Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Purdue Cytometry Mail List Re: Fc receptors on Embryonic Stem     cells?FroWhat about doing a blocking step with 10 mgthen not worrying about     it?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mitch Haynes - 11 Feb 2008 10:06 GMT
Re: Fc receptors on Embryonic Stem cells?
This message: [ Message body ] [ More options ]
Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply
to ]
From: Beverly Barton <bartonbe@UMDNJ.EDU>
Date: Fri Jul 15 2005 - 07:01:45 EST

What about doing a blocking step with 10 mg/ml IgG before staining
and
then not worrying about it?  We've done that for years, buying the
cheapest IgG we can find-- goat, horse, whatever.  And we block every
cell type, because background staining can be due, not to Fc receptor
binding (you can eliminate that by using F(ab'2) fragments or
biotinylated primary Abs + streptavidin-fluorochrome conjugates) but
non-specific protein-protein interactions.  As far as I know, only
certain hematopoietic cells normally express Fc receptors, but every
cell has the potential to have protein stick to it.  Sort of like
running an ELISA or western without a blocking step-- you get high
backgrounds there too.    Sometimes we have to go to 20 mg/ml to reduce
non-specific binding, but not often.

Beverly Barton

Beverly E. Barton, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Surgery/Division of Urology
UMDNJ-NJMS  MSB G519
185 S. Orange Avenue
Newark, New Jersey 07103

Telephone            973-972-0662
E-mail                bartonbe@umdnj.edu
Telefacsimile        973-972-3892

On Jul 14, 2005, at 9:01 AM, Pizzo,Eugene wrote:

> Hi Patty,
>
> In our hands we use a routine staining buffer (PBS) that includes Fc
> block in all staining and washing steps. I use 2.5% total protein in
> the block, 1% BSA,1% FBS and .5% nmIg. It can be pricey if you use at
> the recommended concentrations we are used to so we grow it up with a
> hybridoma Ig spitting cell line from ATCC ; MOPC-31C for staining
> mouse lymphocytes at 500ug/ml. The Bible for my generation was and is
> Harlow and Lane, Antibodies-A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor
> Press for all this kind of stuff..
>
> Gene Pizzo
>
> Manager, Flow Cytometry Facility
> UCONN Health
> Farmington, CT. 06032
> http://flowcytometry.uchc.edu
> 860 679 7567
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patricia Lovelace [mailto:patricia.lovelace@sbcglobal.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 6:38 PM
> To: Cytometry Mailing List
> Subject: Fc receptors on Embryonic Stem cells?
>
> Dear Flowers,
>
> Would anyone happen to know if Fc receptors are expressed on human
> embryonic stem cells or mouse embryonic fibroblasts? A colleague is
> having some non-specific staining background and is wondering if Fc
> receptors should be considered as a possible culprit.
>
> As far as Fc blocking is concerned, I have searched and found many
> differing opinions as far as what to use: 2% up to 20% serum, IgG
> 200ug/ml up to 10mg/ml, and , in the mouse system, the monoclonal
> antibody directed against the Fc receptors. Can anyone advise me as to
> how to choose a method of blocking? Trial and error? Is there an
> upper limit as to how much serum or IgG you can add to the
> staining buffer (ie, possible adverse effects)? What is the latest
> thought on Fc blocking when staining intracellular markers following
> surface staining? Does one need to re-add the blocking reagent with
> each step?
>
> Thanks for any advice. I know that the topic comes up a lot on the
> list, just wanted to revisit it.
>
> Patricia Lovelace
> Manager, Flow Cytometry
> Geron Corporation
> 230 Constitution Drive
> Menlo Park, CA 94025

Received on Fri Jul 15 14:58:00 2005
This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: laura.m.dash@gsk.com: "Fw: anti-FOXP3 MAbs replies"
Previous message: Andy Riddell: "RE: Vantage vs Calibur 'sensitivity'
and MNR counts?"
In reply to: Pizzo,Eugene: "RE: Fc receptors on Embryonic Stem
cells?"
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ]
[ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 -
22:03:50 EST
Mitch Haynes - 16 Feb 2008 19:49 GMT
> Re: Fc receptors on Embryonic Stem cells?
> This message: [ Message body ] [ More options ]
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 14 2006 -
> 22:03:50 EST

http://misc.mailarchive.ca/health.aids/2008-01/index.html#330
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.