 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / April 2008HIV racism
The overt racism of the HIV movement never fails to amaze me. Their latest wheeze is to, effectively, pay people in Africa *not* to have sex. <http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=453468>: ----- Begin Quote ----- Thousands of people in Africa will be paid to avoid unsafe sex, under a groundbreaking World Bank-backed experiment aimed at halting the spread of Aids. The $1.8m trial to be launched this year will counsel 3,000 men and women aged 15-30 in southern rural Tanzania over three years, paying them on condition that periodic laboratory test results prove they have not contracted sexually transmitted infections. ----- End Quote -----  Signature<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/> 4,852 days and counting... If one reads what you wrote, it would seem no sex is involved in this program. However you go on and post that it has to be safe-sex which would indeed include sex. Another example is: you use the HIV movement, but the article states sexually transmitted infections.......... Your views come across better when you stick to the facts > The overt racism of the HIV movement never fails to amaze me. Their > latest wheeze is to, effectively, pay people in Africa *not* to have [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > ----- End Quote ----- >If one reads what you wrote, it would seem no sex is involved >in this program. >However you go on and post that it has to be safe-sex >which would indeed include sex. No sex or protected sex, the aim is the same: prevent (black) Africans from reproducing. >Another example is: you use the HIV movement, but >the article states sexually transmitted infections.......... LOL. <http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=453468> Title of article: "World Bank backs anti-Aids experiment" It contains: "...groundbreaking World Bank-backed experiment aimed at halting the spread of Aids;" "In spite of billions of dollars spent annually on treatment and prevention worldwide, there were about 2.5m new HIV infections in 2007, predominantly in Africa;" "...reducing HIV infection...;" "The Tanzanian trial programme, which is still subject to fine-tuning and ethical approval, will not specifically test for HIV, which is costly..." Only in the final paragraph do we discover that participants won't be tested for HIV (antibodies): "The Tanzanian trial programme, which is still subject to fine-tuning and ethical approval, will not specifically test for HIV, which is costly and already widely conducted in the country. It will use proxies including gonorrhoea, and guarantees any participant found to be infected receives state treatment." >Your views come across better when you stick to the facts The article also contains this: "The designers of the Tanzanian programme believe that payments of $45 when combined with careful counselling could play an important role in reducing HIV infection, especially for vulnerable young women." Careful counselling and $45 isn't the same as safe sex. I wonder if vaginal drenching with lemon juice will be promoted as a way to prevent HIV infection? Perhaps not: that was another failed HIV experiment. Signature<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/> 4,852 days and counting... "Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk> wrote in message > "Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > No sex or protected sex, the aim is the same: prevent (black) Africans > from reproducing. Again you go out on a limb and inject a subject not embrased by the article you posted. The stated aim is to reduce sexually transmitted infections. I saw nothing to indicate that this is about birth control. >>Another example is: you use the HIV movement, but >>the article states sexually transmitted infections.......... [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > "...reducing HIV infection...;" There ya go, that makes my case. >"Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk> wrote in message >> No sex or protected sex, the aim is the same: prevent (black) Africans >> from reproducing. >Again you go out on a limb and inject a subject not embrased >by the article you posted. > >The stated aim is to reduce sexually transmitted infections. >I saw nothing to indicate that this is about birth control. Okay, so that's abstinence and condom usage out of the window. What's left? >><http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=453468> >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >There ya go, that makes my case. Which was: "Another example is: you use the HIV movement, but the article states sexually transmitted infections.........." Of course you overlook the rather obvious fact that the article mentions HIV and AIDS several times, but only specifically refers to one other STD; and that the title of the article is "World Bank backs anti-Aids experiment." Signature<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/> 4,853 days and counting... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.