Posted on: Thursday, 28 June 2007, 12:06 CDT
Governor Signs Bill to Make HIV Testing Routine With Verbal Consent
By Belleville News-Democrat, Ill.
Jun. 28--Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich signed a bill Wednesday that will make HIV testing a
routine part of general medical care.
The bill will allow medical providers to give an HIV test after receiving verbal consent from a
patient, rather than written consent, which was required before the bill was signed. The test
will now be administered as part of routine check-ups and blood work and is expected to
increase the number of Illinoisans who are tested for HIV/AIDS and increase the awareness
regarding knowledge of HIV status.
The bill, Senate Bill 929, makes testing simpler for people and is expected to allow more HIV
infections to be detected at earlier stages. Early detection means early care, services and
treatment for people affected by the disease.
Medical providers must offer patients an opportunity to ask questions about the HIV test but
allows patients to decline receiving the test.
When the San Francisco Health Department went to verbal consent for HIV testing, that
department saw a significant increase in HIV test rates and the awareness of HIV status.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV testing for all patients.
Although the bill signed by Gov. Blagojevich eliminates the requirement for written consent,
the legislation does not make HIV testing mandatory. Patients still have the right to refuse
all testing.
The law goes into effect June 1, 2008.
visit http://www.belleville.com.
#1 Fan - 30 Jun 2007 16:44 GMT
Death wrote...
> Medical providers must offer patients an opportunity to ask questions about the HIV test but
> allows patients to decline receiving the test.
But they can only decline if they're asked. With verbal consent there is no record to
prove that the patient declined to be tested, and I doubt that the doctors promoting
verbal consent would be inclined to pass out paper forms to sign to that effect.
> When the San Francisco Health Department went to verbal consent for HIV testing, that
> department saw a significant increase in HIV test rates and the awareness of HIV status.
All the $25 trillion that has been spent on HIV over the last 25 years has been to
"raise awareness." But for all the raised awareness and general enlightenment about
the wonders of HIV/AIDS, there has been no observable decrease in the number of new
HIV infections.
As for "verbal consent," it is just code for "involuntary testing" because in reality
the sorts of patients that doctors would want to test would be too fucktarded and
cracked-out to remember having consented. They might even agree with the doctor's
request but not understand it if he is clever enough to phrase it using big fancy
words with several syllables. The point is, allowing verbal consent for ANY medical
test is a bad idea from a libertarian standpoint, and from a practical standpoint it
doesn't make sense to allow it for HIV if official policy remains unchanged and those
testing positive turned loose to wreak havoc on the singles scene.