 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / July 2005Proof That Jan Drew/ Lady Lollipop Lied About Having Mercury Poisoning
On June 16, 1999 the day before Jan Drew began to have her amalgams removed Jan Drew stated that her health had been rapidly deteriorating over months due to mercury poisoning from amalgams and that she had severe foot pain and was bedridden. On June 17-18, 1999 Jan Drew had 8 of 12 amalgams removed and said she looked forward to having the rest of the mercury out. On June 18, 1999 Jan Drew stated that she felt better than she had in two years. >>>> On June 18, 1999 Jan Drew says: >>>>I have been reading this thread. I have peripheral neuropathy. I have found a >>>>>dentist (alternative) who knows that mercury amalgams are very dangerous. They >>>>>can cause all manner of things. He will remove them and put in composities. I >>>>>have just had 3/4 of mine remover. The others will come out in a few weeks, >>>>>along with the one root canal, which will be extracted. >>>> >>>>>If an individual has read on this subject and is knowledgable, he will take >>>>>care of you. >>>> >>>>>He has written "Tooth Truth and tells it like it is. He tells how the ADA has >>>>>covered up this problem. >>>> >>>>>So, it is just a matter of finding the right dentist. He has people flying in >>>>>from all over to get the work done. >>>> >>>>>I believe the mercury is the cause of my problems. I hav felt better today that >>>>>I have in the last 2 years, and am looking forward to getting the rest of the >>>>>mercury out and the root canal pulled. >>>> >>>>>Jan Jan Drew claimed that the reason that she felt better than she had in two years is because of relief that the dental work was over. The dental work obviously was NOT over as she had four more amalgams and a root canal to be removed. Not only was the dental work not over, it had just BEGUN the day before she felt better. >>>>Rich for the LAST time, I said I felt better than I had in two years. That was >>>>very true. I had been very very ill and my health was deteriorating fast. After >>>>much reading and research I was convinced it was my teeth. I wasn't absolutely >>>>positivity 100% sure, but it all fit together and I knew I had to do something. >>>>It wasn't easy, what if it didn't work? That was very stressful. >>> >>>>Finally all the work was done, the metal was out, the bill was paid, I didn't >>>>have to sit in the dentist chairs for hours with a rubber dam in my >>>>mouth!!!!!!!!!! Of course I was very relieved. A big big burden was lifted. >>>>That makes one FEEL BETTER. >>>> >>>>What's so hard to understand? What's so hard to understand is how Jan Drew/Lady Lollipop can continue to lie after her lies are completely exposed. Jan Drew claims that she knows that removing amalgams puts MORE mercury in the body. >>>>>On 30 Aug 2004 06:44:36 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>There's never been any arguement about the fact that removing amalgams puts >>>>>>more mercury in the body. On June 26, 1999 Jan Drew claimed that her foot pain was gone and that she was able to go out line dancing. So on June 16,1999 Jan Drew is bedridden dying of mercury poisoning. On June 17-18, 1999 she has 8 of 12 amalgams out which by Jan's own admission puts MORE mercury in the body and eight days later is not only not bedridden but line dancing with no more foot pain (Note that the pain soon returned since placebo responses are short lived). >> http://tinyurl.com/674oy >>On June 26, 1999 Jan Drew said: >> I am feeling much >>>>>>better, because I am not receiving a new dose of mercury each day. The >>>>>>elimination of 8 mercury amalgams has made a difference. Nothing psychosomatic >>>>>>about it. > >http://tinyurl.com/6n3ax > >>How do I know it was the metal? Because my mercury level was monitored by my >>MD, it was only AFTER the metal was removed that it started dropping and I >>started to regain my health. http://tinyurl.com/dm67s >Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry >From: jdrew63...@aol.com (Jan) - >Date: 27 Nov 2004 04:13:43 GMT >Local: Fri,Nov 26 2004 11:13 pm >Subject: Re: Mercury Levels Highest After Amalgam Removal >>Subject: Mercury Levels Highest After Amalgam Removal >>From: Mark Thorson nos...@sonic.net >>Date: 11/26/2004 6:50 PM Pacific Standard Time >>Message-id: <41A7EBE9.D7805...@sonic.net> >>These studies show that mercury levels increase in the >>days following amalgam removal, and don't decline >>to the pre-operative level for about a month. > >>>Tell us something we didn't already know. > >>>Then do tell us what this mercury coming from amalgams does to the body. >>>Jan Jan Drew is a despicable liar. She says that she did not begin to regain her health until AFTER her mercury level dropped. On June 26, 1999 only a week after having eight amalgams out Jan Drew's mercury level was HIGHER than it was on June 16,1999 when she said she was bedridden and dying of mercury poisoning. On June 26,1999 she says all her foot pain is gone and she is going out line dancing. She clearly was beginning to regain her health BEFORE her mercury level dropped. And Jan knows it!!! Jan cannot explain any of the above. All she can do is attack me for exposing her bogus claim of mercury poisoning. And the despicable Jan Drew has been trying to stop me from exposing her lies by filing complaints to my ISP and stalking me by posting what she believes is my address and phone number, and trying to call me and others who might know me. Perhaps all can be explained by Jan's statement that she found out I was a Jew. Jan is despicable. Jan is evil. Jan is an anti-semite. There was a woman Jan Drew Who really had not a clue She said she was dying But really was lying While stirring a witches brew Aloha, Rich PS: I give a 100% guarantee that Jan Drew will not reconcile her contradictory history and instead divert attention by starting a new post attacking in order to get others to respond to the post and continue the attack. Or maybe she will continue her stalking by posting what she believes to be my address and phone number. Or Jan Drew/Lady Lollipop make get her sock puppet troll, PeterB to answer for her. Just watch. ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance Okay, here it is again. I know I should just mind my own business but why do you care if this person fibbed about having her fillings removed? Is this going to go on for the next several years or until one of you croak first? | On June 16, 1999 the day before Jan Drew began to have her amalgams | removed Jan Drew stated that her health had been rapidly [quoted text clipped - 142 lines] | | Best defense to logic is ignorance >Okay, here it is again. >I know I should just mind my own business but why do you care if this person >fibbed about having her fillings removed? I find it interesting that you would ask this question. I wonder why you don't ask Jan why she lied. But I will answer. I care because I want to prevent someone from believing her lie and having their amalgams unnecessarily removed. > Is this going to go on for the >next several years or until one of you croak first? As long as Jan Drew continues to lie about almost dying from mercury poisoning I will continue to expose her lie. She stops lying, I stop exposing her lie. Pretty simple. I have been posting in this group for well over ten years and have exposed many bogus claims long before Jan Drew started posting here. I don't plan to stop any time soon even though Jan Drew has attempted to stop me by complaining to my ISP and by her attempts to stalk me in my private life. But I imagine that you really could not care less about Jan's stalking me because I expose her lies. You prefer to focus on my exposing her lies, which you now cannot even dispute, once I provided the proof. Aloha, Rich PS: Cue Jan to attack me simply for exposing her lies. Sad that. >| On June 16, 1999 the day before Jan Drew began to have her amalgams >| removed Jan Drew stated that her health had been rapidly [quoted text clipped - 163 lines] >| >| Best defense to logic is ignorance ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance How did she stalk you in your private life? | >Okay, here it is again. | >I know I should just mind my own business but why do you care if this person [quoted text clipped - 200 lines] | | Best defense to logic is ignorance >How did she stalk you in your private life? She repeatedly posts what she thinks is my name, address and phone number in this newsgroup. Then she said she tried to call the number. Then she said that since the number was no longer in service that she called a number of people at that address and asked about me. She encourage other people to call that number. Jan has been stalking me for years. She is obsessed with trying to interfere with my private life by her stalking behavior. It is sad that she cannot take responsibility for her posting behavior and the many lies that she has told in this newsgroup. Aloha, Rich ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance Wow! That's a bit scary. Does she live near you? | >How did she stalk you in your private life? | [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] | | Best defense to logic is ignorance >Wow! That's a bit scary. > >Does she live near you? No. Thank goodness for small blessings (actually big blessings). Aloha, Rich PS: I absolutely guarantee that Jan Drew is going to attack me viciously now that you have acknowledged that what she did was wrong. She will try to change the focus from *her* stalking to my posting behavior. Just watch. PPS: The most ironic thing is that Jan Drew repeatedly accuses me of stalking her even though I have NEVER posted what I know to be her address and phone number. I have NEVER tried calling her or any of her neighbors. PPS: But the real reason she is stalking me is because of her perception that I am Jewish. >>> >Richard H Jacobson (which I learned was a Jew just last week) Jan is a very sick and bigoted woman who has been stalking me in my private life for YEARS. She cannot stop me from exposing her lies and it really burns her up. Aloha, Rich >| >How did she stalk you in your private life? >| [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >| >| Best defense to logic is ignorance ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance >PS: I absolutely guarantee that Jan Drew is going to attack me >viciously now that you have acknowledged that what she did was wrong. >She will try to change the focus from *her* stalking to my posting >behavior. Just watch. As I predicted instead of dealing with her own stalking behavior Jan Drew changes the subject and attacks me with more of her lies. Jan Drew says that she was not bedridden on June 16, 1999 the day before she had began having her dental amalgams out. >*Over several weeks her health deteriorated until on June 16, 1999 she >was bedridden and unable to walk.* > >That is another total lie. > >I was not bedridden on June 16th, 1999. Here is proof that she was bedridden the day before the amalgams were out and it is in Jan Drew's own words: >>Can you tell us what your health was like before the amalgams were >>removed and then how your health improved after the amalgams were removed? > >I was bedfast and nonfunctional for several months, my bowels had nearly shut >down. >Jan Notice that Jan DRew was specifically asked about her health before the amalgams were removed. June 16, 1999 was the day before she began to have her amalgams removed. She said she was "bedfast" and nonfunctional for *several months* Bedfast means bedridden. *Jan Drew was feeling pretty good on March 4, 1999.* NO, I never said I was feeling pretty good, that is just another one of Rich's lies. > JDrew63929 Mar 3 1999, 3:00 am > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >for me. >Jan Cue Jan Drew to call me a liar because it was March 3 and not March 4, 1999 when she said that she felt good. So how can Jan Drew have been bedfast and nonfunctional for several months before she had her amalgams out on June 17-18, 1999 when on March 3, 1999 she said that her body feels good. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. Jan Drew will not respond to any of these points and proof in her own words that she is a liar. She will simply make a new post with even more lies. Or maybe she will again prove she is a stalker by posting what she believes to be my name, address and phone number. Just watch. Aloha, Rich ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance >PS: I absolutely guarantee that Jan Drew is going to attack me >viciously now that you have acknowledged that what she did was wrong. >She will try to change the focus from *her* stalking to my posting >behavior. Just watch. Since I made this absolute guarantee Jan Drew has already posted *several* new threads to attack me. And I predict several more. The reason she is doing this is because she realizes that she is completely busted. She is really coming apart at the seams. She realizes that she is fooling no one. I proved that she is stalking me by trying to telephone me and people who might know me. I proved that she continues to lie about her amalgam history. Jan Drew cannot deal with her lies and stalking being exposed. Not only does Jan lie and stalk but she falsely accuses other of same. But what is really upsetting to Jan is that it is Stacy who is agreeing with me that Jan Drew's stalking behavior is scary. Stacy is sympathetic with Jan having her mercury amalgams out so she has no axe to grind to Jan. But Stacy has enough integrity to acknowledge that Jan Drew's behavior is scary even if she may share Jan's alternative medicine ideology. I respect Stacy a great deal for her comments. And then what does Jan Drew do?? She repeats what she believe to be my name, address and phone number to prove again that she is a stalker. Then Jan Drew blames me for someone else posting a link to her possible address and phone number. Not only did I have absolutely nothing to do with it, I criticized Mark Thorson for doing it. Cue Jan to call me a liar. Sorry to belabor the obvious. Aloha, Rich ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance > Wow! That's a bit scary. It's also a lie. *She repeatedly posts what she thinks is my name, address and phone number in this newsgroup.* Now, you will get just a small glimpse how of Richard H Jacobson lies. The fact is, he played a role in another *gang* member here who posted all the Drew's in my home town. Rich is famous for blaming others of exactly what he is guilty of. Now for what I posted. It is a doctors directory, and is an *advertisment*, it is NOT Rich's address and phone number as he reported. That shows what a liar, Rich is. It is my belief, that Rich is a failed psychiatrist, who has lost his license. http://marinersguide.com/regions/hawaii/kailua.hi/medical.html RICHARD H JACOBSON MD 970 N KALAHEO AVE # 07, KAILUA, HI (808) 595-2761 PHYSICIANS Now, you can compare this to where he lied about his name. Are you sure my name is Richard Jacobson?? >>>>Is it or isn't it? >>Negative. Does this mean that I don't have to agree to Jan's request to cease and desist?? Of course her request presumes that I have been stalking and harassing her. >I am grateful for one thing; that Richard Jacobson is not my real name. Unfortunately the Richard Jacobson that DOES live in Hawaii may not be too happy with my assuming his name for purposes of the internet especially given the recent events. He happens to live on a different island from me. I do plan to contact him to let him know that someone may try to harass him since he is listed in the phone book. =============================== Hiking The Kalalau Trail Richard Jacobson (richj@cris.com) Sat, 16 Mar 1996 00:27:34 -0500 (EST) >Hawaii's premier backpacking trail, the Kalalau Trail on the island of Kauai still remains closed past Hanakoa due to the reconstruction of the trail near "crawler's ridge". Estimated date of completion is Mid May. Until then, camping will only be permitted in Hanakapiai and Hanakoa Valleys. I for one am anxious to have Kalalau open again. It has to be one of the finest trails in the world. Aloha, Rich ------------------------ ------------------------ Richard H. Jacobson Always remember to put Horace before Descarte ========== Rich is not only a liar, he is a stalker, a despicable person who has a history of despicable behavior, you don't have time to read it all. Jan > Does she live near you? > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > | > | Best defense to logic is ignorance >Now, you will get just a small glimpse how of Richard H Jacobson lies. Is this thread about Richard H Jacobson?? It is about proof that Jan Drew lied about having mercury poisoning and how she has been stalking me to keep me from exposing her lies. As I predicted Jan Drew tries to change the subject. Aloha, Rich ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Best defense to logic is ignorance > Okay, here it is again. > I know I should just mind my own business but why do you care if this person > fibbed about having her fillings removed? Jan calls anyone who disagrees with her a liar. A dose of her own medicine is a fair response. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.