 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2006PfizerPfraud
Pfrod Show likes to go around squealing that people on this list are in the pay of pharma. Pfrod is deranged. However, that's not to say that OTHERS aren't in the pay of pharma and that there aren't conflicts of interest that are extremely lucrative. It is indeed a serious problem. Frod, unfortunatley, points the stick in the wrong direction. George M. Carter *** http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/nih-scientist-charged-pfizer-conflict/stor y.aspx?guid=%7B751F7242-819E-4D54-BBD8-1082E3A06866%7D NIH scientist charged with Pfizer conflict of interest PrintDisable live quotesRSSDigg itDel.icio.usBy Gabriel Madway Last Update: 2:15 PM ET Dec 4, 2006 SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Federal prosecutors on Monday charged a National Institutes of Health scientist with engaging in a criminal conflict of interest by earning private consulting fees from Pfizer Inc., according to media reports. Dr. Trey Sunderland was accused of performing consulting work for the pharmaceutical giant that improperly overlapped with his government duties, the Associated Press reported. Court papers say Sunderland did not get proper approval from the government for his consulting work and did not properly report $285,000 in consulting fees and travel money from Pfizer, the report said. The conflict of interest charge carries a maximum of one year in prison and a $100,000 fine, the AP said. ******** "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message > overlapped with his government duties, the Associated Press reported. > Court papers say Sunderland did not get proper approval from the > government for his consulting work and did not properly report > $285,000 LOL, what is more scary are the charges. They stem from the fact he did not have grub-ment permission and he didn't pay the proper kick-back to the grub-ment. > Pfrod Show likes to go around squealing that people on this list are > in the pay of pharma. Pfrod is deranged. > > However, that's not to say that OTHERS aren't in the pay of pharma and > that there aren't conflicts of interest that are extremely lucrative. George Mary is obviously suffering from a nervous breakdown with paranoid Pfeatures, arising not only from his own pharma greed and sleazy past, but also the significant thumping he got at the hands of Quackwatch. >> Pfrod Show likes to go around squealing that people on this list are >> in the pay of pharma. Pfrod is deranged. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >pharma greed and sleazy past, but also the significant >thumping he got at the hands of Quackwatch. Pharma greed? You make that claim. It is wholly unsupported. Arkopharma? They subsidized PART of a trip; not the whole thing. I went with two colleagues, wrote a report and noted that. And despite you efforts, I'm not ashamed nor concerned by that--an event that occurred something like 10 years ago? Nope. I receive nothing from pharma. And "thumping" from Quackwatch? LOL. That discredited bunch of sh.ts couldn't thump their way out of a paper bag. George M. Carter >>> Pfrod Show likes to go around squealing that people on this list are >>> in the pay of pharma. Pfrod is deranged. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Pharma greed? You make that claim. It is wholly unsupported. And in typical George Mary fashion, he goes on to support only the most minimal aspects of his PharmaGreed: > Arkopharma? They subsidized PART of a trip; not the whole thing. > > Nope. I receive nothing from pharma. An amazing memory - if only for the selective details George Mary overlooks - as in his employment by pharma magazine POZ where he was paid to impersonate an HIV+ doctor in his column DR ME and then there's Carter pushing NAC and the rest of his pharma-made quack claptrap. And let's not forget about the PharmaPayola generously provided to the ACT UP New York and Golden Gate faggots for all their help with bringing the rest of the gay lemmings to the Pfountain of Everlasting Life-after-infection... and we ALL know how that worked out... > And "thumping" from Quackwatch? LOL. That discredited bunch of sh.ts > couldn't thump their way out of a paper bag. As we can see, George Mary was traumatized by his "victimization" by the good folks at Quackwatch. snip >> Pharma greed? You make that claim. It is wholly unsupported. > >And in typical George Mary fashion, he goes on to support only >the most minimal aspects of his PharmaGreed: Nope. >> Arkopharma? They subsidized PART of a trip; not the whole thing. They're not even a pharmaceutical company in any event. That is hardly an example of "greed." >> Nope. I receive nothing from pharma. > >An amazing memory - if only for the selective details George Mary >overlooks - as in his employment by pharma magazine POZ where >he was paid to impersonate an HIV+ doctor in his column LOL...many people wrote for that column. It did NOT suggest that the author was a physician nor their HIV status. That's wholly your imaginary fantasizing. That's because you have to stretch and fold, spindle and mutilate your mind to come up with anything that might even remotely support your point when in actuality--there's no "there" there. In short--you're a liar and a coward. George M. Carter |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.