 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / August 2005Adverse Effects OF Drugs, 100,000 - 4th-6th-leading cause of death
IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS http://tinyurl.com/dbez2 Mark Probert would rather talk about *5* people Which he calls: a lot of CHEATlationists in Georgia Even though it clearly states: All patients were discharged without permanent sequelae. It is unclear if effects were related to dose or rate of administration. Nuff said. >I >Mark Probert would rather talk about *5* people Jan Drew would rather talk about the rare vaccination adverse effects than the MILLIONS of children who die EVERY YEAR from vaccine preventable diseases not to mention the millions more who suffer from these diseases without dying. But Jan Drew does not care about the MILLIONS of children. If a single child has an adverse reaction to a vaccine Jan Drew is quick to tell everyone about it. Wonder why she does not say a peep about the MILLIONS of children who die EVERY YEAR due to NOT being vaccinated?? Could it be that Jan Drew does not give a rat's a.s about the millions of children who die each year because most of them are minorities. Sad that. May God have mercy on Jan's soul. Aloha, Rich ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance >IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >Nuff said. always nice to put things in perspective. >>IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > always nice to put things in perspective. Yes, Jan talks about those incredibly rare adverse vaccine reactions to show that vaccines are more dangerous than a China Syndrome Meltdown. Do not fall for the hypocrite. >>>IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS >>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Yes, Jan talks about those incredibly rare adverse vaccine reactions to > show that vaccines are more dangerous than a China Syndrome Meltdown. Adverse Effects OF Drugs, 100,000 - 4th-6th-leading cause of death IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS http://tinyurl.com/dbez2 NOT one single word about adverse vaccine reactions. Mark Probert just can't STOP LYING! > Do not fall for the hypocrite. >>>>IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS >>>> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Mark Probert just can't STOP LYING! You mention advserse vaccine reactions in many of your posts. Do you deny that? >>Do not fall for the hypocrite. Good advise when speaking about Jan Drew. Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message news:93FQe.2213$OT1.1677@fe09.lga...> LadyLollipop wrote: >> IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS >> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Yes, fortunately these folks got good medical care. AND,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, They are,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, D E A D!!!!!!! > Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message > news:93FQe.2213$OT1.1677@fe09.lga...> LadyLollipop wrote: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > D E A D!!!!!!! Although being discharged to the morgue might incur no sequelae, the implication was that these patients were discharged alive to their homes. Where did you get the information that they are dead?  Signature--Rich Recommended websites: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/ > Mark Probert" <markprobert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message > news:93FQe.2213$OT1.1677@fe09.lga...> LadyLollipop wrote: [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > D E A D!!!!!!! No, they are alive, thanks to RealMedicine. I wonder how many of them returned to get more CHEATlation? Adverse drug reactions is a more important prob- lem in drug treatment and drug development than pre- viously thought. A meta-analysis revealed that serious adverse drug reactions occur among 6.7% of all hos- pitalised patients and that 0.32% of all hospitalised patients develop fatal adverse reactions, causing more than 100 000 deaths annually in the US. did I read it right? >Adverse drug reactions is a more important prob- >lem in drug treatment and drug development than pre- [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >did I read it right? How should we know? We don't know what you were reading. What you were probably reading was based on a very bad paper by Starfield in JAMA a few years ago, in which the odds of a fatal adverse reaction (or the number of such annually) were overestimated by a factor of six or seven. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me." -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth > Adverse drug reactions is a more important prob- > lem in drug treatment and drug development than pre- [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > did I read it right? Well, considering your demonstrated poor reading comprehension skills, coupled with your selective out of context and unattributed snipping, it is hard to tell what you are reading. > IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > a lot of CHEATlationists in Georgia Yes, there are a lot of them in Georgia. However, the point, which you ignore, is that this is NOT A BENIGN TREATMENT. It is dangerous, and should only be used when absolutely necessary, and not for something that is unproven. > Even though it clearly states: > > All patients were discharged without permanent sequelae. It is unclear if > effects were related to dose or rate of administration. > > Nuff said. Yes, fortunately these folks got good medical care. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.