Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and AIDS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ozzy - 14 Jul 2006 12:46 GMT
Just read this book by Harvey Bialy, about the scientific life of Peter
Duesberg. Can anyone comment on it?

I'm not a medical student, nor a molecular biologist, so some of the
stuff Bialy talks about goes over my head. particulary in the beginning
as Bialy explains present day theory about viruses and how they relate
to cancer theory and how this maybe be related to AIDS. and in the end
when Bialy seems excitied about Duesbergs discoveries in the field of
Cancer research, but I cannot tell  what effect this would have on
modern HIV/AIDS theory, and what is  Bialy so excited about?
RJ - 14 Jul 2006 16:38 GMT
> Just read this book by Harvey Bialy, about the scientific life of Peter
> Duesberg. Can anyone comment on it?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Cancer research, but I cannot tell  what effect this would have on
> modern HIV/AIDS theory, and what is  Bialy so excited about?

Both he and Duesberg still hope that Duesberg will somehow win the
Nobel prize for his cancer theory and be rehabilitated as a scientist.
Ain't gonna happen, Duesberg has destroyed his own career. When someone
gets so desperate to support their theories that they start lying about
the content of their cites in published papers, you know it's over.
Next step down the ladder is taking your case to the lay public, which
of course Duesberg has been doing now for decades with the help of
Barry - oh, sorry, I mean Celia - Farber and publishing his book for
the extreme right wing Regnery publishing house. And of course, he is
70 and the average lifespan for a male here is, I think, 72.
GMCarter - 14 Jul 2006 18:05 GMT
>. And of course, he is
>70 and the average lifespan for a male here is, I think, 72.

Oh, that's just CRUEL, Richard.

That means Dubya could live another 12 years.

Ugh.

Well, maybe folks like Petie, Rummy, Dickie (Cheney), Tony Scalia and
Clarence Uncle Thomas will beat the odds and start stroking out soon!

And maybe the 6th Circuit judges too!!
http://www.afj.org/2006/07/why-sixth-circuit-okays-dirty-dozen.html

Hope springs eternal!

        George M. Carter
DavidT - 24 Jul 2006 10:30 GMT
> >. And of course, he is
> >70 and the average lifespan for a male here is, I think, 72.
>
> Oh, that's just CRUEL, Richard.
>
> That means Dubya could live another 12 years.

Actually George, the chances of Dubya living well beyond the age of 72
are very high. Life expectancy is estimated from birth, for someone who
has managed to survive long enough to get near the normal predicted
age, it implies they are very likely to survive well beyond it.
GMCarter - 24 Jul 2006 12:02 GMT
>> >. And of course, he is
>> >70 and the average lifespan for a male here is, I think, 72.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>has managed to survive long enough to get near the normal predicted
>age, it implies they are very likely to survive well beyond it.

What a horrible thought.
Ozzy - 14 Jul 2006 18:38 GMT
> > Just read this book by Harvey Bialy, about the scientific life of Peter
> > Duesberg. Can anyone comment on it?
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> the extreme right wing Regnery publishing house. And of course, he is
> 70 and the average lifespan for a male here is, I think, 72.

I doubt that, I dont think its been Duesberg mis-representing the
contents of his sites in papers. At least thats the idea that being
presented reading Bialy's book. If you read the book maybe you can tell
me where Bialy admits this about Duesberg...?

72 is old, but duesberg looks quite young for his age, he  looks 50
ish.

Or perhaps you mean that Duesberg is basically refuting his own theory
about "oncogenes"  with his "aneuploidy" theory about cancer?
monty1945@lycos.com - 22 Jul 2006 19:16 GMT
If your post is genuine, Ozzy, you should read the essays on my site,
http://groups.msn.com/TheScientificDebateForum-/

I think they will answer your questions, but if not, feel free to use
either of the message boards there to ask.  I am an independent scholar
with no conflicts of interest or ties to any industry or agency.  I
sell no products.  I am simply trying to help, as I was able to help
myself back in 2000 due to my training in evidence analysis (in
graduate school).

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.