Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NEW SCIENCE REVEALS RISK BEHIND SATURATED FATS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dr. Jai Maharaj - 26 Jul 2005 06:33 GMT
NEW SCIENCE REVEALS RISK BEHIND SATURATED FATS

Forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>

[ Subject: New science reveals risk behind saturated fats
[ From: Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005

New science reveals risk behind saturated fats

A diet high in cream, cheese and other saturated fat rich foods can
influence the uptake of bad cholesterol to the arteries, confirms new
research.

7/25/2005

http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=61481&m=1fnu725&c=qdrhrvoeraoqydo

Scientists are already aware that a diet high in
saturated fat increases plasma cholesterol levels (LDL
levels) and atherosclerosis. But it was not known how
dietary fats directly affect uptake of LDL cholesterol
ester, and whether selective uptake was a factor.

While we need some fat in our diet, because it helps the
body absorb some vitamins, is a good source of energy and
a source of the essential fatty acids that the body can
not make itself, having too much saturated fat can
increase the amount of cholesterol in the blood, which
increases the chance of developing heart disease.

Saturated fats are found in a wide variety of foods,
including :meat products, meat pies, sausages; hard
cheese; butter and lard; pastry; cakes and biscuits;
cream, soured cream and crème fraîche; coconut oil,
coconut cream or palm oil.

Scientists at Columbia University in the US now suggest
that diet can influence delivery of LDL cholesterol ester
to arteries via selective uptake, affecting cholesterol
depostion and atherogenesis.

Selective uptake is a process whereby LDL cholesterol
esters can be delivered to cell independent of the full
LDL molecule.

For the study, mice that are relatively atherosclerosis
resistant (C57BL/6) or susceptible to atherosclerosis
(apoE-/-) were fed a chow or a saturated fat diet and
then injected with double radiolabelled or fluorescent-
labelled human LDL, to independently trace LDL-CE core
and whole-particle uptake, respectively.

"Our results show that a SAT [saturated-fat] diet
increased contributions of selective uptake to total
arterial LDL-cholesteryl ester delivery in C57BL/6 and
apoE-/- mice," report the researchers.

The saturated fat-rich diet increased plasma fatty acid
and cholesterol levels.

These studies suggest that arterial LDL-CE delivery via
SU [selective uptake] can be an important mechanism in
vivo, and that dietary influences on arterial LPL levels
and atherogenesis modulate arterial LDL-CE delivery,
cholesterol deposition, and SU, they conclude.

Full findings are posted in the Journal of Clinical
Nutrition, published online on 21 July.

http://www.jci.org/cgi/content/abstract/JCI24327v1

End of forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org

The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate

The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

    "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
    "For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
    "And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.

    o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
    o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
    o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.
cathyb - 26 Jul 2005 11:06 GMT
<snip>
<snip religious bigotry>

Good to know you find scientists useful for something.

Why the upper case thread-title though? I hardly think that anyone is
going to find the news that saturated fat is bad for you particularly
shocking, or be particularly surprised that someone found more evidence
of it.

Cathy
Chris C - 26 Jul 2005 21:47 GMT
The saturated fat came from a mixture of coconut oil, olive oil,  corn
oil, & safflower oil.  Only one of those is saturated...  Not only that
it's not even ANIMAL staturated fat which from what I understand has a
different fatty acid profile than say coconut oil.

Corn and safflower oil are both known to cause lots of health problems
in animals and humans.

There is no real evidence that saturated fat per se is bad for you.  It
is easy to make blanket statements, but they are rarely ever correct.
There is a lot of grey area in nutrition, and it sucks that stuff like
this makes it to the headlines confusing people.

All saturated fats are not the same.  A healthy cow treated well,
eating grass, and living in a non-poluted environment is going to have
much healthier beneficial fat than one stuck in a crowded factory farm
eating grain and injected with antibiotics.

> NEW SCIENCE REVEALS RISK BEHIND SATURATED FATS
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/news/ng.asp?n=61481&m=1fnu725&c=qdrhrvoeraoqydo
Rich - 26 Jul 2005 22:07 GMT
> The saturated fat came from a mixture of coconut oil, olive oil,  corn
> oil, & safflower oil.  Only one of those is saturated...  Not only that
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> much healthier beneficial fat than one stuck in a crowded factory farm
> eating grain and injected with antibiotics.

You obviously know nothing about either food science or dairy farming.
Neither science nor your body could tell from milk fats what the cow ate or
how it was treated. Treating cows well is an integral part of dairy farming.
Happy cows produce more milk, and production is profit. Dairy farmers are
not stupid hicks that mistreat their cows for fun. Milk is tested for
antibiotics, and rejected by the dairy co-op if it is contaminated. So dairy
farmers are VERY careful to keep antibiotics out of the milk. Not to say
that they don't use antibiotics. As you say, healthiness is important for
cows, and cows, like humans, sometimes need some antibiotics to stay that
way. Grass is an important component of a dairy cow's diet in the
summertime. It is non-existant in the winter, and replaced by hay, silage,
or "haylage". Grain supplements are important, too, because grass alone
could never supply the calorie content needed by a productive cow. You are
just spouting off a lot of hippie-dippie PC bullshit.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

Chris C - 15 Aug 2005 21:38 GMT
> "Chris C" <chrisc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > All saturated fats are not the same.  A healthy cow treated well,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You obviously know nothing about either food science or dairy farming.

It doesn't seem like you do either.

> Neither science nor your body could tell from milk fats what the cow ate or
> how it was treated. Treating cows well is an integral part of dairy farming.
> Happy cows produce more milk, and production is profit.

For one thing.... who said I was talking about milk?

Since we're talking about milk, do you know what makes butter yellow?
(Other than using food coloring that is).  Were do you think that
yellow comes from? Grain?

> Dairy farmers are
> not stupid hicks that mistreat their cows for fun. Milk is tested for
> antibiotics, and rejected by the dairy co-op if it is contaminated.

Never said they were, but they are trying to run a business right?

And things like Bgh were initially introduced for that very purpose
correct?

Or was that to make the cows happy and healthy?

>So dairy
> farmers are VERY careful to keep antibiotics out of the milk. Not to say
> that they don't use antibiotics. As you say, healthiness is important for
> cows, and cows, like humans, sometimes need some antibiotics to stay that
> way.

Antibiotics have there place when it comes to saving someone from a
crippling disease when it's a last resort, but for the most part they
are making humans and animals more sickly.

>Grass is an important component of a dairy cow's diet in the
> summertime. It is non-existant in the winter,

Depends on where you live now doesn't it?  Or are you under the
impression that the entire earth gets covered in snow every year?

> and replaced by hay, silage,
> or "haylage". Grain supplements are important, too, because grass alone
> could never supply the calorie content needed by a productive cow.

And what ever did those poor cows eat before us people came along?
They must have all starved to death! :-O

I get all the 100% grassfed dairy I want.  Well they do get some
alfalfa, etc. I'm sorry I choose cows on a good diet as upposed to a
"productive" diet and no I don't think that grain and industrial waste
products are a good diet, no matter what time of the year.

And you listing a bunch of skeptic sites is just as pathetic as the
hippies you claim to dislike.  It just replaces one dogma with another.
Rich Shewmaker - 18 Aug 2005 00:45 GMT
> > "Chris C" <chrisc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > > All saturated fats are not the same.  A healthy cow treated well,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> (Other than using food coloring that is).  Were do you think that
> yellow comes from? Grain?

Yes, from grain, partly. The yellow color is carotene which the cow obtains
from various sources in her diet. Because the diet of cows changes through
the seasons, so does the color of butter. Now where do YOU think the yellow
in butter comes from?

> > Dairy farmers are
> > not stupid hicks that mistreat their cows for fun. Milk is tested for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> And things like Bgh were initially introduced for that very purpose
> correct?

Yes, they were, and I've never approved of the practice.

> Or was that to make the cows happy and healthy?

I don't see that BGH affects the happiness of cows one way or another.

> >So dairy
> > farmers are VERY careful to keep antibiotics out of the milk. Not to say
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> crippling disease when it's a last resort, but for the most part they
> are making humans and animals more sickly.

If antibiotic therapy were always delayed until it were a "last resort", it
would indeed be the LAST resort in many cases. You may have difficulty
supporting your thesis that antibiotics "are making humans and animals more
sickly".

> >Grass is an important component of a dairy cow's diet in the
> > summertime. It is non-existant in the winter,
>
> Depends on where you live now doesn't it?  Or are you under the
> impression that the entire earth gets covered in snow every year?

Most dairy farming is done in the world's temperate climates.

> > and replaced by hay, silage,
> > or "haylage". Grain supplements are important, too, because grass alone
> > could never supply the calorie content needed by a productive cow.
>
> And what ever did those poor cows eat before us people came along?
> They must have all starved to death! :-O

The modern dairy cow did not exist "before people came along". Their
ancestors probably did starve to death in great numbers during hard winters.
In any case, they were not expected to produce more than ten times their
body weight in milk AND a calf every year. A working dairy cow is
unprofitable if she does not do so.

> I get all the 100% grassfed dairy I want.

That makes the cows happier?

> Well they do get some
> alfalfa, etc. I'm sorry I choose cows on a good diet as upposed to a
> "productive" diet and no I don't think that grain and industrial waste
> products are a good diet, no matter what time of the year.

"Industrial waste products"?

> And you listing a bunch of skeptic sites is just as pathetic as the
> hippies you claim to dislike.  It just replaces one dogma with another.

When did I claim to dislike hippies? I'm as much a hippie as anyone in my
generation. But we hippies do not all agree on everything any more than any
other group of people. The skeptic sites offer reality based information,
not dogma. They are a breath of fresh air compared to the miasma of magical
nonsense that pollutes the internet and this ng.

--Rich

("Pathetic" skeptic links omitted because I'm not at my own computer, and I
don't feel like looking up the urls.)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.