> What on earth could have destroyed her immune system so fast, she worked in
> a hospital and must have had the best possible care.
Almost 10 years. Pretty good considering she worked
in such a hostile environment to any immune system.
Hospitals are breeding grounds for any filth that exists.
Martin - 16 Feb 2008 12:29 GMT
>>What on earth could have destroyed her immune system so fast, she worked
>>in a hospital and must have had the best possible care.
>Almost 10 years. Pretty good considering she worked
>in such a hostile environment to any immune system.
>Hospitals are breeding grounds for any filth that exists.
Eight and a half years.
I would have expected her to have had a good, above average, immune
system at the time of HIV 'infection,' so her decline would have
started from a stronger position.
I very much doubt the nurse would have had very much direct contact
with patients after she was diagnosed HIV+.
What we see here is a clear case of death by prescription. :)

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519
4,782 days and counting...
dank - 17 Feb 2008 17:53 GMT
Martin wrote...
> I very much doubt the nurse would have had very much direct contact
> with patients after she was diagnosed HIV+.
Here in the USA there is a strong national disabilities law that
forbids discrimination against HIV patients. I read a story of
a surgeon who was permitted to perform open-heart surgery despite
his arms being covered in festering AIDS sores, and the most the
hospital could do is require he wear a double pair of gloves.
Then there was the tattoo parlor which was sued for refusing to
tattoo an AIDS patient. The hospital didn't only not transfer
the nurse to a back room position, they were practically required
to promote her because she had HIV.
Martin - 19 Feb 2008 23:35 GMT
>Martin wrote...
>> I very much doubt the nurse would have had very much direct contact
>> with patients after she was diagnosed HIV+.
>Here in the USA there is a strong national disabilities law that
>forbids discrimination against HIV patients.
I don't consider HIV to be a disability.
>I read a story of a surgeon who was permitted to perform
>open-heart surgery despite his arms being covered in festering AIDS
>sores, and the most the hospital could do is require he wear a double
>pair of gloves.
What happens when a cripple who uses a wheelchair wants to be a
firefighter or a homosexual wants to join the armed forces? Some
people are obviously unsuited to some professions. :) :) :)

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519
4,785 days and counting...
>What on earth could have destroyed her immune system so fast, she worked in
>a hospital and must have had the best possible care.
That's what I thought. And, of course, there is the 'HIV morning
after pill' too. Didn't it work?
This article,
<http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=98723&in_page_id=34>,
suggests the nurse was 'infected' with HIV-2. HIV science invented
HIV-2 to explain why some of the infected in Africa, particularly West
Africa, don't die as quickly as HIV science dictates:
"Ms Young was diagnosed with the African strain of HIV weeks after the
incident on June 3, 1999 and she went on to develop Aids."
The article also contains:
"And her GP Dr Raja Sinha, of the Maddock Way surgery, said Ms Young
had been the model patient."
Presumably "model patient" means she took all the killer HIV
medication that she was prescribed. And, perhaps, that's what killed
her.

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519
4,782 days and counting...
petenewman - 19 Feb 2008 07:46 GMT
Yeah no doubt a case of hit hard hit early, to give her the best chance
possible... but that pesky bloody virus was just too clever lol. What
morons. MDs (merchants of death)
I was told to expect about 5 yrs before slip sliding away, because of my
age, so thats next week... eek.
--
Message posted using http://www.talkabouthealthnetwork.com/group/misc.health.aids/
More information at http://www.talkabouthealthnetwork.com/faq.html
Martin - 20 Feb 2008 00:34 GMT
>Yeah no doubt a case of hit hard hit early, to give her the best chance
>possible... but that pesky bloody virus was just too clever lol. What
>morons. MDs (merchants of death)
There is something unsettling about this case. The nurse knew when
she was 'infected' and how, had less deadly HIV-2 and presumably had
access to the best HIV medication and services available, yet she died
after only eight and a half years.
However I was probably 'infected with more deadly HIV-1' several
times, can't pinpoint the exact date of transmission and don't take
HIV wonder drugs but remain HIV asymptomatic (having no symptoms of
HIV infection).
>I was told to expect about 5 yrs before slip sliding away, because of my
>age, so thats next week... eek.
We'll miss you. :)
What annoys me is that no matter why I finally stop breathing it will
be chalked up as another HIV death.
I've been wonder where I should place myself on the HIV death chart at
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hiv-timecourse.png>. Unfortunately
it suggests I should have died three years ago!

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519
4,786 days and counting...