This article concludes that HIVers "live dramatically longer now,"
thanks to "antiviral cocktail drugs and early intervention."
Yes, HIVers do appear to be living longer now, but is that really
thanks to HIV wonder-drugs? Few HIVers take the deadly concoctions as
and when they should, and many sell them on for profit.
Has early intervention led to HIVers living longer? Probably not. HIV
enablers continue to promote mass testing, citing that a large number
of people don't know they have the killer virus until it's too late.
Quite why today's HIVers live longer than those diagnosed with the
(antibody) condition in the early 1980s is a bit of a mystery.
<http://www.mydesert.com/article/20090610/NEWS01/906100302/1006/news01/Drugs+help
ing+HIV+patients+live+longer>:
----- Begin Quote -----
AIDS is not the death sentence it was in the 1980s. And that's the
inherent difficulty advocates face in educating a fatigued public on
HIV/AIDS.
Antiviral cocktail drugs and early intervention today mean those
infected with HIV/AIDS can live 20, 30 and 40 years or more with the
disease.
That wasn't the case in the early 1980s, when young gay men
inexplicably began contracting opportunistic infections and cancers.
An AIDS diagnosis then almost certainly meant a speedy death. Pictures
of gay men wasting away became the poster child of the disease, and
fear.
People live dramatically longer now, said David Brinkman, executive
director of the Desert AIDS Project in Palm Springs.
There's been a decrease in the stigma within the gay community
because they have lived through the epidemic together. It has become
more normalized and because of the education with HIV there is also
the decrease of the fear of it.
Each year in California which has one of the highest infection rates
in the U.S. with more than 100,000 people living with HIV/AIDS an
estimated 5,000 to 7,000 people contract the disease.
----- End Quote -----

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
5,262 days and counting...
Dank 110100100 - 08 Jul 2009 03:37 GMT
> This article concludes that HIVers "live dramatically longer now,"
> thanks to "antiviral cocktail drugs and early intervention."
>
> Yes, HIVers do appear to be living longer now, but is that really
> thanks to HIV wonder-drugs? Few HIVers take the deadly concoctions as
> and when they should, and many sell them on for profit.
I know an HIV patient who was very sick around 1994, and improved
dramatically after receiving the new antiviral 'cocktail' drugs. 15
years later he is as 'healthy' as could be expected for someone with
such a nasty virus, and I have no doubt it is the medications that are
responsible.
> Has early intervention led to HIVers living longer? Probably not. HIV
> enablers continue to promote mass testing, citing that a large number
> of people don't know they have the killer virus until it's too late.
The HIV patient I know was given a year or two to live in 1994, and is
still around 15 years later. 'Alive' is a strong word to use, but he
is definitely 'animate,' which is supposedly an improvement over the
inanimate corpse he would have been without the new medications.
> Quite why today's HIVers live longer than those diagnosed with the
> (antibody) condition in the early 1980s is a bit of a mystery.
One possibility is that those with virulent strains of the virus died
quickly, leaving survivors with less virulent strains. This is simple
evolution, since viruses and parasites that kill their hosts too
quickly reduce their chances of propagating successfully.