> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra
ctPlus&list_uids=17301569&query_hl=5&itool=pubmed_docsum
>
> Further evidence for the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment and an
> indication that it may result in lowered infectivity.
more bought junk science
DavidT wrote...
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstra
ctPlus&list_uids=17301569&query_hl=5&itool=pubmed_docsum
>
> Further evidence for the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment and an
> indication that it may result in lowered infectivity.
But will any of the scientists who conducted the study actually agree to have
unprotected sex with women receiving the HAART therapy? And how will they
ethically test their theory in the real world? They plan on bribing AIDS-
infected women to participate in their study and give them the experimental
drugs and then encourage them to engage in sex to see if they infect their
partners. And no matter how confident the scientists claim to be of the
treatment's efficacy, they still won't have sex with HAART therapy patients,
but they will expect the rest of the world to do so.
Death - 01 Mar 2007 15:59 GMT
"brainfart" <fart@brain.org> wrote in message
> DavidT wrote...
> > Further evidence for the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment and an
> > indication that it may result in lowered infectivity.
>
> But will any of the scientists who conducted the study actually agree to have
> unprotected sex with women receiving the HAART therapy?
Not knowing who took the placebo, I'm sure (they) will pass.
If by chance, one of *them* did have sex with one of the test patients
that took the HAART meds, and became infected, the answer would
be, that woman had the placebo.
Neat scam to be sure.