Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Police chiefs, babies and QUILES: A key Florida fluoridation glitch

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Todd Gastaldo - 27 May 2005 19:58 GMT
POLICE CHIEFS:  There are likely MANY people in your jurisdiction who do not
consent to mass fluoride/toxic waste chemotherapy (euphemism
“fluoridation”).  

If so, MASS BATTERY is occurring – the common law doctrine of informed
consent holds that medication without consent is a battery - and police
chiefs everywhere can stop the mass battery by simply stopping the injection
of the fluoride/toxic waste into city water supplies.

BABIES: Where the water is fluoridated, bottledfed babies can get 100 times
more of the poison fluoride than breastfed babies.

QUILES: A KEY FLORIDA FLUORIDATION GLITCH

MASS BATTERY IS LEGAL IN FLORIDA!

Doug Balog, the QUILES attorney blithely accepts the QUILES decision
logic^^^ – rubberstamped by the Florida Supreme Court - that fluoridation is
not medication because Florida cities are fluoridating FAUCETS, not
bloodstreams. <----PREPOSTEROUS!!

Does anyone else wonder why top anti-fluoride activist Paul Connett, PhD is
studiously silent – failing to state the FACT that fluoridation is OBVIOUSLY
CRIMINAL mass battery? (In every state, medication without consent is a
battery. See also: Paul’s Reason #31 quoted below.)

Does anyone else wonder why Paul Connett, PhD referred me to the QUILES
attorney when I asked him to account for his silence about the mass battery
(obviously criminal) aspect of fluoridation?

Paul Connett, PhD remained silent when I exposed the QUILES decision’s
“FAUCETS, not bloodstreams” logic.

Paul still remains silent.

Does top anti-fluoride activist Paul Connett, PhD accept the preposterous
QUILES logic?

Hopefully Paul will address this issue in his next FAN CAMPAIGN BULLETIN.

I will cc Paul via paul@fluoridealert.org, NYSCOF@aol.com ,
mconnett@fluoridealert.org.

^^^For the QUILES decision...and for QUILES Attorney Doug Balog’s email to
me – with my responses to him...

See Florida Fluoride Is For Faucets - Not People!
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2667

ACTION STEP: Forward this email to your city’s chief of police...or forward
one of my other emails to your city’s chief of police...

See Fluoridated police chiefs: Illegal municipal
chemotherapy - please stop it.
http://health.groups.yahoo.com /group/chiro-list/message/3577

I myself will be forwarding this email to police chiefs in Beaverton and
Hillsboro, Oregon which cities I believe are the ones nearest me being
subjected to the mass fluoride/toxic waste chemotherapy (euphemism
“fluoridation”)...

ONWARD...

Anita of Pinellas Citizens for Safe Water posted www.actionpa.org’s Laws and
Court Decisions Regarding  Fluoridation
http://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/lawandcourts/

I agree with Jake – great resource Anita!

But I didn’t see the Florida QUILES decision listed (in effect, fluoridation
is not medication because Florida cities are fluoridating FAUCETS, not
bloodstreams.)

Is QUILES there and I just missed it?

Nor did I see the California Supreme Court’s 1993 THOR decision (medication
without consent – even GOOD medicine without consent – is a battery).

Every state court decision that repeats the common law doctrine of informed
consent should be considered a “Fluoride-related-court case” - because mass
fluoride/toxic waste chemotherapy is OBVIOUS mass battery because many
people do not consent.

Bizarrely, Paul ASKS (in his “50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoridation”) whether it
is right to medicate without consent!

Paul is ignoring common law in every state which indicates that mass
medication without consent IS mass battery.

When I asked Paul why he is doing this – he in effect threw QUILES in my
face...

Paul was (still is!) in effect keeping law enforcement out of the loop.

Fluoridation is an obvious CRIME – mass battery.

WHY is Paul failing to say this?

Interesting that Paul knew to throw QUILES at me when I pressed him on the
issue of why he isn’t explicitly stating that fluoridation is mass battery.

Clay Tanner stepped up to the plate to express mild support when
BeyondBetterHealth and Virginia Brown threatened to censor me for deigning
to publicly question this bizarre behavior of our fearless leader Paul
Connett, PhD.

I again thank Clay for doing that.

Does anyone else wonder why top anti-fluoride activist Paul Connett, PhD is
studiously silent about the FACT that fluoridation is OBVIOUSLY CRIMINAL
mass battery?

Does Paul accept QUILES logic?

Could THAT be why Paul referred me to the QUILES attorney when I confronted
him about his bizarre silence about the fact that fluoridation is OBVIOUS
mass battery?

Why am I the only one demanding an answer to this most penetrating question?

I will cc Paul again via paul@fluoridealert.org, NYSCOF@aol.com ,
mconnett@fluoridealert.org.

I will also cc www.actionpa.org via:

Mike Ewall
Director
ActionPA
Philadelphia, PA
215-743-4884
catalyst@actionpa.org
www.actionpa.org

Thanks Mike for the great resource Anita brought from your site.

Maybe you could include QUILES and THOR thereon?

You write:

“The Lebanon decisions...created the de facto situation of Pennsylvania
being the only state where fluoridation is not mandatory, but where it's
illegal to STOP fluoridation.”
http://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/lawandcourts/

Wow.  That’s worse than Florida!

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
todd@chiromotion.com

PS Note to Jake:  I think your speculation is right – I think Tom Nocera is
advocating “pharmaceutical grade” mass battery in order to “bankrupt the
beast” (as you note, the toxic waste fluoride source has lead which is bad
and pure fluoride sources may be too expensive so fluoridation must end)...

Then again, as I wrote in a post to Clay recently (sorry for the repetition
)...

NO INFORMED CONSENT WAS KEY IN EUROPE...

Clay,

It seems to me elementary logic that if a massive drinking water
poisoning/medication crime is occurring one states the crime, cites relevant
common law and demands that law enforcement take action to stop the illegal
municipal chemotherapy/mass battery.

If Mighty Paul Connett, PhD were to contact law enforcement (and use his FAN
CAMPAIGN BULLETIN to urge others to do so), I suspect his PhD environmental
chemist/toxicologist authority – and the LAW - could quickly end the mass
battery in 49 states – and perhaps even end it in QUILES-bound Florida.

I don’t know if mass medication without consent is considered the crime of
mass battery in western Europe – but as I noted – Paul himself says that the
fact that no consent is obtained is “one of the key reasons why most of
western Europe has ruled against fluoridation,” as in,

>>  „31) Fluoridation is unethical [ILLEGAL/MASS BATTERY - TG] because
>> individuals are
>> not being asked for their informed consent prior to medication. This is
>> standard practice for all medication, and one of the key reasons why most of
>> western Europe has ruled against fluoridation (see appendix 2).‰
http://www.fluoridealert.org/50-reasons.htm

If everyone states the crime, cites relevant common law and demands that law
enforcement take action – and nothing happens...

THEN I would say go with the strategy of “bankrupting the beast with a
demand for ‘pharmaceutical quality’ mass battery”...

on 5/27/05 8:17 AM, Henry Morgan at henrymorgan@knology.net wrote:

> What a great resource Anita!
>  
> I think this should be a link on our web site.
>  
> Virginia, Marcy, Dave.....comments?
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fluoride@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fluoride@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
> Anita Knight
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 2:02 AM
> To: fluoride group
Subject: [FLUORIDE] Fluoride-Related Laws in Pennsylvania and
Fluoride-Related State Court Decision
<SNIP Laws and Court Decisions Regarding  Fluoridation
">http://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/lawandcourts/>
<http://www.actionpa.org/fluoride/lawandcourts/>

A FEW FINAL NOTES...

As I indicated above and noted at the bottom of Fluoridated police chiefs:
Illegal municipal
chemotherapy - please stop it.
http://health.groups.yahoo.com /group/chiro-list/message/3577

POLICE CHIEFS, Paul Connett, PhD likes to point out (this is my favorite
anti-fluoride fact) that breasts filter out the toxin fluoride such that
bottlefed babies in fluoridated areas can get 100 times more of the poison
than breastfed babies.  I think I've got the numbers right - but check with
Paul for sure.

ONE LAST NOTE: Ending mandatory mass toxic waste chemotherapy is not my
primary focus.

To read about my primary focus – showing women how to open their birth
canals an “extra” up to 30% at delivery - go to:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com /group/chiro-list/message/3552

My thanks to PeterB for suggesting that I should offer info on my primary
focus in my fluoride posts.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
todd@chiromotion.com

Copied to: Jerry Allegood, News Observer reporter (Greenville, NC) (252)
752-8411 via jerrya@newsobserver.com (CHLORAMINE LEACHING LEAD STORY)
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/2417113p-8794959c.html 

Copied also to: Gene Burke
Santa Monicans for Safe Drinking Water Coalition
P.O. Box 358; S.M. CA 90406
(310) 451-9950
burkegene@msn.com

This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.

Search http://groups.google.com for “Police chiefs, babies and QUILES: A key
fluoridation glitch”
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com - 28 May 2005 07:30 GMT
>>POLICE CHIEFS:  There are likely MANY people in your jurisdiction who do not consent to mass fluoride/toxic waste chemotherapy (euphemism
"fluoridation").

If so, MASS BATTERY is occurring - the common law doctrine of
informed
consent holds that medication without consent is a battery <<

COMMENT:

I can't wait till Gastaldo hears about selective service and draft
boards.

Earth to Gastaldo. Earth to Gastaldo.  Your society can do anything to
you that the majority approve. Vote with your feet before you discover
this first-hand! It's a shocker, all right.

But I hear Anarctica's not nice this time of year. Bummer.

SBH
Todd Gastaldo - 28 May 2005 17:08 GMT
ARROGANT EARTHLING STEVE B. HARRIS, MD...

See below...

in article 1117261823.485598.68060@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com,
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com at sbharris@ix.netcom.com wrote on 5/27/05
11:30 PM:

>>> POLICE CHIEFS:  There are likely MANY people in your jurisdiction who do not
>>> consent to mass fluoride/toxic waste chemotherapy (euphemism
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I can't wait till Gastaldo hears about selective service and draft
> boards.

Steve,

Your wait was over a long time ago.  During the Viet Nam war I registered
for the draft, was enrolled in the lottery, and lucked out and got a very
high lottery number.

> Earth to Gastaldo. Earth to Gastaldo.

Gastaldo to Earthling Steve: You rang? : )

> Your society

It's WAY more YOUR society than mine.  See below.

> can do anything to
> you that the majority approve.

Interestingly, the majority can approve a president and still get a
president who was not approved by the majority.  It can happen either via
voter fraud or the electoral college thing...

Arrogant Earthling Steve, no one ever voted for you and your fellow MDs to
be able to rip and slice infant penises en masse or close birth canals up to
30% or rob babies of up to 50% of their blood volume...

Yet you MDs do these obviously criminal things with impunity.

> Vote with your feet before you discover
> this first-hand! It's a shocker, all right.
>
> But I hear Anarctica's not nice this time of year. Bummer.

Remember when you, in effect, threatened to send a nurse to employment
Antarctica?

When Rick Churcher, RN wrote:

"I didn't say nursing has nothing to do with medicine. I said nursing
wasn't part of the medical profession, and it isn't."

First you LIED to Mr. Churcher: "[A]n insurance company...doesn't want its
money going for quackery,religion...or whatever..." (more on this below)

Then you verbally SLAPPED him:

"You'll do as you're told...or somebody (and it may even be me) will get
your frigging a.s fired. I promise."

See MD slaps RN/Two MDs on nurse practitioners (Clergyman Harris and High
Priest Borao)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/867

Thanks for reading, Steve.

Sincerely,

Your friend,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
todd@chiromotion.com

PS Insurance companies ROUTINELY pay for quackery and religion...

Medicare pays hospitals a total of $11 billion annually to train 100,000
residents - roughly $110,000 per year per resident. [March 3, 2005 USA Today
front page article.]

Medicare is right now paying recently graduated medical students in
obstetric residencies to close birth canals up to 30% and keep birth canals
closed when babies get stuck.

Medicare is also paying medical residents to rob babies of up to 50% of
their blood volume.

Of course, recently graduated medical students learn that it's OK to perform
these obvious crimes in medical school BEFORE they go on the Medicare dole.

PERTINENT QUOTES:

"Thus I say that most men only care for science so far as they get a living
by it, and they worship even error when it affords them a
subsistence."--Johann Wolfgang Goethe (1749-1832)

"Religion comprises all, extends to all [including] ethics, law,the
principles of political organization, and even science."--Durkheim E:
Division of Labor, p. 135

JOINING THE AMA IS LIKE JOINING A CHURCH

"There is one quotation that captures the essence of what membership in both
the AMA and our state medical associations is all about...'Joining the AMA
is like joining a church...'[Hopkins D reviewing Campion FD: The AMA and
U.S. Health PolicySince 1940, 1984, Review Press: Chicago, IL. In Western J
Med,1985;142(2):273]

A federal appeals court had to order the American medical religion's largest
diocese (the AMA) to let individual MDs and individual hospitals make
"individual decisions"...

The AMA appealed!  And lost... [Wilk CA. Medicine,monopolies, and malice.
Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996]

Of course, letting MDs make "individual decisions" is no solution because:

"[T]he intellectual foundation of medical care...is...whatever a physician
decides is by definition correct." [Eddy DM. The challenge. (Jan12)1990
JAMA]

MONUMENTAL MD ARROGANCE - AS BABIES SCREAM AND WRITHE AND BLEED (and
sometimes die or lose a penis)

In late 1987, I exposed the American medical religion's phony "babies can't
feel pain" neurology and petitioned Congress for a religious exemption from
the child abuse statutes for the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of
the foreskin on the penis.

In January 1988, the American Academy of Pediatrics came out against ALL
religious exemptions.

In February 1988, the American Academy of Pediatrics came out in favor of
anonymity for PERPETRATORS of child abuse.

In March 1988, the California Medical Association House of Delegates, by
voice vote, instantly changed routine infant circumcision from "no medical
indications" to "effective public health measure."

The California Medical Association ignored the advice of its own
Scientific Board: mass child abuse had been exposed and MDs
know full well that child abuse - like other forms of assault and battery -
can lead to prison time.

MDs stood to go to prison.  MDs STILL stand to go to prison - hence my call
for pardons in advance - as medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform
child abuse.

Recently (2004), American pediatricians published the false notion that the
American medical religion's TOTAL foreskin amputation ritual is the same as
the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis.

See Are obstetricians Bible-based?
http://groups-beta.google.com/ group/misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/ 7ff4c2607...

Alternate URL: http://health.groups.yahoo.com /group/chiro-list/message/3304

NOTE: This just cited Are obstetricians Bible-based? post was to be my last
post to the usenet - but I lied about that - though not intentionally.

I thought Medical Veritas Editor-in-Chief Gary S. Goldman, PhD was going to
use his peer-reviewed medical journal to exhort MDs who obviously suspect
child abuse to do the MINIMUM required by law and report.  Gary did quite
the opposite.

Sorry to disappoint those who were hoping I would finally be gone from the
usenet.

With MDs able to legally (de facto) commit crimes against babies...

I think 100% of babies would want someone here persistently protesting and
pointing out the obvious MD lies.

So I am still here.

MDs are truly some of the most arrogant Earthlings.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
todd@chiromotion.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.