Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / May 2007
HIV men 'having unsafe FAGGOT sex'
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jim - 01 May 2007 01:38 GMT http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm
More than one in three gay men with HIV have unprotected sex, a survey says.
The University College London poll of 2,640 men in Manchester, Brighton and London also revealed a fifth of gay men without HIV do the same.
Researchers said it was worrying, and called for a renewed push to discourage risky behaviour, the Sexually Transmitted Infections journal said
But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having unprotected sex with others with HIV.
>>YOU DIRTY, SICK, CHILD-MOLESTING c.nts SHOULD *ALL* BE KILLED<< RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 02:54 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > >>YOU DIRTY, SICK, CHILD-MOLESTING c.nts SHOULD *ALL* BE KILLED<< Considering it is the heterosexual community that are by far the biggest group who child molest, I suppose that is who you are talking about.
James Riske - 01 May 2007 03:10 GMT >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Considering it is the heterosexual community that are by far the biggest > group who child molest, I suppose that is who you are talking about. Considering the heterosexual community makes up the vast majority of the population one could imagine them leading in majority figures for just about anything.
However, known liar "Ramrod", Song of Bile, is bankrupt when it comes to defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to be a pedophile than a heterosexual is.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
Bernard Hubbard - 01 May 2007 07:39 GMT >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to > be a pedophile than a heterosexual is. Please, oh please. stop using Foonhoon as a reputable source and get some real figures by doing a Google search on "Homosexuals who molest children" I think you will find much scientific information there to give you cause to rethink your assertion. But then I have told you this before and even quparts of scientific documents and studies and yet you still come out with the usual lies.
 Signature " Homosexuality is so etched onto the mind of Jimbo Riske that even mental illness does not prevent him from focusing on it." --Bernard Hubbard
James Riske - 01 May 2007 21:30 GMT >>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > some real figures by doing a Google search on "Homosexuals who molest > children" <snip>
You are every bit as stupid as "Ramrod", Song of Bullshit.
You, like "Ramrod", don't even know what a pedophile is.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
GarnGetFukt - 01 May 2007 08:41 GMT >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to > be a pedophile than a heterosexual is. That bad ol' 'lebbenty factor has the rectum rangers as confused as it does to the down low low life yard apes. No surprise there, really.
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 18:40 GMT >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > defending the proved fact that homosexuals are many times more likely to > be a pedophile than a heterosexual is. Here we have a few State Sex offended registries, which clearly show how the Heterosexuals are the leading group in child molestation, not some wacko group like Foonhoon, or some front for a bigot group like Paul Cameron, but official Government numbers showing that Gays are not molesting children more than Heterosexuals.
West Virginia Sex register
http://www.wvstatepolice.com/sexoff/WebDetails.cfm?OffenderID=406
As usual I used the names Smith and Jones to search out the records, as they are common names.
What did I find?
Of 22 Smiths, there were.
3 that had multiple victims, one two girls, one a boy and a girl and one that no gender was mentioned, hence I have left these out of the total
Of the remaining 19
18 of the victims were girls
1 was a male
Of the Jones, the numbers were really too small (3), but anyway
2 of the victims were female
1 was a male
Let us look at the previous data I have posted
From Texas sex offenders
http://www.austin360.com/homes/content/homes/safety/crime/crime_sexoffenders.htm l;COXnetJSessionID=1z1TDKa0sEsE2To30SQEMsLZKJHMXSzDC0G4XWWWmu6VGsYcZdf3!-1662071 056?urac=n&urvf=10687608514260.2647391116786134
If this does not work, because of the length of this URL, then look up the Texas sex offender's registry.
I looked up A Smith; B Smith, and C Smith
58 offenders, less the six unknowns make it 52 offenders of which only 8 were against males.
If you do not like the Texas site, try Utah sex register
http://corrections.utah.gov/asp-bin/sexoffendersearchform.asp
Here I did a search of Smith, the numbers?
31 offenders in total
25 offenders against females
2 offender's against males
Female against female. 1
1 Male who offence was not listed (IE not male nor female)
2 Males offending against both males and females
So excluding the odd ones out, IE fem-fem and multiples, we end up with a total of .
Now all states do not list the gender of the sex of the victim, but these do.
West Virginia
Texas
Utah
Not states known for their love of gays...
Funny how all three states end up with similar numbers of female verses male victims
In three states we end with this sort of numbers.
Total people offending 105
Total offences against females 99
Total offences against males 13
Looky looky no where near the numbers the bigots quote..
Of course now we will have the favourite bigot game of numbers , but you forgot that there are only X % of males, and Y % of gays, and do not forget to take away the number you first thought of.... J
James Riske - 01 May 2007 20:22 GMT >>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > Here we have a few State Sex offended registries, which clearly show how > the Heterosexuals are the leading group in child molestation <snip>
Which says absolutely *nothing* about pedophiles, do you even know what a pedophile is "Ramrod", Song of Bile ?
Even the pedophile "boy lovers" must be laughing at you, and I am sure that's nothing new...
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 21:49 GMT >>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Even the pedophile "boy lovers" must be laughing at you, and I am sure > that's nothing new... You obviously did not do the research, and this post of yours only proves that you cannot refute the evidence that heterosexuals are the leading group by far in child molestation, with anything like an official AMA or Government site quoting the URL.
You are a joke, a sad joke but a joke never the less.
James Riske - 01 May 2007 21:55 GMT >>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > proves that you cannot refute the evidence that heterosexuals are the > leading group by far in child molestation <snip> Evasion.
Where did I mention child molestation?
Just admit that you are too stupid to even know what a pedophile is.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 02 May 2007 03:02 GMT >>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > Just admit that you are too stupid to even know what a pedophile is. More lunatic rhetoric, but no facts and figures from any official site like any Government or American Medical Association to back up your statements.
James Riske - 02 May 2007 20:12 GMT >>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > like any Government or American Medical Association to back up your > statements. Surrender noted and accepted. Just admit that you don't even know what a pedophile is.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 02 May 2007 22:51 GMT >>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > Surrender noted and accepted. > Just admit that you don't even know what a pedophile is. Yep you are beaten and cannot produce any official government or AMA URL to back up any of your ravings, but we have seen this a dozen times previously.
James Riske - 02 May 2007 23:02 GMT >>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > to back up any of your ravings, but we have seen this a dozen times > previously. How embarrassing it must be for you to not know what a pedophile is and having your stupidity cause you to lose the thread.
How utterly embarrassing...
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
Wonderer - 03 May 2007 00:46 GMT >>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > > How utterly embarrassing... standard boiler plates
RamRod Sword of Baal - 03 May 2007 08:47 GMT >>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 65 lines] > How embarrassing it must be for you to not know what a pedophile is and > having your stupidity cause you to lose the thread. We are not all as stupid as you, I do not have time to educate you, actually I do not think anyone could, so I suggest you look up pedophile in the dictionary (if you know what big word means) so you understand the meaning of the word, that is if you can comprehend the meaning.
I see that you used the old dodge of trying to change the subject when you cannot produce the goods, once again you cannot defend your statements and I have shown that the greatest sex offenders are heterosexuals.
So let me quote again ......
Here we have a few State Sex offended registries, which clearly show how the Heterosexuals are the leading group in child molestation, not some wacko group like Foonhoon, or some front for a bigot group like Paul Cameron, but official Government numbers showing that Gays are not molesting children more than Heterosexuals.
West Virginia Sex register
http://www.wvstatepolice.com/sexoff/WebDetails.cfm?OffenderID=406
As usual I used the names Smith and Jones to search out the records, as they are common names.
What did I find?
Of 22 Smiths, there were.
3 that had multiple victims, one two girls, one a boy and a girl and one that no gender was mentioned, hence I have left these out of the total
Of the remaining 19
18 of the victims were girls
1 was a male
Of the Jones, the numbers were really too small (3), but anyway
2 of the victims were female
1 was a male
Let us look at the previous data I have posted
From Texas sex offenders
http://www.austin360.com/homes/content/homes/safety/crime/crime_sexoffenders.htm l;COXnetJSessionID=1z1TDKa0sEsE2To30SQEMsLZKJHMXSzDC0G4XWWWmu6VGsYcZdf3!-1662071 056?urac=n&urvf=10687608514260.2647391116786134
If this does not work, because of the length of this URL, then look up the Texas sex offender's registry.
I looked up A Smith; B Smith, and C Smith
58 offenders, less the six unknowns make it 52 offenders of which only 8 were against males.
If you do not like the Texas site, try Utah sex register
http://corrections.utah.gov/asp-bin/sexoffendersearchform.asp
Here I did a search of Smith, the numbers?
31 offenders in total
25 offenders against females
2 offender's against males
Female against female. 1
1 Male who offence was not listed (IE not male nor female)
2 Males offending against both males and females
So excluding the odd ones out, IE fem-fem and multiples, we end up with a total of .
Now all states do not list the gender of the sex of the victim, but these do.
West Virginia
Texas
Utah
Not states known for their love of gays...
Funny how all three states end up with similar numbers of female verses male victims
In three states we end with this sort of numbers.
Total people offending 105
Total offences against females 99
Total offences against males 13
Looky looky no where near the numbers the bigots quote..
Of course now we will have the favourite bigot game of numbers , but you forgot that there are only X % of males, and Y % of gays, and do not forget to take away the number you first thought of.... J
James Riske - 03 May 2007 10:31 GMT >>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > statements and I have shown that the greatest sex offenders are > heterosexuals. <snip>
I guess I will have to school you a bit here since you are obviously too stupid to understand. A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to young children, a person can be sexually attracted to someone and not offend. That makes any and all of your posts about offender lists and numbers void and completely irrelevant.
Now, with that in mind, you have utterly embarrassed yourself and are the laughing stock of usenet once again, a homosexual is *more likely* to be a pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is.
My gawd you are a stupid one...
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 03 May 2007 16:48 GMT >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > I guess I will have to school you a bit here since you are obviously too > stupid to understand. Not stupid enough to walk into your trap.......
> A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to young children, a > person can be sexually attracted to someone and not offend. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more > likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is. Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual, and according to you most pedophiles are Gay, then the homosexual pedophiles are better at controlling their urges than the heterosexual ones.............
My God, you walked into that one, talk about being stupid.
James Riske - 06 May 2007 17:13 GMT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 86 lines] > > Not stupid enough to walk into your trap....... In other words, you know that I am 100% correct and that you are a proved liar who is afraid to admit it.
Glad we got that settled.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 07 May 2007 17:36 GMT >> Not stupid enough to walk into your trap....... > > In other words, you know that I am 100% correct and that you are a proved > liar who is afraid to admit it. > > Glad we got that settled. So now you set the questions, and then answer them yourself, that is called 'talking to yourself' a classic sign of mental disease.
BTW you forgot to reply to this one where you made an idiot of yourself yet again.
"James Riske" <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message news:t8vns.cc3.19.1@news.alt.net...
> A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to young children, a > person can be sexually attracted to someone and not offend. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more > likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is. Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual, and according to you most paedophiles are Gay, then the homosexual paedophiles are better at controlling their urges than the heterosexual ones.............
My God, you walked into that one, talk about being stupid.
James Riske - 08 May 2007 00:52 GMT > Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual, > and according to you most paedophiles are Gay <snip>
Cite the post including verifiable message id to prove that I ever made any such statement that "most pedophiles are gay".
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 08 May 2007 03:38 GMT >> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are heterosexual, >> and according to you most paedophiles are Gay > <snip> > > Cite the post including verifiable message id to prove that I ever made > any such statement that "most pedophiles are gay". No worries
"James Riske" <james.riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message news:t8vns.cc3.19.1@news.alt.net...
> Now, with that in mind, you have utterly embarrassed yourself and are the > laughing stock of usenet once again, a homosexual is *more likely* to be a > pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a homosexual is more > likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is. James Riske - 08 May 2007 03:50 GMT >>> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are >>> heterosexual, and according to you most paedophiles are Gay [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >> to be a pedophile than a heterosexual is, I did not say that a >> homosexual is more likely to be a sex offender than a heterosexual is. Nope, no proof there, my words don't say "most pedophiles are gay" however I did say that a homosexual is *more likely* to be a pedophile, a fact that is supported by empirical evidence and is completely different from what noted liar "Ramrod" claims that I said.
Ho hum, another day, another lie told to us by defeated faggot "Ramrod".
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
Wonderer - 08 May 2007 04:03 GMT >>>> Then it follows that because most of the sex offenders are >>>> heterosexual, and according to you most paedophiles are Gay [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > that is supported by empirical evidence and is completely different from > what noted liar "Ramrod" claims that I said. then post the evidence
> Ho hum, another day, another lie told to us by defeated faggot "Ramrod". Qazfez - 01 May 2007 08:31 GMT [snip]
>> >>YOU DIRTY, SICK, CHILD-MOLESTING c.nts SHOULD *ALL* BE KILLED<< > > Considering it is the heterosexual community that are by far the biggest > group who child molest, I suppose that is who you are talking about. Nope. He's obviously referring to homosexuals.
GMCarter - 01 May 2007 11:17 GMT some a.shole wrote
>[snip] > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Nope. He's obviously referring to homosexuals. Most HIV infection is heterosexually transmitted.
Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists and hate-filled bigots? Can use the guns the NRA loves so much??
Except I don't believe killing is an answer to problems. That's for the mentally ill. Like Bush/Cheney and their horrible f.ck ups in Iraq.
George M. Carter
HIV Positive - 02 May 2007 00:13 GMT >Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists >and hate-filled bigots? Even the ones who belong to the Church of HIV?
 Signature Should I begin ART? Vote: <http://hiv-positive.freehostia.com/vote/>
GMCarter - 02 May 2007 11:58 GMT >>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists >>and hate-filled bigots? > >Even the ones who belong to the Church of HIV? If they're fundamentalists who accept concepts utterly on faith and without evidence, sure. But to me, that sounds like denialists.
And I'm very sorry to say to you that as one who refuses treatment based utterly on a faith in the lack of a cause of HIV for your illness, you will kill yourself.
George M. Carter
HIV Positive - 04 May 2007 02:24 GMT >>>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists >>>and hate-filled bigots?
>>Even the ones who belong to the Church of HIV?
>If they're fundamentalists who accept concepts utterly on faith and >without evidence, sure. But to me, that sounds like denialists. LOL. So those who believe HIV=AIDS=Death are denialists too. :)
Well over half the people on this planet believe in some sort of God. Their beliefs are based on faith with little evidence, if any, to back them up. Are they all denialists too?
Ironically your definition of a denialist as someone who "accepts concepts utterly on faith and without evidence" includes millions of Jews.
LOL. I think you might have to rework that definition a little.
>And I'm very sorry to say to you that as one who refuses treatment >based utterly on a faith in the lack of a cause of HIV for your >illness, you will kill yourself. That sort of psychology doesn't work on me. I am not scared of death. However the prospect of a long, lingering, death is a bit scary.
 Signature Should I begin ART? Vote: <http://hiv-positive.freehostia.com/vote/>
GMCarter - 04 May 2007 10:32 GMT >>>>Hey! Better idea. Why don't we kill all the religious fundamentalists >>>>and hate-filled bigots? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >LOL. So those who believe HIV=AIDS=Death are denialists too. :) To the contrary. There is a vast amount of evidence to support the development of extremely low CD4 counts and AIDS as a result of HIV infection.
There are no alternative explanations that describe the epidemiology or for which there is any convincing evidence.
So you're avoiding doctors. And not taking prophylaxis any more. There is a thing called resensitization for TMP/SMX that you might consider.
I fear your denial is causing a great deal of confusion for you and undoubtedly frustrates physicians.
Your body. Your life. Your early death.
George M. Carter
HIV Positive - 04 May 2007 21:44 GMT >So you're avoiding doctors. And not taking prophylaxis any more. There >is a thing called resensitization for TMP/SMX that you might consider. Oh yes, taking a lower dosage of both. Now, where have I heard that before?
>I fear your denial is causing a great deal of confusion for you and >undoubtedly frustrates physicians. It seems you're blaming the patient for failing the drugs. It's a common accusation leveled at 'HIV patients.'
BTW, it's interesting that you snipped all the stuff about "denialists." I thought you'd have a few problems with that. :)
 Signature Should I begin ART? Vote: <http://hiv-positive.freehostia.com/vote/>
Death - 05 May 2007 00:37 GMT "HIV Positive" <hiv.positive@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Oh yes, taking a lower dosage of both. Now, where have I heard that > before? LOL
GMCarter - 05 May 2007 10:43 GMT >>So you're avoiding doctors. And not taking prophylaxis any more. There >>is a thing called resensitization for TMP/SMX that you might consider. > >Oh yes, taking a lower dosage of both. Now, where have I heard that >before? I don't know. Where have you heard that before?
>>I fear your denial is causing a great deal of confusion for you and >>undoubtedly frustrates physicians. > >It seems you're blaming the patient for failing the drugs. It's a >common accusation leveled at 'HIV patients.' Not at all. I suggested a method to overcome the sensitivity.
>BTW, it's interesting that you snipped all the stuff about >"denialists." I thought you'd have a few problems with that. :) Like you don't snip stuff and ignore stuff.
George M. Carter
Death - 05 May 2007 00:34 GMT "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
> If they're fundamentalists who accept concepts utterly on faith and > without evidence, sure. But to me, that sounds like denialists. > > And I'm very sorry to say to you that as one who refuses treatment > based utterly on a faith in the lack of a cause of HIV for your > illness, you will kill yourself. Too late Killer Karter, Pasquarelli is dead. Your attempt at atonement is noted though.
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 03:03 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having > unprotected sex with others with HIV. Actually that mean little, it depends on what was the question, if the question was "Do you have unsafe sex" meaning sex without a condom, the answer mean little as anyone who is HIV - and in a one to one relationship that only has 'unsafe' sex with ones partner then that is not unsafe sex really.
The same goes for someone who is HIV+ and has 'unsafe' sex with their one and only partner, again what does it matter to others.
Unsafe promiscuous sex is the worry and did the question ask if this was what these people were doing?
Sure the numbers look bad, but what questions were asked?
BTW I wonder what the numbers would be if the same question was asked of the Heterosexual group?
James Riske - 01 May 2007 03:08 GMT >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > BTW I wonder what the numbers would be if the same question was asked of > the Heterosexual group? Leave it to known liar "Ramrod", Song of Bile, to try and engage in endless semantic sophistry when it is confronted with some facts that it can't honestly deal with.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
holland.chris@yahoo.com - 01 May 2007 03:23 GMT > Leave it to known liar "Ramrod", Song of Bile, to try and engage in > endless semantic sophistry when it is confronted with some facts that it > can't honestly deal with. I know - what a twat!
f.cking fag
Bernard Hubbard - 01 May 2007 07:46 GMT >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > endless semantic sophistry when it is confronted with some facts that it > can't honestly deal with. My,my such big words. BTW as any person who is familiar with polling knows the questions asked can give great bias in the answers and hence to the poll. What a dumb c.nt you are.
I'm happy to see you back here. Where have you been for the past mont or so? Did mommy move her computer behind a locked door? Also please remember that you next circle jerk with Death and his mates is on May 5 at 9.30 PM.
 Signature " Homosexuality is so etched onto the mind of Jimbo Riske that even mental illness does not prevent him from focusing on it." --Bernard Hubbard
Qazfez - 01 May 2007 08:41 GMT >>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > knows the questions asked can give great bias in the answers and hence to > the poll. What a dumb c.nt you are. Do you know what it reveals about you that you repeat the same misogynist insults as the queer bashers?
> I'm happy to see you back here. Where have you been for the past mont or > so? Did mommy move her computer behind a locked door? Also please > remember that you next circle jerk with Death and his mates is on May 5 at > 9.30 PM. You make it sound like a bad thing.
James Riske - 01 May 2007 20:24 GMT >>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>> [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > remember that you next circle jerk with Death and his mates is on May 5 > at 9.30 PM. Typical faggot, it just *can't stop* thinking about sex in some form or another.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 01 May 2007 21:51 GMT >>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > Typical faggot, it just *can't stop* thinking about sex in some form or > another. Using that theory, then it is the same that you are here and cannot stop thinking about you being homosexual all the time................
James Riske - 01 May 2007 22:01 GMT >>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > Using that theory, then it is the same that you are here and cannot stop > thinking about you being homosexual all the time................ Another lie that faggots like to tell is the 'closet homo' lie that has been thoroughly refuted/denounced so many times that nobody could hardly keep track. Like many of its peers, that's what "Ramrod", Song of Bullshit, likes to do, lie like there is no tomorrow.
And I'm certain this wont be the last time...
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
RamRod Sword of Baal - 02 May 2007 03:08 GMT >>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > Like many of its peers, that's what "Ramrod", Song of Bullshit, likes to > do, lie like there is no tomorrow. I am only following your lead, after all you think the Bernard keeps think of sex all the time and you are here on an area where Gay sex is spoken about, so one has to surmise it is because it interests you.
BTW I have see the closet homo report, but have yet to see anything that refutes it, care to post something official, that we can all believe, you said it has been refuted/denounced many times, so you should have no problem fining it.
James Riske - 02 May 2007 20:27 GMT >>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >>>>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > think of sex all the time and you are here on an area where Gay sex is > spoken about, so one has to surmise it is because it interests you. Since you have created a room in your house dedicated only for the purpose of having depraved faggot sex I would bet thoughts of sex consume you for most of your day.
People who naturally despise faggots are not really faggots themselves just as people who naturally despise pedophiles are not really pedophiles.
> BTW I have see the closet homo report, but have yet to see anything that > refutes it, care to post something official, that we can all believe, > you said it has been refuted/denounced many times, so you should have no > problem fining it. One refutation is the absence of a report on people who express natural disgust toward pedophiles, are they really closet pedophiles themselves? of course not. Another one which ironically was posted by anonymous faggot and documented liar "No One" over in alt.politics.homosexuality is where the researchers themselves admitted that their study was most possibly flawed since it put undue pressure on the so-called "homophobes" making them feel very uncomfortable during the exam resulting in varying penile circumference differences. Another is the Kent state Ohio exams, anyone who would believe what Kent state has to offer is a straight up idiot in the truest sense of the word. The dope heads at Kent state showed lesbian sex videos to measure the penile changes in the so-called "homophobes" which is obviously flawed from the very start since heterosexuals are normally sexually attracted to attractive women whether they are engaging in homosexual behavior or not, it was not necessarily the sex that turned them on.
However none of this matters to a depraved faggot on usenet who has already been proved to be a liar on many occasions.
 Signature "The anus is so etched onto the minds of homosexuals that even mental illness does not prevent them from focusing on it." -- Erik Holland
Frank Provasek - 01 May 2007 08:29 GMT If 46 states banned HETEROSEXUAL marriage, what would the rates of HIV be amongst members of that group?
Qazfez - 01 May 2007 08:33 GMT >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm >> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > BTW I wonder what the numbers would be if the same question was asked of > the Heterosexual group? Probably not nearly as bad.
nappy-headed ho - 02 May 2007 17:38 GMT Jim wrote...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6609023.stm > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Brighton and London also revealed a fifth of gay men without HIV do > the same. The numbers don't make sense. According to official orthodoxy, those who test positive for HIV are faultless because the government didn't do enough to educate them on condom use. But now that they've been properly counseled they are sure to use condoms faithfully and therefore this group can't possibly have a lower condom use rate than the ignorant HIV-negative group which isn't nearly as educated on how HIV is transmitted as the smarter HIV-positive group.
> But experts said evidence suggested many men with HIV were having > unprotected sex with others with HIV. If that is true, it is not due to any concern the AIDS patients have for society, but due to the fact that nearly every gay man in the industrialized world is already infected.
|
|
|