>http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/04/04/hiv-drug.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>for treating HIV since the mid-1990s, but the virus is becoming
>increasingly resistant.
I don't think anything about HIV can be described as 'gold standard.'
The whole theories of HIV and AIDS are based on very unstable
foundations.
>In the study, researchers studied 100 people who took darunavir in
>combination with a low dose of an older protease inhibitor called
>ritonavir, and a control group of 120 people who took an existing
>combination therapy.
So one group took one set of deadly drugs, and the control group took
another set of deadly drugs? I think I've heard this one before:
don't tell me... is one set of deadly drugs shown to be slightly less
toxic than the other by any chance?
>People in both groups had advanced HIV infection and their current
>therapies were failing, said Dr. Bonaventura Clotet of Barcelona and
>colleagues in an upcoming issue of the medical journal the Lancet.
Aha, at last. Someone has admitted the HIV treatments fail. Well,
that's a start I suppose.
>About 45 per cent of those taking darunavir-ritonavir showed the
>lowest recordable level of HIV genetic material in their blood
>compared with 10 per cent in the control group.
Erm, so what is this trying to tell us? 10% of the 'control' group,
whose lethal drug cocktail was failing, still manage to have
undetectable viral load?
>"For now, all of us treating HIV-infected individuals in clinical
>practice will probably rejoice in the availability of darunavir, since
>it seems to be a safe, well-tolerated, and truly effective agent
>against multi-drug resistant HIV," MacArthur wrote.
Oh well, at least he still has an open mind about it. :)
>The virus mutates quickly and may resist medications, especially if
>drug regimens are not followed closely.
Oh yes, that old trick. For a 'virus' that has a very basic
composition, HIV is very clever.
>Failure rates for antiretroviral drugs range from 21 per cent among
>patients already taking the medications to 11 per cent in those just
>starting treatment, the researchers said.
To nearer 100% if you include those who die.

Signature
URL: http://hiv.positive.googlepages.com/
Moible: +447939991519
GMCarter - 08 Apr 2007 12:27 GMT
>On 4 Apr 2007 18:38:58 -0700, "spamhotmail" <spamhotmail@yahoo.com>
>I don't think anything about HIV can be described as 'gold standard.'
>The whole theories of HIV and AIDS are based on very unstable
>foundations.
LOL...bullshit. What a profound expression of your abject ignorance.
You'll be dead soon enough.
HIV Positive - 08 Apr 2007 13:30 GMT
>>I don't think anything about HIV can be described as 'gold standard.'
>>The whole theories of HIV and AIDS are based on very unstable
>>foundations.
>LOL...bullshit. What a profound expression of your abject ignorance.
>
>You'll be dead soon enough.
LOL. Am I messing up your HIV=AIDS=Death statistics?
It's very unkind to wish someone death simply because they don't fit
into your theory or agree with your point of view.
I'm sure you'll be pleased to learn that my death may not be too far
off. I've been suffering from depressions that's been steadily
getting worse for some time now. So at my own hand your wish may soon
come true, however my death won't be another statistic to add to your
argument.

Signature
URL: http://hiv.positive.googlepages.com/
Moible: +447939991519
GMCarter - 08 Apr 2007 22:23 GMT
>>>I don't think anything about HIV can be described as 'gold standard.'
>>>The whole theories of HIV and AIDS are based on very unstable
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>LOL. Am I messing up your HIV=AIDS=Death statistics?
LOL...no, you're messing with your own head.
RocketScience - 09 Apr 2007 22:42 GMT
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:28:40 +0100, "HIV Positive"
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> You'll be dead soon enough.
Important video relating to HIV and AIDS.
http://www.aidsfraudvideo.com/
HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud? One of the most powerful video documentaries
of our time boldly reveals the modern medical-industrial complex's
dire descent into utter corruption. This feature-length expose
explains exactly how the 300-Billion-dollar AID$ fraud began, why HIV
can NOT be the cause of AIDS, what the real causes could be, and who
manipulates the public's good intentions while poisoning hundreds of
thousands with toxic drugs that cause the very disease they are
supposed to prevent. This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$
machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide
plight of human suffering and drove it down the road to hell. Yet this
program offers hope, inspired by the courage and articulate arguments
of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the
HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria. A MUST SEE for anyone interested in truly
understanding the facts about HIV/AID$.
You will meet a number of highly reputable scientists who all agree
that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, including Dr. Peter Duesberg, who was the
first scientist to map the genetic structure of retroviruses. He is
joined by Nobel Prize winners Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr.Walter Gilbert,
along with Dr. David Rasnick, an expert in the field of protease
inhibitors
Is HIV/AIDS the golden idol of junk science? Judge for yourself.
Professionally produced, written and researched, acclaimed by
physicians, scientists, journalists and humanitarians internationally,
this is the video encyclopedia of HIV/AIDS dissident movement! THE
defining documentary on the HIV/AIDS fraud
rocketscience
>http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2007/04/04/hiv-drug.html
Is this like HEAL Toronto? Oh. No. Most of them died of AIDS.