Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIV men 'having unsafe FAGGOT sex'

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim - 01 May 2007 01:38 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm

More than one in three gay men with HIV have unprotected sex, a survey
says.

The University College London poll of 2,640 men in Manchester,
Brighton and London also revealed a fifth of gay men without HIV do
the same.

Researchers said it was worrying, and called for a renewed push to
discourage risky behaviour, the Sexually Transmitted Infections
journal said

But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having
unprotected sex with others with HIV.

>>YOU DIRTY, SICK, CHILD-MOLESTING c.nts SHOULD *ALL* BE KILLED<<
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 02:54 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> >>YOU DIRTY, SICK, CHILD-MOLESTING c.nts SHOULD *ALL* BE KILLED<<

Considering it is the heterosexual community that are by far the biggest
group who child molest, I suppose that is who you are talking about.
James Riske - 01 May 2007 03:10 GMT
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Considering it is the heterosexual community that are by far the biggest
> group who child molest, I suppose that is who you are talking about.

Considering the heterosexual community makes up the vast majority of the
population one could imagine them leading in majority figures for just
about anything.

However, known liar "Ramrod", Song of Bile, is bankrupt when it comes to
defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to
be a pedophile than a heterosexual is.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

Bernard Hubbard - 01 May 2007 07:39 GMT
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to
> be a pedophile than a heterosexual is.

Please, oh please. stop using Foonhoon as a reputable source and get
some real figures by doing a Google search on "Homosexuals who molest
children"  I think you will find much scientific information there to
give you cause to rethink your assertion.  But then I have told you this
before and even quparts of scientific documents and studies and yet you
still come out with the usual lies.

Signature

" Homosexuality is so etched onto the mind of Jimbo Riske that even mental
illness does not prevent him from focusing on it." --Bernard Hubbard

James Riske - 01 May 2007 21:30 GMT
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> some real figures by doing a Google search on "Homosexuals who molest
> children"
<snip>

You are every bit as stupid as "Ramrod", Song of Bullshit.

You, like "Ramrod", don't even know what a pedophile is.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

GarnGetFukt - 01 May 2007 08:41 GMT
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to
> be a pedophile than a heterosexual is.

That bad ol' 'lebbenty factor has the rectum rangers as confused as it does
to the down low low life yard apes. No surprise there, really.
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 18:40 GMT
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to
> be a pedophile than a heterosexual is.

Here we have a few State Sex offended registries, which clearly show how the
Heterosexuals are the leading group in child molestation, not some wacko
group like Foonhoon, or some front for a bigot group like Paul Cameron, but
official Government numbers showing that Gays are not molesting children
more than Heterosexuals.

West Virginia Sex register

http://www.wvstatepolice.com/sexoff/WebDetails.cfm?OffenderID=406

As usual I used the names Smith and Jones to search out the records, as they
are common names.

What did I find?

Of 22 Smiths, there were.

3 that had multiple victims, one two girls, one a boy and a girl and one
that no gender was mentioned, hence I have left these out of the total

Of the remaining 19

18 of the victims were girls

1 was a male

Of the Jones, the numbers were really too small (3), but anyway

2 of the victims were female

1 was a male

Let us look at the previous data I have posted

From Texas sex offenders

http://www.austin360.com/homes/content/homes/safety/crime/crime_sexoffenders.htm
l;COXnetJSessionID=1z1TDKa0sEsE2To30SQEMsLZKJHMXSzDC0G4XWWWmu6VGsYcZdf3!-1662071
056?urac=n&urvf=10687608514260.2647391116786134


If this does not work, because of the length of this URL, then look up the
Texas sex offender's registry.

I looked up A Smith; B Smith, and C Smith

58 offenders, less the six unknowns make it 52 offenders of which only 8
were against males.

If you do not like the Texas site, try Utah sex register

http://corrections.utah.gov/asp-bin/sexoffendersearchform.asp

Here I did a search of Smith, the numbers?

31 offenders in total

25 offenders against females

2 offender's against males

Female against female. 1

1 Male who offence was not listed (IE not male nor female)

2 Males offending against both males and females

So excluding the odd ones out, IE fem-fem and multiples, we end up with a
total of .

Now all states do not list the gender of the sex of the victim, but these
do.

West Virginia

Texas

Utah

Not states known for their love of gays...

Funny how all three states end up with similar numbers of female verses male
victims

In three states we end with this sort of numbers.

Total people offending              105

Total offences against females   99

Total offences against males                  13

Looky looky no where near the numbers the bigots quote..

Of course now we will have the favourite bigot game of numbers , but you
forgot that there are only  X % of males, and Y % of gays, and do not forget
to take away the number you first thought of.... J
James Riske - 01 May 2007 20:22 GMT
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Here we have a few State Sex offended registries, which clearly show how
> the Heterosexuals are the leading group in child molestation
<snip>

Which says absolutely *nothing* about pedophiles, do you even know what
a pedophile is "Ramrod", Song of Bile ?

Even the pedophile "boy lovers" must be laughing at you, and I am sure
that's nothing new...

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 21:49 GMT
>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Even the pedophile "boy lovers" must be laughing at you, and I am sure
> that's nothing new...

You obviously did not do the research, and this post of yours only proves
that you cannot refute the evidence that heterosexuals are the leading group
by far in child molestation, with anything like an official AMA or
Government site quoting the URL.

You are a joke, a sad joke but a joke never the less.
James Riske - 01 May 2007 21:55 GMT
>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> proves that you cannot refute the evidence that heterosexuals are the
> leading group by far in child molestation
<snip>
Evasion.

Where did I mention child molestation?

Just admit that you are too stupid to even know what a pedophile is.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 02 May 2007 03:02 GMT
>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> Just admit that you are too stupid to even know what a pedophile is.

More lunatic rhetoric, but no facts and figures from any official site like
any Government or American Medical Association to back up your statements.
James Riske - 02 May 2007 20:12 GMT
>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> like any Government or American Medical Association to back up your
> statements.

Surrender noted and accepted.
Just admit that you don't even know what a pedophile is.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 02 May 2007 22:51 GMT
>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Surrender noted and accepted.
> Just admit that you don't even know what a pedophile is.

Yep you are beaten and cannot produce any official government or AMA URL to
back up any of your ravings, but we have seen this a dozen times previously.
James Riske - 02 May 2007 23:02 GMT
>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> to back up any of your ravings, but we have seen this a dozen times
> previously.

How embarrassing it must be for you to not know what a pedophile is and
having your stupidity cause you to lose the thread.

How utterly embarrassing...

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

Wonderer - 03 May 2007 00:46 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
>
> How utterly embarrassing...

standard boiler plates
RamRod Sword of Baal - 03 May 2007 08:47 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> How embarrassing it must be for you to not know what a pedophile is and
> having your stupidity cause you to lose the thread.

We are not all as stupid as you, I do not have time to educate you, actually
I do not think anyone could,  so I suggest you look up pedophile in the
dictionary (if you know what big word means) so you understand the meaning
of the word, that is if you can comprehend the meaning.

I see that you used the old dodge of trying to change the subject when you
cannot produce the goods, once again you cannot defend your statements and I
have shown that the greatest sex offenders are heterosexuals.

So let me quote again ......

Here we have a few State Sex offended registries, which clearly show how the
Heterosexuals are the leading group in child molestation, not some wacko
group like Foonhoon, or some front for a bigot group like Paul Cameron, but
official Government numbers showing that Gays are not molesting children
more than Heterosexuals.

West Virginia Sex register

http://www.wvstatepolice.com/sexoff/WebDetails.cfm?OffenderID=406

As usual I used the names Smith and Jones to search out the records, as they
are common names.

What did I find?

Of 22 Smiths, there were.

3 that had multiple victims, one two girls, one a boy and a girl and one
that no gender was mentioned, hence I have left these out of the total

Of the remaining 19

18 of the victims were girls

1 was a male

Of the Jones, the numbers were really too small (3), but anyway

2 of the victims were female

1 was a male

Let us look at the previous data I have posted

From Texas sex offenders

http://www.austin360.com/homes/content/homes/safety/crime/crime_sexoffenders.htm
l;COXnetJSessionID=1z1TDKa0sEsE2To30SQEMsLZKJHMXSzDC0G4XWWWmu6VGsYcZdf3!-1662071
056?urac=n&urvf=10687608514260.2647391116786134


If this does not work, because of the length of this URL, then look up the
Texas sex offender's registry.

I looked up A Smith; B Smith, and C Smith

58 offenders, less the six unknowns make it 52 offenders of which only 8
were against males.

If you do not like the Texas site, try Utah sex register

http://corrections.utah.gov/asp-bin/sexoffendersearchform.asp

Here I did a search of Smith, the numbers?

31 offenders in total

25 offenders against females

2 offender's against males

Female against female. 1

1 Male who offence was not listed (IE not male nor female)

2 Males offending against both males and females

So excluding the odd ones out, IE fem-fem and multiples, we end up with a
total of .

Now all states do not list the gender of the sex of the victim, but these
do.

West Virginia

Texas

Utah

Not states known for their love of gays...

Funny how all three states end up with similar numbers of female verses male
victims

In three states we end with this sort of numbers.

Total people offending              105

Total offences against females   99

Total offences against males                  13

Looky looky no where near the numbers the bigots quote..

Of course now we will have the favourite bigot game of numbers , but you
forgot that there are only  X % of males, and Y % of gays, and do not forget
to take away the number you first thought of.... J
James Riske - 03 May 2007 10:31 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 76 lines]
> statements and I have shown that the greatest sex offenders are
> heterosexuals.
<snip>

I guess I will have to school you a bit here since you are obviously too
stupid to understand.
A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to young children, a
person can be sexually attracted to someone and not offend.
That makes any and all of your posts about offender lists and numbers
void and completely irrelevant.

Now, with that in mind, you have utterly embarrassed yourself and are
the laughing stock of usenet once again, a homosexual is *more likely*
to be a pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a
homosexual is more likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is.

My gawd you are a stupid one...

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 03 May 2007 16:48 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> I guess I will have to school you a bit here since you are obviously too
> stupid to understand.

Not stupid enough to walk into your trap.......

> A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to young children, a
> person can be sexually attracted to someone and not offend.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more
> likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is.

Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual, and
according to you most pedophiles are Gay, then the homosexual pedophiles are
better at controlling their urges than the heterosexual ones.............

My God, you walked into that one, talk about being stupid.
James Riske - 06 May 2007 17:13 GMT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
>
> Not stupid enough to walk into your trap.......

In other words, you know that I am 100% correct and that you are a
proved liar who is afraid to admit it.

Glad we got that settled.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 07 May 2007 17:36 GMT
>> Not stupid enough to walk into your trap.......
>
> In other words, you know that I am 100% correct and that you are a proved
> liar who is afraid to admit it.
>
> Glad we got that settled.

So now you set the questions, and then answer them yourself, that is called
'talking to yourself' a classic sign of mental disease.

BTW you forgot to reply to this one where you made an idiot of yourself yet
again.

"James Riske" <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:t8vns.cc3.19.1@news.alt.net...

> A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to young children, a
> person can be sexually attracted to someone and not offend.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more
> likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is.

Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual, and
according to you most paedophiles are Gay, then the homosexual paedophiles
are
better at controlling their urges than the heterosexual ones.............

My God, you walked into that one, talk about being stupid.
James Riske - 08 May 2007 00:52 GMT
> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual,
> and according to you most paedophiles are Gay
<snip>

Cite the post including verifiable message id to prove that I ever made
any such statement that "most pedophiles are gay".

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 08 May 2007 03:38 GMT
>> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual,
>> and according to you most paedophiles are Gay
> <snip>
>
> Cite the post including verifiable message id to prove that I ever made
> any such statement that "most pedophiles are gay".

No worries

"James Riske" <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:t8vns.cc3.19.1@news.alt.net...

> Now, with that in mind, you have utterly embarrassed yourself and are the
> laughing stock of usenet once again, a homosexual is *more likely* to be a
> pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more
> likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is.
James Riske - 08 May 2007 03:50 GMT
>>> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are
>>> heterosexual, and according to you most paedophiles are Gay
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>> to be a pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a
>> homosexual is more likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is.

Nope, no proof there, my words don't say "most pedophiles are gay"
however I did say that a homosexual is *more likely* to be a pedophile,
a fact that is supported by empirical evidence and is completely
different from what noted liar "Ramrod" claims that I said.

Ho hum, another day, another lie told  to us by defeated faggot "Ramrod".

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

Wonderer - 08 May 2007 04:03 GMT
>>>> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are
>>>> heterosexual, and according to you most paedophiles are Gay
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> that is supported by empirical evidence and is completely different from
> what noted liar "Ramrod" claims that I said.

then post the evidence

> Ho hum, another day, another lie told  to us by defeated faggot "Ramrod".
Qazfez - 01 May 2007 08:31 GMT
[snip]

>> >>YOU DIRTY, SICK, CHILD-MOLESTING c.nts SHOULD *ALL* BE KILLED<<
>
> Considering it is the heterosexual community that are by far the biggest
> group who child molest, I suppose that is who you are talking about.

Nope. He's obviously referring to homosexuals.
GMCarter - 01 May 2007 11:17 GMT
some a.shole wrote
>[snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Nope. He's obviously referring to homosexuals.

Most HIV infection is heterosexually transmitted.

Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists
and hate-filled bigots? Can use the guns the NRA loves so much??

Except I don't believe killing is an answer to problems. That's for
the mentally ill. Like Bush/Cheney and their horrible f.ck ups in
Iraq.

        George M. Carter
HIV Positive - 02 May 2007 00:13 GMT
>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists
>and hate-filled bigots?

Even the ones who belong to the Church of HIV?
Signature

Should I begin ART?
Vote: <http://hiv-positive.freehostia.com/vote/>

GMCarter - 02 May 2007 11:58 GMT
>>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists
>>and hate-filled bigots?
>
>Even the ones who belong to the Church of HIV?

If they're fundamentalists who accept concepts utterly on faith and
without evidence, sure. But to me, that sounds like denialists.

And I'm very sorry to say to you that as one who refuses treatment
based utterly on a faith in the lack of a cause of HIV for your
illness, you will kill yourself.

        George M. Carter
HIV Positive - 04 May 2007 02:24 GMT
>>>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists
>>>and hate-filled bigots?

>>Even the ones who belong to the Church of HIV?

>If they're fundamentalists who accept concepts utterly on faith and
>without evidence, sure. But to me, that sounds like denialists.

LOL.  So those who believe HIV=AIDS=Death are denialists too. :)

Well over half the people on this planet believe in some sort of God.
Their beliefs are based on faith with little evidence, if any, to back
them up.  Are they all denialists too?

Ironically your definition of a denialist as someone who "accepts
concepts utterly on faith and without evidence" includes millions of
Jews.

LOL.  I think you might have to rework that definition a little.

>And I'm very sorry to say to you that as one who refuses treatment
>based utterly on a faith in the lack of a cause of HIV for your
>illness, you will kill yourself.

That sort of psychology doesn't work on me.  I am not scared of death.
However the prospect of a long, lingering, death is a bit scary.
Signature

Should I begin ART?
Vote: <http://hiv-positive.freehostia.com/vote/>

GMCarter - 04 May 2007 10:32 GMT
>>>>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists
>>>>and hate-filled bigots?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>LOL.  So those who believe HIV=AIDS=Death are denialists too. :)

To the contrary. There is a vast amount of evidence to support the
development of extremely low CD4 counts and AIDS as a result of HIV
infection.

There are no alternative explanations that describe the epidemiology
or for which there is any convincing evidence.

So you're avoiding doctors. And not taking prophylaxis any more. There
is a thing called resensitization for TMP/SMX that you might consider.

I fear your denial is causing a great deal of confusion for you and
undoubtedly frustrates physicians.

Your body. Your life. Your early death.

        George M. Carter
HIV Positive - 04 May 2007 21:44 GMT
>So you're avoiding doctors. And not taking prophylaxis any more. There
>is a thing called resensitization for TMP/SMX that you might consider.

Oh yes, taking a lower dosage of both.  Now, where have I heard that
before?

>I fear your denial is causing a great deal of confusion for you and
>undoubtedly frustrates physicians.

It seems you're blaming the patient for failing the drugs.  It's a
common accusation leveled at 'HIV patients.'

BTW, it's interesting that you snipped all the stuff about
"denialists."  I thought you'd have a few problems with that. :)
Signature

Should I begin ART?
Vote: <http://hiv-positive.freehostia.com/vote/>

Death - 05 May 2007 00:37 GMT
"HIV Positive" <hiv.positive@gmail.com> wrote in message

> Oh yes, taking a lower dosage of both.  Now, where have I heard that
> before?

LOL
GMCarter - 05 May 2007 10:43 GMT
>>So you're avoiding doctors. And not taking prophylaxis any more. There
>>is a thing called resensitization for TMP/SMX that you might consider.
>
>Oh yes, taking a lower dosage of both.  Now, where have I heard that
>before?

I don't know. Where have you heard that before?

>>I fear your denial is causing a great deal of confusion for you and
>>undoubtedly frustrates physicians.
>
>It seems you're blaming the patient for failing the drugs.  It's a
>common accusation leveled at 'HIV patients.'

Not at all. I suggested a method to overcome the sensitivity.

>BTW, it's interesting that you snipped all the stuff about
>"denialists."  I thought you'd have a few problems with that. :)

Like you don't snip stuff and ignore stuff.

        George M. Carter
Death - 05 May 2007 00:34 GMT
"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message

> If they're fundamentalists who accept concepts utterly on faith and
> without evidence, sure. But to me, that sounds like denialists.
>
> And I'm very sorry to say to you that as one who refuses treatment
> based utterly on a faith in the lack of a cause of HIV for your
> illness, you will kill yourself.

Too late Killer Karter, Pasquarelli is dead.
Your attempt at atonement is noted though.
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 03:03 GMT
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having
> unprotected sex with others with HIV.

Actually that mean little, it depends on what was the question, if the
question was "Do you have unsafe sex" meaning sex without a condom, the
answer mean little as anyone who is HIV - and in a one to one relationship
that only has 'unsafe' sex with ones partner then that is not unsafe sex
really.

The same goes for someone who is HIV+ and has 'unsafe' sex with their one
and only partner, again what does it matter to others.

Unsafe promiscuous sex is the worry and did the question ask if this was
what these people were doing?

Sure the numbers look bad, but what questions were asked?

BTW I wonder what the numbers would be if the same question was asked of the
Heterosexual group?
James Riske - 01 May 2007 03:08 GMT
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> BTW I wonder what the numbers would be if the same question was asked of
> the Heterosexual group?

Leave it to known liar "Ramrod", Song of Bile, to try and engage in
endless semantic sophistry when it is confronted with some facts that it
can't honestly deal with.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

holland.chris@yahoo.com - 01 May 2007 03:23 GMT
> Leave it to known liar "Ramrod", Song of Bile, to try and engage in
> endless semantic sophistry when it is confronted with some facts that it
> can't honestly deal with.

I know - what a twat!

f.cking fag
Bernard Hubbard - 01 May 2007 07:46 GMT
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> endless semantic sophistry when it is confronted with some facts that it
> can't honestly deal with.

My,my such big words.  BTW as any person who is familiar with polling
knows the questions asked can give great bias in the answers and hence
to the poll.  What a dumb c.nt you are.

I'm happy to see you back here.  Where have you been for the past mont
or so?  Did mommy move her computer behind a locked door?  Also please
remember that you next circle jerk with Death and his mates is on May 5
at 9.30 PM.

Signature

" Homosexuality is so etched onto the mind of Jimbo Riske that even mental
illness does not prevent him from focusing on it." --Bernard Hubbard

Qazfez - 01 May 2007 08:41 GMT
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> knows the questions asked can give great bias in the answers and hence to
> the poll.  What a dumb c.nt you are.

Do you know what it reveals about you that you repeat the same misogynist
insults as the queer bashers?

> I'm happy to see you back here.  Where have you been for the past mont or
> so?  Did mommy move her computer behind a locked door?  Also please
> remember that you next circle jerk with Death and his mates is on May 5 at
> 9.30 PM.

You make it sound like a bad thing.
James Riske - 01 May 2007 20:24 GMT
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> remember that you next circle jerk with Death and his mates is on May 5
> at 9.30 PM.

Typical faggot, it just *can't stop* thinking about sex in some form or
another.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 21:51 GMT
>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> Typical faggot, it just *can't stop* thinking about sex in some form or
> another.

Using that theory, then it is the same that you are here and cannot stop
thinking about you being homosexual all the time................
James Riske - 01 May 2007 22:01 GMT
>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> Using that theory, then it is the same that you are here and cannot stop
> thinking about you being homosexual all the time................

Another lie that faggots like to tell is the 'closet homo' lie that has
been thoroughly refuted/denounced so many times that nobody could hardly
keep track.
Like many of its peers, that's what "Ramrod", Song of Bullshit, likes to
do, lie like there is no tomorrow.

And I'm certain this wont be the last time...

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

RamRod Sword of Baal - 02 May 2007 03:08 GMT
>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Like many of its peers, that's what "Ramrod", Song of Bullshit, likes to
> do, lie like there is no tomorrow.

I am only following your lead, after all you think the Bernard keeps think
of sex all the time and you are here on an area where Gay sex is spoken
about, so one has to surmise it is because it interests you.

BTW I have see the closet homo report, but have yet to see anything that
refutes it, care to post something official, that we can all believe, you
said it has been refuted/denounced many times, so you should have no problem
fining it.
James Riske - 02 May 2007 20:27 GMT
>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> think of sex all the time and you are here on an area where Gay sex is
> spoken about, so one has to surmise it is because it interests you.

Since you have created a room in your house dedicated only for the
purpose of having depraved faggot sex I would bet thoughts of sex
consume you for most of your day.

People who naturally despise faggots are not really faggots themselves
just as people who naturally despise pedophiles are not really pedophiles.

> BTW I have see the closet homo report, but have yet to see anything that
> refutes it, care to post something official, that we can all believe,
> you said it has been refuted/denounced many times, so you should have no
> problem fining it.

One refutation is the absence of a report on people who express natural
disgust toward pedophiles, are they really closet pedophiles themselves?
of course not.
Another one which ironically was posted by anonymous faggot and
documented liar "No One" over in alt.politics.homosexuality is where the
researchers themselves admitted that their study was most possibly
flawed since it put undue pressure on the so-called "homophobes" making
them feel very uncomfortable during the exam resulting in varying penile
circumference differences.
Another is the Kent state Ohio exams, anyone who would believe what Kent
state has to offer is a straight up idiot in the truest sense of the word.
The dope heads at Kent state showed lesbian sex videos to measure the
penile changes in the so-called "homophobes" which is obviously flawed
from the very start since heterosexuals are normally sexually attracted
to attractive women whether they are engaging in homosexual behavior or
not, it was not necessarily the sex that turned them on.

However none of this matters to a depraved faggot on usenet who has
already been proved to be a liar on many occasions.

Signature

"The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental
illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland

Frank Provasek - 01 May 2007 08:29 GMT
If 46 states banned HETEROSEXUAL marriage,  what would the rates of HIV be
amongst members of that group?
Qazfez - 01 May 2007 08:33 GMT
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> BTW I wonder what the numbers would be if the same question was asked of
> the Heterosexual group?

Probably not nearly as bad.
nappy-headed ho - 02 May 2007 17:38 GMT
Jim wrote...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Brighton and London also revealed a fifth of gay men without HIV do
> the same.

The numbers don't make sense.  According to official orthodoxy, those
who test positive for HIV are faultless because the government didn't
do enough to educate them on condom use.  But now that they've been
properly counseled they are sure to use condoms faithfully and
therefore this group can't possibly have a lower condom use rate than
the ignorant HIV-negative group which isn't nearly as educated on how
HIV is transmitted as the smarter HIV-positive group.

> But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having
> unprotected sex with others with HIV.

If that is true, it is not due to any concern the AIDS patients have
for society, but due to the fact that nearly every gay man in the
industrialized world is already infected.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.