Medical Forum / General / Alternative / August 2005
Jan Drew is Guilty Of Libel
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Rich.@. - 02 Aug 2005 17:11 GMT li·bel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbl) n.
A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation. The act of presenting such material to the public. The written claims presented by a plaintiff in an action at admiralty law or to an ecclesiastical court.
n Tue, 02 Aug 2005 07:48:12 GMT, "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote:
>Somebody quick get Rich a dictionary! I got a dictionary. Hope you have a good lawyer.
>No wonder he lost his license as a psychiatrist!!!!!!! Note clearly that Jan Drew is asserting that a Richard H Jacobson MD whose business address Jan continues to post in this newsgroup lost his license as a psychiatrist. Jan Drew is not saying it is her opinion that he lost his license but that he did.
Jan clearly violates copy write laws. Now she is libeling a physician unless of course she can provide PROOF that Richard H Jacobson lost his license.
Poor Jan. Bearing FALSE WITNESS against thy neighbor. Jan Drew says she is a Christian. She is a liar unless she can provide proof of Dr. Jacobson losing his license
Foaming at the mouth because I exposed her lies about having mercury poisoning, now libeling physician.
Aloha,
Rich
------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 02 Aug 2005 18:04 GMT > li·bel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbl) > n. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > his license as a psychiatrist. Jan Drew is not saying it is her > opinion that he lost his license but that he did. Perhaps someone should contact Richard H Jacobson, MD and let him know that Jan Drew has asserted, in a public venue, that he has lost his license. It might be interesting to see if Jan runs off to Tijuana to avoid the ramifications...
Mark, MD
LadyLollipop - 02 Aug 2005 18:48 GMT Rich.@. wrote:
> li·bel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbl) > n. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > his license as a psychiatrist. Jan Drew is not saying it is her > opinion that he lost his license but that he did. Perhaps someone should contact Richard H Jacobson, MD and let him know that Jan Drew has asserted, in a public venue, that he has lost his license. It might be interesting to see if Jan runs off to Tijuana to avoid the ramifications...
Mark, MD
Perhaps, you have forgotten to answer???
<mlow...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1122513203.063853.211750@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> <snip> Can you tell us why you snipped??
>> Aloha,
>> Rich
>> PS: Cue Jan to start a new thread attacking me.
> Or me, or anyone else on her list of enemies.
> Mark, MD <snip>
Most certainly Richard H Jacobson never attacks me, does he Mark MD??? He isn't a liar either, is he?
Now, don't forget to answer.
mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 02 Aug 2005 19:27 GMT Asked and answered.
Mark, MD
LadyLollipop - 02 Aug 2005 19:53 GMT > Asked and answered. > > Mark, MD Oh? Where?
mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 03 Aug 2005 17:33 GMT > > Asked and answered. > > > > Mark, MD > > Oh? Where? You look it up. Hint: it's in another current thread.
Mark, MD
LadyLollipop - 03 Aug 2005 20:07 GMT >> > Asked and answered. >> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Mark, MD No reason for it to be in another thread.
You have made NO posts until yesterday.
It was NOT answered at that time, you LIED.
mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 04 Aug 2005 04:56 GMT > >> > Asked and answered. > >> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > It was NOT answered at that time, you LIED. Bite me. I answered it in another thread approximately 90 seconds before I made my reply above. If that doesn't satisfy you, pound sand.
Mark, MD
LadyLollipop - 04 Aug 2005 06:25 GMT >> >> > Asked and answered. >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Mark, MD Whew. Temper, Temper, Doc.
You did not answer in answer in another thread.
mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 04 Aug 2005 05:06 GMT > >> > Asked and answered. > >> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > No reason for it to be in another thread. You post the same cut-'n'-paste nonsense to dozens of different threads every day -- do I really need to engage in the same kind of scattergun, bandwidth-wasting behavior, just to make sure that your lazy butt doesn't have to work too hard to find my answer to your asinine question?
Grow a brain cell, you crazy bink.
> You have made NO posts until yesterday. That's a LIE, Jan Drew!!! I have SO posted before yesterday! You are a LIAR!!!
> It was NOT answered at that time, you LIED. LIAR!!! LIAR!!! Pants on fire!!!
Mark, MD
P.S. Jan, your grammar sucks. Buy yourself a 9th grade English textbook. Maybe something that addresses basic punctuation or something...please?
LadyLollipop - 04 Aug 2005 06:35 GMT >> >> > Asked and answered. >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > You post the same cut-'n'-paste nonsense to dozens of different threads > every day -- I asked you a question one time, it was not a cut and paste, it was only in one thread.
<hissy fit and insults snipped>
>> You have made NO posts until yesterday. > > That's a LIE, Jan Drew!!! I have SO posted before yesterday! You are > a LIAR!!! LOLOLOL!!!
You very well know what I meant.
You had made no posts, until yesterday, since I asked you the question, therefroe you had not answered.
>> It was NOT answered at that time, you LIED. > > LIAR!!! LIAR!!! Pants on fire!!! Do prove you answered it. You made the claim you did, it is your responsibility to prove it.
> Mark, MD > > <snip more insults> mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 04 Aug 2005 22:15 GMT > >> >> > Asked and answered. > >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > > > <snip more insults> Pound sand, Poop.
Mark, MD
LadyLollipop - 05 Aug 2005 00:21 GMT >> >> >> > Asked and answered. >> >> >> > [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Mark, MD You just proved my point.
You have no proof. You did not answer.
Not only did you lie, You are now as low as cess pool mouth as Andrew Kingoff.
What will be next?
Steaming bag of feces
douche bag
playing with yourself
swallowed anythiing good lately lately?
pound sand up you a.s
Rich.@. - 05 Aug 2005 03:59 GMT >On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:57:03 GMT, "LadyLollipop" ><LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >>Jan wrote:
>>Then when his lies are exposed, he changes the subject title and >>insults. >> >>Proving once again: >> >>Genesis 27:19-20, 24. Jacob had to lie again to cover up his first lie
>When starting a new thread don't just reply to a message sent by someone >else and clear the subject line. Not all e-mail and news clients behave like [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >Message" function. This will start a fresh thread of your own without any >traces of previous threads. ------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
mlowry3@bellsouth.net - 05 Aug 2005 04:20 GMT <snip>
> pound sand up you a.s I never said "pound sand up you (sic) a.s". I left it up to your dirty mind to fill in the blanks, and I guess you've done so admirably.
Pound sand, Lollypoop.
Mark, MD
Rich.@. - 05 Aug 2005 04:32 GMT ><snip> > >> pound sand up you a.s > >I never said "pound sand up you (sic) a.s". I left it up to your dirty >mind to fill in the blanks, and I guess you've done so admirably. I thought it was a new treatment that Jan discovered for parasites.
>Pound sand, Lollypoop. Amazing how many parasites you will find in lollipoops:-)
Aloha,
Rich ------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
Best defense to logic is ignorance
LadyLollipop - 05 Aug 2005 06:03 GMT > <snip> Restored:
> Pound sand, Poop.
> Mark, MD You just proved my point.
You have no proof. You did not answer.
Not only did you lie, You are now as low as cess pool mouth as Andrew Kingoff.
What will be next?
Steaming bag of feces
douche bag
playing with yourself
swallowed anythiing good lately lately?
pound sand up you a.s
>> pound sand up you a.s > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Mark, MD
|
|
|