[2003] Depopulation and HIV by Jon Rappoport

http://www.reviewingaids.org/awiki/index.php/Document:Massive_Fraud_Behind_HIV_Tests
Medavoy told me, "Duesberg was a wild card. We knew we could come across
one, and he was it. He saw through the propaganda we were spreading in the
guise of science. He attacked HIV from a researcher's point of view and he
said all the right things. That is, he didn't know there was an intense
propaganda campaign coordinated at high levels to 'protect' HIV as the cause
of AIDS. But he knew the science. He knew the difference between real
research and badly done or fake research. And HIV was, make no mistake about
it, a fake from day one."

Medavoy said, "A lot of what we did at this point was stop things from
getting into print. That's often more important than planting lies. As far
as Duesberg was concerned, I can tell you there were many newspapers and
magazines who were ready to give his views some space. You know, maverick
scientist rejects HIV as cause of AIDS. So we began a coordinated effort to
keep that from happening. We let the scientists at NIH [National Institutes
of Health], who had the most to lose if Duesberg could establish a credible
beachhead, handle the PR on rejecting Duesberg's science. They engaged in
some character assassination as well, which was fine. We, on the other side,
got "reliable sources" to go to those newspapers and magazines and tell them
that to print anything good about Duesberg was DANGEROUS and IRRESPONSIBLE.
That was our tack. We had our people say that thousands of people could die
if they stopped believing that HIV was the cause of AIDS. Promiscuous sex
would become more rampant than ever, people would get infected, get sick,
and spread the virus even further. We hammered on all this, and we cowed
most of those media outlets. It worked, for the most part."

"As far as the very embarrassing and growing list of AIDS survivors was
concerned - the people who had rejected the idea of HIV and were rebuilding
their health successfully without medical drugs - we tried to keep track of
pending stories on these people, and we went to those media outlets and told
them these people were 'vegetarian kooks' and 'anecdotal examples who had
not been studied by real scientists' and 'publicity seekers' and so on. We
said some of them had never really been HIV positive to begin with. It was
like shooting pigeons. We did pretty well. Some stories did appear on these
survivors, but the general tone was, 'so and so is a strange curiosity and
scientists are studying why he has managed to live for so long without
getting sick, and this may hold promise for future research.' You know, all
that crap."

Here is another choice quote from Medavoy on the AIDS scam. He told me this
in 1996:

"Some other operatives I was aware of played a role in getting mainstream
researchers to lobby for, and win, a new standard for HIV illness, based
purely on numbers of T-cells. [Note: this "innovation" came later, long
after 1987.] Tests would determine if a person was 'getting sick,' or if he
was 'getting better' after taking his AZT - all measured by how many T-cells
[part of the immune system defense] showed up on the tests. These operatives
knew, and had been briefed on this, that T-cells could actually vary all
over the place, up and down, depending on factors like the time of day a
person was given the test. It was another area of shoddy science, and they
took advantage of it. I'll give you an example. You've got some guy who has
been told he's HIV positive, and so, even though he's not sick at all, he
gets tested every few months for numbers of T-cells. Sooner or later, those
numbers will go down on a test. If the doctor isn't really attentive, he'll
tell the patient he is now officially diagnosed with full-blown AIDS,
because those numbers are too low. If the patient hasn't been taking AZT
yet, he will go for it now."