Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / November 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIVAIDS funding cuts

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martin - 06 Nov 2009 01:57 GMT
Here's another article bitching about HIVAIDS funding cuts.

I particular like the quote from Mulhern-Pearson, who appears to be
complaining the cuts will lead to California losing its status as the
US' HIVAIDS capital.

<http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/arts/013885.html>:

----- Begin Quote -----

Mulhern-Pearson, the director of state and local affairs at the San
Francisco AIDS Foundation, has been working to organize protests and
raise public awareness since Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's line-item
veto cut a majority of funding to AIDS programs.

[...]

"It's disheartening to see California do this, when we were pretty
much at the forefront of the epidemic," Mulhern-Pearson said. "We were
the leaders and it's really sad to see how far we've been set back.

----- End Quote -----
Signature

<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
14 years, 9 months and 24 days.

Dänk 1010011010 - 10 Nov 2009 03:35 GMT
> Here's another article bitching about HIVAIDS funding cuts.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> ----- End Quote -----

I've long advocated strict funding limits for HIV/AIDS programs, as an
incentive for health officials to contain the disease instead of
promoting it in hopes of increasing their budgets.

The current funding model has perverse incentives, by increasing
funding for each new HIV patient added to the system.  My proposal
would be to set a fixed budget, forcing health officials to treat all
HIV/AIDS cases within that budget, and allowing them to keep whatever
money is left over.  No longer would the health department allow
highly promiscuous patients to roam free to spread their virus, adding
new patients that would deplete the treatment budget.
Death - 13 Nov 2009 02:33 GMT
"Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk> wrote in message

> <http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/arts/013885.html>:
>
> "It's disheartening to see California do this, when we were pretty
> much at the forefront of the epidemic," Mulhern-Pearson said. "We were
> the leaders and it's really sad to see how far we've been set back.

sounds like the same cry from ACORN, lol.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.