> On 13 May, 18:49, "HIVPositive" <hiv.posit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
20 years of medical research since 1984 shows that HIV does not kill
immune cells called T cells or CD4 cells.
The amount of the HIV virus present in the blood is so miniscule, it
can only be measured by amplification techniques called PCR.
The man who invented PCR and received a Nobel Prize for his efforts
says HIV does NOT cause AIDS.
The HIV viral load by PCR has does not predict loss of immune cells.
The entire proposition is a mistake.
Important video relating to HIV and AIDS.
http://www.aidsfraudvideo.com
http://aidsmyth.addr.com/enteraidsmyth.htm
http://www.amazon.com/Science-Sold-Out-Really-Cause/dp/1556436424
http://www.amazon.com/Inventing-AIDS-Virus-Peter-Duesberg/dp/0895263998
http://aras.ab.ca/rethinkers.php
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/culshaw1.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1430/is_n9_v14/ai_12508167
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/aids/chap6.htm
http://www.hiv-aids-factorfraud.com/producer.htm
J Infect Dis 1990,161:833-877 "The probability of transmission of
HIV-1 from male to female during an episode of intercourse has been
examined in seven studies. Analysis of data from North American and
European studies of heterosexual couples provide estimates of per-sex-
act HIV-1 transmission of approximately 1
in 1000 (0.001, ranging from 0.0008 to 0.002)."
ttp://www.retroconference.org/2001/posters/222.pdf
another good video:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yVcxP0wTOCo#
rocketscience
GMCarter - 14 May 2007 16:12 GMT
snip
>20 years of medical research since 1984 shows that HIV does not kill
>immune cells called T cells or CD4 cells.
LOL...that's bullshit frodlet. HIV does directly kill CD4 cells,
however, it is true that most of the CD4 cells that die aren't
infected. But the proximate cause, as Billi Goldberg used to say, for
that cell destruction is HIV infection.
HIV also infected a variety of antigen presenting cells. Inflammatory
responses at the sites of infection, such as the gut, lymph nodes,
etc., clearly show a severe disruption of local tissue architecture as
disease progresses.
George M. Carter
rocketscience - 15 May 2007 00:07 GMT
> On 14 May 2007 06:33:04 -0700,rocketscience
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> George M. Carter
Nice example of circular reasoning which is the usual standard for
shills peddling death drugs to the unsuspecting. Why not tell the
people how much the drug companies paid you last year?
rocketscience
GMCarter - 15 May 2007 10:16 GMT
>> On 14 May 2007 06:33:04 -0700,rocketscience
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>shills peddling death drugs to the unsuspecting. Why not tell the
>people how much the drug companies paid you last year?
Sure. $0.00.
LOL...nice example of a lame attempt to attack the messenger? From a
former parole officer who is so chicken sh.t now that he can't even
sign his own name.
What's circular?
Your bullshit. Wish you could find healing, dear.
George M. Carter
Pembe - 16 May 2007 18:56 GMT
> On 14 May 2007 16:07:52 -0700, rocketscience
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Are there any Aids sufferers that would consider being an herbal
ginepig???
I for one do not believe that this should be tested on humans for
profit.
rocketscience - 16 May 2007 19:34 GMT
> On 14 May 2007 16:07:52 -0700, rocketscience
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
see these two web sites;
http://www.helpforhiv.com/
http://www.livingwithouthivdrugs.com/