"Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk>

something I found for you.....

Health/Science
Fri, Jan. 18, 2008
Experts call for rethinking AIDS money
By MARIA CHENG
AP Medical Writer

LONDON --In the two decades since AIDS began sweeping the globe, it has
often been labeled as the biggest threat to international health.

But with revised numbers downsizing the pandemic - along with an admission
that AIDS peaked in the late 1990s - some AIDS experts are now wondering if
it might be wise to shift some of the billions of dollars of AIDS money to
basic health problems like clean water, family planning or diarrhea.

"If we look at the data objectively, we are spending too much on AIDS,"
said Dr. Malcolm Potts, an AIDS expert at the University of California,
Berkeley, who once worked with prostitutes on the front lines of the
epidemic in Ghana.

Problems like malnutrition, pneumonia and malaria kill more children in
Africa than AIDS.

"We are programmed to react quickly to small children with AIDS in
distress," Potts said. "Unfortunately, we don't have that same reaction
when looking at statistics that tell us what we should be spending on."

The world invests about $8 billion to $10 billion in AIDS every year, more
than 100 times what it spends on water projects in developing countries.
Yet more than 2 billion people do not have access to adequate sanitation,
and about 1 billion lack clean water.

In a recent series in the journal Lancet, experts wrote that more than
one-third of child deaths and 11 percent of the total disease burden
worldwide are due to mothers and children not getting enough to eat - or
not getting enough nutritional food.

"We have a system in public health where the loudest voice gets the most
money," said Dr. Richard Horton, editor of Lancet. "AIDS has grossly
distorted our limited budget."

But some AIDS experts argue that cutting back on fighting HIV would be
dangerous.

"We cannot let the pendulum swing back to a time when we didn't spend a lot
on AIDS," said Dr. Kevin De Cock, director of the AIDS department at the
World Health Organization. "We now have millions of people on treatment and
we can't just stop that."

Still, De Cock once worked on AIDS projects in Kenya, his office just above
a large slum.

"It did feel a bit peculiar to be investing so much money into
anti-retrovirals while the people there were dealing with huge problems
like water and sanitation," De Cock said.

Part of the issue is advocacy, from celebrity ambassadors to red ribbons.

"No one is beating the drum for basic health problems," said Daniel
Halperin, an AIDS expert at Harvard University's School of Public Health.

Aside from southern Africa, most of the continent has relatively low rates
of HIV, and much higher rates of easily treatable diseases like diarrhea
and respiratory illnesses. Yet much of the money from the West, especially
from the United States, goes into AIDS.

Halperin recently wrote a commentary in The New York Times on the imbalance
and said he was astounded by the response. Most were positive, he said,
with many AIDS experts agreeing it was time to re-examine spending.

Most AIDS officials say the solution is to boost the budget for all of
public health.

"Why does the public health budget have to be so limited?" asked Tom
Coates, a professor of global AIDS research at the University of
California, Los Angeles. "Let's not drag AIDS care and prevention down to
the level of every other disease, but let's bring everything else up to the
level of AIDS."

That may be wishful thinking.

"At the end of the day, there are limits to how big the public health pie
can be," Halperin said.

Since the discovery of anti-retrovirals to fight HIV in the 1990s, AIDS has
virtually become a chronic, treatable disease in the West. But the disease
has not been conquered so easily in Africa. Not only are the AIDS drugs too
expensive for most patients, but major problems in the health system need
to be fixed first.

"It's hard to get Western donors to listen," said Dr. Richard Wamai, a
Kenyan doctor at Harvard's School of Public Health.

Wamai said that some African health systems are so weak they cannot absorb
the donations, and AIDS drugs are sometimes left in warehouses because
governments cannot distribute them.

Still, "trying to redirect AIDS money will take a long time," Wamai said.
"It's a bit like trying to stop an ocean liner."