My advice to you to is to access AOL keyword "TOS" and read about the
things you can't post to USENET via AOL.
This incident has been reported to abuse <at> aol.com
Winston - 29 Jun 2004 01:39 GMT
"Baby Peanut" <baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com> wrote...
> My advice to you to is to access AOL keyword "TOS" and read about the
> things you can't post to USENET via AOL.
>
> This incident has been reported to abuse <at> aol.com
a.shole. Unable to counter whatever was said with any intelligent
discourse of your own, you choose the typical leftist tactic of
censoring those who disagree with you.
You probably can guess who I am, and I dare you to complain to my
ISP to try to shut me up. I have stuck with my ISP for 5 years
because they don't respond to complaints from whiny netnazis (or
netcommies in your case) a.sholes like you. And on the off chance
they ever did cut me off, there are dozens of other local ISPs to
choose from, and I know how to use anonymous remailers and there
is always Altopia, the free speech newsserver. Altopia costs $6 a
month and remailers are inconvenient, but we will not be silenced
by commies like you.
Why don't you move to North Korea if you don't want read anything
offensive? DPRK has no Internet, and a single media outlet, KCNA,
which carries such hard-hitting stories such as the latest floral
basket given to Kim Jong Il for his birthday by the Libyan ambassador,
or how pig iron production was up 145% over last quarter...
http://www.kcna.co.jp/index.htm
Luvthatsvnshow - 30 Jun 2004 01:40 GMT
From: baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut)
>This incident has been reported to abuse <at> aol.com<
Baby Piss Ant kinda like you posting Paul Kings name and address on the web ?
Are you a internet cop ?
did you report the guy who got you pregnant with aids ?
or havent you narrowed it down yet ?
Winston - 30 Jun 2004 07:55 GMT
"Luvthatsvnshow" <luvthatsvnshow@aol.com> wrote...
> From: baby_p_nut2@yahoo.com (Baby Peanut)
> >This incident has been reported to abuse <at> aol.com<
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> did you report the guy who got you pregnant with aids ?
> or havent you narrowed it down yet ?
LOL!!! But I think he's narrowed it down to a "short list" of
a few hundred most likely possibilities.
"Luvthatsvnshow" <luvthatsvnshow@aol.com> wrote...
> From one a.shole to the next gay men spread this filthy disease around like
> Hallmark Cards I dont care about Africa or Asia HIV in USA is a Gay Disease.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The gay world is a evil world full of hysterical homos
I fully agree with you. But while I'm willing to consider mandatory
testing and forced tattooing, I think that it should be applied to
the ENTIRE population, not just homosexuals. It just wouldn't work
otherwise, as homosexual men would simply hide their homosexuality
and avoid being tested.
Several years ago I read an opinion column in my regional newspaper.
The writer suggested that all those with HIV receive a small, but
conspicuous and distinct symbol, tattoo on their genitals. She said
that it would be a reasonable compromise, placing the tattoo where it
couldn't be seen under ordinary circumstances and thus spare the
bearer from stigma, but clearly visible to those who would normally
see his/her genitals - i.e. a person he/she intended to have sex
with. Naturally, this idea was met with the predictable comparisons
to the tattooing of Jews in the Nazi concentration camps. What's
ironic is that the column author was a black woman, so you would be
hard-pressed to accuse her of Nazi sympathies...
I also agree with your last sentence about hysterical homos, but
please keep in mind that not all homosexuals are like that. I happen
to be gay myself, and under a variety of aliases I have been here
viciously attacking the radical leftist homos and their wanton sexual
promiscuity and disease-spreading, the ones who give all of us a bad
name. And while my positions occassionally mirror those of the
traditional xian religious-fanatic right, I am not one of them and
base my criticisms on independent thought and not simply what the
fuckin' bible, koran, etc. have to say on the subject.
I already replied to Baby Peanut's reply to you before reloading my
read message headers to see what you said that got his panties all in
a bunch. Never mind him, he is a communist homo, to the left of Pol
Pot and Ho Chi Minh, and screams hatecrime anytime someone invades the
little fantasy universe he inhabits. On the off chance that his
complaint to AOL about you succeeds, might I recommend learning how
to use an anonymous remailer (google it) or subscribe to Altopia's
uncencored newsgroup service (http://www.altopia.com) which fiercely
guards its subscribers' privacy and free speech (it won't act on
anything less than a law-enforcement subpoena or court order, never
on whiny complaints from netcommies like Baby Peanut who are simply
offended by your words and want to shut you up by having your
internet service canceled).
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a position
of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every
thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-
religious character of leftism; everything contrary to leftists'
beliefs represents Sin...and as long as anyone harbors in some
corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the
leftist has to re-educate him."
-- The Unabomber Manifesto
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Allan Larsen - 29 Jun 2004 08:26 GMT
Baby Peanut once made the same threat to me . Shortly afterward I
developed a short term problem with my service and thought that maybe he
had been successful. It had nothing to do with his complaint. When I
talked with my provider and explained the situation it turned out he
disliked homosexuals more than I did.
Winston - 30 Jun 2004 08:05 GMT
"Allan Larsen" <Ace96@webtv.net> wrote...
> Baby Peanut once made the same threat to me . Shortly afterward I
> developed a short term problem with my service and thought that maybe he
> had been successful. It had nothing to do with his complaint. When I
> talked with my provider and explained the situation it turned out he
> disliked homosexuals more than I did.
Your ISP's personal opinions shouldn't matter, you should be free to
post your opinion on the Internet without netcommies like Baby Peanut
being able to get your service cut off. It's called FREE SPEECH and
leftist commies like BP just can't stand it. The U.S. and other
countries still have laws against making threats or promoting illegal
activities (such as if Luvthatsvnshow had threatened to personally
kill people with HIV), but simply expressing an opinion that people
with AIDS should be gassed is completely protected speech, at least
here in the U.S. If Baby Peanut is sure a crime has been committed,
then he should have reported it to the police or FBI. But since no
crime was committed, BP's only option was to censor the OP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"When the Bolsheviks in Russia were outsiders, they vigorously opposed
censorship and the secret police, they advocated self-determination
for ethnic minorities, and so forth; but as soon as they came into
power themselves, they imposed a tighter censorship and created a more
ruthless secret police than any that had existed under the tsars, and
they oppressed ethnic minorities at least as much as the tsars had
done. In the United States, a couple of decades ago when leftists
were a minority in our universities, leftist professors were vigorous
proponents of academic freedom, but today, in those universities where
leftists have become dominant, they have shown themselves ready to
take away from everyone else's academic freedom. (This is 'political
correctness.') The same will happen with leftists and technology:
They will use it to oppress everyone else if they ever get it under
their own control."
-- The Unabomber Manifesto
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GMCarter - 30 Jun 2004 12:48 GMT
snip...
>Your ISP's personal opinions shouldn't matter, you should be free to
>post your opinion on the Internet without netcommies like Baby Peanut
>being able to get your service cut off.
Free Speech is something that the GOVERNMENT must protect. Speaking
out against the Bush administration's deceptions to get the US into an
illegal war that caused suffering and death is an example.
By contrast, spouting libel or otherwise slandering people is NOT
protected speech. And an ISP indeed is a private entity that has the
right to kick people off their roles for violating the terms of their
contract, which includes the type of vicious assault you've engaged in
here.
But it is your short life! Should you choose to spend it filling your
mind and body full of hate for others, that is your suffering. Best of
luck overcoming it.
George M. Carter
Baby Peanut - 30 Jun 2004 01:48 GMT
> "Luvthatsvnshow" <luvthatsvnshow@aol.com> wrote...
> > From one a.shole to the next gay men spread this filthy disease around like
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> -- The Unabomber Manifesto
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
What me leftist? *giggle*
Dick Cheney: From the standpoint of the oil industry obviously - and
I'll talk a little later on about gas - for over a hundred years we as
an industry have had to deal with the pesky problem that once you find
oil and pump it out of the ground you've got to turn around and find
more or go out of business. >>>Producing oil is obviously a
self-depleting activity.<<< Every year you've got to find and develop
reserves equal to your output just to stand still, just to stay even.
This is as true for companies as well in the broader economic sense it
is for the world. A new merged company like Exxon-Mobil will have to
secure over a billion and a half barrels of new oil equivalent
reserves every year just to replace existing production. It's like
making one hundred per cent interest; discovering another major field
of some five hundred million barrels equivalent every four months or
finding two Hibernias a year.
***For the world as a whole, oil companies are expected to keep
finding and developing enough oil to offset our seventy one million
plus barrel a day of oil depletion, but also to meet new demand. By
some estimates there will be an average of two per cent annual growth
in global oil demand over the years ahead along with conservatively a
three per cent natural decline in production from existing reserves.
That means by 2010 we will need on the order of an additional fifty
million barrels a day.***
Kjell Aleklett writes
<< To understand the magnitude of the problem that Dick Cheney is
addressing we can compare fifty million barrels a day with the total
production coming from the six countries bordering the Persian Gulf
(Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Qatar),
that in 2001 produced 22,4 million barrels per day (Energy Information
Administration). >>
Baby Peanut writes: D00d! Yr toast! There's no way to keep your
idea of a normal day with plastic and cars and wonderbread going.