> Ramona wrote:
>
>> Thanks Rich.
>> Jan acts like a <snip obsession>  That seems to be their M.O.
>
> Interesting that you would say that.
>
> I recently did a bit of Googling and found:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?enc_author=6tm9gBUAAAB7RqyHjI6fho_OR6BqSkNd_Ieqd
T84RXyMhuizDAk-CQ&hl=en
>
> http://tinyurl.com/d6wkj
>
> Since Jan has concluded that I am the same person as a disbarred
> attorney based on the same name and location, I must conclude that Jan
> is this person, as you suspected, since the names are the same and they
> are both posting to usenet.
>
>> For the record, I really did post to her email address in error.
>
> Only Jan is allowed to make an error. All others are liars.

> LadyLollipop wrote:

>> "Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:DYqQe.15526$HM2.7633@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

>>>LadyLollipop wrote:

>>>>"Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:38pQe.14671$HM2.13702@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

>>>>>C.Health wrote:

>>>>>>I don't have any allergies. These symptoms have occurred when colds or
>>>>>>flues
>>>>>>were prevalent in my area. Once or twice a year in the winter. It's
>>>>>>definitely not allergies. I have never had a respiratory allergy.

>>>>>Have you been tested by an allergist that verified your belief that you
>>>>>"never had a respiratory allergy?"

>>>>>>These natural remedies work when used properly.

>>>>>Not according to the research which clearly contradicts you.

>>>>Who cares?

>>>Sorry you don't and would risk killing your own children.

>> What research? *organized medicine* research?

>> The ones who DENY real diseases?

> What "real diseases" are denied by the medical profession?

> Speaking of real disease that are denied:
> <snip obsession with Scientology>

>> Actually, had I not turned to alternative medicine, I would most likely
>> be 6' under.

> Only if you self inflicted.

> Placebo's don't help.

>>>>Some have sense enough to go by what is known as RESULTS.

>>>>>And don't forget the results of chelation therapy used on a boy with
>>>>>Autism.  It killed him.

>>>>This LIE is now repeated!

>>>lie?  Type in chelation therapy and autism for yourself.

>>>http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/huffpost/20050827/cm_huffpos...
>>>David Kirby: Autism and Chelation: Where is the Science? David Kirby
>>>Sat Aug 27,12:28 AM ET

>>>Nearly four years ago, the Institute of Medicine recommended research
>>>into chelation therapy and autism. But that never happened, and now a
>>>little boy in Pennsylvania is dead.

>> Actually not a good source.

> There are plenty more sources if you deny that one.  Type chelation
> therapy and autism in your own search.

>> *They claim that the use of chelation to treat autism is foolishly
>> dangerous, and should be shut down at once.*

> Yes.  IT *KILLED* a boy.  That isn't dangerous?  Then I have no idea what
> is to you.