by Zak Szymanski
http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=1311
The Bay Area Reporter Online
Issue: Vol. 36 / No. 45 / 9 November 2006
Serving the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender
communities since 1971
HIV campaigns spark debate
NEWS
Published 11/09/2006
by Zak Szymanski
z.szymanski@ebar.com
[07_HIV_Disclosure_45.jpg]
Les Pappas, president of Better World Advertising,
speaking Monday in front of the bus shelter posters for
the "Disclosure" HIV prevention campaign. Photo: Rick
Gerharter
Send to a Friend
To a welcome reception on Monday, November 6, the San
Francisco Department of Public Health released its
long-anticipated "Disclosure" campaign. Featuring
psychedelic photographic images by photographer Duane
Cramer and emphasizing HIV status disclosure as a means
of prevention, the DPH bus stop and billboard effort is
a groundbreaking, community-led prevention method that
marks the first time a public health agency has
recognized the validity of "serosorting" - a longtime
gay community practice where men have a variety of sex,
some of it unprotected, with men of the same HIV
status.
"We as a health department are acknowledging what many
men in the community have embraced as a harm reduction
strategy," said Disclosure Initiative director Doug
Sebesta. "Our campaign was really initiated to help
people make better informed decisions. It's really
empowering, and sex positive, and really about arming
ourselves with more knowledge."
The colorful advertisements are a piece of a much
larger DPH project known as the Disclosure Initiative,
which involves prevention and care professionals and
community members and aims to help men normalize HIV
conversations and disclose their status. More
information is available at www.disclosehiv.org, which
also links to www.hivdisclsoure.org.
The San Francisco campaign comes several weeks after
the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center launched its
controversial "HIV is a gay disease" campaign, and
about 10 months after gay men grew vocally critical of
the billboard in San Francisco's Castro District
earlier this year that proclaimed, "New Years
Resolution: I Won't Infect Anyone." All of the
campaigns were designed by the San Francisco-based firm
Better World Advertising, which has attracted a growing
number of critics in recent years.
Critics of HIV social marketing campaigns often find
their objections described as problems with the
messages, while sponsors of the messages often point to
the discussion generated by the controversy as a mark
of success.
But there is more to the debate than a simple
disagreement over the slogans and images in HIV
prevention advertisements. At the core of such
campaigns is a set of assumptions or conclusions drawn
about gay men, namely, that they are not talking enough
about HIV.
It's a reasonable conclusion, said Les Pappas, founder
and president of Better World Advertising and a former
HIV prevention staffer at the San Francisco AIDS
Foundation. Pappas - who conducts focus groups with men
who have sex with men and who said he has been
astounded by some of the misinformation that continues
in the gay community - said there is no other way to
explain why seroconversions continue.
"I do believe there's a disclosure problem. I think
some people want to believe that everybody is doing the
right thing and behaving properly and taking care of
each other, but that's not what's happening. I don't
see the benefit of sugar-coating and glossing over
problems," said Pappas, who has proudly remained
HIV-negative through the AIDS crisis. "We know there
are people getting infected and we know that some of
these people getting infected because they are having
unprotected sex with somebody who is positive."
Pappas places the HIV infection rate at three per day
in San Francisco, and five to six daily in Los Angeles.
Although he said he does believe the majority of gay
men do the right thing, he also believes "most of the
positive men know they are positive. Some of them
don't, but there are men out there who are out there
and know they are positive and are allowing themselves
to infect other people. I want people to be more
honest, be more respectful, be more considerate.
Getting tested, disclosure, and using condoms --this is
basic human consideration and compassion for yourself
and the community."
The right conversations
The right kinds of HIV conversations obviously aren't
happening with frequency in the gay community, said
Pappas, otherwise, "How do [his critics] explain the
infections? If we were all doing that, this thing would
end tomorrow."
But there is another possibility, say some longtime
AIDS activists and educators: that gay men are in fact
talking about HIV and taking care of each other, but
that a post-crisis climate has meant more people -
positive and negative - are using harm
[07_HIV_Disclose_45_med.jpg]
Writer and activist Tony Valenzuela
reduction approaches and taking calculated risks they
can live with. Critics of marketing said the evolution
of the disease from a death sentence to a more
manageable condition - combined with the declining HIV
rates among gay men - mean that sex without condoms is
often practiced with thought, discussion, and safety
rather than recklessness.
"The tone of many of these campaigns presume the lowest
common denominator of gay men. But the gay men I know
are smart, savvy, sophisticated, and caring of one
another. They are talking about HIV and interested in
serosorting and knowing more of the science behind it,"
said Los Angeles-based HIV activist and writer Tony
Valenzuela. "With or without the blessing of health
departments and AIDS service organizations, men are
figuring out how to have the sex they want to have more
safely. Some are choosing only oral sex. Some
[negatives] are choosing unprotected sex only if they
top. Just because things have improved doesn't mean
people think it's no big deal. I have spoken with
people who understand HIV to be a manageable disease
but who still do not want to get it. But it's
reasonable to assume that if the meds continue to get
better, and there is a reduced threat of HIV, people
will be taking calculated risks as a means of harm
reduction and HIV prevention."
Such a prevention trend is something that has already
been acknowledged by AIDS health advocates: earlier
this year, San Francisco's DPH predicted a 10 percent
drop in new HIV infections in San Francisco in 2006
compared to 2001, with another 20 percent decline in
the rate of HIV transmission among gay and bisexual
men. Chief reasons cited by AIDS groups for such
progress was the decline in meth use and the increase
in serosorting.
Pappas, too, has at least by proxy acknowledged the
effectiveness of this practice: his most recent DPH
disclosure campaign does rubber-stamp serosorting -
called "status sorting" in the ads - while noting that
people must be honest and actually know their status
for the practice to work. But the ads themselves stop
short of celebrating gay men for already practicing
this prevention method on their own for years. As
Pappas emphasized, they also promote the idea that gay
men are not discussing HIV or disclosing their status,
though activists note that the well-documented trend of
serosorting clearly requires disclosure.
Messages that imply an irresponsible community can
further stigmatize gay men and thus encourage new
infections, said Walter Armstrong, former
editor-in-chief of the internationally distributed Poz
magazine. Recently troubled by the Los Angeles "HIV is
a gay disease" campaign, Armstrong is among a growing
chorus calling for an end to all HIV social marketing.
Such measures "may seem controversial or even
counterproductive on the surface. . .but I think this
would, at best, force us and the prevention
'establishment' to find more scientific, more
innovative, more responsive forms of HIV prevention
and, at worst, just silence all the slogans that have
never been anything but truisms, half-truths, or
outright lies, starting with 'Safe Sex Is Hot' back in
1986."
Armstrong said such campaigns are always steps behind
what gay men are already doing; "it wasn't until the
mid-1990s that the big gay groups officially ranked
oral sex as low risk, despite the fact that gay men had
never used condoms for bl.wj.bs."
Armstrong takes issue with the LA Center's implied "HIV
is a gay disease" message, which "may reinforce for
young gay men that HIV is inevitable if you are gay and
that you are not fully gay until you become
HIV-positive."
San Francisco HIV activist Michael Petrelis said there
also is a problem with prevention campaigns that do not
include measurable outcomes and markers of success -
the goal of the LA campaign, said LA Center spokesman
Jim Key, was simply "to get gay/bi men talking about
HIV again."
LA Center officials said they were responding to a
degaying strategy of HIV that went too far: the recent
International AIDS Conference in Toronto barely
addressed same-sex transmission, they said, and recent
Better World focus groups included many gay men who
said they wanted to see more images of heterosexuals
with HIV and who wondered, "What about the babies born
with HIV?"
"There are no babies being born with HIV in San
Francisco. Period. So that's what about babies," is
Pappas's response.
In Los Angeles, where 75 percent of people with HIV are
gay and bisexual men, LA Center CEO Lorri Jean said
there is an underlying internalized homophobia behind
the desire to degay HIV, and she is confused by the
campaign criticism - much of it from sex-positive
activists - that seems overly invested in the
right-wing reaction to the ads, or "what straight
people think." Regaying HIV, she said, was meant to
re-invigorate the spirit that once demanded research
and funding for marginalized populations.
"We've become largely invisible in the world of AIDS
policy and funding structures. . .we're being written
out of the epidemic even though were still the most
impacted," said Jean. "In the old days, we would demand
attention and recognition of these realities. Today, we
are responding out of fear and silence."
It should also be noted, said the LA Center's chief of
staff Darrel Cummings, that much of the controversy
stemmed from a Los Angeles Times article that contained
inaccuracies; the two public billboards never contained
the words, "gay disease;" that phrasing was reserved
for the LGBT newspaper ads to generate discussion
inside the community. Placing the HIV discussion back
in the cultural context of the gay community is
critical to HIV prevention, he said, noting that
epidemiological terms like, "MSM" do not resonate with
gay men who make their decisions within their own
community. He added that one HIV-positive man who was
present at a community forum said he felt isolated and
unwelcome at gay events as a visibly sick person until
the campaign was launched.
Valenzuela, whose grassroots group "Real Prevention"
has taken to task recent HIV marketing efforts, said
his group was mixed on the L.A. campaign, but that most
people agreed it's counterproductive to measure a
campaign's success by the community in-fighting that
occurs as a result of its controversy.
"[LA Center officials] said their goal was to get
people talking. In the forums and meetings I attended,
people were talking, but not about how to have safer
sex or do real HIV prevention," said Valenzuela, who
also takes issue with the campaign's "Own It. End It"
slogan, which he says promotes a "fantasy" that it is
possible to end HIV through prevention alone.
Valenzuela is not convinced that a moratorium is the
solution to the inherent limitations of HIV prevention
marketing - "maybe we are expecting too much of this
vehicle" - but he would like to see posters that are
arming gay men with information that is useful for what
they are already practicing, rather than telling them
what to do. A recent anti-smoking ad, he said, told
people who wanted to quit that they would "need a
plan," acknowledging the complexities of that decision
without resorting to scare tactics.
That's exactly the spirit of the San Francisco's
Disclosure Initiative, said DPH officials. Even the
outspoken Petrelis - who has made a career of
criticizing "AIDS Inc." - saw the merits of San
Francisco's most recent campaign, though he remains
troubled that financial figures on the costs of the
program were not readily available.
San Francisco DPH officials such as Tracey Packer,
interim director of HIV prevention at DPH, said she has
agreed with many of the concerns about HIV social
marketing, and believes the disclosure initiative in
many ways responds to that.
"I think it's good that we're hitting the mark," said
Packer.
Meanwhile, this week the LA Center launched another
Better World advertising campaign, entitled, "I Am the
Cure," an extension of the "HIV Stops With Me" campaign
that encouraged HIV-positive individuals to take
control of limiting the virus' spread.
"I beg to profoundly differ with Better World; poz guys
are not the cure," said one man in response to the ads
on an e-mail list that discusses prevention campaigns.
"The cure is a scientific breakthrough that we have
been denied as a society by inadequate early response
and funding for research that goes all the way back to
the Reagan administration. The cure is not anything
young poz men can do; it's the charge of scientists and
researchers the world over from an infectious disease,
medical, and biochemical approach. Even if there is a
role for positive men to attempt to prevent new
infections, they share this responsibility with
negative men who need to also protect themselves."
Check out the B.A.R's new blog section!
http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=1311
by Zak Szymanski
js - 12 Nov 2006 09:28 GMT
> by Zak Szymanski
> http://www.ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=1311
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> HIV campaigns spark debate
Yeah. Especially for people who've watched this
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4396856850556632563&q=HIV+Fact+or+Fiction