Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

For the Record

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LadyLollipop - 01 Sep 2005 01:04 GMT
"Ramona" <atlramona@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BmpRe.1890$%j7.1427@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> Rich.@. wrote:

     Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).

>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:15:07 -0400, Ramona <atlramona@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>
>>>>"ramona" <atlramona@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1125520932.851305.154960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>>LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"ramona" <atlramona@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:1125492059.291510.222990@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It was brought to my atention that I inadvertantly sent this to email
>>>>>>>rather than post to ng.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually not!
>>>>>
>>>>>You didn't send me an email informing me that I inadvertantly sent you
>>>>>the email?
>>>>
>>>>That's correct!
>>>>
>>>> Odd since the email addresses matches yours.
>>>>
>>>>There is nothing odd, whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>>>>You posted it on the ng and sent it to *me*  also.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, inadvertantly!!  Please look that word up in a dictionary.
>>>>>Sheesh, I also thanked you for bringing it to my attention.
>>>>
>>>>You *just* sent me ANOTHER e-mail, AFTER my telling you
>>>>
>>>>do not e-mail me again.
>>>
>>>I sent you the inadvertant email and then an email thanking you for
>>>notifying me of my error.  That's it folks.
>>>
>>>>>>I politely informed you of my requested and long standing rule that I
>>>>>>knew
>>>>>>you were not aware of.
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't perceive your email polite,
>>>>
>>>>I suggest, you brush up on your perceiving skills
>>>>
>>>>Here here is my e-mail in full.
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps, you are not aware of my requested rule. Everything that is
>>>>said,
>>>>should be said on the newsgroup. I do not chose to engage in private
>>>>e-mails. Do not e-mail me, again.
>>>>
>>>>Jan
>>>
>>>And here is mine to you.
>>>
>>>Thanks for letting me know that I inadvertantly clicked the wrong button
>>>sending it to author rather than the newgroup.
>>>
>>>Ramona
>>>
>>>> but I still managed to thank you
>>>>
>>>>>for informing me of the posting screw up.
>>>>
>>>>You managed to e-mail me AGAIN, AFTER you LIED in the earlier post, when
>>>>in
>>>>FACT you posted BOTH on this ng and sent it to me by e-mail, you did NOT
>>>>inadvertantly sent it to me and not post it here.
>>>
>>>It was done inadvertantly you twit for brains.
>>>Your post proves it!
>>
>> Don't mind Jan Drew. She is a complete hypocrite. Jan Drew does not
>> want people to send her private email but she has no problem posting
>> what she believes to be the name, business address and phone number of
>> a poster here and then admitting to trying to call that person and
>> failing that admitting to calling someone at the business address that
>> might know him. Jan Drew is a stalker and a complete hypocrite. Sorry
>> for belaboring the obvious.
>>
>> Cue Jan to start a new thread attacking me and not acknowledging the
>> inappropriateness of trying to contact by telephone a member of this
>> group for no other purpose than harassment.
>>
>> Aloha,
>>
>> Rich
>
> Thanks Rich.

> Jan acts like a <snip obsession>.  That seems to be their M.O.
>
> For the record, I really did post to her email address in error.

For the record, you are a  L I A R, proven by your post.

You in FACT posted to this ng.

"Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:8TDQe.17344$HM2.12826@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

> LadyLollipop wrote:

>> "Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:DYqQe.15526$HM2.7633@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

>>>LadyLollipop wrote:

>>>>"Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:38pQe.14671$HM2.13702@bignews5.bellsouth.net...

>>>>>C.Health wrote:

>>>>>>I don't have any allergies. These symptoms have occurred when colds or
>>>>>>flues
>>>>>>were prevalent in my area. Once or twice a year in the winter. It's
>>>>>>definitely not allergies. I have never had a respiratory allergy.

>>>>>Have you been tested by an allergist that verified your belief that you
>>>>>"never had a respiratory allergy?"

>>>>>>These natural remedies work when used properly.

>>>>>Not according to the research which clearly contradicts you.

>>>>Who cares?

>>>Sorry you don't and would risk killing your own children.

>> What research? *organized medicine* research?

>> The ones who DENY real diseases?

> What "real diseases" are denied by the medical profession?

There is a LOOOONNNNNGGGGGG list on Quackwatch.

> Speaking of real disease that are denied:
> <snip obsession with Scientology>

>> Actually, had I not turned to alternative medicine, I would most likely
>> be 6' under.

> Only if you self inflicted.

Like I stated:

But, you know nothing about that.

> Placebo's don't help.

Like I stated:

But, you know nothing about that.

==

For the record, Richard H Jacobson is a *hyprcrite*

"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message

news:PGYQe.20259$KX7.12455@fe10.lga...

> Rich.@. wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
>> <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:

>>>Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.

>> Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
>> Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?

Poor cyberstalker, *hypocrite* Richard H Jacobson, still attacking me

     R...@.   Aug 29, 2:06 pm

     Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Sep 5, 2:06 pm).

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:03:18 GMT, "LadyLollipop"

<LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:
>Actually, it is Martk Thorson who is guilty on ALL COUNTS!!!!!!!

Is Mark Thorson the subject of this thread?

<snip>

====

For the record, Richard H Jacobson is a cyberstalker who does the attacking,
with a REPEATED pattern.

http://tinyurl.com/39u2g

http://tinyurl.com/2vxcl

http://tinyurl.com/2nbzc

http://tinyurl.com/3gzhf

> Ramona
>>
>>>>>and before I forget
>>>>
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>abuse@bellsouth.net
>>>
>>>*plonk*
>>>
>>>Ramona
>>>
>>>>>Ramona
>>>>>
>>>>><snip>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 01 Sep 2005 01:28 GMT
>Now that you have
>responded to my post I can give you a 99.999999% guarantee that Jan
>Drew is going to try to divert attention away from proof that she has
>stalked a member of this group by making a personal attack against me.
>Just watch. It is like clockwork.

>On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:04:12 GMT, "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com
> wrote:

>> Rich.@. wrote:
>
>      Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 01 Sep 2005 01:29 GMT
>Now that you have
>responded to my post I can give you a 99.999999% guarantee that Jan
>Drew is going to try to divert attention away from proof that she has
>stalked a member of this group by making a personal attack against me.
>Just watch. It is like clockwork.

>> Rich.@. wrote:
>
>      Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 01 Sep 2005 01:30 GMT
>Now that you have
>responded to my post I can give you a 99.999999% guarantee that Jan
>Drew is going to try to divert attention away from proof that she has
>stalked a member of this group by making a personal attack against me.
>Just watch. It is like clockwork.

And then right on cue minutes later:

>> Rich.@. wrote:
>
>      Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).

<snip Jan Drew's rant>

Some things are so predictable.

Aloha,

Rich

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Best defense to logic is ignorance
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.