Medical Forum / General / Alternative / August 2005
The Drugging of Seniors in Nursing Homes
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Roman Bystrianyk - 09 Jul 2005 00:17 GMT http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?event=org_news_print_list_item&id=047
Roman Bystrianyk, "The Drugging of Seniors in Nursing Homes", Health Sentinel, July 8, 2005,
In 2001, Medicaid spent over $3 billion dollars for antipsychotic drugs, compared with $2.7 billion for antimicrobial drugs, $2.4 billion for cardiovascular drugs, and $1.8 billion for antidepressants. Prescribing of antipsychotic drugs has been increasing in nursing homes, but with little information on the appropriateness of such prescribing. A June 2005 study in the Archives of Internal Medicine examines the quality of antipsychotic drug prescriptions in approximately 2.5 million Medicaid beneficiaries in nursing homes.
The appropriateness of antipsychotic drug prescribing in nursing homes has been an issue since 1986 when the Institute of Medicine issued a report indicating widespread misuse of antipsychotic medications to "sedate or discipline" people in nursing homes. The following year Congress passed a law providing for more oversight of conventional antipsychotic medications. Studies examining those early governmental efforts found a decrease in the numbers of patients receiving these medications.
Since then a second-generation of antipsychotic drugs, or "atypicals" have been introduced including clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, fumarate, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. With their introduction the decrease in antipsychotic medication prescriptions has reversed course and has now increased. In 1995, 16% of nursing home residents were receiving antipsychotics and by 1999 the number had increased to 19.4%.
Most atypical medications receive FDA approval for use in patients with diagnosed schizophrenia, but increasingly these medications are prescribed for other conditions with much less evidence. Also, although these medications are widely promoted as causing less movement disorders as the older medications, they have shown other serious problems such as falls, extreme drowsiness, and abnormal walking. "In the face of limited evidence, the wider use of antipsychotics in nursing homes deserves attention to understand the extent of new indications and new patient populations and the ability of established guidelines to protect nursing home residents from inappropriate use."
In their analysis the study authors found that "more than 1 of every 4 (27.6%)" nursing home resident receiving Medicare receives antipsychotic medications. The average amount of time per year that a person was on antipsychotics was just over half a year at 6.4 months.
The study also found that "over half (58.2%)" of these residents received antipsychotic medications that exceeded the maximum recommended dose of the medication, received duplicate therapy, or had inappropriate indications for the medication in the first place according to guidelines.
More than 200,000 nursing home residents received antipsychotic therapy but had, "no appropriate indications for use." Most of the out of guideline prescriptions were for memory problems, restlessness, unsociability, uncooperativeness, indifference to their surroundings, or depression. Prescriptions for these conditions was strongly discouraged by a recently assembled expert panel on the appropriate use of antipsychotics in seniors, which also noted the need for more guidance in use of these medications.
Despite being prescribed these medications, nearly 40% still regularly resisted taking medications or eating meals. Nearly 40% also made disruptive noises such as screaming, disrobing in public, and throwing food. The authors note that, "our study cannot easily explain the lack of improved stable behavior patterns with appropriately prescribed antipsychotics." They also note that other study authors have also "failed to detect improvement in patient outcomes" with the expanded use of atypical medications. One study found no improvement in admissions to hospitals or long-term care facilities despite California Medicaid increased spending of atypical mediations by 670% over 8 years.
This study raises serious questions about the current use of antipsychotics in nursing homes while detecting the highest level of antipsychotic use in nursing homes in over a decade. The authors conclude that, "Most atypicals were prescribed outside the prescribing guidelines and for doses and indications without strong clinical evidence. Failure to detect a positive relationship between behavioral symptoms and antipsychotic therapy raises questions about the appropriateness of prescribing."
SOURCE: Archives of Internal Medicine, June 13 2005
Roman Bystrianyk - 09 Jul 2005 23:23 GMT Comment:
In 2000, I visited my mother in a nursing home outside of Buffalo, NY and found her heavily medicated with Risperdal, Ativan and a 3rd RX I cannot remember. This was in response to her "agitation". These medications made her sleep most of the day and she had severe motion sickness if you tried to move her wheelchair above a crawl. The drugs stopped when she became sick for other reasons... I subsequently notified the Doctor and nursing home to stop the medications or I would take legal action. It turns out she was "agitated" due to being dumped in a nursing home in a sneaky and unethical manner by other family members and abandoned. She is still alive and approaching 92 years old-AND DRUG FREE OF THOSE TYPES OF DRUGS ! I relocated her to New Jersey to a nursing home by me in 4/2001 and she is much improved. MORAL OF THE STORY: YOU HAVE THE RIGHT--AND THE MORAL OBLIGATION--TO MONITOR WHAT THESE INSTITUTIONS ARE MEDICATING YOUR LOVED ONES WITH. THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR FAMILY OVERSIGHT AND INVOLVEMENT. JOE PAVONE NEW JERSEY
Matt Beckwith - 17 Jul 2005 13:03 GMT > In 2000, I visited my mother in a nursing home outside of Buffalo, NY > and found her heavily medicated with Risperdal, Ativan and a 3rd RX I > cannot remember. This was in response to her "agitation". These > medications made her sleep most of the day and she had severe motion > sickness if you tried to move her wheelchair above a crawl. I suspect most nursing home attending physicians do their jobs lackadaisically. If you think about it, patients in a nursing home are so chronically ill that they require frequent attention from a physician. After all, they require daily nursing; hence the name "nursing home". I wonder whether anyone's done a study of nursing homes to discover exactly how much time the average nursing home physician spends on each patient per month. So being the attending physician in a nursing home should be a full-time job. Yet in my community all of the nursing home physicians that I know have full-time practices in the community, and attend the nursing home patients in their spare time.
Of course, there are probably market forces involved. I mean, if a physician could make a living just doing nursing home work and nothing else, perhaps the problem wouldn't exist.
The nursing situation in nursing homes is probably not much better. I've spoken with nurses who worked in nursing homes in the past. One said she was responsible for the entire nursing home population each night, all by herself. She considered it a good night if nobody died.
The inappropriate sedating of nursing home patients arises mostly out of the unwillingness or inability of the doctors and nurses to spend more time with the patients. It's easier to just sedate the patient than actually go see her.
J. Davidson - 17 Jul 2005 19:49 GMT As a DHS nurse,much of my time was spent in nursing homes, assessing the care of the patients for compliance with state and medicare regulations. I can tell you that some doctors call going to the nursing station and glancing at the chart a "doctor visit". Maybe they will stand in the doorway of the patients in question. Nurses and aides / attendants generally work very hard but have way too many patients to care for. So the care in the homes can run the gamut from neglect to fairly good care. I advise families to drop in often, unannounced, and see what is going on with the patients. Jackie
> > In 2000, I visited my mother in a nursing home outside of Buffalo, NY > > and found her heavily medicated with Risperdal, Ativan and a 3rd RX I [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > the patients. It's easier to just sedate the patient than actually go see > her. Rich - 17 Jul 2005 19:57 GMT > I advise families to drop in often, unannounced, and see what is going on > with the patients. > Jackie I agree! When my grandfather was in a nursing home, my mother came every day to visit him. His room mate was unkempt and often still in bed at ten a.m. Grandpa was always bathed, dressed, and up in a chair at 7 a.m. whem Mom showed up to help him with breakfast. His room mate lost his hearing aid, and it never was replaced. When Grandpa's teeth went missing, he had an appointment made the next day to have them replaced at the nursing home's expense. Mom didn't nag or admonish the staff, ever. Her presense was all that was necessary.
 Signature
--Rich
Recommended websites:
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles http://www.acahf.org.au http://www.quackwatch.org/ http://www.skeptic.com/ http://www.csicop.org/
djk - 17 Jul 2005 21:41 GMT > As a DHS nurse,much of my time was spent in nursing homes, assessing the > care of the patients for compliance with state and medicare regulations. I [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > with the patients. > Jackie my father was in a nursing home for a time and during one of my visits a doctor (wearing white lab coat/stethoscope) came in with my dad's chart and asked several questions about how my dad was feeling, etc, while flipping through the chart. He seemed very kind and concerned. He said good day to both of us and left. It was later that night at home having dinner with my mom that she explained the fellow who visited my dad was one of the patients. He had me fooled. Anyway, if you drop in to see what's going on, look deeper than the surface.
J. Davidson - 17 Jul 2005 23:01 GMT Go to the home at mealtime and look at and smell the food. See if there are puddles under the chairs. See if people who are supposed to be fed are fed. Take pictures of your relative now and then. I could go on if anyone wishes. Jackie
> > As a DHS nurse,much of my time was spent in nursing homes, assessing the > > care of the patients for compliance with state and medicare regulations. I [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > patients. He had me fooled. Anyway, if you drop in to see what's > going on, look deeper than the surface. djk - 17 Jul 2005 23:53 GMT > Go to the home at mealtime and look at and smell > the food. See if there are puddles under the chairs. See if people who are > supposed to be fed are fed. Take pictures of your relative now and then. > I could go on if anyone wishes. > Jackie my dad is deceased now, my experience was from the early 90's, but he was fortunate to be in a good place as far as care for him was concerned, that's all I really know about, and I would guess the others, although I never did look in on others, I felt they had a right to privacy. I've read horror stories about some places so I understand your thoughts.
Matt Beckwith - 19 Jul 2005 00:37 GMT > ... the fellow who visited my dad was one of the > patients... Sounds like he did a better job than the doctor.
Roman Bystrianyk - 18 Jul 2005 13:22 GMT Another horrible story:
My mother entered a nursing home in Illinois walking, talking, eating and going to the bathroom by herself. She ate breakfast out daily prior to institutionalization. She had early stage dementia and was hospitalized when my father had a heart attack. Dad had a life long documented mental health disability since WWII but with the encouragement of a distant relative who I hadn't seen in 46 years he was allowed to put a "dnr" on Mom on admission. In addition she was administered zyprexa, an anti-psychotic. It is documented that she was also given "the right to refuse to eat". Dad signed an incompletely checked "informed consent", but was 81, very ill and definitely not of "sound mind".
I was with her the day of admission and she ate breadfast out with friends. She ate pizza and stayed up late the night before enjoying the company. I found her five weeks later when I returned for Dad's funeral.......she had lost 20# and ALL abilities. Her tongue was hanging out. She was incapable of eating or drinking. It was only long after the fact that I became aware of how horrible her treatment was; After her death, I gained access to her records, (the state named the distant relative guardian), (Mom couldn't testify on her own behalf since the damage of the zyprexa and lack of intervening care) and she prevented me from healthcare info access. She promptly put her in hospice to conserve the estate.
I'm having a terrible time getting the state of Il to recognize a problem, despite the fact she fell 5 times in 5 weeks, went 6 months without glasses, lost 20# in 5 weeks, was drugged,had no working call light, (documented) starved, complained of sexual abuse, (they must have thought this was psychosis but the hospital admission documents pubic area surface skin wounds and hospice documented a fould greensish vaginal discharge, (SKAREY!) All documented but I guess IDPH can't read well or thoroughly or the investigators have selective blinders.
What will it take to protect these poor vulnerable elderly. Oh, and yes, there are funds missing. If the state had investigated early on when I requested intervention, Mother might have been saved. Her neighbors and breakfast group have been supportive but what's to keep it from happening to them.
As I am sure your'e aware of, ELI Lilly has issued a warning on zyprexa. Mother must have had a stroke, (severe) and they ignored it. This stuff needs to get out of nursing homes. Mother was quiet and enjoyable before the facility. The hospice admission violated Mother's human rights, also since she was a ward of the state she was entitled to special procedures before cessation of life-sustaining treatment with completion of a form and contact by the office of guardian of all known friends and family. Didn't happen. The state didn't notice this either and what is frightening is she was admitted easily. The signature portion of the hospice admission read, "lethargic". She hadn't written in over two years.
There is no record of the anti-psychotic or falls in the Dr.'s records. The dept or regulation has sealed their investigation so I am at a total loss to find the truth. The state police reopened their investigation after I managed to embarass them by writing with documentation and copying it to Washington.
The judge states a discovery is too "invasive" despite the large funds missing. If Mom's case is indicative of what is possible even easy to accomplish in Illinois, God better bless the elderly and disabled, they need it.
It's weird but somehow the authorities act like I am the one with a problem or vivid imagination despite the documentation. I am an only child who lost his mother. She had considerable funds and didn't even receive a second opinion. (I Pleaded for one to both the guardian ad litum and judge to no avail.) I wouldn't even have the evidence to prove that Mother was abused and neglected if she hadn't named me as executor to her will. As it was, it took me nine months and an extra 1000. the attorneys extorted from me to get the records. Somebody really needs to work on the anti-psychotic issue. Best wishes in your efforts.
J. Davidson - 18 Jul 2005 19:23 GMT I am sorry, but our elderlies are like very young children. Not worth much. They don't vote. They cannot complain loudly. They are expendable. If I had my way I would burn down every nursing home and place those patients on wards in the acute hospitals. No one would have to be out of a job but the administrators and DONs who sit in their offices and see nothing all day long. I believe Administrators and DONs who are making rounds, talking to patients, etc. could find employment. I hope I can kill myself before I have to go to a nursing home to rot . Jackie
Quasin - 11 Aug 2005 21:12 GMT I protested my father, who was perfectly capable of walking, being strapped into a wheel chair and having no one to help him get out of it to use a toilet, so he had to wet himself, and sit there wet, until someone had time to clean him.
I was told "nursing homes strap people into wheel chairs to prevent falls because a nursing home is liable for falls and no nursing home has the staff to prevent falls any other way." This was a high quality nursing home run by a religious organization!
If a relative is in a nursing home, you MUST visit often, take a camera, and pay attention to any complaints. If attendants know they are being watched, they act better.
I had to beat on staff to get the doctor-ordered therapy for an aunt. PT said "she's old, what's the point doing the therapy?"
Some people hire their own attendant several hours a day to help care for the nursing home relative.
> Another horrible story: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > pubic area surface skin wounds and hospice documented a fould greensish > vaginal discharge, (SKAREY!) All documented
|
|
|