"Ramona" <atlramona@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BmpRe.1890$%j7.1427@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> Rich.@. wrote:
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:15:07 -0400, Ramona <atlramona@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>
>>>>"ramona" <atlramona@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1125520932.851305.154960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>>LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"ramona" <atlramona@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:1125492059.291510.222990@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It was brought to my atention that I inadvertantly sent this to email
>>>>>>>rather than post to ng.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Actually not!
>>>>>
>>>>>You didn't send me an email informing me that I inadvertantly sent you
>>>>>the email?
>>>>
>>>>That's correct!
>>>>
>>>> Odd since the email addresses matches yours.
>>>>
>>>>There is nothing odd, whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>>>>You posted it on the ng and sent it to *me* also.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, inadvertantly!! Please look that word up in a dictionary.
>>>>>Sheesh, I also thanked you for bringing it to my attention.
>>>>
>>>>You *just* sent me ANOTHER e-mail, AFTER my telling you
>>>>
>>>>do not e-mail me again.
>>>
>>>I sent you the inadvertant email and then an email thanking you for
>>>notifying me of my error. That's it folks.
>>>
>>>>>>I politely informed you of my requested and long standing rule that I
>>>>>>knew
>>>>>>you were not aware of.
>>>>>
>>>>>I didn't perceive your email polite,
>>>>
>>>>I suggest, you brush up on your perceiving skills
>>>>
>>>>Here here is my e-mail in full.
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps, you are not aware of my requested rule. Everything that is
>>>>said,
>>>>should be said on the newsgroup. I do not chose to engage in private
>>>>e-mails. Do not e-mail me, again.
>>>>
>>>>Jan
>>>
>>>And here is mine to you.
>>>
>>>Thanks for letting me know that I inadvertantly clicked the wrong button
>>>sending it to author rather than the newgroup.
>>>
>>>Ramona
>>>
>>>> but I still managed to thank you
>>>>
>>>>>for informing me of the posting screw up.
>>>>
>>>>You managed to e-mail me AGAIN, AFTER you LIED in the earlier post, when
>>>>in
>>>>FACT you posted BOTH on this ng and sent it to me by e-mail, you did NOT
>>>>inadvertantly sent it to me and not post it here.
>>>
>>>It was done inadvertantly you twit for brains.
>>>Your post proves it!
>>
>> Don't mind Jan Drew. She is a complete hypocrite. Jan Drew does not
>> want people to send her private email but she has no problem posting
>> what she believes to be the name, business address and phone number of
>> a poster here and then admitting to trying to call that person and
>> failing that admitting to calling someone at the business address that
>> might know him. Jan Drew is a stalker and a complete hypocrite. Sorry
>> for belaboring the obvious.
>>
>> Cue Jan to start a new thread attacking me and not acknowledging the
>> inappropriateness of trying to contact by telephone a member of this
>> group for no other purpose than harassment.
>>
>> Aloha,
>>
>> Rich
>
> Thanks Rich.
> Jan acts like a <snip obsession>. That seems to be their M.O.
>
> For the record, I really did post to her email address in error.
For the record, you are a L I A R, proven by your post.
You in FACT posted to this ng.
"Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8TDQe.17344$HM2.12826@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> LadyLollipop wrote:
>> "Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:DYqQe.15526$HM2.7633@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>>>LadyLollipop wrote:
>>>>"Ramona" <atlram...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:38pQe.14671$HM2.13702@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>>>>>C.Health wrote:
>>>>>>I don't have any allergies. These symptoms have occurred when colds or
>>>>>>flues
>>>>>>were prevalent in my area. Once or twice a year in the winter. It's
>>>>>>definitely not allergies. I have never had a respiratory allergy.
>>>>>Have you been tested by an allergist that verified your belief that you
>>>>>"never had a respiratory allergy?"
>>>>>>These natural remedies work when used properly.
>>>>>Not according to the research which clearly contradicts you.
>>>>Who cares?
>>>Sorry you don't and would risk killing your own children.
>> What research? *organized medicine* research?
>> The ones who DENY real diseases?
> What "real diseases" are denied by the medical profession?
There is a LOOOONNNNNGGGGGG list on Quackwatch.
> Speaking of real disease that are denied:
> <snip obsession with Scientology>
>> Actually, had I not turned to alternative medicine, I would most likely
>> be 6' under.
> Only if you self inflicted.
Like I stated:
But, you know nothing about that.
> Placebo's don't help.
Like I stated:
But, you know nothing about that.
==
For the record, Richard H Jacobson is a *hyprcrite*
"Mark Probert" <markprob...@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message
news:PGYQe.20259$KX7.12455@fe10.lga...
> Rich.@. wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:26:46 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
>> <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:
>>>Poor, pathetic Mark Probert.
>> Jan Drew aka Lady Lollipop says it is ALWAYS wrong to belittle. Jan
>> Drew's hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Is Jan Drew the subject of this thread?
Poor cyberstalker, *hypocrite* Richard H Jacobson, still attacking me
R...@. Aug 29, 2:06 pm
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Sep 5, 2:06 pm).
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:03:18 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
<LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote:
>Actually, it is Martk Thorson who is guilty on ALL COUNTS!!!!!!!
Is Mark Thorson the subject of this thread?
<snip>
====
For the record, Richard H Jacobson is a cyberstalker who does the attacking,
with a REPEATED pattern.
http://tinyurl.com/39u2g
http://tinyurl.com/2vxcl
http://tinyurl.com/2nbzc
http://tinyurl.com/3gzhf
> Ramona
>>
>>>>>and before I forget
>>>>
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>abuse@bellsouth.net
>>>
>>>*plonk*
>>>
>>>Ramona
>>>
>>>>>Ramona
>>>>>
>>>>><snip>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 01 Sep 2005 01:28 GMT
>Now that you have
>responded to my post I can give you a 99.999999% guarantee that Jan
>Drew is going to try to divert attention away from proof that she has
>stalked a member of this group by making a personal attack against me.
>Just watch. It is like clockwork.
>On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:04:12 GMT, "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com
> wrote:
>> Rich.@. wrote:
>
> Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 01 Sep 2005 01:29 GMT
>Now that you have
>responded to my post I can give you a 99.999999% guarantee that Jan
>Drew is going to try to divert attention away from proof that she has
>stalked a member of this group by making a personal attack against me.
>Just watch. It is like clockwork.
>> Rich.@. wrote:
>
> Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
Rich.@. - 01 Sep 2005 01:30 GMT
>Now that you have
>responded to my post I can give you a 99.999999% guarantee that Jan
>Drew is going to try to divert attention away from proof that she has
>stalked a member of this group by making a personal attack against me.
>Just watch. It is like clockwork.
And then right on cue minutes later:
>> Rich.@. wrote:
>
> Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Sep 7, 4:29 pm).
<snip Jan Drew's rant>
Some things are so predictable.
Aloha,
Rich
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance