Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2005
Re: Posted For Jeff, NOT Mark Probert
|
|
Thread rating:  |
LadyLollipop - 19 May 2005 01:05 GMT "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:LQMie.5259$796.3405@attbi_s21...
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:TIGie.6673$w21.2757@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:BRtie.3286$z_.1398@attbi_s71...
"Rich" <joshew@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message news:HKpie.22825$ya2.4972@tornado.socal.rr.com...
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:gspie.3022$z_.86@attbi_s71...
"Mark Probert" <Mark Probert@lumbercartel.com> wrote in message news:b3mie.22267$HJ2.1376@fe11.lga...
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:Ks8ie.221$z_.76@attbi_s71...
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:pm3ie.5722$w21.1037@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"john" <nospamoridiotss@vaccine.con> wrote in message news:d6adqr$74k$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
<mlowry3@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:1116032002.671926.71030@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... Andrew Wakefield is a sad case. He started out with what I am sure were the best of intentions (to explore the null hypothesis that the MMR might not pose any health risk re: autism), but he was blinded by the allure of international recognition and forgot his role as a researcher.
bollocks to that, you vaccinators have to think that or your world would crumble
I don't know why Wakefield said what he said.
The reality of the matter is that vaccines save millions of lives a year. And they have been proven safe.
Jeff
http://www.wnho.net/vaccine_coverup.htm
Do you have a credible source?
YES
http://www.wnho.net/vaccine_coverup.htm
NO
This is a story about a letter that claims that a research study found harm to children for thimerosal preservative in vaccines. NO referrence to the original study is given, only an opinion. This does not constitute a credible source. In fact, let's look at the source. This website is also campaigning against fluoride, monosodium glutamate, aspartame, genetically modified foods, chemtrails [!], Codex Alimentarius, and, of course, vaccinations in general. They also sell "ministerial credentials" up to and including "ordained minister" "if you feel it's something you need".
--Rich
On page 16 as well, Dr. Johnson makes an incredible statement, one that defines the problem we have in this country with the promoters of these vaccines. He states, "As an aside, we found a cultural difference between vaccinologist and environmental health people in that many of us in the vaccine arena have never thought about uncertainty factors before. We tend to be relatively concrete in our thinking." Then he says, "One of the big cultural events in that meeting ---was when Dr. Clarkson repetitively pointed out to us that we just didn't get it about uncertainty, and he was actually quite right."
This is an incredible admission. First, what is a vaccinologist? Do you go to school to learn to be one? How many years of residency training are required to be a vaccinologist? Are there board exams? It's a stupid term used to describe people who are obsessed with vaccines, not that they actually study the effects of the vaccines, as we shall see throughout this meeting. Most important is the admission by Dr. Johnson that he and his fellow "vaccinologist" are so blinded by their obsession with forcing vaccines on society that they never even considered that there might be factors involved that could greatly affect human health, the so-called "uncertainties."
Back to Jeff's statement:
And they have been proven safe.
Indeed they have not.
http://www.909shot.com/Issues/VAERS.htm
The hotlots idea has never been proven.
What idea???
The hotlots idea. It is discussed on the web page you posted but did not read. Snicker, snicker.
Liar.
snipo
I read, and I didn't ask Mark.
Waiting for Jeff to answer.
LL/Jan
Mark Probert - 19 May 2005 13:57 GMT Jan the stripper wrote:
You cannot limit who responds to you. My response will be in the original thread. I encourage everyone not to respond to your stripping.
> <mlowry3@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:1116032002.671926.71030@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... Andrew [quoted text clipped - 79 lines] > > LL/Jan LadyLollipop - 19 May 2005 19:39 GMT > Jan the stripper wrote: Wiat one minute,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ROTFLOL.
I want you to know, I am not a stripper.
LL/Jan
> You cannot limit who responds to you. My response will be in the original > thread. I encourage everyone not to respond to your stripping. ME 3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
COVER THY EYES.
>> <mlowry3@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >> news:1116032002.671926.71030@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... Andrew [quoted text clipped - 87 lines] >> >> LL/Jan Mark Probert - 19 May 2005 22:42 GMT > > Jan the stripper wrote: > > Wiat one minute,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ROTFLOL. > > I want you to know, I am not a stripper. Yes, you are a stripper. You strip out formatting.
> LL/Jan > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > COVER THY EYES. Or what?
> >> <mlowry3@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > >> news:1116032002.671926.71030@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... Andrew [quoted text clipped - 87 lines] > >> > >> LL/Jan
|
|
|