Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

niggers and faggots

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Death - 26 Nov 2007 20:49 GMT
Study Calls HIV in D.C. A 'Modern Epidemic'
More Than 80 Percent Of Recent Cases Were Among Black Residents

By Susan Levine
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 26, 2007; A01

The first statistics ever amassed on HIV in the District, released today in
a sweeping report, reveal "a modern epidemic" remarkable for its size,
complexity and reach into all parts of the city.

The numbers most starkly illustrate HIV's impact on the African American
community. More than 80 percent of the 3,269 HIV cases identified between
2001 and 2006 were among black men, women and adolescents. Among women who
tested positive, a rising percentage of local cases, nine of 10 were
African American.

The 120-page report, which includes the city's first AIDS update since
2000, shows how a condition once considered a gay disease has moved into
the general population. HIV was spread through heterosexual contact in more
than 37 percent of the District's cases detected in that time period, in
contrast to the 25 percent of cases attributable to men having sex with
men.

"It blows the stereotype out of the water," said Shannon Hader, who became
head of the District's HIV/AIDS Administration in October. Increases by
sex, age and ward over the past six years underscore her blunt conclusion
that "HIV is everybody's disease here."

The new numbers are a statistical snapshot, not an estimate of the
prevalence of infection in the District, which is nearly 60 percent black.
Hader, an epidemiologist and public health physician who has worked on the
disease in this country and internationally, said previous projections
remain valid: One in 20 city residents is thought to have HIV and 1 in 50
residents to have AIDS, the advanced manifestation of the virus.

Almost 12,500 people in the District were known to have HIV or AIDS in
2006, according to the report. Figures suggest that the number of new HIV
cases began declining in 2003, but the administration said the drop more
likely reflects underreporting or delayed reporting. A quarter-century into
the epidemic, the city's cumulative number of AIDS cases exceeds 17,400.

"HIV/AIDS in the District has become a modern epidemic with complexities
and challenges that continue to threaten the lives and well-being of far
too many residents," the report states.

District health officials have long been faulted for the lack of HIV
information and lagging AIDS data. Not until forced by federal funding
requirements did the health department start tracking HIV.

Until that began in 2000, critics said, neither the government nor
organizations responding to the disease knew whether their dollars and
efforts were effectively addressing the problem.

The report notes that its comprehensive picture "offers the District a new
tool to help improve the scope, quality and distribution of care and
treatment and prevention services."

HIV information is particularly valuable because it represents the most
recent infections and can indicate changes in transmission patterns. It is
mainly collected through the investigation of cases forwarded by
laboratories and health-care providers.

The compilation signifies a major step forward for the HIV/AIDS agency,
which has gone through repeated program and leadership upheavals in recent
years. "For us, this is a milestone," said Hader, its third administrator
since 2004.

A letter from Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) accompanies the release: "We must
take advantage of this information with the sense of urgency that this
epidemic deserves."

The District's AIDS rate is the worst of any city in the country, nearly
twice the rate in New York and more than four times the incidence in
Detroit, and it has been climbing faster than that of many jurisdictions.

One explanation might be the high percentage of infected residents labeled
"late testers," people who learn they have AIDS within a year of the HIV
diagnosis. Although the proportion of adults and adolescents screened for
HIV is greater in the city than nationally, the finding raises questions
about the strategy of the District's "know your status" campaign.

People who learn of their infection late face serious consequences. By the
time symptoms arise or infections occur, their immune systems have suffered
considerable damage. They face increased medical costs and death rates.

More than two-thirds of local AIDS cases fell into this category during the
past decade, according to the report, compared with 39 percent of cases in
the United States. "I think that's dramatic information for our care and
treatment providers," Hader said.

No longer is HIV a crisis primarily among younger adults. Starting in 2004,
the number of new HIV cases among men and women ages 40 to 49 outpaced
every other age group in the city.

But the data made public today expose an alarming dimension of pediatric
HIV. Each of the three dozen District children to test positive in the past
five years was infected during birth.

"This is a line that should be zero," said Hader, who is pushing for
routine HIV testing during pregnancy, quick-results oral swabs during labor
and "fast tracking" of the antiretroviral drugs that can prevent
transmission during delivery.

The administration said it wants to use the report to begin asking and
answering, "What next?" Given the scope of HIV and AIDS in the District,
health leaders say they can't focus on just one aspect of the disease or
one at-risk group.

"We don't have the luxury of only picking one," Hader said. "We have the
imperative to do it all."
Martin - 26 Nov 2007 23:20 GMT
>Study Calls HIV in D.C. A 'Modern Epidemic'
>More Than 80 Percent Of Recent Cases Were Among Black Residents
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>tested positive, a rising percentage of local cases, nine of 10 were
>African American.

This isn't a surprise.  I posted here sometime ago that black women
and gay men were vying for top spot on the HIV league table in the UK.

I've heard those who follow the HIV religion explain this by
suggesting that black women prefer to take 'deliveries around the
back.'

You should have cross-posted your article to soc.culture.south-africa
so that Moira could have explained to us whether African woman prefer
men to enter through the front door or go round the back.

>The 120-page report...

That's a whole week supply of toilet paper.  It might just last those
on HIV meds a couple of hours.
Signature

<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519

Death - 27 Nov 2007 04:41 GMT
"Martin" <martin@hiv-poz.co.uk> wrote in message

>  " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> suggesting that black women prefer to take 'deliveries around the
> back.'

It is the males who take it up the down-low.
They in turn take it back to the women who think
the male is straight.

> You should have cross-posted your article to soc.culture.south-africa
> so that Moira ...

Pass on Moira. She thinks poverty/malnutrition causes HIV.
dank - 01 Dec 2007 18:52 GMT
Death wrote (quoting article)...
> Study Calls HIV in D.C. A 'Modern Epidemic'
> More Than 80 Percent Of Recent Cases Were Among Black Residents
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> sex, age and ward over the past six years underscore her blunt conclusion
> that "HIV is everybody's disease here."

It just reinforces the stereotype that the primary victims of the disease
are homosexuals and Africans.  Those two groups made up the majority of
the initial cases in the early 1980s, and they still make up the majority
of cases 25 years later.

> The administration said it wants to use the report to begin asking and
> answering, "What next?" Given the scope of HIV and AIDS in the District,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> "We don't have the luxury of only picking one," Hader said. "We have the
> imperative to do it all."

But we're not going to give them money to do it all.  They should be given
a fixed sum of money to cover all treatment and prevention costs as well
as their organizational expenses and salaries, then they can set their
priorities to make the most efficient use of their fixed budget.  They can
choose to spend most of it on antiviral drugs to treat patients who will
continue to contribute to new infections which also require more spending
on antiviral drugs, or they can choose to spend it on EFFECTIVE prevention
campaigns, and the money saved on antiviral drugs can be used to pay staff
salaries.  But what they really want is unlimited gobs of money thrown at
them to continue the same failed policies as before.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.