> http://www.mercola.com/2005/aug/18/15_ways_the_auto_industry_would_change_if
> _it_operated_like_drug_companies.htm
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Your car would cost $4.5 million, a 30,000 percent markup over cost.
The cost of automobiles includes the development of new technologies, like
antilock brakes and airbags. Likewise, the price of drugs includes
development.
> *
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> and airplanes, just as the drug companies try to do with herbs and
> nutritional supplements.
Actually, automakers would be making bicycles and airplanes, just like bid
drug companies sell herbs and supplements.
> *
>
> All auto imports would be banned. If you drove a Toyota down from
> Canada, you would be arrested.
Actually, no one is arresting people importing drugs for their own use. And
it is now illegal to import a Toyota from outside the country, unless it
meets US requirements.
> *
>
> Car dealers would be bribed with money, free vacations, free food,
> and free cars by automobile sales representatives to push certain cars.
They already are.
> Safety
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> systems would be declared perfectly safe by the FDA, which would instead
> focus on the dangers of bicycles.
Actually, cars would have to meet strict safety requirements.
> *
>
> Driver's ed programs would be cancelled nationwide, and people would
> be encouraged to buy new cars rather than repair damaged ones or avoid
> accidents in the first place.
Actually, car dealers would be required to take continuing education.
> *
>
> Safety tests showing that cars were dangerous would be buried, and
> scientists who produced such results would be prevented from ever
> conducting car safety tests ever again.
You mean like Ford and the problems with the Explorer?
> *
>
> After being sued by customers injured in the cars with no safety
> systems, automakers would further lobby Congress to pass laws protecting
> car companies against class-action lawsuits.
Really? Didn't one big drug maker just lose a $250 million or so suit for
its COX2 inhibitor?
> *
>
> Any federally mandated warnings about car safety problems would be
> printed in small type on a tiny label hidden under the driver's seat.
Or in ads in newspapers.
> *
>
> Driving certain cars would cause side effects like loss of sex drive
> or full-body muscle pain.
That already happens. Ever see an old dude driving a Porshe?
> Advertising
>
> *
>
> Car companies would heavily promote new models each year, which would
> be no different from the ones they were selling 30 years ago.
You mean like conmed people (conjecture-based medicine aka alternative
medicine)?
> *
>
> Car companies would invent reasons for you to buy a dozen or more
> cars.
Just like con-med.
> *
>
> Automobile advertising would be filled with pictures of happy,
> healthy, energetic drivers, but the cars would break down constantly, fail
> to perform as promised, and quickly stop working.
Again, just like con-med.
> *
>
> Cars would be sold to you with extra features like a sunroof, air
> conditioning, or a navigational system, but when the car arrived none of
> these features would be included, just as drug companies exaggerate the
> "multiple health benefits" of their products.
Just like con-med.
Garbage (mercola's comments) deleted.
Jeff
Eric Bohlman - 30 Aug 2005 07:39 GMT
>> http://www.mercola.com/2005/aug/18/15_ways_the_auto_industry_would_cha
>> nge_if _it_operated_like_drug_companies.htm
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> like antilock brakes and airbags. Likewise, the price of drugs
> includes development.
What's even sillier is that the people who talk about "30,000 percent
markup" are comparing the retail price of a pill with the cost of the raw
materials used to make it. But the raw materials don't work the way the
pill does (remember we're talking about the reactants in the synthesis of
the active compound, not the active compound itself), so people like that
aren't just omitting the cost of development, they're omitting the cost
of manufacturing! A car appears to have a very high "markup" if you
compare its sale price to the cost of the steel it's built with.
Jeff - 30 Aug 2005 12:08 GMT
>>> http://www.mercola.com/2005/aug/18/15_ways_the_auto_industry_would_cha
>>> nge_if _it_operated_like_drug_companies.htm
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> of manufacturing! A car appears to have a very high "markup" if you
> compare its sale price to the cost of the steel it's built with.
Don't forget the low cost of sand used to make silicon-based chips!