It's a bit late for Mark Thorson.

****That does not mean that
you present the truth.*****

*****but you are being

*****untruthful*******

***Mark Thorson,it is disappointing to find that he is not truly looking for
answers***

************** (as he has received the answers*** many times)*****

*** Mr. Thorson knows this but has also refused to accept****

(as proven he is still doing it)

***intent slanderous***

***Mr. Thomson
is well aware that Super Blue Green Algae does not contain any neurotoxin as
he
was actually involved with a court case in which the plaintiff against Cell
Tech claimed there were neurotoxins in the algae.***

*** Mr. Thomson is also well
aware that the case was dropped because noneurotoxins whatsoever were ever
found after two years of testing by the mostreputable scientists in algal
toxicology throughout the world****

****Mr.Thorson's intent to create alarm and public panic
regarding the microcystinissue demonstrates a lack of knowledge or
slanderous
intent.***

In light of the information shared above, the focus on microcystin in
blue-green algaecertainly appears to be a

***vicious obsession.***

***Why Mr. Thorson spends so
much lime and energy bashing Cell Tech and SuperBlue-Green Algae remains a
mystery to me and many other scientists who have the background to properly
interpret the scientific literature***.

**** He does not appear to be interested in
discovering the truth***

since it has been conveyed to him

***many times****

and out of
the court case mentioned above, he knows that there is no neurotoxin
whatsoever
present in Super Blue-Green Algae.  In addition,

****Mr. Thorson makes a concerted
and unsolicited effort to track down and forward his postings to anyone he
suspects to be interested or involved with Super Blue Green Algae.  I
suppose
that this is an unfortunate side to freedom of speech which, when coupled
with
the power of the internet, allows someone to spread ***

**erroneous statements***

==

Mark still says he didn't lie, as the above show he most certainly did and
he
can cry he didn't until the cows come home.

Untruthful:

not containing or telling the truth : FALSE, INACCURATE <untruthful report>
synonym see DISHONEST

Then he used the bit of the original  that clearly show he didn't lie and
ask
me to post it. I don't need the original, I know what he stated in his
retraction.

**http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp
**
**>> Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer During the last several
**>> years, I have
**>> from time to time posted to this and other newsgroups a file of
**>> information
**>> called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now retract the statements made in
**>> the
**>> Anatoxin-a Primer. The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green
**>> Algae
**>> from Klamath Lake, produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a
**>> neurotoxin I
**>> characterized as addictive), and that ****Cell Tech deliberately
**>> avoids testing
**>> for this toxin**** because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects
**>> reported
**>> by SBGA users. I have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts
**>> regular tests
**>> that would disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been
**>> found in
**>> Super Blue Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in
**>> the
**>> Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

=========

Quoting:

During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and

Yet he claims he didn't lie.

Therefore using this logic, I could plaster all over the net:

Mark Thorson *deliberately* molests children.

In *my* world, I would never so such a thing, *characterize* with no basis.
simply because having no basis is  : something on which something else is
established or based, which means I made it up. In *MY world* this is L Y I
N
G.

Cell Tech states:

One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication
regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites.
Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell Tech,
its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the
settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been
widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement,
undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.

Now, if I were to plaster all over the net, Mark Thorson *deliberately*
molests
children, and this no basis statement were believed, it would more than
likely
greatly damage Mark's reputation, most likely lose his job, and most likely
cause personal problems for his family.

AFTER that happened, I could whistle a tune, saying, I had no basis for my
*characterization*, I had no basis for my *suggestions*, I hereby retract in
full.

It would be a bit late, but what the hey, I didn't lie.

===========

Because I have pointed this out, Mark repeats the lying and makes all kinds
of
garbage posts about me. He has no basis for those either.

In short, Mark didn't learn from his mistakes and has a huge problem, and
still
repeats his mistakes, never learning it's past time to *shut up*