 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2005The Truth About Peer Reviewed
"Rich" <jos...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message news:Ofrie.22830$ya2.15320@tornado.socal.rr.com... > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLolli...@insightbb.com> wrote in message > news:lmpie.2780$V2.1586@attbi_s72... >> "Rich" <jos...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message >> news:RZhie.22735$ya2.13105@tornado.socal.rr.com... >>> Jeffs suggestion that a referrence to peer-reviewed >>> research is more convincing > This is what peer review is really all about. If you can suggest a process > that would be more fair and accurate for selecting manuscripts and grant > proposals, please do. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review > --Rich http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_fraud Science is still a very strongly career-driven discipline. Suppression/non-publication of data A related issue concerns the deliberate suppression, failure to publish, or selective release of the findings of scientific studies. Such cases may not be strictly definable as scientific misconduct as the deliberate falsification of results is not present. However, in such cases the intent may nevertheless be to deliberately deceive. Studies may be suppressed or remain unpublished because the findings are perceived to undermine the commercial, political or other interests of the sponsoring agent or because they fail to support the ideological goals of the researcher http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02JF/02jfgoo.htm Peer review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas (http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/PDF/peerReview.pdf) (Warning: 469 kB PDF) "Rich" jos...@hawaii.rr.com Yes, scientific fraud does sometimes happen <Snip off topicdiversion stupid skeptic tricks> LL/Jan > "Rich" <jos...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > LL/Jan Children are sometime abused at day care centers. --Rich >> "Rich" <jos...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] >> >> LL/Jan >>> <Snip off topicdiversion stupid skeptic tricks> >>> >>> LL/Jan Pardon me. I had forgotten that, being too stupid to understand analogy, you interpret the technique as "stupid skeptic tricks". I'll try to express myself in concrete terms that a third-grader could understand. --Rich >>>> <Snip off topicd iversion stupid skeptic tricks and insults> >>>> >>>> LL/Jan >>>>> <Snip off topicd iversion stupid skeptic tricks and insults> >>>>> >>>>> LL/Jan What you are doing is the equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA". You have LOST the argument through your refusal to participate. No more. --Rich |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.