Discourse online about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes has been problematical. How are participants continuingly made welcome? How are participants encouraged to foment discourse without fearing a retributing moderating when there are disagreements? For example, see http://continuedat.blogspot.com
Online forums need to be improved, as potential case studies, summits' forums' moderating has been operating contrary to the vision enunciated for http://www.2009lgbtihealth.org The 2009 National LGBTI Health Summit, The Bisexual Health Summit, the agenda enunciated for the http://gaymenshealth.ning.com Gay Men's Health Summit. In the cases of these online forums the Socratic Method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method needs to be invoked. At least three of the participants in the stdprevention forum http://www.stdpreventiononline.org/index.php/blog/view/517 have been involved. The others can take responsibility for their actions, enter in a discourse on the topic and conduct exchanges in a manner that we can learn more about discourse in online forums about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes.
http://www.stdpreventiononline.org/index.php/blog/view/517
Martin - 22 Jul 2009 22:04 GMT
>Discourse online about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes has
>been problematical. How are participants continuingly made welcome?
Perhaps your bizarre method of discourse is putting people off.
It appears that every few days you start a new blog, essentially
containing the same stuff as your previous ones, and then spam it
everywhere you can think of.
>How are participants encouraged to foment discourse without fearing
>a retributing moderating when there are disagreements? For
>example, see http://continuedat.blogspot.com
The first entry I see in your latest blog effort is this:
----- Begin Quote -----
TUESDAY, JULY 21, 2009
> "pls cut it with the hate. It isn't going to fly here,
doll. Knock
> it off."
when is a proposal to collect data to verify a claim about a method to
reduce HIV infections and AIDS deaths being hateful or hating?
> "I don't think any of us need to look all that far to be
> confronted by ugly, inflammatory, mean-spirited views."
how is the proposal for the collection of data to verify a claim...
ugly, inflammatory, mean-spirited?
POSTED BY THE ZAK AT 1:56 AM 0 COMMENTS
----- End Quote -----
It means NOTHING to me. You appear to be quoting a previous message,
but you don't specify who it was from or provide a link to the
original.

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
5,304 days and counting...