Death wrote...
> Dual TB, HIV treatment key to Aids battle
> Date Posted: Friday 08-Jun-2007
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> treatment with HIV prevention programmes if they are to win the Aids battle, a top World Health
> Organisation official said on Thursday.
How will that help if they are not combined with the authority to quarantine those
testing positive for those diseases? Right now someone who tests positive for HIV
is given an AIDS brochure to counsel him and he sent on his way to infect whoever
he wants, so I don't see how giving him an additional TB brochure before sending
him on his way will solve the problem.
Quarantine is extremely expensive, but one should ask whether removing a person
from the labor pool and providing him with food, clothing, shelter, and medical
care for several decades costs more than turning him loose and treating every
person he infects and every person they infect and so on for the same several
decades. Also consider that most AIDS patients are fucktards: They are too
dumb for office work and too sickly for manual labor, so there really would be
no significant loss of labor wages (i.e., the uninfected taxpayers wind up
supporting their warted a.ses either way).
Death - 25 Jun 2007 18:03 GMT
"#1 Fan" <fan@superstar.stalk.net> wrote in message
> How will that help if they are not combined with the authority to quarantine those
> testing positive for those diseases?
It won't.
>Right now someone who tests positive for HIV
> is given an AIDS brochure to counsel him and he sent on his way to infect whoever
> he wants, so I don't see how giving him an additional TB brochure before sending
> him on his way will solve the problem.
It won't.
> Quarantine is extremely expensive,
How many billions have been wasted so far?
>but one should ask whether removing a person
> from the labor pool and providing him with food, clothing, shelter, and medical
> care for several decades costs more than turning him loose and treating every
> person he infects and every person they infect and so on ...
That is the wrong question to ask.
How many votes will that cost the democratic party?
Don't you buy into that bullshit about any-ones health,
yours, mine or ours,
it is all about a political agenda.
Martin - 25 Jun 2007 19:21 GMT
>Quarantine is extremely expensive, but one should ask whether removing a person
>from the labor pool and providing him with food, clothing, shelter, and medical
>care for several decades costs more than turning him loose and treating every
>person he infects and every person they infect and so on for the same several
>decades.
Why would a government want to waste money and resources on
quarantine? Surely it's in their interest to have gays, druggies and
blacks remain in society to spread the fear of HIV amongst their
communities.
The fact that there isn't really any virus doesn't matter.
You have already told us that white heterosexuals are virtually immune
to HIV. So what difference does it make to them whether those
'infected' with HIV are in the community or not?

Signature
<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519