, we are able to synthesize our own unsaturated fats when we don't eat the "EFA," so they are not "essential." The term thus appears to be a misnomer. [M. E. Hanke, "Biochemistry," Encycl. Brit. Book of the Year, 1948.]
Q: You say vegetable oils are hazardous to your health. What vegetable oils are you talking about?
Mainly, I'm referring to soybean oil, corn oil, safflower oil, canola, sesame oil, sunflower seed oil, palm oil, and any others that are labeled as "unsaturated" or "polyunsaturated." Almond oil, which is used in many cosmetics, is very unsaturated.
Chemically, the material that makes these oils very toxic is the polyunsaturated fat itself. These unsaturated oils are found in very high concentrations in many seeds, and in the fats of animals that have eaten a diet containing them. The fresh oils, whether cold pressed or consumed as part of the living plant material, are intrinsically toxic, and it is not any special industrial treatment that makes them toxic. Since these oils occur in other parts of plants at lower concentration, and in the animals which eat the plants, it is impossible to eat a diet which lacks them, unless special foods are prepared in the laboratory.
These toxic oils are sometimes called the "essential fatty acids" or "vitamin F," but this concept of the oils as essential nutrients was clearly disproved over 50 years ago.
Linoleic and linolenic acids, the "essential fatty acids," and other polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are now fed to pigs to fatten them, in the form of corn and soy beans, cause the animals' fat to be chemically equivalent to vegetable oil. In the late 1940s, chemical toxins were used to suppress the thyroid function of pigs, to make them get fatter while consuming less food. When that was found to be carcinogenic, it was then found that corn and soy beans had the same antithyroid effect, causing the animals to be fattened at low cost. The animals' fat becomes chemically similar to the fats in their food, causing it to be equally toxic, and equally fattening.
These oils are derived from seeds, but their abundance in some meat has led to a lot of confusion about "animal fats." Many researchers still refer to lard as a "saturated fat," but this is simply incorrect when pigs are fed soybeans and corn.
Q: How are these oils hazardous to your health?
Ultimately, all systems of the body are harmed by an excess of these oils. There are two reasons for this. One is that the plants produce the oils for protection, not only to store energy for the germination of the seed. To defend the seeds from the animals that would eat them, the oils block the digestive enzymes in the animals' stomachs. Digestion is one of our most basic functions, and evolution has built many other systems by using variations of that system; as a result, all of these systems are damaged by the substances which damage the digestive system.
The other reason is that the seeds are designed to germinate in early spring, so their energy stores must be accessible when the temperatures are cool, and they normally don't have to remain viable through the hot summer months. Unsaturated oils are liquid when they are cold, and this is necessary for any organism that lives at low temperatures. For example, fish in cold water would be stiff if they contained saturated fats. These oils easily get rancid (spontaneously oxidizing) when they are warm and exposed to oxygen. Seeds contain a small amount of vitamin E to delay rancidity. When the oils are stored in our tissues, they are much warmer, and more directly exposed to oxygen, than they would be in the seeds, and so their tendency to oxidize is very great. These oxidative processes can damage enzymes and other parts of cells, and especially their ability to produce energy.
The enzymes which break down proteins are inhibited by unsaturated fats, and these enzymes are needed not only for digestion, but also for production of thyroid hormones, clot removal, immunity, and the general adaptability of cells. The risks of abnormal blood clotting, inflammation, immune deficiency, shock, aging, obesity, and cancer are increased. Thyroid and progesterone are decreased. Since the unsaturated oils block protein digestion in the stomach, we can be malnourished even while "eating well."
Plants produce many protective substances to repel or injure insects and other animals that eat them. They produce their own pesticides. The oils in seeds have this function. On top of this natural toxicity, the plants are sprayed with industrial pesticides, which can concentrate in the seed oils.
It isn't the quantity of these polyunsaturated oils which governs the harm they do, but the relationship between them and the saturated fats. Obesity, free radical production, the formation of age pigment, blood clotting, inflammation, immunity, and energy production are all responsive to the ratio of unsaturated fats to saturated fats, and the higher this ratio is, the greater the probability of harm there is.
There are interesting interactions between these oils and estrogen. For example, puberty occurs at an earlier age if estrogen is high, or if these oils are more abundant in the diet. This is probably a factor in the development of cancer.
All systems of the body are harmed by an excess of these oils. There are three main kinds of damage: one, hormonal imbalances, two, damage to the immune system, and three, oxidative damage.
Q: How do they cause hormonal imbalances?
There are many changes in hormones caused by unsaturated fats. Their best understood effect is their interference with the function of the thyroid gland. Unsaturated oils block thyroid hormone secretion, its movement in the circulatory system, and the response of tissues to the hormone. When the thyroid hormone is deficient, the body is generally exposed to increased levels of estrogen. The thyroid hormone is essential for making the "protective hormones" progesterone and pregnenolone, so these hormones are lowered when anything interferes with the function of the thyroid. The thyroid hormone is required for using and eliminating cholesterol, so cholesterol is likely to be raised by anything which blocks the thyroid function. [B. Barnes and L. Galton, Hypothyroidism, 1976, and 1994 references.]
Q: How do they damage the immune system?
Vegetable oil is recognized as a drug for knocking out the immune system. Vegetable oil emulsions were used to nourish cancer patients, but it was discovered that the unsaturated oils were suppressing their immune systems. The same products, in which vegetable oil is emulsified with water for intravenous injection, are now marketed specifically for the purpose of suppressing immunity in patients who have had organ transplants. Using the oils in foods has the same harmful effect on the immune system. [E. A. Mascioli, et al.,Lipids 22(6) 421, 1987.] Unsaturated fats directly kill white blood cells. [C. J. Meade and J. Martin, Adv. Lipid Res., 127, 1978.]
Q: How do they cause oxidative damage?
Unsaturated oils get rancid when exposed to air; that is called oxidation, and it is the same process that occurs when oil paint "dries." Free radicals are produced in the process. This process is accelerated at higher temperatures. The free radicals produced in this process react with parts of cells, such as molecules of DNA and protein and may become attached to those molecules, causing abnormalities of structure and function.
Q: What if I eat only organically grown vegetable oils?
Even without the addition of agricultural chemicals, an excess of unsaturated vegetable oils damages the human body. Cancer can't occur, unless there are unsaturated oils in the diet. [C. Ip, et al., Cancer Res. 45, 1985.] Alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver cannot occur unless there are unsaturated oils in the diet. [Nanji and French, Life Sciences. 44, 1989.] Heart disease can be produced by unsaturated oils, and prevented by adding saturated oils to the diet. [J. K. G. Kramer, et al., Lipids 17, 372, 1983.]
Q. What oils are safe?
Coconut and olive oil are the only vegetable oils that are really safe, but butter and lamb fat, which are highly saturated, are generally very safe (except when the animals have been poisoned). Coconut oil is unique in its ability to prevent weight-gain or cure obesity, by stimulating metabolism. It is quickly metabolized, and functions in some ways as an antioxidant. Olive oil, though it is somewhat fattening, is less fattening than corn or soy oil, and contains an antioxidant which makes it protective against heart disease and cancer.
Israel had the world's highest incidence of breast cancer when they allowed the insecticide lindane to be used in dairies, and the cancer rate decreased immediately after the government prohibited its use. The United States has fairly good laws to control the use of cancer-causing agents in the food supply, but they are not vigorously enforced. Certain cancers are several times more common among corn farmers than among other farmers, presumably because corn "requires" the use of more pesticides. This probably makes corn oil's toxicity greater than it would be otherwise, but even the pure, organically grown material is toxic, because of its intrinsic unsaturation.
In the United States, lard is toxic because the pigs are fed large quantities of corn and soy beans. Besides the intrinsic toxicity of the seed oils, they are contaminated with agricultural chemicals. Corn farmers have a very high incidence of cancer, presumably because of the pesticides they use on their crop.
Q: But aren't "tropical oils" bad for us?
In general, tropical oils are much more healthful than oils produced in a cold climate. This is because tropical plants live at a temperature that is close to our natural body temperature. Tropical oils are stable at high temperatures. When we eat tropical oils, they don't get rancid in our tissues as the cold-climate seed oils, such as corn oil, safflower oil and soy oil, do. [R.B. Wolf, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 59, 230, 1982; R. Wolfe, Chem 121, Univ. of Oregon, 1986.]
When added to a balanced diet, coconut oil slightly lowers the cholesterol level, which is exactly what is expected when a dietary change raises thyroid function. This same increase in thyroid function and metabolic rate explains why people and animals that regularly eat coconut oil are lean, and remarkably free of heart disease and cancer.
Although I don't recommend "palm oil" as a food, because I think it is less stable than coconut oil, some studies show that it contains valuable nutrients. For example, it contains antioxidants similar to vitamin E, which lowers both LDL cholesterol and a platelet clotting factor. [B. A. Bradlow, University of Illinois, Chicago; Science News 139, 268, 1991.] Coconut oil and other tropical oils also contain some hormones that are related to pregnenolone or progesterone.
Q: Isn't coconut oil fattening?
Coconut oil is the least fattening of all the oils. Pig farmers tried to use it to fatten their animals, but when it was added to the animal feed, coconut oil made the pigs lean [See Encycl. Brit. Book of the Year, 1946].
Q: What about olive oil? Isn't it more fattening than other vegetable oils?
In this case, as with coconut oil, "fattening" has more to do with your ability to burn calories than with the caloric value of the oil. Olive oil has a few more calories per quart than corn or soy oil, but since it doesn't damage our ability to burn calories as much as the unsaturated oils do, it is less fattening. Extra virgin olive oil is the best grade, and contains an antioxidant that protects against cancer and heart disease. [1994, Curr. Conts.]
Q: Is "light" olive oil okay?
No. Now and then someone learns how to make a profit from waste material. "Knotty pine" boards were changed from a discarded material to a valued decorative material by a little marketing skill. Light olive oil is a low grade material which sometimes has a rancid smell and probably shouldn't be used as food.
Q: Is margarine okay?
There are several problems with margarine. The manufacturing process introduces some toxins, including a unique type of fat which has been associated with heart disease. [Sci. News, 1974; 1991.] There are likely to be dyes and preservatives added to margarine. And newer products contain new chemicals that haven't been in use long enough to know whether they are safe.
However, the basic hardening process, hydrogenation of the oils, has been found to make the oils less likely to cause cancer. If I had to choose between eating ordinary corn oil or corn oil that was 100% saturated, to make a hard margarine, I would choose the hard margarine, because it resists oxidation, isn't suppressive to the thyroid gland, and doesn't cause cancer.
Q: What about butter?
Butter contains natural vitamin A and D and some beneficial natural hormones. It is less fattening than the unsaturated oils. There is much less cholesterol in an ounce of butter than in a lean chicken breast [about 1/5 as much cholesterol in fat as in lean meat on a calorie basis, according to R. Reiser of Texas A & M Univ., 1979.].
Q: Are fish oils good for you?
Some of the unsaturated fats in fish are definitely less toxic than those in corn oil or soy oil, but that doesn't mean they are safe. Fifty years ago, it was found that a large amount of cod liver oil in dogs' diet increased their death rate from cancer by 20 times, from the usual 5% to 100%. A diet rich in fish oil causes intense production of toxic lipid peroxides, and has been observed to reduce a man's sperm count to zero. [H. Sinclair, Prog. Lipid Res. 25, 667, 1989.]
Q: What about lard?
In this country, lard is toxic beause the pigs are fed large quantities of corn and soy beans. Besides the natural toxicity of the seed oils, the oils are contaminated with agricultural chemicals. Corn farmers have a very high incidence of cancer, presumably because corn "requires" the use of more pesticides. This probably makes corn oil's toxicity greater than it would be otherwise. but even the pure, organically grown material is toxic, because of its unsaturation.
Women with breast cancer have very high levels of agricultural pesticides in their breasts [See Science News, 1992, 1994].
Israel had the world's highest incidence of breast cancer when they allowed the insecticide lindane to be used in dairies, and the cancer rate decreased immediately after the government prohibited its use. The United States has fairly good laws to control the use of cancer-causing agents in the food supply, but they are not vigorously enforced. [World Incid. of Cancer, 1992]
Q: I have no control over oils when eating out. What can I do to offset the harmful effects of polyunsaturated oils?
A small amount of these oils won't kill you. It is the proportion of them in your diet that matters. A little extra vitamin E (such as 100 units per day) will take care of an occasional American restaurant meal. Based on animal studies, it would take a teaspoonful per day of corn or soy oil added to a fat-free diet to significantly increase our risk of cancer. Unfortunately, it is impossible to devise a fat-free diet outside of a laboratory. Vegetables, grains, nuts, fish and meats all naturally contain large amounts of these oils, and the extra oil used in cooking becomes a more serious problem.
Q Why are the unsaturated oils so popular if they are dangerous?
It's a whole system of promotion, advertising, and profitability.
50 years ago, paints and varnishes were made of soy oil, safflower oil, and linseed (flax seed) oil. Then chemists learned how to make paint from petroleum, which was much cheaper. As a result, the huge seed oil industry found its crop increasingly hard to sell. Around the same time, farmers were experimenting with poisons to make their pigs get fatter with less food, and they discovered that corn and soy beans served the purpose, in a legal way. The crops that had been grown for the paint industry came to be used for animal food. Then these foods that made animals get fat cheaply came to be promoted as foods for humans, but they had to direct attention away from the fact that they are very fattening. The "cholesterol" focus was just one of the marketing tools used by the oil industry. Unfortunately it is the one that has lasted the longest, even after the unsaturated oils were proven to cause heart disease as well as cancer. [Study at L.A. Veterans Hospital, 1971.]
I use some of these oils (walnut oil is very nice, but safflower oil is cheaper) for oil painting, but I am careful to wash my hands thoroughly after I touch them, because they can be absorbed through the skin.
SUMMARY Unsaturated fats cause aging, clotting, inflammation, cancer, and weight gain.
Avoid foods which contain the polyunsaturated oils, such as corn, soy, safflower, flax, cottonseed, canola, peanut, and sesame oil.
Mayonnaise, pastries, even candies may contain these oils; check the labels for ingredients.
Pork is now fed corn and soy beans, so lard is usually as toxic as those oils; use only lean pork.
Fish oils are usually highly unsaturated; "dry" types of fish, and shellfish, used once or twice a week, are good. Avoid cod liver oil.
Use vitamin E.
Use coconut oil, butter, and olive oil.
Unsaturated fats intensify estrogen's harmful effects.
REFERENCES
1. C. F. Aylsworth, C. W. Welsch, J. J. Kabora, J. E. Trosko, "Effect of fatty acids on junctional communication: Possible role in tumor promotion by dietary fat," Lipids 22(6), 445-54, 1987.
2. J. M. Bell and P. K. Lundberg, "Effects of a commercial soy lecithin preparation on development of sensorimotor behavior & brain biochemicals in the rat," Dev. Psychobiol. 8(1), 59-66, 1985.
3. R. S. Britton and B. R. Bacon, "Role of free radicals in liver diseases and hepatic fibrosis," Hepatogastroenterology 41(4), 343-348, 1994.
4. M. S. Brown, et al., "Receptor mediated uptake of lipoprotein-cholesterol and its utilization for steroid synthesis," Recent Progress in Hormone Res. 35, 315-257, 1979.
5. P. A. Cerutti, "Oxy-radicals and cancer," Lancet 455(8926), 862-863, 1994.
6. I. Davies and A. P. Fotheringham, "Lipofuscin--Does it affect cellular performance?" Exp. Gerontol. 16, 119-125, 1981.
7. K. L. Erickson, et al., "Dietary lipid modulation of immune responsiveness," Lipids 18, 468-74, 1983.
8. V. A. Folcik and M. K. Cathcart, "Predominance of esterified hydroperoxy-linoleic acid in human monocyte-oxidized LDL," J. Lipid Res. 35(9), 1570-1582, 1994.
9. Fuller, C. J. and I. Jialal, "Effects of antioxidants and fatty acids on low-density-lipoprotein oxidation," Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 60(6 Suppl.), S1010-S1013, 1994.
10. M. C. Galli, et al., "Peroxidation potential of rat thymus during development and involution," Comp. Biochem. Physiol (C) 107(3), 435-440, 1994.
11. J. M. Gaziano, et al., "Supplementation with beta-carotene in vivo and in vitro does not inhibit low density lipoprotein oxidation," Atherosclerosis 112(2), 187-195, 1995.
12. M. B. Grisham, "Oxidants and free radicals in inflammatory bowel disease," Lancet 344(8926), 859-861, 1994.
13. J. M. C. Gutteridge, "Antioxidants, nutritional supplements and life-threaening diseases," Brit. J. Biomed. Sci. 51(3), 288-295, 1994.
14. D. Harman, et al., "Free radical theory of aging: effect of dietary fat on central nervous system function," J. American Geriatrics Soc. 24(1), 292-98, 1976.
15. W. S. Hartroft and E. A. Porta, "Ceroid pigments," chapter VIII in Present Knowledge in Nutrition, 3rd Edition, Nutrition Foundation, N.Y., 1967.
16. H. J. Helbock, et al., (Univ. of Calif. Berkeley) January, 1993 Pediatrics; in Science News 143, 78, 1993. "Toxic 'fats' in preemie supplement."
H. R. Hirsch, "The waste-product theory of aging: Cell division rate as a function of waste volume," Mech. Ageing Dev. 36, 95-107, 1986.
17. S. G. Imre, et al., "Increased proportion of docosahexanoic acid and high lipid peroxidation capacity in erythrocytes of stroke patients," Stroke 25(12), 2416-2420, 1994.
18. Clement Ip, et al., "Requirement of essential fatty acids for mammary tumorigenesis," Cancer Res. 45(5), 1997-2001, 1985.
19. P. V. Johnston, "Dietary fat, eicosanoids, and immunity," Adv. in Lipid Res. 21, 103-41, 1985.
20. S. Kasayna, et al., "Unsaturated fatty acids are required for continuous proliferation of transformed androgen-dependent cells by fibroblast growth factor family proteins," Cancer Research 54(24), 6441-6445, 1994.
21. H. A. Kleinveld, et al., "Vitamin E and fatty acid intervention does not attenuate the progression of atherosclerosis in watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits," Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15(2), 290-297, 1995.
22. J. K. G. Kramer, et al., Lipids 17, 372, 1983.
23. I. A. Kudryavtsev, et al., "Character of the modifying action of polyunsaturated fatty acids on growth of transplantable tumors of various types," Bull. Exp. Biol & Med. 105(4), 567-70, 1986.
24. R. D. Lynch, "Utilization of polyunsaturated fatty acids by human diploid cells aging in vitro," Lipids 15(6), 412-20, 1967.
25. M. Martinez and A. Ballabriga, "Effects of parenteral nutrition with high doses of linoleate on the developing human liver and brain," Lipids 22(3), 133-8, 1987.
26. R. S. Mehta, et al., "High fish oil diet increases oxidative stress potential in mammary gland of spontaneously hypertensive rats," Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 21(11), 881-889, 1994.
27. A. A. Nanji and S. W. French, "Dietary linoleic acid is required for development of experimentally induced alcoholic liver-injury," Life Sciences 44, 223-7, 1989.
28. J. A. Lindsay, et al., "Fatty acid metabolism and cell proliferation," Lipids 18, 566-9, 1983.
29. M. L. Pearce and S. Dayton, "Incidence of cancer in men on a diet high in polyunsaturated fat," Lancet 1, 464-467, 1971.
30. Pryor, W. A., "Free radicals and lipid proxidation--what they are and how they got that way," Natural Antioxidants in Human, pp. 1-24, 1994.
31. P. Purasiri, et al., "Modulation of cytokine production in vivo by dietary essential fatty acids in patients with colorectal cancer," Clin. Sci. 87(6), 711-717, 1994.
32. S. Rapoport and T. Schewe, "Endogenous inhibitors of the respiratory chain," Trends in Biochemical Sci., Aug., 1977, 186-189.
33. H. Selye, "Sensitization by corn oil for the production of cardiac necrosis...," Amer. J. of Cardiology 23, 719-22, 1969.
34. D. A. Street, et al., "Serum antioxidants and myocardial infarction--Are low levels of carotenoids and alpha-tocopherol risk factors for myocardial infarction?" Circulation 90(3), 1154-1161, 1994.
35. M. Takei, et al., "Inhibitory effects of calcium antagonists on mitochondrial swelling induced by lipid peroxidation or arachidonic acid in the rat brain in vitro," Neurochem. Res. 29(9), 1199-1206, 1994.
36. J. P. Thomas, et al., "Involvement of preexisting lipid hydroperoxides in Cu2+-stimulated oxidation of low-density lipoprotein," Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 315(2), 244-254, 1994.
37. C. W. Welsch, "Review of the effects of dietary fat on experimental mammary gland tumorigenesis: Role of lipid peroxidation," Free Radical Biol. Med. 18(4), 757-773, 1995.
Essential Fatty Acids ("EFA"): A Technical Point
|
|