Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / July 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Problematical discourse online about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
don warner saklad - 22 Jul 2009 12:05 GMT
Discourse online about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes has been problematical. How are participants continuingly made welcome? How are participants encouraged to foment discourse without fearing a retributing moderating when there are disagreements? For example, see http://continuedat.blogspot.com

Online forums need to be improved, as potential case studies, summits' forums' moderating has been operating contrary to the vision enunciated for http://www.2009lgbtihealth.org The 2009 National LGBTI Health Summit, The Bisexual Health Summit, the agenda enunciated for the http://gaymenshealth.ning.com Gay Men's Health Summit. In the cases of these online forums the Socratic Method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method needs to be invoked. At least three of the participants in the stdprevention forum http://www.stdpreventiononline.org/index.php/blog/view/517 have been involved. The others can take responsibility for their actions, enter in a discourse on the topic and conduct exchanges in a manner that we can learn more about discourse in online forums about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes.
http://www.stdpreventiononline.org/index.php/blog/view/517
Martin - 22 Jul 2009 22:04 GMT
>Discourse online about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes has
>been problematical. How are participants continuingly made welcome?

Perhaps your bizarre method of discourse is putting people off.

It appears that every few days you start a new blog, essentially
containing the same stuff as your previous ones, and then spam it
everywhere you can think of.

>How are participants encouraged to foment discourse without fearing
>a retributing moderating when there are disagreements? For
>example, see http://continuedat.blogspot.com

The first entry I see in your latest blog effort is this:

----- Begin Quote -----

TUESDAY, JULY 21, 2009

         > "pls cut it with the hate. It isn't going to fly here,
doll. Knock
         >  it off."

when is a proposal to collect data to verify a claim about a method to
reduce HIV infections and AIDS deaths being hateful or hating?

         > "I don't think any of us need to look all that far to be
         >  confronted by ugly, inflammatory, mean-spirited views."

how is the proposal for the collection of data to verify a claim...
ugly, inflammatory, mean-spirited?
POSTED BY THE ZAK AT 1:56 AM 0 COMMENTS

----- End Quote -----

It means NOTHING to me.  You appear to be quoting a previous message,
but you don't specify who it was from or provide a link to the
original.
Signature

<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
5,304 days and counting...

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.