Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Drugging of Seniors in Nursing Homes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roman Bystrianyk - 09 Jul 2005 00:17 GMT
http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?event=org_news_print_list_item&id=047

Roman Bystrianyk, "The Drugging of Seniors in Nursing Homes", Health
Sentinel, July 8, 2005,

In 2001, Medicaid spent over $3 billion dollars for antipsychotic
drugs, compared with $2.7 billion for antimicrobial drugs, $2.4 billion
for cardiovascular drugs, and $1.8 billion for antidepressants.
Prescribing of antipsychotic drugs has been increasing in nursing
homes, but with little information on the appropriateness of such
prescribing. A June 2005 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine
examines the quality of antipsychotic drug prescriptions in
approximately 2.5 million Medicaid beneficiaries in nursing homes.

The appropriateness of antipsychotic drug prescribing in nursing homes
has been an issue since 1986 when the Institute of Medicine issued a
report indicating widespread misuse of antipsychotic medications to
"sedate or discipline" people in nursing homes. The following year
Congress passed a law providing for more oversight of conventional
antipsychotic medications. Studies examining those early governmental
efforts found a decrease in the numbers of patients receiving these
medications.

Since then a second-generation of antipsychotic drugs, or
"atypicals" have been introduced including clozapine, risperidone,
olanzapine, quetiapine, fumarate, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. With
their introduction the decrease in antipsychotic medication
prescriptions has reversed course and has now increased. In 1995, 16%
of nursing home residents were receiving antipsychotics and by 1999 the
number had increased to 19.4%.

Most atypical medications receive FDA approval for use in patients with
diagnosed schizophrenia, but increasingly these medications are
prescribed for other conditions with much less evidence. Also, although
these medications are widely promoted as causing less movement
disorders as the older medications, they have shown other serious
problems such as falls, extreme drowsiness, and abnormal walking. "In
the face of limited evidence, the wider use of antipsychotics in
nursing homes deserves attention to understand the extent of new
indications and new patient populations and the ability of established
guidelines to protect nursing home residents from inappropriate use."

In their analysis the study authors found that "more than 1 of every
4 (27.6%)" nursing home resident receiving Medicare receives
antipsychotic medications. The average amount of time per year that a
person was on antipsychotics was just over half a year at 6.4 months.

The study also found that "over half (58.2%)" of these residents
received antipsychotic medications that exceeded the maximum
recommended dose of the medication, received duplicate therapy, or had
inappropriate indications for the medication in the first place
according to guidelines.

More than 200,000 nursing home residents received antipsychotic therapy
but had, "no appropriate indications for use." Most of the out of
guideline prescriptions were for memory problems, restlessness,
unsociability, uncooperativeness, indifference to their surroundings,
or depression. Prescriptions for these conditions was strongly
discouraged by a recently assembled expert panel on the appropriate use
of antipsychotics in seniors, which also noted the need for more
guidance in use of these medications.

Despite being prescribed these medications, nearly 40% still regularly
resisted taking medications or eating meals. Nearly 40% also made
disruptive noises such as screaming, disrobing in public, and throwing
food. The authors note that, "our study cannot easily explain the
lack of improved stable behavior patterns with appropriately prescribed
antipsychotics." They also note that other study authors have also
"failed to detect improvement in patient outcomes" with the
expanded use of atypical medications. One study found no improvement in
admissions to hospitals or long-term care facilities despite California
Medicaid increased spending of atypical mediations by 670% over 8
years.

This study raises serious questions about the current use of
antipsychotics in nursing homes while detecting the highest level of
antipsychotic use in nursing homes in over a decade. The authors
conclude that, "Most atypicals were prescribed outside the
prescribing guidelines and for doses and indications without strong
clinical evidence. Failure to detect a positive relationship between
behavioral symptoms and antipsychotic therapy raises questions about
the appropriateness of prescribing."

SOURCE: Archives of Internal Medicine, June 13 2005
Roman Bystrianyk - 09 Jul 2005 23:23 GMT
Comment:

In 2000, I visited my mother in a nursing home outside of Buffalo, NY
and found her heavily medicated with Risperdal, Ativan and a 3rd RX I
cannot remember. This was in response to her "agitation". These
medications made her sleep most of the day and she had severe motion
sickness if you tried to move her wheelchair above a crawl. The drugs
stopped when she became sick for other reasons... I subsequently
notified the Doctor and nursing home to stop the medications or I would
take legal action. It turns out she was "agitated" due to being dumped
in a nursing home in a sneaky and unethical manner by other family
members and abandoned. She is still alive and approaching 92 years
old-AND DRUG FREE OF THOSE TYPES OF DRUGS ! I relocated her to New
Jersey to a nursing home by me in 4/2001 and she is much improved.
MORAL OF THE STORY: YOU HAVE THE RIGHT--AND THE MORAL OBLIGATION--TO
MONITOR WHAT THESE INSTITUTIONS ARE MEDICATING YOUR LOVED ONES WITH.
THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR FAMILY OVERSIGHT AND INVOLVEMENT. JOE PAVONE
NEW JERSEY
Matt Beckwith - 17 Jul 2005 13:03 GMT
> In 2000, I visited my mother in a nursing home outside of Buffalo, NY
> and found her heavily medicated with Risperdal, Ativan and a 3rd RX I
> cannot remember. This was in response to her "agitation". These
> medications made her sleep most of the day and she had severe motion
> sickness if you tried to move her wheelchair above a crawl.

I suspect most nursing home attending physicians do their jobs
lackadaisically.  If you think about it, patients in a nursing home are so
chronically ill that they require frequent attention from a physician.
After all, they require daily nursing; hence the name "nursing home".  I
wonder whether anyone's done a study of nursing homes to discover exactly
how much time the average nursing home physician spends on each patient per
month.  So being the attending physician in a nursing home should be a
full-time job.  Yet in my community all of the nursing home physicians that
I know have full-time practices in the community, and attend the nursing
home patients in their spare time.

Of course, there are probably market forces involved.  I mean, if a
physician could make a living just doing nursing home work and nothing else,
perhaps the problem wouldn't exist.

The nursing situation in nursing homes is probably not much better.  I've
spoken with nurses who worked in nursing homes in the past.  One said she
was responsible for the entire nursing home population each night, all by
herself.  She considered it a good night if nobody died.

The inappropriate sedating of nursing home patients arises mostly out of the
unwillingness or inability of the doctors and nurses to spend more time with
the patients.  It's easier to just sedate the patient than actually go see
her.
J. Davidson - 17 Jul 2005 19:49 GMT
As a DHS nurse,much of my time was spent in nursing homes, assessing the
care of the patients for compliance with state and  medicare regulations.  I
can tell you that some doctors call going to the nursing station and
glancing at the chart a "doctor visit".  Maybe they will stand in the
doorway of the patients in question.
Nurses and aides / attendants  generally work very hard but have way too
many patients to care for.  So the care in the homes can run the gamut from
neglect to fairly good care.
I advise families to drop in often, unannounced, and see what is going on
with the patients.
Jackie

> > In 2000, I visited my mother in a nursing home outside of Buffalo, NY
> > and found her heavily medicated with Risperdal, Ativan and a 3rd RX I
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> the patients.  It's easier to just sedate the patient than actually go see
> her.
Rich - 17 Jul 2005 19:57 GMT
> I advise families to drop in often, unannounced, and see what is going on
> with the patients.
> Jackie

I agree! When my grandfather was in a nursing home, my mother came every day
to visit him. His room mate was unkempt and often still in bed at ten a.m.
Grandpa was always bathed, dressed, and up in a chair at 7 a.m. whem Mom
showed up to help him with breakfast. His room mate lost his hearing aid,
and it never was replaced. When Grandpa's teeth went missing, he had an
appointment made the next day to have them replaced at the nursing home's
expense. Mom didn't nag or admonish the staff, ever. Her presense was all
that was necessary.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

djk - 17 Jul 2005 21:41 GMT
> As a DHS nurse,much of my time was spent in nursing homes, assessing the
> care of the patients for compliance with state and  medicare regulations.  I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> with the patients.
> Jackie

my father was in a nursing home for a time and during one of my
visits a doctor (wearing white lab coat/stethoscope) came in
with my dad's chart and asked several questions about how my dad
was feeling, etc, while flipping through the chart. He seemed
very kind and concerned. He said good day to both of us and
left. It was later that night at home having dinner with my mom
that she explained the fellow who visited my dad was one of the
patients. He had me fooled. Anyway, if you drop in to see what's
going on, look deeper than the surface.
J. Davidson - 17 Jul 2005 23:01 GMT
Go to the home at mealtime and look at and smell
the food.  See if there are puddles under the chairs.  See if people who are
supposed to be fed are fed.  Take pictures of your relative now and then.
I could go on if anyone wishes.
Jackie
> > As a DHS nurse,much of my time was spent in nursing homes, assessing the
> > care of the patients for compliance with state and  medicare regulations.  I
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> patients. He had me fooled. Anyway, if you drop in to see what's
> going on, look deeper than the surface.
djk - 17 Jul 2005 23:53 GMT
> Go to the home at mealtime and look at and smell
> the food.  See if there are puddles under the chairs.  See if people who are
> supposed to be fed are fed.  Take pictures of your relative now and then.
> I could go on if anyone wishes.
> Jackie

my dad is deceased now, my experience was from the early 90's,
but he was fortunate to be in a good place as far as care for
him was concerned, that's all I really know about, and I would
guess the others, although I never did look in on others, I felt
they had a right to privacy. I've read horror stories about some
places so I understand your thoughts.
Matt Beckwith - 19 Jul 2005 00:37 GMT
> ... the fellow who visited my dad was one of the
> patients...

Sounds like he did a better job than the doctor.
Roman Bystrianyk - 18 Jul 2005 13:22 GMT
Another horrible story:

My mother entered a nursing home in Illinois walking, talking, eating
and going to the bathroom by herself. She ate breakfast out daily prior
to institutionalization. She had early stage dementia and was
hospitalized when my father had a heart attack. Dad had a life long
documented mental health disability since WWII but with the
encouragement of a distant relative who I hadn't seen in 46 years he
was allowed to put a "dnr" on Mom on admission. In addition she was
administered zyprexa, an anti-psychotic. It is documented that she was
also given "the right to refuse to eat". Dad signed an incompletely
checked "informed consent", but was 81, very ill and definitely not of
"sound mind".

I was with her the day of admission and she ate breadfast out with
friends. She ate pizza and stayed up late the night before enjoying the
company. I found her five weeks later when I returned for Dad's
funeral.......she had lost 20# and ALL abilities. Her tongue was
hanging out. She was incapable of eating or drinking. It was only long
after the fact that I became aware of how horrible her treatment was;
After her death, I gained access to her records, (the state named the
distant relative guardian), (Mom couldn't testify on her own behalf
since the damage of the zyprexa and lack of intervening care) and she
prevented me from healthcare info access. She promptly put her in
hospice to conserve the estate.

I'm having a terrible time getting the state of Il to recognize a
problem, despite the fact she fell 5 times in 5 weeks, went 6 months
without glasses, lost 20# in 5 weeks, was drugged,had no working call
light, (documented) starved, complained of sexual abuse, (they must
have thought this was psychosis but the hospital admission documents
pubic area surface skin wounds and hospice documented a fould greensish
vaginal discharge, (SKAREY!) All documented but I guess IDPH can't read
well or thoroughly or the investigators have selective blinders.

What will it take to protect these poor vulnerable elderly. Oh, and
yes, there are funds missing. If the state had investigated early on
when I requested intervention, Mother might have been saved. Her
neighbors and breakfast group have been supportive but what's to keep
it from happening to them.

As I am sure your'e aware of, ELI Lilly has issued a warning on
zyprexa. Mother must have had a stroke, (severe) and they ignored it.
This stuff needs to get out of nursing homes. Mother was quiet and
enjoyable before the facility. The hospice admission violated Mother's
human rights, also since she was a ward of the state she was entitled
to special procedures before cessation of life-sustaining treatment
with completion of a form and contact by the office of guardian of all
known friends and family. Didn't happen. The state didn't notice this
either and what is frightening is she was admitted easily. The
signature portion of the hospice admission read, "lethargic". She
hadn't written in over two years.

There is no record of the anti-psychotic or falls in the Dr.'s records.
The dept or regulation has sealed their investigation so I am at a
total loss to find the truth. The state police reopened their
investigation after I managed to embarass them by writing with
documentation and copying it to Washington.

The judge states a discovery is too "invasive" despite the large funds
missing. If Mom's case is indicative of what is possible even easy to
accomplish in Illinois, God better bless the elderly and disabled, they
need it.

It's weird but somehow the authorities act like I am the one with a
problem or vivid imagination despite the documentation. I am an only
child who lost his mother. She had considerable funds and didn't even
receive a second opinion. (I Pleaded for one to both the guardian ad
litum and judge to no avail.) I wouldn't even have the evidence to
prove that Mother was abused and neglected if she hadn't named me as
executor to her will. As it was, it took me nine months and an extra
1000. the attorneys extorted from me to get the records. Somebody
really needs to work on the anti-psychotic issue. Best wishes in your
efforts.
J. Davidson - 18 Jul 2005 19:23 GMT
I am sorry, but our elderlies are like very young children.  Not worth much.
They don't vote.  They cannot complain loudly.  They are expendable.
If I had my way I would burn down every nursing home and place those
patients on wards in the acute hospitals.  No one would have to be out of a
job but the administrators and DONs who sit in their offices and see nothing
all day long.   I believe  Administrators and DONs who are making rounds,
talking to patients, etc. could find employment.
I hope I can  kill myself before I have to go to a nursing home to rot .
Jackie
Quasin - 11 Aug 2005 21:12 GMT
I protested my father, who was perfectly capable of walking, being
strapped into a wheel chair and having no one to help him get out of
it to use a toilet, so he had to wet himself, and sit there wet, until
someone had time to clean him.

I was told "nursing homes strap people into wheel chairs to prevent
falls because a nursing home is liable for falls and no nursing home
has the staff to prevent falls any other way."  This was a high
quality nursing home run by a religious organization!

If a relative is in a nursing home, you MUST visit often, take a
camera, and pay attention to any complaints.  If attendants know they
are being watched, they act better.

I had to beat on staff to get the doctor-ordered therapy for an aunt.
 PT said "she's old, what's the point doing the therapy?"

Some people hire their own attendant several hours a day to help care
for the nursing home relative.

> Another horrible story:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> pubic area surface skin wounds and hospice documented a fould greensish
> vaginal discharge, (SKAREY!) All documented
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.