ISAC Congress FUCing FACS! Collusion! Help ME!

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Mitch Haynes - 18 Dec 2008 19:06 GMT

The Purdue Cytometry discussion group is strictly for
discussion of scientific issues relating to the fields in which ISAC
is generally involved. This includes flow cytomery and imaging and
basic science areas of cellular function, cell cycling, immunology,
microbiology and the many areas where single cells or tissues are
analysed.

To join you must send a request to: Subscr...@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
and you must include your name, your institution and your area of
scientific interest. All subscriptions are reviewed - it is not
automatic
*****************************************************************

Larry, we have about 3000 people on the Purdue discussion list which
is

primarily about cytometry -

and a lot of flow cytometry -

to join,

people actually have to go through

me,

and we

review every person who

comes on.
******************************************************************
So Mario, when are you going to talk about software that runs on
computers that

the other 90% plus that people have.......in terms of world computer

sales, Apple is right up there at .....4%!!

Paul
*******************************************************************

Dear Robert Murphy

NEW
FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers
CAN
PROCESS 24,000-42,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR. FLOW CYTOMETRY FCS CYTO PRO
QUICK FACS http://www.kanecki.com/flow.html

Increased quality and productivity. With 10,000,000 event files, you
can process 24,000 samples/hour, and maintain quality up to Sigma 5
or
better. Compare this to having your research technologist performing
only 100 samples/hour analysis.
Increased laboratory utilization by 3X because you can perform the
analysis off-lab and free laboratory time for reading samples. This
was achieved when I developed the program, and we had a program
project grant from 1992 to 1998 of $8M.
Works with FCS 3.0 in all data modes as floating point, integer*4,
and
ASCII.
Works with BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers and Cell Sorters
Backwards compatible with FCS 2.0 files and Flow Cytometers and Cell
Sorters.
Can read FCS 3.0 files up to 10M events with 20 parameters. Easy to
Use, three step process. Load initial file, set gate, specify file
list to process. That's it.
Collaboration tools to allow you to cut and paste image results to
results.
Statistical analysis results imprinted on histogram plots directly as
mean, mode, and median with the ability to present results in log
mode
or linear mode, depending on the detector used. Plain vanilla coding
for easy update and maintenance to allow for the greatest user and
software quality.
One time purchase fee, no yearly renewal fees as with others. Proven
tract record in FACS, Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorter Laboratory.
The laboratory was rated the best laboratory in the Midwest USA in
1990.

This application is designed for large-scale fluorescent activated
cell sorter
analysis. The program can read up to FCS 3.0 files and has been
tested
to run on Becton Dickinson and CoulterOrtho based flow cytometers and
cell sorters. The main advantage of this program is that you can have
the computer perform the analysis for you after you have selected the
region to analyze. The result is that up to 24,000 samples per hour
can be analyzed on a 1.4 GHz speed computer. This program is designed
for researcher and technologist use. It uses rectangular gating, and
is intuitive to use. To use this program, the FCS must have the
extension, *.bin as "54203023.bin" as an example. The *.bin extension
is what the computer uses to locate the files on the computer.

THANK YOU FOR YOU TIME MITCHELL HAYNES VP
SALES KANECKI
ASSOCIATES 832-347-1669

THIS WAS J PAUL ROBINSON RESPONSE TO THE INFORMATION SENT Re: Fw: NEW
FLOWCYTOMETRY SOFTWARE FOR ALL BD and Beckman/Coulter Flow Cytometers
CAN PROCESS 24,000 SAMPLES PER HOUR...Standard Header|Full Message
View J. Paul Robinson J. Paul Robinson ... ViewFriday, September 28,
2007 9:37:32 AM To:mitchell haynes Cc:david_at_kanecki2.com;
skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

Steve
what is this email –

it came to me with Bob Murphy's name associated
with it.

It seems to be an advertisement, this junk mail, and it
seems
to have been modified by you ...

So I guess I am confused. was this sent to the list,

or do you have
an
details about it –

i am concerned about these junk messages going out
to
our members, -

if they are using our lists, I will deal with them
appropriately,

but I am not happy about this –

any info you can give
me
appreciated

thanks

paul

mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com>

Ø To: skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

> Cc: skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 11:39:02 AM

Ø > Subject: NOT A JUNCK MAIL STEVE WAS JUST FOWARDING
INFORMATION TO PROPER

> CHANNELS

> Dear Paul,
> I recieved your responce to the email I sent.

Ø

Ø Please understand it is not

> junkmail but a update on new technology that will inhance all
> flowcytometers..It is currently being evaluated by BD who request for this
> software to be developed directly by our corporation.

> It was simply sent as an announcement for you concideration.
> The software is demonstrates precision and a higer processing rate than
> every existing software today.

> If you have any questions please call I provided my phone number with the
> email. I understand institutions of your caliber is always looking for new
> technology. Futhermoore this is the only software in the world that works
> for every platform on one peice of software

> Thank your for you time and have a great day.

> Please do not blame Steve for send the information to the proper channels
> I would think you would be upset if he did not foward important infomation
> that pertains to furthering cytometry breakthroughs.

> If you would like us to send information to another address that won't
> interfer please foward it to me and I will make sure that there are no
> more misunderstandings.

Mitchell Haynes

From: "jpr_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu"
<jpr_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

To: mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com>

Cc: jpr_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:26:51 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: NOT A JUNCK MAIL STEVE WAS JUST FOWARDING
INFORMATION
TO
PROPER CHANNELS

Sorry, I think it is junk mail

regards

paul robinson

GLarry Farrell wrote:

> Someone has apparently decided to post the following, and a huge number
> of related messages, to misc.health.aids. I have asked that person,

> several occasions, not to post this material into that newsgroup and
> have been ignored. My reasons for that request are two-fold: (1)
> Misc.health.aids is an HIV/AIDS group so the material is decidedly off
> topic, and (2) Some of these messages contain reference to a site from
> which cytometry software can be purchased and commercial solicitations
> of any sort are expressly forbidden by the group's charter. Is there

> any way you can intervene in this issue and stop the *many* posting

> this and related cytometry messages in misc.health.aids?

Paul Robinson was *not* informed of my message to you. What makes
you

Ø think he was?
J. Paul Robinson
<jpr_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>

ViewMonday, November 19, 2007 2:14:38 PM

To:Larry Farrell <farrlarr_at_isu.edu>; mitchell haynes
<buybroker_at_yahoo.com>;
skelley_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu; Bartek Rajwa
rajwa_at_flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

Larry

Sorry you are experiencing a problem

>From the header - This is apparently coming from a Mitchel Haynes

mitchell haynes <buybroker_at_yahoo.com> - is this correct?

I initially thought messages coming from this person were a scam and

challenged them when they started posting to our list as well. I had

someone do a check on them. it is apparent that they have written
some

software and they think its ants-pants. They have tried to post
things

on the Purdue list, they have used every possible website and email

discussion group to get cross listed to boost their ratings on
Google.

Basically I view their behavior as very tenuous and from the message
you

sent me, it appears that it is not appropriate to do what they are
doing...

I have taken the following action:

Steve Kelley has been instructed to remove their email and any
postings on the Purdue list.

They are now banned

2. I am going to Copying Bartek Rajwa the editor of the ISAC site to

beware of them

3. I am contacting Google and other sites to let them know that these

people are self-propagating links.

4. If I see any message that in any way impunes Purdue or our

reputation,

I will go after them with every possible legal recourse
at

my disposal.

We will not allow our reputation to suffer because of

commercial abuse.

5. You should ban this address, and basically indicate to your
members

that this is a scam.

While they claim to be legitimate, they are
acting

exactly as any scam artist...I already told them that they were
acting

as scammers and they got upset with me...well, if they don't desist,

they will find out how much influence we actually have...

I will check the message

> Subject: flow cytometry software will you trust Purdue..Lets play

MONOPOLY

> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:38:56 -0800 (PST)
> Organization: http://groups.google.com

and see if this is actually libelous - it appears to be - and if it
is,

I will close this person down really, really fast!!! (Steve please
check

out this message and make a copy)

Larry, we have about 3000 people on the Purdue discussion list which
is

primarily about cytometry - and a lot of flow cytometry - to join,

people actually have to go through me, and we review every person who

comes on.

I am sorry you are experiencing this problem, and we are happy to
help

in any way we can.

regards

paul Robinson

Professor, Purdue

http://advenet.com/flowcytometry/blog/default.aspx

http://www.new.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=23879772873&ref=mf

Reply to this Message

Mitch Haynes - 25 Dec 2008 01:15 GMT

> The Purdue Cytometry discussion group is strictly for
> discussion of scientific issues relating to the fields in which ISAC
[quoted text clipped - 355 lines]
>
> http://www.new.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=23879772873&ref=mf

Mailing List - How it works and why!!
From: J. Paul Robinson (jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu)
Date: Sat Mar 17 2001 - 11:10:35 EST
•    Next message: Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson: "RE: Apoptosis -- no
direct responses"
•    Previous message: David_C_McFarland@sbphrd.com: "AnnexinV"
•    In reply to: Rick A. Bright: "RE: Apoptosis -- no direct responses"
•    Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and why!!"
•    Maybe reply: Mark Kukuruga: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Maybe reply: Margaret Tropea: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Reply: Candace Enockson: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Reply: Sebastian, J, Gelderbloem, Mr: "Re: Mailing List - How it
works and why!!"
•    Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
<smaller>Mailing List Response

A recent comment on the list ...

"People not responding directly to questions may have to do with the
fact that
when the reply button is hit the email from the postee is presented
NOT the
mailing list. This should be changed so that the mailing list is
presented first."

----------------------------------------

C<bigger>olleagues:

We have had many requests over the years to change this and that
- particularly that!! If you hit REPLY to a message from the list, you
will only send the message to the individual who posed the
question. This is intentional on our part. Everyone on the list knows
how to send a message to the list and we do not publish anywhere
how to do that. This is also intentional. When you want your
message to go to the list, it should be by intention, not by
accident. On the most part, we have rescued from public
embarrassment the accidental personal messages that were sent
to the list. Remember, you get a clean list because this is a
monitored list - we review messages and remove the trash mail that
squeak in...

If we did publish how to send messages, the list would be come a
spam target. You don't want that nor do we. I receive more than
enough trash email.... Further, we require people to subscribe in
order to participate - why? It makes them be more responsible in
using (or abusing) the list. I personally review every subscription
request and 80% are denied on first request!!! There are 2030
members currently. I will only subscribe someone when I have a
name, an institution and an area of interest - This takes valuable
time on my part on a daily basis - but the bottom line is that 2030
other people save time.

REPLY ALL: We will not change this. If any of you are in doubt as
to why this should not happen, subscribe to the CONFOCAL list. A
week or two should cure any desire to have the REPLY button go
to the list. It is amazing how many embarrassing, personal
memos, gripes, etc appear because people hit the reply button....

When you receive good advice, create a summary and post the
results - several people do that on this list and it is a great
service.
We have redesigned our serach engine, so you shoudl be able to
better search for key words now.

FINALLY: Please enter a subject!!!! - We are considering, not
posting messages without subject lines.....?

Our goal is to maintain the best, most useful cytometry Internet
service there can be. Check the rest of our new web site at

http://www.cyto.purdue.edu

and send me a message as to how to improve, fix, or change
something.

Paul Robinson

Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories

<nofill>
J.Paul Robinson, Ph.D.,
Professor of Immunopharmacology
Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Director, Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories
Hansen Hall, Roon B050
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1515
(Ph) (765) 494-0757 Fax (765) 494-0517
jpr@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu

http://www.cyto.purdue.edu

http://www.bioscope.org
________________________________________
•    Next message: Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson: "RE: Apoptosis -- no
direct responses"
•    Previous message: David_C_McFarland@sbphrd.com: "AnnexinV"
•    In reply to: Rick A. Bright: "RE: Apoptosis -- no direct responses"
•    Next in thread: Adrian Smith: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Reply: Adrian Smith: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and why!!"
•    Maybe reply: Mark Kukuruga: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Maybe reply: Margaret Tropea: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Reply: Candace Enockson: "Re: Mailing List - How it works and
why!!"
•    Reply: Sebastian, J, Gelderbloem, Mr: "Re: Mailing List - How it
works and why!!"
•    Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ attachment ]
________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jan 01 2004 -
17:40:13 EST

Reply to this Message