Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIV is racist

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Martin - 02 Mar 2008 09:03 GMT
<http://www.southtownstar.com/news/johnson/820530,030108johnson.article>:

----- Begin Quote -----

"Black Americans have been disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS
since the epidemic's beginnings, and that disparity has deepened over
time. Blacks account for more HIV/AIDS cases, people estimated to be
living with AIDS and HIV-related deaths than any other racial/ethnic
group in the United States," according to a July 2007 report issued by
the Henry Kaiser Family Foundation.

Although blacks make up approximately 13 percent of the U.S.
population, 49 percent of the new HIV/AIDS diagnoses in the United
States were for blacks in those states with long-term confidential
reporting, according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.

----- End Quote -----
Signature

<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519
4,797 days and counting...

Maxwell Hamilton - 03 Mar 2008 10:25 GMT
> <http://www.southtownstar.com/news/johnson/820530,030108johnson.article>:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> ----- End Quote -----

Hi Martin,

I think this is a very strong hint against an infectious AIDS theory.

Greetings Max
Death - 03 Mar 2008 14:18 GMT
"Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk> wrote in message

> "Black Americans have been disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS
> since the epidemic's beginnings, and that disparity has deepened over
> time. Blacks account for more HIV/AIDS cases, ...

Let me go back on record and say again, AIDS is in the a.shole.
If it were in the blood as others would have me believe, why is
Not the spleen effected?

Calling me bigot and racist just means I am a realist.......
RamRod Sword of Baal - 03 Mar 2008 19:09 GMT
> Let me go back on record and say again, AIDS is in the a.shole.
> If it were in the blood as others would have me believe, why is
> Not the spleen effected?

and where did you gleam this priceless piece of information from ???
Death - 04 Mar 2008 09:26 GMT
> > Let me go back on record and say again, AIDS is in the a.shole.
> > If it were in the blood as others would have me believe, why is
> > Not the spleen effected?
>
> and where did you gleam this priceless piece of information from ???

you can start by looking for who has aids and how they got it
RamRod Sword of Baal - 04 Mar 2008 09:40 GMT
>> > Let me go back on record and say again, AIDS is in the a.shole.
>> > If it were in the blood as others would have me believe, why is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
> you can start by looking for who has aids and how they got it

That is not what my interest is, rather your statement of "AIDS is in the
a.shole. If it were in the blood as others would have me believe, why is
not the spleen effected",  like to tell us where this great stroke of wisdom
came from?

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.