 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / AIDS / June 2006A recursive question. Conspiracy theories about attempts to circulate conspiracy theories.
A somewhat recursive question. What conspiracy theories are there?... about the attempts to circulate the conspiracy theories we see around. Disinformation? Perhaps, Don, you can clue us all in on what in the world you are trying to say. In the meantime, I will continue to ask for just ONE scientific study that demonstrates the connection between what has been deemed retroviral phenomena and a clinical syndrome that contains everything except the proverbial kitchen sink, or has that been added within the last 24 hour? I would not be at all surprised if it was. >Perhaps, Don, you can clue us all in on what in the world you are >trying to say. In the meantime, I will continue to ask for just ONE a.shole. There isn't just ONE. There's THOUSANDS. Le Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:51:39 +0200, GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> a écrit: >> Perhaps, Don, you can clue us all in on what in the world you are >> trying to say. In the meantime, I will continue to ask for just ONE > > a.shole. There isn't just ONE. There's THOUSANDS. So then why don't you cite just ONE, you dummy ? Oh no, I don't have to ask. Because, if you read any of the THOUSANDS, you find that it's the same BS as any other one of the THOUSANDS. And why do you need the nasty words, Georgie? Because you already know that none of the THOUSANDS hold a candle ? >Le Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:51:39 +0200, GMCarter <fiar@verizon.net> a écrit: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >So then why don't you cite just ONE, you dummy ? Over the years, I've cited MANY studies. From many perspectives and scientific disciplines. If you're too inept to look them up then my citing them won't be of much assistance. George M. Carter > Le Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:51:39 +0200, GMCarter > <fiar@verizon.net> a écrit: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Because you already know that none of the THOUSANDS > hold a candle ? I had this same discussion with a second year med student. He gave me some 50 references of "hiv-isolation". So I start reading the abstracts, and it goes like this : - P24 (reverse transcriptase) found, does not count as isolation - P24 found - no method specified - p24 found - no method spec'd .. .. .. And so for all his references.... And then he replies, "I knew you would reject all 50 of them". LOL.. It would be like repeating the cold fusion experiment, and saying that you could not find any new energy, but that it had worked nevertheless because you saw bubbles coming out of the lithium sponge, and that this has to mean something very pro(o)found. Uwe Hayek.  SignatureL'intellectuel qui pense comme autrui ne sert à rien ! This is the bitterest pain among men, to have much knowledge but no power. Herodotus (484 BC - 430 BC), The Histories of Herodotus IDIOCY - Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. snip >I had this same discussion with a second year med >student. He gave me some 50 references of "hiv-isolation". So you claim. And why in the world should we believe you are capable of discerning whether the evidence is valid or not? Your criteria based on this post suggest that you simply wave your hands, sniff and say "gosh, it ain't so." George M. Carter > snip > >I had this same discussion with a second year med [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > George M. Carter But Georgie boy, EVERYBODY knows you'll never be lulled into believing anything else than what you believe today. Things like: Hiv=Aids => Death unless ARVs and Hiv, the virus that causes Aids. But, you know, other people visit this board and THEY will eventually start to think it over. JS --- http://www.nightsofarmour.com >But, you know, other people visit this board and THEY will eventually start to think it >over. LOL....I actually doubt that. And most people can recognize a kook when they see one. Sadly, some folks may indeed buy your brand of nonsense. And if they become HIV-infected, they, like too many others, will discover what AIDS is all about. So--got any actual new ideas, Jannie? Or just more dithering? George M. Carter > Perhaps, Don, you can clue us all in on what in the world you > are trying to say. In the meantime, I will continue to ask for > just ONE scientific study that demonstrates the connection > between what has been deemed retroviral phenomena By the above do you mean to say you believe there is no such thing as a retrovirus? > and a clinical syndrome that contains everything except the > proverbial kitchen sink, With a suppressed immune system, what could go wrong? We don't need no stinkin' immune system! Or maybe we do, and without one, any number of things, including kitchen sink syndrome, can happen. > or has that been added within the last 24 hour? I would not be > at all surprised if it was.
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.