Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / December 2006
Pharma's Genocide
|
|
Thread rating:  |
GMCarter - 15 Nov 2006 18:17 GMT http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,,1946998,00.html Rich countries 'blocking cheap drugs for developing world'
· US and EU have broken Doha pledges, says Oxfam · Stop Aids claims 75% of HIV patients not treated
Sarah Boseley, health editor Tuesday November 14, 2006 The Guardian
Poor people are needlessly dying because drug companies and the governments of rich countries are blocking the developing world from obtaining affordable medicines, a report says today.
Five years to the day after the Doha declaration - a groundbreaking deal to give poor countries access to cheap drugs - was signed at the World Trade Organisation, Oxfam says things are worse.
The charity accuses the US, which champions the interests of its giant pharmaceutical companies, of bullying developing countries into not using the measures in the Doha declaration and the EU of standing by and doing nothing. Doha technically allows poor countries to buy cheap copies of desperately needed drugs but the US is accused of trying to prevent countries such as Thailand and India, which have manufacturing capacity, making and selling cheap generic versions so as to preserve the monopolies of the drug giants.
"Rich countries have broken the spirit of the Doha declaration," said Celine Charveriat, head of Oxfam's Make Trade Fair campaign. "The declaration said the right things but needed political action to work and that hasn't happened. In fact, we've actually gone backwards. Many people are dying or suffering needlessly."
The Indian generics firms make most of the cheap drug cocktails that are now being rolled out to people with HIV in Africa and are keeping more than a million people alive. They brought the price of a basic three-drug cocktail down from $10,000 (£5,250) a year to less than $150 (£79). But new Aids drugs will soon be needed because the virus will become resistant to the basic ones now in use - as has happened in the EU and the US.
Those newer Aids drugs, together with drugs for cancer and diabetes, are under patent. The Oxfam report points out that 4 million people were newly infected with HIV in 2005 and cancer and diabetes are expanding faster in developing countries than in the richer world.
The report says that, since the signing of the Doha declaration on November 14 2001, "rich countries have failed to honour their promises. Their record ranges from apathy and inaction to dogged determination to undermine the declaration's spirit and intent. The US, at the behest of the pharmaceutical industry, is uniqely guilty of seeking ever higher levels of intellectual property protection in developing countries."
The US has pursued its own free trade agreements with developing countries, tying them into much tighter observance of patent rights than anticipated at Doha. "The USA has also pressured countries for greater patent protection through threats of trade sanctions," the report says.
The drugs firms are also fighting to have patents observed. Pfizer is challenging the Philippines government in a bid to extend its monopoly on Norvasc, a drug pressure drug. Novartis is engaged in litigation in India to enforce a patent for Glivec, a cancer drug, which could save many lives if it were available at generic prices.
The Stop Aids campaign, a coalition of 90 NGOs of which Oxfam is a member, is calling for the government to champion the issue at the G8 summit next year. Three-quarters of HIV drugs are still under monopoly and unaffordable in poor countries, it said. More than 75% of those who need HIV treatment urgently are still not getting it. Only 8% of children with HIV are on drugs, which cost four times more than those for adults.
"Sadly, promising words have not translated into life-saving treatments and five years is too long to wait when the stakes are so high," said Steve Cockburn, campaign coordinator.
Case study
Premavati, a 60-year-old widow living in Delhi who is suffering from non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a cancer of the lymphatic system, has spent around $900 (£470) on medicines. "My husband died two years ago," says Premavati. "We have absolutely no savings. Of my two sons one is a casual labourer, the other has no job. My daughter is 30, has two children and is also a widow." She is one of 1.42 billion people in India who cannot afford the drugs they need to save their lives. Their country is the leading producer of inexpensive generic drugs but about 67% of the output is exported, and it is under pressure to stop copying new patented drugs. The future looks bleak for Premavati. "How will I raise the money for my treatment?" she says, "Already, I've spent what we had. If nobody helps I will just go back to my daughter and will have to die without medicines."
Life - 19 Nov 2006 20:45 GMT > Poor people are needlessly dying because drug companies and the > governments of rich countries are blocking the developing world from > obtaining affordable medicines, a report says today. Poor people in "rich countries" are also unable to obtain affordable medicines - and they, too, are dying.
George Mary, don't you think your time would be better spent helping to fix this problem at home first?
Aside from your frequent megalomaniacal rants and your bad vocal outbursts of "we are the world", there's little to do about those "third world" countries that promote overpopulation of stupid superstitious mud people - let the forces of nature run their course.
GMCarter - 19 Nov 2006 22:28 GMT >> Poor people are needlessly dying because drug companies and the >> governments of rich countries are blocking the developing world from >> obtaining affordable medicines, a report says today. > >Poor people in "rich countries" are also unable to obtain affordable >medicines - and they, too, are dying. Quite true.
>George Mary, don't you think your time would be better spent >helping to fix this problem at home first? Fred Shaw, it is not an either/or situation. The fight for access to healthcare as a right is a global effort.
George M. Carter
Life - 20 Nov 2006 04:08 GMT >>> Poor people are needlessly dying because drug companies and the >>> governments of rich countries are blocking the developing world from [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Fred Shaw, it is not an either/or situation. The fight for access to > healthcare as a right is a global effort. George Mary - your attempt to define me as some strawman only illustrates the desperation of the paranoia arising from your years of shooting heroin - not to mention the bankruptcy of your argument.
Laughable, as always.
GMCarter - 20 Nov 2006 10:15 GMT snip
>George Mary - your attempt to define me as some strawman But you are, Frod Show.
Life - 20 Nov 2006 20:32 GMT > snip >>George Mary - your attempt to define me as some strawman > > But you are, Frod Show. Sorry to disappoint, but I have found many references to FShaw in the Google groups search engine.
And it would seem that FShaw and David Pasquarelli were among the members of ACT UP San Francisco who frequently blew the whistle on your HIV treatment scams... while Pasquarelli succumbed to the HIV drugs, it would seem that your fear of FShaw being "out there" is very real indeed.
Death - 21 Nov 2006 01:28 GMT "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote in message
> And it would seem that FShaw and David Pasquarelli were > among the members of ACT UP San Francisco who frequently > blew the whistle on your HIV treatment scams... while > Pasquarelli succumbed to the HIV drugs, it would seem that > your fear of FShaw being "out there" is very real indeed. I believe Carter looks under the bed every night to make sure Fred isn't there. That guy has really shaken Carters world and left him a shambles.
I wonder just how many ghost are in his closet.
GMCarter - 21 Nov 2006 11:38 GMT >> snip >>>George Mary - your attempt to define me as some strawman [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Sorry to disappoint, but I have found many references to FShaw >in the Google groups search engine. Oh, please. Who in the WORLD do you think you're kidding?
So if you're not him (right), who are you?
Or are you another coward like "death"?
Death - 21 Nov 2006 17:15 GMT "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
> So if you're not him (right), who are you? > > Or are you another coward like "death"? Why do you need to know that? Why does that haunt you so? What difference would it make? How would the out-come change? Would that alter what you say or the way you say it? Knowing my name would effect the topic how?
There is not going to be any-thing personal between us so you can call me Death or not at all. Either way suits the sh.t right out of me. If you prefer I can call you Sally or Mary. I have no doubt that your opinions will still be your opinions.
GMCarter - 22 Nov 2006 02:03 GMT >"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Why do you need to know that? A question of a coward, no less.
When it comes to the type of personal attacks and libelous statements, you'd think he'd have the guts to stand up and say who he is.
Neither of you do.
No surprise.
Death - 22 Nov 2006 02:40 GMT "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net>
" Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote in message
> Why do you need to know that? > Why does that haunt you so? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > If you prefer I can call you Sally or Mary. > I have no doubt that your opinions will still be your opinions. GMCarter - 22 Nov 2006 11:27 GMT >" Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote in message >> >There is not going to be any-thing personal between us That's irrelevant.
The fact is that you are a coward who spews his racist and anti-gay venom from behind his little keyboard.
Death - 22 Nov 2006 17:13 GMT "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
> " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > That's irrelevant. No, that is exactly the point.
GMCarter - 22 Nov 2006 18:18 GMT >"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >No, that is exactly the point. Yes, this is exactly the point.
The fact is that you are a coward who spews his racist and anti-gay venom from behind his little keyboard.
Death - 22 Nov 2006 18:47 GMT "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net>
> " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> > >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The fact is that you are a coward who spews his racist and anti-gay > venom from behind his little keyboard. I accept that you are Carter without worrying if you really are or not. As you said, you have made up several silly names for your-self.
I have no idea if your name is really Carter or not.
Your useless rant is for naught, Dr Me, Mary or Fred Shaw.
GMCarter - 23 Nov 2006 00:17 GMT >"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> >I accept that you are Carter without worrying if you really are or not. LOL. What a complete load of disingenuous crap.
Death - 24 Nov 2006 17:30 GMT "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:47:18 -0600, " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > LOL. What a complete load of disingenuous crap. Would you care to expand on that Carter, if Carter really is your name. You admit to making up several silly names
Life - 27 Nov 2006 05:56 GMT > "GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > Would you care to expand on that Carter, if Carter really is your name. > You admit to making up several silly names I'm afraid "Carter" is the name he makes up for his silly little keyboard...
but I DO have his mother's address outside of Pittsburgh...
Death - 27 Nov 2006 23:49 GMT "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote in message
> " Death" <Death@yourdoor.net> wrote in message > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I'm afraid "Carter" is the name he makes up for his silly little keyboard... He should have named his keyboard, Pussy. That way he could run his fingers across Pussy. He could pound Pussy.
> but I DO have his mother's address outside of Pittsburgh... Home of Brotherly Love?
Life - 28 Nov 2006 01:30 GMT > "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Home of Brotherly Love? No, that's Philadelphia ... but most interesting is how Carter failed to respond to this small detail.
Death - 28 Nov 2006 02:55 GMT "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote in message
> No, that's Philadelphia ... but most interesting is how Carter failed > to respond to this small detail. LOL, I wasn't referring to Philadelphia. That was speculation about Carters dad/uncle.
Life - 28 Nov 2006 05:19 GMT > "Life" <Life@life.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > LOL, I wasn't referring to Philadelphia. > That was speculation about Carters dad/uncle. LOL!
Life - 01 Dec 2006 19:36 GMT >>"GMCarter" <fiar@verizon.net> wrote in message >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > When it comes to the type of personal attacks and libelous statements, > you'd think he'd have the guts to stand up and say who he is. Isn't it interesting how someone like fag Carter accuses everyone ELSE of being a coward, a libeler or whatnot?
GMCarter - 01 Dec 2006 22:07 GMT snip
>> When it comes to the type of personal attacks and libelous statements, >> you'd think he'd have the guts to stand up and say who he is. > >Isn't it interesting how someone like fag Carter accuses >everyone ELSE of being a coward, a libeler or whatnot? But you ARE, Blanche.
Life - 28 Nov 2006 18:41 GMT >>> snip >>>>George Mary - your attempt to define me as some strawman [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Or are you another coward like "death"? Paranoia strikes George Mary deeper than his megalomania and failed attempts to Save the World while blaming the likes of FShaw and David Pasquarelli for his fumblings and bunglings.
|
|
|