Discourse online about preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes has been
problematical. How are participants continuingly made welcome? How are
participants encouraged to foment discourse without fearing a
retributing moderating when there are disagreements? For example, see
http://continuedat.blogspot.com

Online forums need to be improved, as potential case studies, summits'
forums' moderating has been operating contrary to the vision
enunciated for http://www.2009lgbtihealth.org The 2009 National LGBTI
Health Summit, The Bisexual Health Summit, the agenda enunciated for
the http://gaymenshealth.ning.com Gay Men's Health Summit. In the
cases of these online forums the Socratic Method http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
needs to be invoked. At least three of the participants in the
stdprevention forum http://www.stdpreventiononline.org/index.php/blog/view/517
have been involved. The others can take responsibility for their
actions, enter in a discourse on the topic and conduct exchanges in a
manner that we can learn more about discourse in online forums about
preventing STDs, HIV, TB, herpes.
http://www.stdpreventiononline.org/index.php/blog/view/517