Martin wrote...
> At least half of the people diagnosed with AIDS in the US have died.
> So the millions of AIDS patients you refer to probably total no more
> than half a million.
>Martin wrote...
>> At least half of the people diagnosed with AIDS in the US have died.
>> So the millions of AIDS patients you refer to probably total no more
>> than half a million.
>I know I should have used the more accurate term "HIV/AIDS" to describe
>the patients who are being prescribed Viagra at public expense. As for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>off and the actual number of HIV patients eligible for the free Viagra
>is probably closer to 250,000.
US HIV and AIDS figures are a complete mystery to me. There doesn't
appear to be any real, meaningful, numbers concerning HIV and AIDS
from the US, which is odd because HIV was invented there.
From the CDC <http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm>:
"In 2005, the estimated number of persons living with HIV/AIDS in the
33 states and dependent areas with confidential name-based HIV/AIDS
infection reporting was 475,871."
Does this mean that thirteen states are not included in that total?
The CDC also give this disclaimer: "Please note: These numbers do not
represent reported case counts. Rather, these numbers are point
estimates, which result from adjustments of reported case counts."
But wait. The same page also contains this: "At the end of 2003, an
estimated 1,039,000 to 1,185,000 persons in the United States..."
Are there any REAL figures? All I see are estimates based on
estimates. It's in stark contrast to the data from the UK, such as
<http://www.avert.org/statsyr.htm>, which details diagnosed cases year
by year.
>In the USA all "HIV/AIDS-related" drugs are covered by a federal law
>called the Ryan White Act. Not just antivirals but also antibiotics
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>and use only half and trade the other half for crystal meth, or he
>may have lied about the impotence and trades all the pills for meth.
I'll take your word for it.
People who take regular medication are often prescribed several drugs,
some of which are to counteract side effects of the initial treatment.
It's interesting that you describe most HIV patients as drug addicts.
There is a theory that HIV is, itself, a side effect of drug use.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methamphetamine#Effects>:
Diarrhea, nausea, excessive sweating, loss of appetite, tremor, weight
loss, brain damage, delusions, muscle breakdown and Kidney failure.
And your favourite: compulsive fascination with repetitive tasks. You
keep saying people infected with HIV are driven to infect as many
people as possible. This could be described as a compulsive
fascination with a repetitive task.

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519
4,797 days and counting...
Death - 03 Mar 2008 14:34 GMT
> >Martin wrote...
> >> At least half of the people diagnosed with AIDS in the US have died.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Does this mean that thirteen states are not included in that total?
Yes. Large population states with faggots and niggers are excluded.
http://bruindancemarathon.org/egpaf/us-stats.pdf
dank - 04 Mar 2008 17:43 GMT
Martin wrote...
> US HIV and AIDS figures are a complete mystery to me. There doesn't
> appear to be any real, meaningful, numbers concerning HIV and AIDS
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Does this mean that thirteen states are not included in that total?
That is correct. I think those thirteen states follow the original
reporting system from the 1980s and only report cases of "AIDS"
which doesn't include HIV patients without visible symptoms. And
for those states that report positive HIV test results as well as
diagnosed cases of AIDS, the figures only include those who have
been tested, and the number of untested HIV carriers in the general
population remains unknown.
> The CDC also give this disclaimer: "Please note: These numbers do not
> represent reported case counts. Rather, these numbers are point
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> <http://www.avert.org/statsyr.htm>, which details diagnosed cases year
> by year.
But what does the UK do with its detailed data except invite AIDS-
infected Africans to emigrate to Britain to take advantage of free
medical treatment?