Big Bertha Thing coil
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/coil.html
Access page JPG 9K Image
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics

Two drawings of a Gyroscopic Top complete with coil.

Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case
it is easy to see that the rolling of the toe on the side
of the metal produces the motion. But Figs. XV. (a) and (b)
illustrate a top, whose spindle behaves in exactly the same
manner as the toe of the spider top, and yet is in no way magnetic.
The action is purely mechanical, as we shall explain in later pages.
It is an attractive top to watch, especially as it rushes round
the corner when it comes to the end of the coil.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing fiction

Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
9. Gyroscopic Top motion along coil masks a weaker field effect.

The Japanese antigravity experiment only worked one way.
With the object spinning one way OK, but the other way failed.
Anything but a fact...
10. One way gravity reduced and other way gravity increased,
   so is bi-polar field efftect.
11. No antigravity, which is not bi-polar, so contradicts
   bi-polar field effect.

Wave Particle Duality Paradox two slit interference patterns
can be disrupted by;-
1. Passive sensor near 2nd slit.
2. Turning room light on.
Anything but a fact...
12. LCD digital watch, without backlight, near 2nd slit.
13. Thicker wall between slits.

Redshift is both speedometer and tape measure.
According to redshift speedo, the universe has a go faster
stripe painted on the outside.
Anything but a fact...
14. No Big Bang, which needs go faster stripe on the inside
or antigravity.
15. No redshift speedo due to Steady State, which needs
neither to have go faster stripe.

Wave Particle Duality needs 1 slit and 2 slit experiments
to give different results from same effect. Make the walls
inside and outside the slits the same size and centre of
gravity.
Anything but a fact...
16. Centre of gravity is at slit in one, but not the other.
17. Equal forces act on the slit in one, but not the other.
18. Wave Particle Duality as a field effect gives different
results from same effect.

Tony Lance
judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk

20 February 1998 13:38:16
Message
From:    Tony Lance
Subject:    Big Bertha Thing handbook
To:    FC Mods Discussion
Cc:    OUSA Classical Particle
Big Bertha Thing handbook

1. Handbook thread one posting long.
2. Correctly attributed.
3. Professional.
4. Steet savvy.
5. Well read.
6. Appropriate.
7. Source softly spoken.
8. Solitary.
9. More Sesame Street than Darth Vader.
10. Optional, optimal and optical.

Big Bertha Thing balloon
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/balloon.html
7K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.optics

The "Monstre" Balloon

From the book
The Ingoldsby Legends
by the Rev. Richard H. Barham
Published by Richard Edward King,
88 Curtain Road,
London E.C.
Inscribed;-
Barbara Death
From Aunt Emma
March 6th 1921
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1999
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing welfare

29th April 1999
Operations Manager,
The Benefits Agency,

Dear Sirs,

Further to your letter of 28th April 1999,
regarding a list of questions, on the possibility of my working at all.

I will attempt to answer your questions, in order as listed in your letter.

1.I am not working, I am just pottering arround on the internet.
 I last registered for course work with the Open University in
 1997. This would have involved 6 hours work per week.
 I could only manage half-an-hour per day, so totally failed
 to do the work or complete the course. Not even one homework
 assignment was completed.
 In August 1997, I bought a second hand computer for 150 pounds
 sterling, and was given free access to the Open University
 computer along local telephone lines at a call charge of
 1p per minute.
 Since that time, I managed to build up a body of correspondence,
 within the limits of half-an-hour per day mental or physical work.
 In January 1999, this correspondence was transfered by me to my
 web site; www.bertha.ndirect.co.uk(since disabled.)
 I have to pay 14 pounds and 9p per month for this site.

2.Nobody suggested it, it just happened.
3.My doctor does not know that I have a web site.
4.See answer 1 for description of my activities.
 No job is being done, so no job description exists.

5.No employer exists or payments have been recieved.
6.I can think straight for half-an-hour per day.
 The rest of the time is spent pottering arround.
 I can do one side of A4 paper of mathematics
 or computer work per day.

7.On any day free of a major shopping expedition,
 I can do half-an-hour of original work and
 about an hour of copy typing at non-typist speeds.

8.My principle interest is a 50 year scientific project,
 which was started 30 years ago.
 If I could spend 48 hours per week doing it I would.
 However half-an-hour work and an hour pottering,
 seems to be all I can manage and
 at that not every day of the week.
 Due to my condition, I asked Mrs. Pam S....,
 a fellow Open University student to be the project archivist
 for my work on the Open University computer.
 She agreed and kept the archive of the correspondence
 which is now on my web site. This is both an unusual
 request and an unusually generous service
 to a fellow student on incapacity benefit.

9.Zero income for as far as the eye can see.
10.Not applicable, zero wages or income.
11.August 1997 and is ongoing.

I trust that the above will put the internet feeding frenzy
of the newspaper hype into some perspective.

Thank you,
Tony Lance
judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk

From: Tony Lance <judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.chem
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing tactics
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:17:36 +0000

24 February 1998 18:22:42
OUSA Astronomy Item
From:   Frank Hollis
Subject:        Re(2): Big Bertha Thing positron
To:     OUSA Astronomy

Caroline Walcot,oufcnt2.open.ac.uk writes:

I don't see what pics of a positron particle (??) have to do with a conference on
Astronomy, which is basically stargazing and astrophysics and mainly optics.

Surely all this Big Bertha stuff should be diverted to a physics conference such as S271?

cheers

Caroline

Or even better, the conference that was specifically set up for exactly this material,
moderated by Spammer in Chief - Tony Lance.

               Frank

Big Bertha Thing hacked
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/hacked.html
Access page to 15K ZIP file
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.politics

301 files from the third battle of cyberspace.

Big Bertha Thing hacked

I can perhaps make a unique claim.
My Fortunecity web site has been closed, opened, hacked
and disabled by Fortunecity.

1. 30th October 2000 Closed
2. 30th December 2000 Opened
3. 31st December 2000 Hacked
4. 1st January 2001 Net ring code deleted

My Astrophysics web ring picture was replaced by a Fortunecity logo.
All I did was fight the third battle of cyberspace,
using my FC mailbox, amongst others and a mail to newsgroups gateway.

It was a text only battle, no hacking or even anonymous mail was used.
Site references were used instead of attachments.
Thank you,
Tony Lance

Big Bertha Thing reason

1. Third Battle of Cyberspace.
2. Death Threats.(3)
3. Newsgroup Review.
4. Odd newsgroup users with 1000 postings.
5. Berserker attacks on legitimate postings to sci.astro et al.
6. Political and totally innexplicable.
7. Net Newbie basket cases.
8. Violent spam busters.
9. Abuse complaints procedure.
10. Web site closure.

Take your pick, the opposition will not give you the choice.

Tony Lance
judemarie@bigberthathing.co.uk

Newsgroups: sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <joehorace@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:24:28 +0000
Local: Tues, Jan 23 2007 5:24 pm
Subject: Big Bertha Thing tactics

Big Bertha Thing tactics

To whom it may concern. (Newsgroup: sci.chem)
To defend against a denial of service attack on a newsgroup,
use the same tactics that Big Bertha Thing uses
on the most wanted list guys.
1. All threads are one posting long.
2. All replies are posted to one thread.
3. No postings of most wanted are read.
4. No replies to most wanted.
5. No direct criticism of most wanted.
6. All criticism should be pictorial, literate, allegorical
      anecdotal and out of copyright.
7. It is a defense in English law that something which is not
      libelous in one context, cannot be read in another
      context as libelous.
8. This is also true of English universities, where the guy has tenure.
9. Corporate branding can reinforce trust, as well as irritation.
10. A group of guys posting across several newsgroups,
      can have strategic reasons for their choice of newsgroups.
11. Three battles have been won so far. (39 family jewels)
12. The fourth battle is now on. (Asian Rim)
13. So I posted a picture of historical scientific interest,
      which looked like a shell hole. (Virtual artillary shell)
14. Use double pass newsreader software to download headers,
      before the rest of the postings. (NNTP)

http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/want04.html