Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / June 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

TB,HIV

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Death - 11 Jun 2007 15:36 GMT
Dual TB, HIV treatment key to Aids battle
Date Posted: Friday 08-Jun-2007
By Paul Simao

Durban - African, especially southern African, nations must link tuberculosis testing and
treatment with HIV prevention programmes if they are to win the Aids battle, a top World Health
Organisation official said on Thursday.

Dr Kevin de Cock, head of WHO's HIV and Aids department, told the Third South African Aids
Conference traditional treatments for Africa's rampant TB problem could worsen the Aids
epidemic and fuel the spread of the potentially fatal lung infection.

"TB programmes alone cannot reverse the tide," de Cock told about 4 000 Aids researchers,
activists and healthcare officials at the conference in Durban.

He said it was vital to offer those infected with HIV and TB convenient and effective treatment
for both diseases.

TB, which is spread through close personal contact, has long been a problem in Africa, where
hundreds of millions are latent carriers of the disease. But the growing relationship between
TB and HIV has made treatment of both diseases more difficult in vulnerable populations.

The emergence of extremely drug resistant TB (XDR-TB), a strain virtually immune to traditional
and modern antibiotics, has raised alarm bells since recently surfacing in South Africa's
KwaZulu-Natal Province and neighbouring Lesotho, where it killed up to 85 percent of those
infected, the majority of whom also had HIV.

The strain has since spread to other parts of Africa as well as to the industrialised world,
including the United States. The US government recently took the rare step of quarantining a
man who had become infected with XDR-TB.

The prospect of a new and more virulent TB epidemic sweeping through sub-Saharan Africa is a
far more serious threat because the two diseases are so prevalent and interlinked in the
region.

In South Africa, 61 percent of the roughly 250 000 people diagnosed with TB each year have HIV.

HIV-positive people and others with weakened immune systems are particularly vulnerable to TB
as well as other opportunistic infections. But XDR-TB has led to not only higher mortality
rates but also much faster deaths in HIV-positive populations.

In turn, HIV helps to spread TB in the general population. One of the paradoxes of the HIV
epidemic is that the anti-retroviral drugs that have saved so many lives contribute to a jump
in TB because those who are co-infected are not being treated simultaneously for both diseases.

"HIV has caused a devastating reversal in our ability to treat TB," Robin Wood, director of
South Africa's Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, said in a presentation to a Roche Diagnostics symposium
on the sidelines of the conference. Wood said the solution was to combine treatments.

Doing so will require a huge investment in TB laboratories and related medical infrastructure
in much of Africa as well as better tools to tackle the disease.

TB is still diagnosed using methods, such as skin tests, that can take days or even weeks to
complete, while treatment can extend to months or sometimes more than a year, a challenge for
Africa's often highly mobile population.

A urine-based dipstick test under development that gives results almost instantly could be the
answer to beginning to tackle TB. "That would be a great asset if we could get it," Wood said.

URL: http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=84&art_id=nw20070607133527722C842349
#1 Fan - 25 Jun 2007 17:48 GMT
Death wrote...
> Dual TB, HIV treatment key to Aids battle
> Date Posted: Friday 08-Jun-2007
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> treatment with HIV prevention programmes if they are to win the Aids battle, a top World Health
> Organisation official said on Thursday.

How will that help if they are not combined with the authority to quarantine those
testing positive for those diseases?  Right now someone who tests positive for HIV
is given an AIDS brochure to counsel him and he sent on his way to infect whoever
he wants, so I don't see how giving him an additional TB brochure before sending
him on his way will solve the problem.

Quarantine is extremely expensive, but one should ask whether removing a person
from the labor pool and providing him with food, clothing, shelter, and medical
care for several decades costs more than turning him loose and treating every
person he infects and every person they infect and so on for the same several
decades.  Also consider that most AIDS patients are fucktards: They are too
dumb for office work and too sickly for manual labor, so there really would be
no significant loss of labor wages (i.e., the uninfected taxpayers wind up
supporting their warted a.ses either way).
Death - 25 Jun 2007 18:03 GMT
"#1 Fan" <fan@superstar.stalk.net> wrote in message

> How will that help if they are not combined with the authority to quarantine those
> testing positive for those diseases?

It won't.

>Right now someone who tests positive for HIV
> is given an AIDS brochure to counsel him and he sent on his way to infect whoever
> he wants, so I don't see how giving him an additional TB brochure before sending
> him on his way will solve the problem.

It won't.

> Quarantine is extremely expensive,

How many billions have been wasted so far?

>but one should ask whether removing a person
> from the labor pool and providing him with food, clothing, shelter, and medical
> care for several decades costs more than turning him loose and treating every
> person he infects and every person they infect and so on ...

That is the wrong question to ask.
How many votes will that cost the democratic party?

Don't you buy into that bullshit about any-ones health,
yours, mine or ours,
it is all about a political agenda.
Martin - 25 Jun 2007 19:21 GMT
>Quarantine is extremely expensive, but one should ask whether removing a person
>from the labor pool and providing him with food, clothing, shelter, and medical
>care for several decades costs more than turning him loose and treating every
>person he infects and every person they infect and so on for the same several
>decades.

Why would a government want to waste money and resources on
quarantine?  Surely it's in their interest to have gays, druggies and
blacks remain in society to spread the fear of HIV amongst their
communities.

The fact that there isn't really any virus doesn't matter.

You have already told us that white heterosexuals are virtually immune
to HIV.  So what difference does it make to them whether those
'infected' with HIV are in the community or not?
Signature

<http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/>
Moible: +447939991519


Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.